Hand injuries affect occupational engagement and participation, yet anecdotal evidence reports a focus on body structures and functions within hand therapy. Failing to address occupational challenges may result in sub-optimal patient outcomes. In line with the growing body of evidence of positive outcomes relating to occupation-based practice (OBP), this article aimed to describe the knowledge, attitudes and practices towards OBP of occupational therapists treating hand-related conditions in South Africa.
Methods
In this quantitative, cross-sectional study, South African occupational therapists treating hand conditions were recruited. Data were collected via an emailed survey developed for the study. Data were analysed descriptively.
Results
Sixty-seven responses met the inclusion criteria, a response rate of 62%. Most respondents worked in the private sector (73%) with many holding postgraduate qualifications (54%). Lack of access to evidence and a preference for biomedical literature impacted on acquiring knowledge on OBP. Attitudes towards OBP were mostly positive. Barriers were contextual, patient-related and therapist-related. Practice focussed predominantly on performance components and aimed to reduce impairment rather than promoting occupational engagement.
Conclusion
Current hand therapy services in South Africa reflect a biomechanically-focused practice that is mis-aligned with occupational therapy philosophy. In line with existing research, OBP should be adopted more routinely in hand therapy in South Africa.
De KlerkSBuchananHPretoriusB. Occupational therapy hand assessment practices: cause for concern?S Afr J Occup Ther2015; 45: 43–50.
2.
GriceKO. The use of occupation-based assessments and intervention in the hand therapy setting - a survey. Journal of Hand Therapy: Official Journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists2015; 28: 300–305. DOI: 10.1016/j.jht.2015.01.005.
3.
RobinsonLSBrownTO’BrienL. Embracing an occupational perspective: occupation-based interventions in hand therapy practice. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal2016; 63: 293–296. DOI: 10.1111/1440-1630.12268.
4.
TakataSCWadeETRollSC. Hand therapy interventions, outcomes, and diagnoses evaluated over the last 10 years: a mapping review linking research to practice. Journal of Hand Therapy2019; 32: 1–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jht.2017.05.018.
5.
CollisJMMaylandECWright-St ClairV, et al.“The more I do, the more I can do”: perspectives on how performing daily activities and occupations influences recovery after surgical repair of a distal radius fracture. Disability & Rehabilitation2022; 44: 5440–5449. DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1936219.
6.
FordEDi TommasoAGustafssonL, et al.Describing the occupational nature of practice: a scoping review. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy2022; 29: 353–362. DOI: 10.1080/11038128.2021.1968949.
7.
AshbySGrayMRyanS, et al.Maintaining occupaiton-based practice in Australian mental health practice: a critical stance. British Journal of Occupational Therapy2015; 78: 431–439.
8.
MahaniMMehrabanAKamaliM, et al.Facilitators of implementing occupation based practice among Iranian occupaitonal therapists: a qualitative study. Med J Islam Repub2015; 29: 307.
9.
AminiD. Renaissance occupational therapy and occupation based hand therapy. OT Practice2004; 9: 11–15.
10.
MulliganSWhiteBPArthanatS. An examination of occupation-based, client-centered, evidence-based occupational therapy practices in New Hampshire. OTJR (Thorofare N J)2014; 34: 106–116. DOI: 10.3928/15394492-20140226-01.
11.
de KlerkSBadenhorstEButtleA, et al.Occupation-based hand therapy in South Africa: challenges and opportunities. South African Journal of Occupational Therapy2016; 46: 10–15. DOI: 10.17159/2310-3833/2016/v46n3a3.
12.
CederlundRThorén-JönssonA-LDahlinLB. Coping strategies in daily occupations 3 months after a severe or major hand injury. Occupational Therapy International2010; 17: 1–9. DOI: 10.1002/oti.287.
13.
BurleySDi TommasoACoxR, et al.An occupational perspective in hand therapy: a scoping review. British Journal of Occupational Therapy2018; 81: 299–318. DOI: 10.1177/0308022617752110.
14.
