The climate movement has been gaining prominence in global climate politics since 2019. Research has been growing on the main features of its public speech along with its sociological and organizational characteristics. Yet we lack systematic analyses of the normative implications of this public speech to provide a thorough explanation of this political phenomenon. Applying discourse analysis, I identify and rationally reconstruct a set of categories and metaphors that activists use to make sense of the climate crisis. When it comes to advancing the politics of sustainability, I argue that although the climate movement promotes ecologically grounded, far-sighted, and integrated sustainability, it still embraces closed and static understandings of this concept. The paper advances the discussion on the contribution of global activism to deliberative climate politics and governance beyond national borders.
BangG (2024) The U.S. Inflation Reduction Act: Climate policy as economic crisis response. Environmental Politics. Epub ahead of print 10December2024. DOI: 10.1080/09644016.2024.2437886
7.
BerglundOBaileyDJ (2023) Whose system, what change? A critical political economy approach to the UK climate movement. Environmental Politics32(6): 1012–1032.
8.
BiermannF (2018) Global governance in the Anthropocene. In: BrownCEckersleyR (eds) The Oxford Handbook of International Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.467–478.
9.
BradleyM (2012) Migrants in a Feverland: State obligations towards the environmentally displaced. Journal of International Political Theory8(1–2): 147–158.
10.
BrownCEckersleyR (eds) (2018) The Oxford Handbook of International Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
De MoorJ (2018) The ‘efficacy dilemma’ of transnational climate activism: The case of COP21. Environmental Politics27(6): 1079–1100.
15.
De MoorJDe VydtMUbaK, et al. (2021) New kids on the block: Taking stock of the recent cycle of climate activism. Social Movement Studies20(5): 619–625.
DryzekJ (2022) The Politics of the Earth: Environmental Discourses.4th edn.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18.
DryzekJPickeringJ (2019) The politics of the Anthropocene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19.
DryzekJHonigBPhillipsA (2008). Introduction. In: DryzekJHonigBPhillipsA (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp 3–41.
HabermasJ (1984) The theory of communicative action. Volume 1: Reason and the rationalization of society. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
28.
HaddenJ (2015) Networks in Contention. The Divisive Politics of Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29.
HajerMVersteegW (2005) A decade of discourse analysis of environmental politics: Achievements, challenges, perspectives. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning7(3): 175–184.
30.
HestresLEHopkeJE (2020) Fossil fuel divestment: Theories of change, goals, and strategies of a growing climate movement. Environmental Politics29(3): 371–389.
31.
HopkeJHestresL (2017) Communicating about fossil fuel divestment. In NisbetMCHoSSMarkowitzE, et al. (eds) Oxford Encyclopedia of Climate Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.1–35.
32.
Intergovernmental Pannel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2007) Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Summary for Policymakers. Geneva: IPCC.
33.
Intergovernmental Pannel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2014) Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Summary for Policymakers. Geneva: IPCC.
34.
JacobsenSHuntO (2022) Climate justice and global politics. In: PellizzoniLLeonardiEAsaraV (eds) Handbook of Critical Environmental Politics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp.192–205.
LeipoldSFeindtPHWinkelG, et al. (2019) Discourse analysis of environmental policy revisited: Traditions, trends, perspectives. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning21(5): 445–463.
39.
LiuZDengZDavisSJ, et al. (2024) Global carbon emissions in 2023. Nature Reviews Earth and Environment5(4): 253–254.
NortonBG (1999) Pragmatism, adaptive management, and sustainability. Environmental Values8(4): 451–466.
42.
PageE (2018) Environmental justice and sustainability. In: BrownCEckersleyR (eds) The Oxford Handbook of International Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.179–192.
43.
PedersenJ (2008) Habermas’ method: Rational reconstruction. Philosophy of the Social Sciences38(4): 457–485.
44.
RawlsJ (2005) Political Liberalism. Expanded edn. New York: Columbia University Press.
SchlosbergD (1999) Environmental Justice and the New Pluralism: The Challenge of Difference for Environmentalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
50.
SchlosbergD (2013) Theorising environmental justice: The expanding sphere of a discourse. Environmental Politics22(1): 37–55.
51.
SchlosbergDCarruthersD (2010) Indigenous struggles, environmental justice, and community capabilities. Global Environmental Politics10(4): 12–35.
52.
SchumacherEF (2010) Small Is Beautiful. Reprint edn. New York: Harper Perennial.
53.
Soler-i-MartíRFernández-PlanellsAPérez-AltableL (2024) Bringing the future into the present: The notion of emergency in the youth climate movement. Social Movement Studies23(4): 517–536.
54.
SteffenWBroadgateWDeutschL, et al (2015) The trajectory of the Anthropocene: The great acceleration. The Anthropocene Review2(1): 81–98.
55.
SturgeonN (1995) Theorizing social movements: Direct action and direct theory. In: DarnovskyMEpsteinBFlacksR (eds) Cultural Politics. New York: Temple University Press, pp.35–51.
TokarB (2014) Movements for climate justice in the US and worldwide. In: DietzMGarreltsH (eds) Routledge Handbook of the Climate Change Movement. London: Routledge, pp.131–146.
58.
TokarB (2019) On the evolution and continuing development of the climate justice movement. In: JafryTHelwigKMikulewiczM (eds) Routledge Handbook of Climate Justice. London: Routledge.
VahaME (2015) Drowning under: Small island states and the right to exist. Journal of International Political Theory11(2): 206–223.
62.
VanderheidenS (2016) Environmental and climate justice. In: GabrielsonTHallCMeyerJM, et al. (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Environmental Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.321–332.
63.
VlasceanuMDoellKCBak-ColemanJB, et al. (2024) Addressing climate change with behavioral science: A global intervention tournament in 63 countries. Science Advances10(6): 5778.
64.
VoiceP (2015) Comprehensive doctrine. In: MandleJReidyDA (eds) The Cambridge Rawls Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.126–129.
