The paper introduces a multilevel model for the solid transportation problem (STP) involving rough interval parameters. When multiple decision makers are available to model STP in any hierarchical system, multilevel programming addresses the issue. Rough interval environments provide a comparatively new and broader alternative by giving the decision-makers more flexible ways to handle the uncertain information during the decision-making process. Our literature review indicates that no algorithm has been developed for multilevel solid transportation problems employing rough interval numbers as parameters. First, we present a decomposition technique for addressing the multilevel STP, referred to as FRMSTP, wherein all parameters and decision variables exist within rough interval settings. This technique decomposes the FRMSTP into four distinct linear multilevel STPs, with an additional bounded variable constraint for the crisp problems, wherein the optimization variables of the lower problems are treated as parameters in the upper problems. Secondly, we enhance three methodologies—the constraint technique, the interactive approach, and the fuzzy approach—by employing imprecise interval data to derive a compromised optimal solution for the FRMSTP. A numerical example is provided to highlight the advantages of utilizing computational techniques. For the comparison, the results from the example indicated that all methods found a very similar rough preferred solution for the same objective functions.
AkramM.IlyasF. (2025). An enhanced interval rough numbers-based outranking technique for evaluation of technology for sustainable mining. Iranian Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 22(1), 111–130. https://doi.org/10.22111/ijfs.2025.49980.8832
2.
AkramM.IlyasF.DeveciM. (2024). Interval rough integrated SWARA-ELECTRE model: An application to machine tool remanufacturing. Expert Systems with Applications, 238, 122067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.122067
3.
AnithakumariT.VenkateswarluB.AkilbashaA. (2021). Optimizing a fully rough interval integer solid transportation problems. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 41(1), 2429–2439. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-202373
4.
BeraS.GiriP. K.JanaD. K., & Maiti, M. (2018). Multi-item 4D-TPs under budget constraint using rough interval. Applied Soft Computing, 71, 364–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2018.06.037
5.
BindA. K.RaniD.GoyalK. K., & Ebrahimnejad, A. (2023). A solution approach for sustainable multi-objective multi-item 4D solid transportation problem involving triangular intuitionistic fuzzy parameters. Journal of Cleaner Production, 414, 137661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137661
6.
ChhibberD.BishtD. C.SrivastavaP. K. (2021). Pareto-optimal solution for fixed-charge solid transportation problem under intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Applied Soft Computing, 107, 107368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107368
7.
ChoudharyA.YadavS. P. (2022). An approach to solve interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy transportation problem of type-2. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 13(6), 2992–3001. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-022-01771-6
8.
DalmanH.SivriM. (2017). Multi-objective solid transportation problem in uncertain environment. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions A: Science, 41, 505–514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40995-017-0254-5
9.
DasA.BeraU. K.MaitiM. (2016). A profit maximizing solid transportation model under a rough interval approach. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 25(3), 485–498. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2016.2556010
10.
DasA.BeraU. K.MaitiM. (2019). A solid transportation problem in uncertain environment involving type-2 fuzzy variable. Neural Computing and Applications, 31, 4903–4927. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-03988-8
11.
DeveciM.ÖzcanE., JohnR., Pamucar, D., & Karaman, H. (2021). Offshore wind farm site selection using interval rough numbers based best-worst method and MARCOS. Applied Soft Computing, 109, 107532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107532
12.
FathyE.AmmarE.HelmyM. A. (2022). On solving the multilevel rough interval linear programming problem. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 42(4), 3011–3028. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-210694
13.
FathyE.AmmarE.HelmyM. A. (2023). Three different optimization techniques for solving the fully rough interval multi-level linear programming problem. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 45(2), 2593–2610. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-230057
14.
GhoshS.RoyS. K.WeberG. W. (2023). Interactive strategy of carbon cap-and-trade policy on sustainable multi-objective solid transportation problem with twofold uncertain waste management. Annals of Operations Research, 326(1), 157–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-023-05347-w
15.
GigovićL.PamučarD., BajićZ., & Drobnjak, S. (2017). Application of GIS-interval rough AHP methodology for flood hazard mapping in urban areas. Water, 9(6), 360. https://doi.org/10.3390/w9060360
GulS. S.SuchitraD. (2024). A multilevel model of energy market considering coupon incentive based demand response with wind power uncertainty. Electric Power Components and Systems, 52(11), 2030–2046. https://doi.org/10.1080/15325008.2023.2263920
18.
HamzeheeA.YaghoobiM. A.MashinchiM. (2014). Linear programming with rough interval coefficients. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 26(3), 1179–1189. https://doi.org/10.3233/IFS-130804
19.
