A new entropy on intuitionistic fuzzy sets (IF entropy) was proposed. Entropies for intuitionistic fuzzy sets are divided into four different groups according to their properties. The IF entropy defined in this study was obtained using the geometric approach and its most important feature is that it also takes into account the hesitation degree. This ensures that some of the disadvantages discussed for other entropies do not occur with the newly defined IF entropy. The unreliability in the results of IF entropy-based applications in some Multi Attribute Decision Making (MADM) or Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods is actually a result of these limitations. For this reason, complex methods were also preferred for MADM/MCDM methods. Taking these situations into account, this study first demonstrated that the newly defined IF entropy is consistent. Then, the solution to two previously studied problems using real data was examined with the IF entropy based TOPSIS (IFEB-TOPSIS) method from the MADM/MCDM methods. Two different situations were analyzed in the selected problems. The first involved data from a study using the Bipolar Fuzzy TOPSIS and COPRAS methods on the tuberculosis risk of pregnant women without multiple criteria. The second was an example with multiple criteria, where some selected companies were analyzed in terms of risk and return according to different portfolios. Finally, the study aimed to show the place and consistency of the newly defined IF entropy in the literature. For this purpose, some existing entropies were selected. The results obtained using the IFEB-TOPSIS method for the two MADM and MCDM problems were compared with the new IF entropy.
BanayounR.RoyB.SussmanN. (1966). Banayoun, Manual de Reference du Programme Electre (French) [Electre Program Reference Manual]. Note de Synthese et Formation 25. Direction Scientique SEMA, 1966, Paris.
3.
BurilloP.BustinceH. (1996). Entropy on intuitionistic fuzzy sets and on interval-valued fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 3, 305–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(96)84611-2
4.
ChakrabortyS. (2011). Applications of the MOORA method for decision making in manufacturing environment. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 54(9), 1155–1166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-010-2972-0
5.
ChenT. Y.LiC. H. (2010). Determining objective weights with intuitionistic fuzzy entropy measures: A comparative analysis. Information Sciences, 180, 4207–4222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2010.07.009
6.
CoimbraE. C. L.BorgesA. C.MounteerA. H.RosaA. P. (2023). Using wastewater treatment performance, biomass and physiological plant characteristics for selection of a floating macrophyte for phytoremediation of swine wastewater through the integrative entropy fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS method. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 53, 103793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2023.103793
7.
De LucaA.TerminiS. (1972). A definition of a nonprobabilistic entropy in the setting of fuzzy sets theory, inform. Control, 20, 301–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(72)90199-4
8.
DongY. C.ZhaQ. B.ZhangH. J.KouG.FujitaH. J.ChiclanaF.ViedmaE.H. (2018). Viedma consensus reaching in social network group decision making: Research paradigms and challenges. Knowledge-based Systems, 162, 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2018.06.036
9.
GhorabaeeM. K.ZavadskasE. K.OlfatL.TurskisZ. (2015). Multicriteria inventory classification using a new method of evaluation based on distance from average solution (EDAS). Informatica, 26(3), 435–451. https://doi.org/10.15388/Informatica.2015.57
10.
GohainB.ChutiaR.DuttaP. (2022). Distance measure on intuitionistic fuzzy sets and its application in decisionmaking, pattern recognition, and clustering problems. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 37, 2458–2501. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.22780
11.
GomesL. F. A. M.LimaM. M. P. P. (1992). TODIM: Basics and application to multicriteria ranking of projects with environmental impacts. Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences, 16(4), 113–127.
12.
HavrdaM. E.CharavátF. (1967). Quantification method of classification processes: Concept of structural a entropy. Kybernetica, 3, 30–35.
13.
HungW. L.YangM. S. (2006). Fuzzy entropy on intuitionistic fuzzy sets. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 21, 443–451. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.20131
14.
HungW. L.YangM. S. (2008). On the J-divergence of intuitionistic fuzzy sets with its application to pattern recognition. Information Sciences, 178, 1641–1650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2007.11.006
15.
HwangC. L.YoonK. (1981). Methods for multiple attribute decision making. In Multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications a state of the art survey (pp. 58–191). Springer.
16.
JiangQ.JinX.LeeS. J.YaoS. W. (2019). A new similarity/distance measure between intuitionistic fuzzy sets based on the transformed isosceles triangles and its applications to pattern recognition. Expert Systems with Applications, 116, 439–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.08.046
17.
JoshiR. (2020). A new multicriteria decision-making method based on intuitionistic fuzzy information and its application to fault detection in a machine. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 11, 739–753. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-019-01322-1
18.
JoshiD.KumarS. (2014). Intuitionistic fuzzy entropy and distance measure based TOPSIS method for multicriteria decision making. Egyptian Informatics Journal, 15, 97–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eij.2014.03.002
19.
JoshiR.KumarS. (2018). A new parametric intuitionistic fuzzy entropy and its applications in multiple attribute decision making. International Journal of Applied and Computational Mathematics, 4, 52–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40819-018-0486-x
20.
LiY.ZhangY.ZhangX.ZhaoJ.HuangY.WangZ.YiY. (2024). Distribution of geothermal resources in eryuan county based on entropy weight TOPSIS and AHP–TOPSIS methods. Natural Gas Industry B, 11, 213–e226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ngib.2024.03.002
21.
MadanchianM.TaherdoostH. (2023). A comprehensive guide to the TOPSIS method for multicriteria decision making. Sustainable Social Development, 1, 2220. https://doi.org/10.54517/ssd.v1i1.2220
22.
