Although most scholars acknowledge that the media play an instrumental role in furthering or limiting the spread of populism, the exact nature of the relationship between right-wing populist parties (RWPPs) and the media remains poorly understood. This article analyzes the various ways in which the media choose to deal with RWPPs in the Benelux region (i.e., Belgium, the Netherlands, and Luxembourg). Using evidence from interviews with media practitioners (n = 46), the findings suggest that in the absence of a credible right-wing populist challenger, media practitioners in Luxembourg and Wallonia adhere to strict demarcation, whereas the Dutch and Flemish media have become gradually more accommodative to RWPPs. This study makes two contributions to the field. First, it systematically theorizes the different ways in which the media can approach the populist radical right. Second, it provides illustrative, comparative evidence about the rationale for why some media provide space for RWPPs while others deny it, thereby illuminating the under-researched topic of societal responses to the populist radical right.
AalbergTorilde VreeseClaes. 2017. “Introduction: Comprehending Populist Political Communication.” In Populist Political Communication in Europe, ed. AalbergTorilEsserFrankReinemannCarstenStrömbäckJesperde VreeseClaes, 3–11. New York: Routledge.
ArtDavid. 2011. Inside the Radical Right: The Development of Anti-immigrant Parties in Western Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press.
4.
BarthChristofBucherHans-Jürgen. 2003. “Forschungsbericht und Entwurf eines Verhaltenskodex für Funkmedien des Großherzogtums Luxemburg” [Research report and draft code of conduct for broadcast media for the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg]. Public research paper, Trier.
5.
BarthChristofHemmerMartine. 2008. “Medien und Medienpolitik.” In Das politische System Luxemburgs: Eine Einführung [Media and Media Politics in The Political System of Luxembourg: An Introduction], ed. LorigWolfgang H.HirschMario, 208–30. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
6.
BlauLucien. 2005. Histoire de l’extrême-droite au Grand-Duché de Luxembourg au XXe siècle [History of the Extreme Right in the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg in the 20th century]. Esch-sur-Alzette: Le Phare.
7.
BoomgaardenHajo G.VliegenthartRens. 2007. “Explaining the Rise of Anti-immigrant Parties: The Role of News Media Content.” Electoral Studies26 (2): 404–17.
8.
CofféHilde. 2005. Extreem-rechts in Vlaanderen en Wallonië: Het verschil [The Extreme Right in Flanders and Wallonia: The Difference]. Roeselare: Roularta Books.
9.
CofféHilde. 2008. “Social Democratic Parties as Buffers against the Extreme Right: The Case of Belgium.” Contemporary Politics14 (2): 179–95.
10.
Conseil Supérieur de l’Audiovisuel. 2011. Règlement relatif aux programmes de radio et de télévision en période électorale [Regulation relating to radio and television programs during campaign periods.]. November30. http://www.csa.be/documents/1649 (accessed May 2, 2017).
11.
Conseil Supérieur de l’Audiovisuel. 2012. Toutes les tendances politiques ont-elles accès à l’antenne? [Do all political tendencies have access to airtime?] January27. http://www.csa.be/faqs/10#question_44 (accessed May 2, 2017).
12.
DamenSofie. 2001. “Strategieën Tegen Extreem-Rechts: Het Cordon Sanitaire Onder De Loep” [Strategies Against The Extreme Right: The Cordon Sanitaire Under The Magnifying Glass]. Tijdschrift Voor Sociologie22 (1): 89–110.
13.
De CleenBenjaminVan AelstPeter. 2017. “Belgium: The Rise and Fall of Populism Research.” In Populist Political Communication in Europe, ed. AalbergTorilEsserFrankReinemannCarstenStrömbäckJesperde VreeseClaes, 99–110. New York: Routledge.
14.
DeschouwerKris. 2012. The Politics of Belgium: Governing a Divided Society. 2nd Edition.Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
15.
DownsWilliam M.2001. “Pariahs in Their Midst: Belgian and Norwegian Parties React to Extremist Threats.” West European Politics24 (3): 23–42.
16.
EatwellRoger. 2003. “Ten Theories of the Extreme Right.” In Right-Wing Extremism in the Twenty-First Century, ed. MerklPeter H.WeinbergLeonard, 47–73. London: Frank Cass.
17.
EllinasAntonis A.2010. The Media and the Far Right in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
EllinasAntonis A.2018. “Media and the Radical Right.” In The Oxford Handbook of the Radical Right, ed. RydgrenJens, 268–84. New York: Oxford University Press.