HuJ.ZouY.SoltanovN. (2024). A multilevel optimization approach for daily scheduling of combined heat and power units with integrated electrical and thermal storage. Expert Systems with Applications, 250, 123729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.123729
20.
HusseinA.ZaherH., SaeidN. R., & Roshdy, H. S. (2024). Optimum system design using rough interval multi-objective de novo programming. Baghdad Science Journal, 21(5), 1649–1649. https://doi.org/10.21123/bsj.2023.8740
21.
JalilS. A.JavaidS.MuneebS. M. (2018). A decentralized multi-level decision making model for solid transportation problem with uncertainty. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 9(5), 1022–1033. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-018-0720-2
22.
JiangJ.LiuX., GargH., & Zhang, S. (2023). Large group decision-making based on interval rough integrated cloud model. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 56, 101964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2023.101964
23.
JimenezF.VerdegayJ. L. (1997). Obtaining fuzzy solutions to the fuzzy solid transportation problem with genetic algorithms. Proceedings of 6th International Fuzzy Systems Conference, Vol. 3, IEEE. pp. 1657–1663.
24.
JiménezF.VerdegayJ. L. (1999). An evolutionary algorithm for interval solid transportation problems. Evolutionary Computation, 7(1), 103–107. https://doi.org/10.1162/evco.1999.7.1.103
KumarP. S. (2018). PSK Method for solving intuitionistic fuzzy solid transportation problems. International Journal of Fuzzy System Applications, 7(4), 62–99. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJFSA.2018100104
27.
KumarP. S. (2024). An efficient approach for solving type-2 intuitionistic fuzzy solid transportation problems with their equivalent crisp solid transportation problems. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 15(9), 4370–4403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-024-02433-5
28.
KushwahaK.JanaR. K.DuttaP. (2025). Multi-objective multi-item solid transportation problem using penalty-based NSGA-II: A case study on fertilizer transportation in India. Sādhanā, 50(2), 67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-025-02673-6
29.
LachhwaniK.DwivediA. (2018). Bi-level and multi-level programming problems: Taxonomy of literature review and research issues. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 25(4), 847–877. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-017-9216-5
30.
LiC.ShiX. (2024). Optimisation of a multilevel logistics network for prepositioned warehouses under an omni-channel retail model. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02237-1
31.
LiuB. (2007). Uncertainty Theory (2nd edn). Springer, Berlin.
32.
LuH.HuangG.HeL. (2009). Inexact rough-interval two-stage stochastic programming for conjunctive water allocation problems. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(1), 261–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.08.011
33.
ManT.OsipovV. Y., ZhukovaN., Subbotin, A., & Ignatov, D. I. (2024). Neural networks for intelligent multilevel control of artificial and natural objects based on data fusion: A survey. Information Fusion, 110, 102427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2024.102427
34.
MardanyaD.MaityG., RoyS. K., & Yu, V. F. (2022). Solving the multi-modal transportation problem via the rough interval approach. RAIRO-Operations Research, 56(4), 3155–3185. https://doi.org/10.1051/ro/2022131
35.
MoghanniA.PascoalM. (2019). The rough interval shortest path problem. In Congress of the Portuguese association of operational research (pp. 53–64). Springer International Publishing.
NaZ.StevićŽ., SubotićM., Das, D. K., Kou, G., & Moslem, S. (2024). A novel interval rough model for optimizing road network performance and safety. Expert Systems with Applications, 255, 124844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124844
38.
OjhaA.DasB., MondalS., & Maiti, M. (2010). A stochastic discounted multi-objective solid transportation problem for breakable items using analytical hierarchy process. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 34(8), 2256–2271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2009.10.034
39.
PamucarD.ChatterjeeK.ZavadskasE. K. (2019). Assessment of third-party logistics provider using multi-criteria decision-making approach based on interval rough numbers. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 127, 383–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.10.023
40.
PamucarD.DeveciM., GokasarI., Brito-Parada, P. R., & Martínez, L. (2024). Evaluation of process technologies for sustainable mining using interval rough number based Heronian and power averaging functions. Knowledge-Based Systems, 289, 111494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2024.111494
41.
PamucarD.DobrodolacM., SimicV., Lazarevic, D., & Görçün, Ö. F. (2025). An interval rough improved ordinal priority approach-based decision support system to redesign postal and logistics networks. Technology in Society, 81, 102845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102845
42.
PamučarD.MihajlovićM., ObradovićR., & Atanasković, P. (2017). Novel approach to group multi-criteria decision making based on interval rough numbers: Hybrid DEMATEL-ANP-MAIRCA model. Expert Systems with Applications, 88, 58–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2017.06.037
43.
