Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Despite the recent surge of women of color in elected political office in the U.S., the representation of Latinas is strikingly low. Past research offers unclear conclusions as to whether Latina political candidates face biases due to the intersection of their identities as women and as ethnic minorities, and how Latinas can navigate such biases. In this study, we identify how Latinas draw on their intersectional identities as both women and ethnic minorities to develop strategic campaign messages and how voters respond to such messages. Through an analysis of campaign advertising data and an original survey experiment, we show that Latina candidates do not face an automatic disadvantage based in gender and ethnic biases, but they can benefit from the intersection of these two identities, especially among female minority voters. These results are consequential because they offer insights into how to improve the descriptive and substantive representation of marginalized groups in the U.S.

Keywords

Latina politics female candidates intersectionality gender stereotypes race/ethnicity political communication

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aaldering

Van Der Pas

D. J.

. 2020. “Political Leadership in the Media: Gender Bias in Leader Stereotypes During Campaign and Routine Times.” British Journal of Political Science 50(3): 911–31. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123417000795.

Badas

Stauffer

K. E.

. 2019. “Voting for Women in Nonpartisan and Partisan Elections.” Electoral Studies 57: 245–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2018.10.004.

Banda

K. K.

Windett

J. H.

. 2021. “Candidate Appearance in Campaign Advertisements.” Electoral Studies 70: 102275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2020.102275.

Barreto

M. A.

2010. Ethnic Cues: The Role of Shared Ethnicity in Latino Political Participation. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

Barreto

M. A.

Collingwood

. 2015. “Group-based Appeals and the Latino Vote in 2012: How Immigration Became a Mobilizing Issue.” Electoral Studies 40: 490–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2014.09.008.

Barreto

M. A.

Segura

G. M.

Woods

N. D.

. 2004. “The Mobilizing Effect of Majority-Minority Districts on Latino Turnout.” American Political Science Review 98(1): 65–75. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055404001005.

Bauer

N. M.

2015. “Who Stereotypes Female Candidates? Identifying Individual Differences in Feminine Stereotype Reliance.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 3(1): 94–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2014.992794.

Bauer

N. M.

2020. “A Feminine Advantage? Delineating the Effects of Feminine Trait and Feminine Issue Messages on Evaluations of Female Candidates.” Politics & Gender 16(3): 660–80. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X19000084.

Bauer

N. M.

Santia

. 2021. “Going Feminine: Identifying how and When Female Candidates Emphasize Gender Stereotypes on the Campaign Trail.” Political Research Quarterly. Online first. https://doi.org/10.1177/10659129211020257.

10.

Bejarano

C. E.

2013. The Latina Advantage: Gender, Race, and Political Success. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

11.

Bejarano

E., Brown

N. E.

Gershon

S. A.

Montoya

. 2020. “Shared Identities: Intersectionality, Linked Fate, and Perceptions of Political Candidates.” Political Research Quarterly 74 (4): 970–985. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912920951640.

12.

Brown

N. E.

2014. “Political Participation of Women of Color: An Intersectional Analysis.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 35(4): 315–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554477X.2014.955406.

13.

Brown

N. E.

Gershon

S. A.

. 2016. “Intersectional Presentations: An Exploratory Study of Minority Congresswomen’s Websites’ Biographies.” Du Bois Review 13(1): 85–108. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742058X15000181.

14.

Brown

N. E.

Lemi

D. C.

. 2021. Sister Style: The Politics of Appearance for Black Women Political Elites. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

15.

Campi

Junn

. 2019. “Racial Linked Fate and Gender in US Politics.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 7(3): 654–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2019.1638805.

16.

Cargile

I. A. M.

2016. “Latina Issues: An Analysis of the Policy Issue Competencies of Latina Candidates.” In Distinct Identities: Minority Women in U.S. Politics, eds. Brown

N. E.

Gershon

S. A.

, 134–50. New York, NY: Routledge.

17.

Cargile

I. A. M.

2021. “Stereotyping Latinas: Candidate Gender and Ethnicity on the Political Stage.” Politics, Groups, and Identities. Online first. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2021.1946097.

18.

