We investigate the relationship between political dual screening—that is, watching political contents on television while reading and commenting on them on social media—and political participation across eight Western democracies: Denmark, Germany, Greece, Italy, Poland, Spain, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Based on custom built online surveys conducted between 2015 and 2016 on samples representative of the adult population with internet access in each country, we test hypotheses on both intra-country and cross-country direct and differential effects of political dual screening on various forms of offline and online political participation. We find a positive correlation between the frequency with which citizens dual screen political content and their overall levels of participation. Such correlation is stronger among respondents with lower levels of interest in politics, suggesting that dual screening has the potential to bridge participatory gaps between citizens who are more and less politically involved. The relationship between dual screening and participation is also significantly stronger in countries whose media systems feature the strongest Public Service Broadcasters. Our findings suggest that dual screening makes a positive contribution to democratic citizenship and political equality, and that it can also help public service media fulfill some of their key functions.
AartsKeesSemetkoHolli A.2003. “The Divided Electorate: Media Use and Political Involvement.” Journal of Politics65 (3): 759–84.
2.
AnsteadNickChadwickAndrew. 2008. “Parties, Election Campaigning, and the Internet toward a Comparative Institutional Approach.” In The Routledge Handbook of Internet Politics, ed. ChadwickAndrewHowardPhilip N.Abingdon: Routledge.
3.
AnsteadNickO’LoughlinBen. 2011. “The Emerging Viewertariat and BBC Question Time: Television Debate and Real-Time Commenting Online.” International Journal of Press/Politics16 (4): 440–62.
4.
AuversetLauren A.BillingsAndrew C.2016. “Relationships between Social TV and Enjoyment: A Content Analysis of The Walking Dead’s Story Sync Experience.” Social Media + Society2 (3): 1–12.
5.
BakerRegBlumbergStephen J.BrickJ. MichaelZahsDan. 2010. “Research Synthesis AAPOR Report on Online Panels.” Public Opinion Quarterly74 (4): 711–81.
6.
BarnidgeMatthewGil de ZúñigaHomeroDiehlTrevor. 2017. “Second Screening and Political Persuasion on Social Media.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media61 (2): 309–31.
7.
BarnidgeMatthewDiehlTrevorRojasHernando. 2018. “Second Screening for News and Digital Divides.” Social Science Computer Review. DOI: 10.1177/0894439317750840
8.
BarnidgeMatthewRojasHernando. 2014. “Hostile Media Perceptions, Presumed Media Influence, and Political Talk: Expanding the Corrective Action Hypothesis.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research26 (2): 135–56.
9.
BentivegnaSaraMarchettiRita. 2015. “Live Tweeting a Political Debate: The Case of the ‘Italia bene commune.’” European Journal of Communication30 (6): 631–47.
10.
BoulianneShelley. 2015. “Social Media Use and Participation: A Meta-Analysis of Current Research.” Information, Communication & Society18 (5): 524–38.
11.
BrüggemannMichaelEngesserSvenBüchelFlorinHumprechtEddaCastroLaia. 2014. “Hallin and Mancini Revisited: Four Empirical Types of Western Media Systems.” Journal of Communication64 (6): 1037–65.
12.
BryanMark L.JenkinsStephen P.2016. “Multilevel Modelling of Country Effects: A Cautionary Tale.” European Sociological Review32 (1): 3–22.
13.
CameronJaclynGeidnerNick. 2014. “Something Old, Something New, Something Borrowed from Something Blue: Experiments on Dual Viewing TV and Twitter.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media58 (3): 400–19.
14.
CantijochMartaCuttsDavidGibsonRachel. 2016. “Moving Slowly up the Ladder of Political Engagement: A ‘Spill-Over’ Model of Internet Participation.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations18 (1): 26–48.
15.
ChadwickAndrew. 2017. The Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power. 2nd Edition.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16.
ChadwickAndrewO’LoughlinBenVaccariCristian. 2017. “Why People Dual-Screen Political Debates and Why It Matters for Democratic Engagement.” Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media61 (2): 220–39.