HansenAØKristensenHKCederlundR, et al.An occupation-based intervention in patients with hand-related disorders grouped using the sense of coherence scale—a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Hand Therapy2020; 33: 455–469. DOI: 10.1016/j.jht.2019.12.009.
15.
Weinstock-ZlotnickGMehtaSP. A systematic review of the benefits of occupation-based intervention for patients with upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders. Journal of Hand Therapy: Official Journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists2019; 32: 141–152. DOI: 10.1016/j.jht.2018.04.001.
16.
Che DaudAZ. Occupation Based Intervention in Hand Injury Rehabilitation: A Malaysian Perspective. Singapore: James Cook University, 2015.
17.
DahlqvistARosenB. Early occupational performance intervention enhances outome after distal radius fracture: a nonrandomized controlled trial. Hand Therapy2016; 21: 100–109.
18.
Che DaudAZYauMKBarnettF, et al.Occupation-based intervention in hand injury rehabilitation: experiences of occupational therapists in Malaysia. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy2016; 23: 57–66. DOI: 10.3109/11038128.2015.1062047.
19.
ColaianniDProvidentI. The benefits of and challenges to the use of occupation in hand therapy. Occupational Therapy in Health Care2010; 24: 130–146. DOI: 10.3109/07380570903349378.
20.
EstesJPierceDE. Pediatric therapists’ perspectives on occupation-based practice. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy2012; 19: 17–25. DOI: 10.3109/11038128.2010.547598.
21.
Dale LFAAdhlakhaPMahonM, et al.Occupational Therapists working in hand therapy: the practice of holism in a cost containment environment. Work2002; 19: 35–45.
22.
FortuneT. Occupational Therapists: is our Therapy truly Occupational or are we merely Filing Gaps?British Journal of Occupational Therapy2000; 63: 225–230.
23.
Che DaudAZYauMKBarnettF, et al.Integration of occupation based intervention in hand injury rehabilitation: a Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Hand Therapy2016; 29: 30–40. DOI: 10.1016/j.jht.2015.09.004.
24.
Hess-AprilLGanasNPhiriL, et al.Occupation-based practice in a tertiary hospital setting: occupational therapists’ perceptions and experiences. The South African Journal of Occupational Therapy2017; 47: 25–31. DOI: 10.17159/2310-3833/2017/v47n3a5.
25.
StewartABiddulphGFirthGB. The aetiology of acute traumatic occupational hand injuries seen at a South African state hospital. SA Orthopaedic Journal2017; 16: 49–53. DOI: 10.17159/2309-8309/2017/v16n4a8.
26.
DiasJJGarcia-EliasM. Hand injury costs. Injury2006; 37: 1071–1077. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2006.07.023.
27.
SedgwickP. Cross sectional studies: advantages and disadvantages. BMJ British Medical Journal2014; 348: g2276. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.g2276.
Di TommasoAIsbelSScarvellJ, et al.Occupational therapists’ perceptions of occupation in practice: an exploratory study. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal2016; 63: 206–213. DOI: 10.1111/1440-1630.12289.
30.
HeiweSKajermoKLenneR, et al.Evidence-based practice: attitudes, knowledge and behaviour among allied health care professionals. International Journal for Quality in Health Care2011; 23: 198–209.
31.
GrahamFRobertsonLAndersonJ. New Zealand occupational therapists’ views on evidence-based practice: a replicated survey of attitudes, confidence and behaviours. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal2013; 60: 120–128. DOI: 10.1111/1440-1630.12000.
32.
BurnsKEDuffettMKhoME, et al.A guide for the design and conduct of self-administered surveys of clinicians. Canadian Medical Association Journal2008; 179: 245–252. DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.080372.
33.
GumucioS. The KAP Survey Model (Knowledge, Attitude and Practices). Saint-Denis: Medecins du Monde, 2011.
34.
BurtonLMazerolleS. Survey instrument validity Part I: principles of survey instrument development and validation in athletic training education research. Athletic Training Education Journal2011; 6: 27–35.
35.