19.
EsserFrankStępińskaAgnieszkaHopmannDavid. 2017. “Populism and the Media: Cross-National Findings and Perspectives.” In Populist Political Communication in Europe, ed. AalbergTorilEsserFrankReinemannCarstenStrömbäckJesperde VreeseClaes, 99–110. New York: Routledge.
20.
HallinDaniel C.ManciniPaolo. 2004. Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21.
HeinzeAnna-Sophia. 2018. “Strategies of Mainstream Parties towards Their Right-Wing Populist Challengers: Denmark, Norway, Sweden and Finland in Comparison.” West European Politics41 (2): 287–309.
22.
HopmannDavidVliegenhartRensde VreeseClaesAlbaekErik. 2010. “Effects of Election News Coverage: How Visibility and Tone Influence Party Choice.” Political Communication27 (4): 389–405.
23.
KoopmansRuudMuisJasper. 2009. “The Rise of Right-Wing Populist Pim Fortuyn in the Netherlands: A Discursive Opportunity Approach.” European Journal of Political Research48 (5): 642–64.
24.
KriesiHanspeter. 2014. “The Populist Challenge.” West European Politics37 (2): 361–78.
25.
MazzoleniGianpietro. 2008. “Populism and the Media.” In Twenty-First Century Populism: The Spectre of Western European Democracy, ed. AlbertazziDanieleMcDonnellDuncan, 49–64. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
26.
MinkenbergMichael. 2001. “The Radical Right in Public Office: Agenda-Setting and Policy Effects.” West European Politics24 (4): 1–21.
27.
MuddeCas. 2004. “The Populist Zeitgeist.” Government & Opposition39 (3): 541–63.
28.
MuddeCas. 2007. Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29.
MuddeCas. 2010. “The Populist Radical Right: A Pathological Normalcy.” West European Politics33 (6): 1167–86.
30.
MuddeCas. 2017. “Populism: An Ideational Approach.” In The Oxford Handbook of Populism, edited by KaltwasserCristóbal RoviraTaggartPaulEspejoPaulina OchoaOstiguyPierre, 27-47. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31.
MuddeCasVan HolsteynJoop. 2000. “The Netherlands: Explaining the Limited Success of the Extreme Right.” In The Politics of the Extreme Right: From the Margins to the Mainstream, ed. HainsworthPaul, 144–71. London: Pinter.
32.
MuddeCasKaltwasserCristóbal Rovira. 2013. “Exclusionary vs. Inclusionary Populism: Comparing Contemporary Europe and Latin America.” Government & Opposition48 (2): 147–74.
33.
PauwelsTeun. 2011. “Explaining the Strange Decline of the Populist Radical Right Vlaams Belang in Belgium: The Impact of Permanent Opposition.” Acta Politica46 (1): 60–82.
34.
RaginCharles C.1987. The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley, California: University of California Press.
35.
RensenPeter. 1994. “Een partij van fascisten, criminelen en tuig” [A party of fascists, criminals and scum]. Nieuwe Revu, February2–9, 41–58.
RooduijnMatthijs. 2015. “The Rise of the Populist Radical Right in Western Europe.” European Review14 (1): 3–11.
38.
SartoriGiovanni. 1976. Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. Vol. I. London: Cambridge University Press.
39.
SchafraadPytrikd’HaenensLeenScheepersPeerWesterFred. 2012. “The Evolution of a Media Image: Newspaper Attention to the Flemish Far Right.” Acta Politica47 (7): 356–77.
TNS ILRES. 2017. “Luxembourg: Etude TNS ILRES (Institut luxembourgeois de recherches sociales et d’études de marchés) PLURIMEDIA LUXEMBOURG 2017.I” [Luxembourg Institute of Social and Market Research Luxembourg: Study TNS ILRES “Plurimedia’ Luxembourg]. Communiqué de presse, January. https://www.tns-ilres.com/media/1428/communique_de_presse_etudeplurimedia_2017.pdf (accessed August 2, 2017).
45.
van KesselStijn. 2015. Populist Parties in Western Europe: Agents of Discontent?Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
46.
van SpanjeJoost. 2018. Controlling the Electoral Marketplace: How Established Parties Ward off Competition. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
47.
van SpanjeJoostde VreeseClaes. 2014. “Europhile Media and Eurosceptic Voting: Effects of News Media Coverage on Eurosceptic Voting in the 2009 European Parliamentary Elections.” Political Communication31 (2): 325–54.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