Carpinella

M., and Bauer

N. M.

. 2019. “A Visual Analysis of Gender Stereotypes in Campaign Advertising.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 9(2): 369–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2019.1637353.

19.

Carpinella

C. M.

Hehman

Freeman

J. B.

Johnson

K. L.

. 2016. “The Gendered Face of Partisan Politics: Consequences of Facial Sex Typicality for Vote Choice.” Political Communication 33(1): 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2014.958260.

20.

Casellas

J. P.

2011. Latino Representation in State Houses and Congress. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

21.

Center for American Women in Politics. 2020, January 22. Women in the U.S. Congress 2020. Retrieved from https://cawp.rutgers.edu/women-us-congress-2020.

22.

Cook

E. A.

1994. “Voter Responses to Women Senate Candidates.” In The Year of the Women: Myths and Realities, 217–36. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

23.

Coronel

J. C.

Moore

R. C.

deBuys

. 2020. “Do Gender Cues from Images Supersede Partisan Cues Conveyed via Text? Eye Movements Reveal Political Stereotyping in Multimodal Information Environments.” Political Communication, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2020.1763530.

24.

Crenshaw

K. W.

1989. “Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics.” University of Chicago Legal Forum 1(8): 139–67.

25.

Fowler

E. F.

Franz

Ridout

T. N.

. 2015. Political Advertising in 2012. Version 1.1. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan Media Project.

26.

Fowler

E. F.

Franz

Ridout

T. N.

. 2017. Political Advertising in 2014. Version 1.1. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan Media Project.

27.

Fowler

E. F.

Franz

Ridout

T. N.

Baum

L. M.

. 2019. Political Advertising in 2016. Version 1.1. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan Media Project.

28.

Fowler

E. F.

Franz

Ridout

T. N.

Baum

L. M.

. 2020. Political Advertising in 2018. Version 1.1. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan Media Project.

29.

Fox

Lawless

J. L.

. 2010. “If Only They’d ask: Gender, Recruitment, and Political Ambition.” The Journal of Politics 72(2): 310–26. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381609990752.

30.

Fraga

Garcia

J. A.

Hero

Jones-Correa

Martinez-Ebers

Segura

G. M.

. 2010. Latino Lives in America: Making it Home. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

31.

Frederick

2011. “Gender Turnover and Roll Call Voting in the US Senate.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 32(3): 193–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554477X.2011.589281.

32.

Fridkin

K. L.

Kenney

P. J.

. 2014. “How the Gender of US Senators Influences People’s Understanding and Engagement in Politics.” The Journal of Politics 76(4): 1017–31. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381614000589.

33.

García Bedolla

2005. Fluid Borders: Latino Power, Identity, and Politics in Los Angeles. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

34.

Gershon

S. A.

2012. “Press Secretaries, Journalists, and Editors: Shaping Local Congressional News Coverage.” Political Communication 29(2): 160–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2012.671230.

35.

Gershon

S. A.

Montoya

E. Bejarano

E. Brown

. 2019. “Intersectional Linked Fate and Political Representation.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 7(3): 642–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2019.1639520.

36.

Gilens

1999. Why Americans Hate Welfare: Race, Media, and the Politics of Anti-Poverty Policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

37.

Herrnson

P. S.

Lay

J. C.

Stokes

A. K.

. 2003. “Women Running “as Women”: Candidate Gender, Campaign Issues, and Voter-Targeting Strategies.” The Journal of Politics 65(1): 244–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2508.

38.

Holman

M. R.

Merolla

J. L.

Zechmeister

E. J.

. 2011. “Sex, Stereotypes, and Security: A Study of the Effects of Terrorist Threat on Assessments of Female Leadership.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 32(3): 173–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554477X.2011.589283.

39.

Holman

M. R.

Merolla

J. L.

Zechmeister

E. J.

. 2016. “Terrorist Threat, Male Stereotypes, and Candidate Evaluations.” Political Research Quarterly 69(1): 134–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912915624018.

40.

Holman

M. R.

Schneider

M. C.

. 2018. “Gender, Race, and Political Ambition: How Intersectionality and Frames Influence Interest in Political Office.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 6(2): 264–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2016.1208105.

