The lack of understanding about the process by which individuals subjectively experience remote work in virtual teams led to a phenomenological study drawing data from 10 interviews with telecommuters, who worked remotely more than 80% of the time. Using in-depth, semi-structured interviews, study findings contribute to the literature on Virtual Human Resource Development (VHRD) with five aspects of working remotely in virtual teams: (1) Telecommuters perceive time as an elastic, boundless aspect of how they work; (2) Telecommuters perceive increased effectiveness as a result of their work arrangements; (3) Individual initiative mediates the challenges of the social and emotional experience of telecommuting; (4) The social and emotional experience of telecommuting in virtual teams is impacted by the perception of others; and (5) The emotional experience of presence is enhanced by informal interactions. The article concludes with implications for VHRD scholars and practitioners in the post-COVID-19 workplace.
Ale EbrahimN.AhmedS.TahaZ. (2009). Virtual teams: A literature review. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 3(3), 2653–2669. https://doi.org/10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.103369
2.
AllenT. D.GoldenT. D.ShockleyK. M. (2015). How effective is telecommuting? assessing the status of our scientific findings. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16(2), 40–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100615593273
3.
BélangerF.Watson-ManheimM. B.SwanB. R. (2013). A multi-level socio-technical systems telecommuting framework. Behaviour & Information Technology, 32, 1257–1279. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2012.705894
4.
BennettE. E. (2009). Virtual HRD: The Intersection of Knowledge Management, Culture, and Intranets. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 11(3), 362–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422309339724
5.
BennettE. E. (2014). How an intranet provides opportunities for learning organizational culture: Implications for virtual HRD. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 16(3), 296–319. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422314532093
6.
BennettE. E.McWhorterR. R. (2017). Organizational learning, community, and virtual HRD: Advancing the discussion. New Horizons in Adult Education and Human Resource Development, 29(3), 19–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/nha3.20188
7.
BennettE. E.McWhorterR. R. (2021). Virtual HRD’s role in crisis and the post covid-19 professional lifeworld: Accelerating skills for digital transformation. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 23(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422320973288
8.
Bosch-SijtsemaP.FruchterR.VartiainenM.RuohomäkiV. (2011). A framework to analyze knowledge work in distributed teams. Group & Organization Management, 36, 275.
9.
BennettE. E.BieremaL. L. (2010). The ecology of virtual human resource development. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 12(6), 632–647. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422310394789
10.
Butler-KisberL.PoldmaT. (2010). The power of visual approaches in qualitative inquiry: The use of collage making and concept mapping in experiential research. Journal of Research Practice, 6(2), M18.
11.
CaligiuriP.De CieriH.MinbaevaD.VerbekeA.ZimmermannA. (2020). International HRM insights for navigating the COVID-19 pandemic: Implications for future research and practice. Journal of International Business Studies, 51, 697–713.
12.
ChangC. (2011). New organizational designs for promoting creativity: A case study of virtual teams with anonymity and structured interactions. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 28(4), 268–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2011.06.004
13.
CreswellJ. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE.
14.
CreswellJ. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods, approaches (4th ed.). SAGE.
15.
CummingsJ. N.HaasM. R. (2012). So many teams, so little time: Time allocation matters in geographically dispersed teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33, 316–341. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.777
16.
de GuineaA. O.WebsterJ.StaplesD. S. (2012). A meta-analysis of the consequences of virtualness on team functioning. Information & Management, 49, 301–308.
17.
EddlestonK. A.MulkiJ. (2017). Toward understanding remote workers’ management of Work–Family boundaries: The complexity of workplace embeddedness. Group & Organization Management, 42(3), 346–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601115619548
18.
EdsallD. L.ConradK. A. (2021). Virtual team member perspectives on personal development: A sequential explanatory study. New Horizons in Adult Education & Human Resource Development, 33(3), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/nha3.20340
19.
FeitosaJ.SalasE. (2021). Today’s virtual teams: Adapting lessons learned to the pandemic context. Organizational Dynamics, 50, 100777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2020.100777
20.
GajendranR. S.HarrisonD. A. (2007). The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: Meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1524
21.
Garro-AbarcaV.Palos-SanchezP.MarianoA. (2021). Virtual teams in times of pandemic: Factors that influence performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. 624637. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.624637
GilsonL.MaynardM.YoungN.VartiainenM.HakonenM. (2014). Virtual teams research: 10 years, 10 themes, and 10 opportunities. Journal of Management, 41(5), 1313–1337. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314559946
24.
GoldenT. D.GajendranR. S. (2019). Unpacking the role of a telecommuter’s job in their performance: Examining job complexity, problem solving, interdependence, and social support. Journal of Business and Psychology, 34, 55–69.
25.
HemingwayC. (2004). Making organisations virtual: The hidden cost of distributed teams. Journal of Information Technology, 19(3), 191–202.
26.
HenryM.Le RouxD.ParryD. (2021). Working in a post Covid-19 world: Towards a conceptual framework for distributed work. South African Journal of Business Management, 52, 2155. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajbm.v52i1.2155
27.
IllerisK. (2004). A model for learning in working life. Journal of Workplace Learning, 16(8), 431–441.
28.
IllerisK. (2011). The fundamentals of workplace learning: Understanding how people learn in working life. Routledge.
29.
JarvenpaaS.LeidnerD. (1999). Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organization Science, 10(6), 791–815. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.6.791
30.
JohnsonS. K.BettenhausenK.GibbonsE. (2009). Realities of working in virtual teams: Affective and attitudinal outcomes of using computer-mediated communication. Small Group Research, 40, 623–649.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE.
33.
MancusoD. S.ChlupD. T.McWhorterR. R. (2010). A study of adult learning in a virtual world. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 12(6), 681–699. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422310395368
34.
MoustakasC. E. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Sage.
35.
NillesJ.M.CarlsonF.R.GrayP.HannemanG. (1976). Telecommuting - An Alternative to Urban Transportation Congestion. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-6, 77–84.
StaplesD.HullandJ.HigginsC. (1999). A self-efficacy theory explanation for the management of remote workers in virtual organizations. Organization Science, 6, 758–776.
40.
SuhA.ShinK. S. (2010). Exploring the effects of online social ties on knowledge sharing: A comparative analysis of co-located vs dispersed teams. Journal of Information Science, 36, 443–463. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551510369632
41.
ThomasK. J. (2014). Workplace technology and the creation of boundaries: The role of VHRD in a 24/7 work environment. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 16(3), 281–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422314532092
42.
WangY.HaggertyN. (2011). Individual virtual competence and its influence on work outcomes. Journal of Management Information Systems, 27(4), 299–334.
43.
WhittleA.MuellerF. (2009). ‘I could be dead for two weeks and my boss would never know’: Telework and the politics of representation. New Technology, Work, & Employment, 24(2), 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-005X.2009.00224.x
44.
WorkmanM. (2007). The effects from technology-mediated interaction and openness in virtual team performance measures. Behaviour & Information Technology, 26(5), 355–365.