PamučarD.StevićŽZavadskasE. K. (2018). Integration of interval rough AHP and interval rough MABAC methods for evaluating university web pages. Applied Soft Computing, 67, 141–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2018.02.057
44.
PramanikS.JanaD. K.MaitiM. (2013). Multi-objective solid transportation problem in imprecise environments. Journal of Transportation Security, 6, 131–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12198-013-0108-0
45.
PramanikS.JanaD. K.MaitiM. (2016). Bi-criteria solid transportation problem with substitutable and damageable items in disaster response operations on fuzzy rough environment. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 55, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2016.04.002
46.
PrathyushaG.Udaya KumaraK. N.VatsalaG. A. (2024). Optimizing bi-objective solid transportation problem using hierarchical order goal programming technique: A case study problem. Soft Computing, 28(1), 271–279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-023-09253-y
47.
QiupingN.YuanxiangT., BroumiS., & Uluçay, V. (2023). A parametric neutrosophic model for the solid transportation problem. Management Decision, 61(2), 421–442. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-05-2022-0660
48.
RadhakrishnanB.AnukokilaP. (2014). Fractional goal programming for fuzzy solid transportation problem with interval cost. Fuzzy Information and Engineering, 6(3), 359–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fiae.2014.12.006
49.
RebolledoM. (2006). Rough intervals—enhancing intervals for qualitative modeling of technical systems. Artificial Intelligence, 170(8–9), 667–685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2006.02.004
RoushanA.DasA., DuttaA., Senapati, T., & Bera, U. K. (2024). Multi-objective supply chain model with multiple levels of transit and vulnerable zone detection implementing hexagonal defuzzification: A case study of 2022 assam flood. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 133, 108183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2024.108183
52.
RuidasS.SeikhM. R.NayakP. K. (2022). A production-repairing inventory model considering demand and the proportion of defective items as rough intervals. Operational Research, 22(3), 2803–2829. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-021-00634-5
53.
SeikhM. R.DuttaS.LiD. F. (2021). Solution of matrix games with rough interval pay-offs and its application in the telecom market share problem. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 36(10), 6066–6100. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.22542
54.
SenguptaD.DasA.BeraU. K. (2018). A gamma type-2 defuzzification method for solving a solid transportation problem considering carbon emission. Applied Intelligence, 48(11), 3995–4022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-018-1173-7
55.
SharmaS.KumarV. (2022). A comprehensive review on multi-objective optimization techniques: Past, present and future. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 29(7), 5605–5633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-022-09778-9
56.
ShivaniD.Rani (2024). An extended Vogel’s approximation algorithm for efficiently solving Fermatean fuzzy solid transportation problems. Soft Computing, 28(17), 9711–9734. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-024-09812-x
57.
ShivaniD.RaniEbrahimnejadA.GuptaG. (2024). Multi-objective non-linear programming problem with rough interval parameters: An application in municipal solid waste management. Complex & Intelligent Systems, 10(2), 2983–3002. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40747-023-01305-y
58.
SinghS.PradhanA.BiswalM. P. (2019). Multi-objective solid transportation problem under stochastic environment. Sādhanā, 44(5), 105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-019-1094-0
59.
SinhaB.DasA.BeraU. K. (2016). Profit maximization solid transportation problem with trapezoidal interval type-2 fuzzy numbers. International Journal of Applied and Computational Mathematics, 2, 41–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40819-015-0044-8
60.
StevićŽDurmićE., GajićM., Pamučar, D., & Puška, A. (2019). A novel multi-criteria decision-making model: Interval rough SAW method for sustainable supplier selection. Information, 10(10), 292. https://doi.org/10.3390/info10100292
61.
TanH.WangY.WangQ., LinZ., & Mohamed, M. A. (2024). Day-ahead dispatch of electricity-hydrogen systems under solid-state transportation mode of hydrogen energy via FV-IGDT approach. Energy, 300, 131113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2024.131113
62.
XiaoL.HuangG.ZhangG. (2021). Improved assessment model for candidate design schemes with an interval rough integrated cloud model under uncertain group environment. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 104, 104352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2021.104352
63.
YangL.FengY. (2007). A bicriteria solid transportation problem with fixed charge under stochastic environment. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 31(12), 2668–2683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2006.10.011
64.
ZhengP.XuX.XieS. Q. (2019). A weighted interval rough number based method to determine relative importance ratings of customer requirements in QFD product planning. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 30(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-016-1224-z