MengL.LiL.XieW.LiY.LiuZ. (2023). Time sequential hesitant fuzzy entropy, cross entropy and correlation coefficient and their application to decision making. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 123, 106455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2023.106455
23.
MesiarR.BorkotokeyS.KalinaM. (2018). Certainty aggregation and the certainty fuzzy measures. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 33, 759–770. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.21961
24.
MishraA. R.JainD.HoodaD. S. (2016). On logarithmic fuzzy measures of information and discrimination. Journal of Information and Optimization Sciences, 37, 213–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/02522667.2015.1103041
25.
MoralesJ. D. M.RicoU. P.NavarroE. S. (2010). Performance comparison between madm algorithms for vertical handoff in 4 g networks. (accessed September 5, 2016).
26.
NatarajanE.AugustinF. (2024). A bipolar fuzzy decisionmaking system for assessing highrisk coexisting tuberculosis disease in pregnant women. Heliyon, 10, e31416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31416
27.
OpricovicS. (1998). Multicriteria Optimization of Civil Engineering Systems [PhD Thesis]. Faculty of Civil Engineering. 302 p.
28.
PandeyV.KomalK.DincerH. (2023). A review on TOPSISmethod and its extensions for different applications with recent development. Soft Computing, 27, 18011–18039. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-023-09011-0
29.
PatelA.JanaS.MahantaJ. (2023). Intuitionistic fuzzy EMSWARA-TOPSIS approach based on new distance measure to assess the medical waste treatment techniques. Applied Soft Computing, 144, 110521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2023.110521
30.
PengJ. J.ChenX. G.TianC.ZhangZ. Q.SongH. Y.DongF. (2022). Picture fuzzy largescale group decisionmaking in a trust relatinship based social network environment. Information Sciences, 608, 1675–1701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2022.07.019
31.
RényiA. (1961). On measures of entropy and information. In: Proceedings of the Berkeley Symposium on mathematical statistics and probability (pp. 547–561). Berkeley, USA.
SzmidtE.KacprzykJ. (4–6 September 2006). Distances between Intuitionistic Fuzzy sets: Straightforward Approaches May Not Work. Proceedings of the 2006 3rd International IEEE Conference Intelligent Systems, London, UK.
35.
SzmidtE.KacprzykJ. (7–11 June 2004). Similarity Measure for Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets and Its Application in Supporting Medical Diagnostic Reasoning. Proceedings of the Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing ICAISC 2004, 7th International Conference, Zakopane, Poland.
36.
SzmidtE.KacprzykJ.BujnowskiP. (10–15 June 2012). Correlation between Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets: Some Conceptual and Numerical Extensions. Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
37.
SzmidtE.KacprzykJ.BujnowskiP. (2014). How to measure the amount of knowledge conveyed by atanassov’s intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Information Sciences, 257, 276–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2012.12.046
38.
ThaoN. X. (2021). Some new entropies and divergence measures of intuitionistic fuzzy sets based on archimedean t-conorm and application in supplier selection. Soft Computing, 25, 5791–5805. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-021-05575-x
39.
VermaR.SharmaB. D. (2013). Exponential entropy on intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Kybernetika, 49, 114–127.
40.
VlachosI. K.SergiadisG. D. (2007). Sergiadis, intuitionistic fuzzy information applications to pattern recognition. Pattern Recognition Letters, 28, 197–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2006.07.004
41.
VlachosI. K.SergiadisG. D. (2007). Sergiadis, subsethood, entropy, and cardinality for interval valued fuzzy sets – an algebraic derivation. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 158, 1384–1396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2006.12.018
42.
WangJ. Q.WangP. (2012). Intuitionistic linguistic fuzzy multicriteria decisionmaking method based on intuitionistic fuzzy entropy. Control Decis, 27, 1694–1698.
WeiC. P.GaoZ. H.GuoT. T. (2012). An intuitionistic fuzzy entropy measure based on trigonometric function. Control and Decision, 104, 571–574.
45.
YadavA. K.SinghK.ArshadN. I.FerraraM.AhmadianA.MesalamY. I. (2024). MADM Based network selection and handover management in heterogeneous network: A comprehensive comparative analysis. Results in Engineering, 21, 101918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2024.101918
46.
YangG.RenM.HaoX. (2023). Multicriteria decisionmaking problem based on the novel probabilistic hesitant fuzzy entropy and TODIM method. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 68, 437–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2023.01.014
YuanX.ZhengC. (2022). Improved intuitionistic fuzzy entropy and its application in the evaluation of regional collaborative innovation capability. Sustainability, 14, 3129. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14053129
ZavadskasE. K.KaklauskasA.ŠarkaS. (1996). The new method of multicriteria evalu¬ation of projects. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 1(3), 131–139.
51.
ZavadskasE. K.TurskisZ.VilutienėT.LepkovaN. (2017). Integrated group fuzzy multicriteria model: Case of facilities management strategy selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 82(1), 317–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2017.03.072
52.
ZengW.LiH. (2006). Relationship between similarity measure and entropy of interval valued fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 157, 1477–1484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2005.11.020
53.
ZhangH.YuL. (2012). MADM Method based on cross-entropy and extended TOPSIS with interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Knowledge-Based Systems, 30, 115–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2012.01.003
54.
ZhuY. J.LiD. F. (2016). A new definition and formula of entropy for intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 30, 3057–3066. https://doi.org/10.3233/IFS-152031