17.
ChoiBoreumJungYoonhyuk. 2016. “The Effects of Second-Screen Viewing and the Goal Congruency of Supplementary Content on User Perceptions.” Computers in Human Behavior64:347–54.
18.
CurranJamesIyengarShantoLundAnker BrinkSalovaara-MoringInka. 2009. “Media System, Public Knowledge and Democracy: A Comparative Study.” European Journal of Communication24 (1): 5–26.
19.
De VreeseClaes H.BoomgaardenHajo. 2006. “News, Political Knowledge and Participation: The Differential Effects of News Media Exposure on Political Knowledge and Participation.” Acta Politica41 (4): 317–41.
20.
Dobek-OstrowskaBoguslawa. 2012. “Italianization (or Mediterraneanization) of the Polish Media System.” In Comparing Media Systems beyond the Western World, ed. HallinDanielManciniPaolo. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 26–50.
21.
EvelandWilliam P.2004. “The Effect of Political Discussion in Producing Informed Citizens: The Roles of Information, Motivation, and Elaboration.” Political Communication21 (2): 177–93.
22.
FletcherRichardNielsenRasmus Kleis. 2017. “Are People Incidentally Exposed to News on Social Media? A Comparative Analysis.” New Media & Society, DOI: 10.1177/1461444817724170.
23.
FlynnD. J.NyhanBrendanReiflerJason. 2017. “The Nature and Origins of Misperceptions: Understanding False and Unsupported Beliefs about Politics.” Political Psychology38 (S1): 127–50.
24.
FreelonDeenKarpfDavid. 2015. “Of Big Birds and Bayonets: Hybrid Twitter Interactivity in the 2012 Presidential Debates.” Information, Communication & Society18 (4): 390–406.
GigliettoFabioSelvaDonatella. 2014. “Second Screen and Participation: A Content Analysis on a Full Season Dataset of Tweets.” Journal of Communication64 (2): 260–77.
27.
Gil de ZúñigaHomeroGarcia-PerdomoVictorMcGregorShannon C.2015. “What Is Second Screening? Exploring Motivations of Second Screen Use and Its Effect on Online Political Participation.” Journal of Communication65 (5): 793–815.
28.
Gil de ZúñigaHomeroLiuJames H.2017. “Second Screening Politics in the Social Media Sphere: Advancing Research on Dual Screen Use in Political Communication with Evidence from 20 Countries.” Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media61 (2): 193–219.
29.
Gil de ZúñigaHomeroMolyneuxLoganZhengPei. 2014. “Social Media, Political Expression, and Political Participation: Panel Analysis of Lagged and Concurrent Relationships.” Journal of Communication64 (4): 612–34.
30.
GottfriedJeffery A.HardyBruce W.HolbertLance R.WinnegKenneth M.JamiesonKathleen Hall. 2016. “The Changing Nature of Political Debate Consumption: Social Media, Multitasking, and Knowledge Acquisition.” Political Communication34 (2): 172–99.
31.
GuessAndrew M.2015. “Measure for Measure: An Experimental Test of Online Political Media Exposure.” Political Analysis23 (1): 59–75.
32.
HallinDaniel C.ManciniPaolo. 2004. Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33.
KingGaryHonakerJamesJosephAnneScheveKenneth. 2001. “Analyzing Incomplete Political Science Data: An Alternative Algorithm for Multiple Imputation.” American Political Science Review95 (1): 49–69.
34.
KreissDaniel. 2016. “Seizing the Moment: The Presidential Campaigns’ Use of Twitter during the 2012 Electoral Cycle.” New Media & Society18 (8): 1473–90.
35.
KreuterFraukePresserStanleyTourangeauRoger. 2008. “Social Desirability Bias in CATI, IVR, and Web Surveys the Effects of Mode and Question Sensitivity.” Public Opinion Quarterly72 (5): 847–65.
36.