PatrickDLBurkeLBGwaltneyCJ, et al.Content validity--establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO Good Research Practices Task Force report: part 2--assessing respondent understanding. Value in Health2011; 14: 978–988. DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.06.013.
36.
HealeRTwycrossA. Validity and reliability in quantiative studies. Evidenced Based Nursing Online2015; 18: 1–2. DOI: 10.1136/eb-2015-102129.
37.
IBM Corp. IBM SPSS Statistics for Macintosh. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp, 2017.
38.
EloSKyngasH. The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing2008; 62: 107–115. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x.
39.
SaldanaJ. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. 2nd ed.London: Sage Publications, 2013.
40.
HudakPLAmadioPCBombardierC. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). American Journal of Industrial Medicine1996; 29: 602–608. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0274.
41.
LawMBaptisteSMcCollM, et al.The Canadian occupational performance measure: an outcome measure for occupational therapy. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy1990; 57: 82–87. DOI: 10.1177/000841749005700207.
42.
ChungKCPillsburyMSWaltersMR, et al.Reliability and validity testing of the Michigan hand outcomes questionnaire. J Hand Surg Am1998; 23: 575–587. DOI: 10.1016/s0363-5023(98)80042-7.
43.
Workwell Musculoskeletal Care for Organizations. Safer Workplaces Healthier Employees. Duluth: Workwell Musculoskeletal Care for Organizations, 2024. https://www.workwell.com/
44.
HayesMHSPattersonDG. Experimental development of the graphic rating method. Psychological Bulletin1921; 18: 98–99.
45.
DownieWWLeathamPARhindVM, et al.Studies with pain rating scales. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases1978; 37: 378–381. DOI: 10.1136/ard.37.4.378.
46.
FisherA. Occupation-centred, occupation-based, occupation-focussed: same, same or different?Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy2013; 20: 162–173.
47.
BurleySCoxRDi TommasoA, et al.Primary contact occupational therapy hand clinics: the pull of an occupational perspective. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal2018; 65: 533–543. DOI: 10.1111/1440-1630.12507.
48.
PolatajkoHJDavisJA. Advancing occupation-based practice: interpreting the rhetoric. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy2012; 79: 259–262. DOI: 10.2182/CJOT.2012.79.5.1.
49.
PowellRKvon der HeydeRL. The inclusion of activities of daily living in flexor tendon rehabilitation: a survey. Journal of Hand Therapy2014; 27: 23–29. DOI: 10.1016/j.jht.2013.09.007.
50.
LesherDAMulcaheyMJHersheyP, et al.Alignment of outcome instruments used in hand therapy with the occupational therapy practice framework: domain and process and the international classification of functioning, disability and health: a scoping review. American Journal of Occupational Therapy2017; 71: 7101190060p1–7101190060p12. DOI: 10.5014/ajot.2017.016741.
51.
BraunYMellemaJJPetersRM, et al.The relationship between therapist–rated function and patient-reported outcome measures. Journal of Hand Therapy2017; 30: 516–521. DOI: 10.1016/j.jht.2016.02.022.
52.
ValdesKMacDermidJAlgarL, et al.Hand therapist use of patient report outcome (PRO) in practice: a survey study. Journal of Hand Therapy2014; 27: 299–308. DOI: 10.1016/j.jht.2014.07.001.
53.
FitzpatrickNPresnellS. Can occupational therapists be hand therapists?British Journal of Occupational Therapy2004; 67: 508–510.
54.
van StormbroekKBuchananH. Hand health for all: do undergraduate occupational therapy hand curricula respond to the call?South African Journal of Occupational Therapy2018; 48: 3–11. DOI: 10.17159/2310-3833/2017/vol48n3a2.
55.
NaidooS. The South African national health insurance: a revolution in health-care delivery. Journal of Public Health2012; 34: 149–150. DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fds008.
56.
SackettDL. Bias in analytic research. Journal of Chronic Diseases1979; 32: 51–63. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9681(79)90012-2.
57.
SalkindNJ. Encyclopedia of Research Design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2010.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