41.

Huddy

Terkildsen

. 1993. “The Consequences of Gender Stereotypes for Women Candidates at Different Levels and Types of Office.” Political Research Quarterly 46(3): 503–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591299304600304.

42.

Juenke

E. G.

Shah

. 2016. “Demand and Supply: Racial and Ethnic Minority Candidates in White Districts.” The Journal of Race, Ethnicity, and Politics 1(1): 60–90. https://doi.org/10.1017/rep.2015.2.

43.

Junn

Brown

N. E.

. 2008. “What Revolution? Incorporating Intersectionality in Women and Politics.” In Political Women and American Democracy, eds. Wolbrecht

Beckwith

Baldez

, 64–78. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

44.

Krogstad

J. M.

Noe-Bustamante

. 2020, September 10. Key Facts about U.S. Latinos for National Hispanic Heritage Month. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/09/10/key-facts-about-u-s-latinos-for-national-hispanic-heritage-month/.

45.

Krupnikov

Piston

Bauer

N. M.

. 2016. “Saving Face: Identifying Voter Responses to Black Candidates and Female Candidates.” Political Psychology 37(2): 253–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12261.

46.

Mansbridge

2003. “Rethinking Representation.” American Political Science Review 97(4): 515–28.

47.

Masuoka

Junn

. 2013. The Politics of Belonging: Race, Public Opinion, and Immigration. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

48.

Matos

Greene

Sanbonmatsu

. 2020. “Do Women Seek “Women of Color” for Public Office? Exploring Women’s Support for Electing Women of Color.” Political Research Quarterly, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912920971793.

49.

Matson

Fine

T. S.

. 2006. “Gender, Ethnicity, and Ballot Information: Ballot Cues in Low-Information Elections.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 6(1): 49–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/153244000600600103.

50.

McCall

2005. “The Complexity of Intersectionality.” Signs 30(3): 1771–800. https://doi.org/10.1086/426800.

51.

McConnaughy

C. M.

White

I. K.

Leal

D. L.

Casellas

J. P.

. 2010. “A Latino on the Ballot: Explaining Coethnic Voting among Latinos and the Response of White Americans.” The Journal of Politics 72(4): 1199–211. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381610000629.

52.

McDermott

M. L.

1998. “Race and Gender Cues in Low-Information Elections.” Political Research Quarterly 51(4): 895–918. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591299805100403.

53.

McGregor

S. C.

Lawrence

R. G.

Cardona

. 2017. “Personalization, Gender, and Social Media: Gubernatorial Candidates’ Social Media Strategies.” Information, Communication & Society 20(2): 264–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1167228.

54.

Meeks

2016. “Gendered Styles, Gendered Differences: Candidates’ Use of Personalization and Interactivity on Twitter.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics 13(4): 295–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2016.1160268.

55.

Meeks

Domke

. 2016. “When Politics is a Woman’s Game: Party and Gender Ownership in Woman-Versus-Woman Elections.” Communication Research 43(7): 895–921. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215581369.

56.

Minta

M. D.

2009. “Legislative Oversight and the Substantive Representation of Black and Latino Interests in Congress.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 34(2): 193–218. https://doi.org/10.3162/036298009788314336.

57.

Noe-Bustamante

Mora

Lopez

M. H.

, 2020, August 11. About one-in-four U.S. Hispanics have heard of Latinx, but just 3% use it. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/hispanic/2020/08/11/about-one-in-four-u-s-hispanics-have-heard-of-latinx-but-just-3-use-it/.

58.

Ocampo

A. X.

Ray

. 2019. “Many are Called but few are Chosen: The Emergence of Latino Congressional Candidates.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 8(4): 738–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2019.1629968.

59.

Ono

Budern

B. C.

. 2019. “The Contingent Effects of Candidate Sex on Voter Choice.” Political Behavior 41: 583–607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-018-9464-6.

60.

Osborn

T. L.

2012. How Women Represent Women: Political Parties, Gender and Representation in the State Legislatures. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

61.