LijphartArend. 1971. “Comparative Politics and the Comparative Method.” American Political Science Review65 (3): 682–93.
McLeodJack M.ScheufeleDietram A.MoyPatricia. 1999. “Community, Communication, and Participation: The Role of Mass Media and Interpersonal Discussion in Local Political Participation.” Political Communication16 (3): 315–36.
39.
NorrisPippa. 2000. A Virtuous Circle: Political Communications in Postindustrial Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40.
PasekJosh. 2016. “When Will Nonprobability Surveys Mirror Probability Surveys? Considering Types of Inference and Weighting Strategies as Criteria for Correspondence.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research28 (2): 269–91.
PriorMarkus. 2010. “You’ve Either Got it or You Don’t? The Stability of Political Interest over the Life Cycle.” The Journal of Politics72 (3): 747–66.
43.
PutnamRobert D.1995. “Tuning In, Tuning Out: The Strange Disappearance of Social Capital in America.” PS: Political Science & Politics28 (4): 664–83.
44.
Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. 2016. “Reuters Digital News Report 2016.” http://www.digitalnewsreport.org/ (accessed March 31, 2017).
45.
RobinsonMichael J.1976. “Public Affairs Television and the Growth of Political Malaise: The Case of ‘The Selling of the Pentagon.’” The American Political Science Review70 (2): 409–32.
SelvaDonatella. 2016. “Social Television: Audience and Political Engagement.” Television & New Media17 (2): 159–73.
48.
ShahDhavan V.HannaAlexBucyErik P.LassenDavid S.Van ThommeJackBialikKristenYangJungHwanPevehouseJon C. W. 2016. “Dual Screening During Presidential Debates: Political Nonverbals and the Volume and Valence of Online Expression.” American Behavioral Scientist60 (14): 1816–43.
49.
SmetsKaat. 2016. “Revisiting the Political Life-Cycle Model: Later Maturation and Turnout Decline among Young Adults.” European Political Science Review8 (2): 225–49.
50.
SorokaStuartAndrewBlakeAalbergTorilIyengarShantoCurranJamesCoenSharonHayashiKaoriJonesPaulMazzoleniGiampietroWoong RheeJuneRoweDavidTiffenRod2013. “Auntie Knows Best? Public Broadcasters and Current Affairs Knowledge.” British Journal of Political Science43 (4): 719–39.
51.
StrömbäckJesperShehataAdam. 2010. “Media Malaise or a Virtuous Circle? Exploring the Causal Relationships between News Media Exposure, Political News Attention and Political Interest.” European Journal of Political Research49 (5): 575–97.
52.
TrillingDamian. 2015. “Two Different Debates? Investigating the Relationship between a Political Debate on TV and Simultaneous Comments on Twitter.” Social Science Computer Review33 (3): 259–76.
53.
VaccariCristianChadwickAndrewO’LoughlinBen. 2015. “Dual Screening the Political: Media Events, Social Media, and Citizen Engagement.” Journal of Communication65 (6): 1041–61.
54.
ValerianiAugustoVaccariCristian. 2016. “Accidental Exposure to Politics on Social Media as Online Participation Equalizer in Germany, Italy, and the United Kingdom.” New Media & Society18 (9): 1857–74.
55.
Van CauwenbergeAnnaSchaapGabiVan RoyRob. 2014. “‘TV no longer commands our full attention’: Effects of Second-Screen Viewing and Task Relevance on Cognitive Load and Learning from News.” Computers in Human Behavior38:100–109.
56.
VerbaSidneySchlozmanKay L.BradyHenry E.1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
57.
VergeerMauriceFransesPhilip H.2016. “Live Audience Responses to Live Televised Election Debates: Time Series Analysis of Issue Salience and Party Salience on Audience Behavior.” Information, Communication & Society19 (10): 1390–1410.
58.
YangHongwei C.DeHartJean L.2016. “Social Media Use and Online Political Participation among College Students during the US Election 2012.” Social Media + Society2 (1): 1–18.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