Paolino

1995. “Group-salient Issues and Group Representation: Support for Women Candidates in the 1992 Senate Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 39(2): 294–313. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111614.

62.

Petrocik

J. R.

1996. “Issue Ownership in Presidential Elections, with a 1980 Case Study.” American Journal of Political Science, 825–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111797.

63.

Plutzer

Zipp

J. F.

. 1996. “Identity Politics, Partisanship and Voting for Women Candidates.” Public Opinion Quarterly 60(1): 30–57. https://doi.org/10.1086/297738.

64.

Reingold

2000. Representing Women: Sex, Gender, and Legislative Behavior in Arizona and California. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press.

65.

Ridout

T. N.

Franz

Goldstein

Freedman

. 2002. Measuring the Nature and Effects of Campaign Advertising. Unpublished paper. Retrieved from https://public.wsu.edu/∼tnridout/reliability.pdf.

66.

Rosenthal

C. S.

1995. “The Role of Gender in Descriptive Representation.” Political Research Quarterly 48(3): 599–611. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591299504800307.

67.

Rouse

S. M.

2013. Latinos in the Legislative Process: Interests and Influence. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

68.

Sanbonmatsu

2002. “Gender Stereotypes and Vote Choice.” American Journal of Political Science 46(1): 20–34. https://doi.org/10.2307/3088412.

69.

Sanbonmatsu

2006. Where Women Run: Gender and Party in the American States. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

70.

Sanchez

G. R

. 2006. “The Role of Group Consciousness in Latino Public Opinion.” Political Research Quarterly 59 (3): 435–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290605900311.

71.

Sanchez

G. R.

2008. “Latino Group Consciousness and Perception of Commonality with African Americans.” Social Science Quarterly 89(2): 428–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2008.00540.x.

72.

Schneider

M. C.

Bos

A. L.

. 2014. “Measuring Stereotypes of Female Politicians.” Political Psychology 35(2): 245–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12040.

73.

Shortle

Johnson

. 2017. “Owning Immigration: Messenger Ethnicity, Issue Ownership, and Support for Latino Candidates.” Journal of Race, Ethnicity and Politics 2 (2): 233–59. https://doi.org/10.1017/rep.2017.7.

74.

Sides

2006. “The Origins of Campaign Agendas.” British Journal of Political Science 36(3): 407–36. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123406000226.

75.

Simien

E. M.

2005. “Race, Gender, and Linked Fate.” Journal of Black Studies 35(5): 529–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021934704265899.

76.

Simien

E. M.

2007. “Doing Intersectionality Research: From Conceptual Issues to Practical Examples.” Politics & Gender 3(2): 264–71. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X07000086.

77.

Stokes

A. K

. 2003. “Latino Group Consciousness and Political Participation.” American Politics Research 31 (4): 361–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X03031004002.

78.

Tate

2003. Black Faces in the Mirror: African Americans and Their Representatives in the U.S. Congress. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

79.

van der Pas

D. J.

Aaldering

. 2020. “Gender Differences in Political Media Coverage: A Meta-Analysis.” Journal of Communication 70(1): 114–43. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqz046.

80.

Volden

Wiseman

A. E.

Wittmer

D. E.

. 2018. “Women’s Issues and Their Fates in the U.S. Congress.” Political Science Research and Methods 6(4): 679–96. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2016.32.

81.

West

D. M.

2014. Air Wars: Television Advertising and Social Media in Election Campaigns 1952–2012. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

82.

White

I. K.

Laird

C. N.

. 2020. Steadfast Democrats: How Social Forces Shape Black Political Behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

83.

White

I. K.

Laird

C. N.

Allen

T. D.

. 2014. “Selling out?: The Politics of Navigating Conflicts Between Racial Group Interest and Self-Interest.” American Political Science Review 108(4): 783–800. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305541400046X.

84.

Wolbrecht

2002. “Female Legislators and the Women's Rights Agenda: From Feminine Mystique to Feminist Era.” In Women Transforming Congress, ed. Rosenthal

C. S.

. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.17 MB

The Intersection of Candidate Gender and Ethnicity: How Voters Respond to Campaign Messages from Latinas

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material