Do people need to explicitly encode conditioned stimuli–unconditioned stimuli (CS–US) pairings for evaluative conditioning (EC) effects to emerge? Despite the large number of studies that addressed this issue, no simple answer has emerged yet. In part, this is due to the relative lack of experimental evidence for the role of awareness of the CS–US contingency at encoding in EC. In the present experiment, participants’ encoding of the CS–US pairings was experimentally manipulated by relying on foveal and parafoveal presentations of the CSs. More specifically, spatial locations (i.e., foveal vs. parafoveal) of the CSs and US valence (i.e., positive vs. negative) were manipulated within participants, and CS–US pairings were counterbalanced across participants. Results reveal explicit encoding of the CSs and EC effects for the foveal CS presentations only. We discuss the implications of these experimental findings for the associative and propositional approach to EC.
AartsH.RuysK.VelingH.RenesR. A.de GrootJ. H. BVan NunenA. M.GeertjesS. (2010). The art of anger: Reward context turns avoidance responses to anger-related objects into approach. Psychological Science, 21, 1406–1410.
2.
BaeyensF.EelenP.Van den BerghO. (1990). Contingency awareness in evaluative conditioning: A case for unaware affective–evaluative learning. Cognition and Emotion, 4, 3–18.
3.
BalasR.GawronskiB. (2012). On the intentional control of conditioned evaluative responses. Learning and Motivation, 43, 89–98.
4.
BlaskK.WaltherE.HalbeisenG.WeilR. (2012). At the crossroads: Attention, contingency awareness, and evaluative conditioning. Learning and Motivation, 43, 99–106.
5.
ChartrandT. L.BarghJ. A. (1996). Automatic activation of impression formation and memorization goals: Nonconscious goal priming reproduces effects of explicit task instructions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 464–478.
6.
CorneilleO.YzerbytV. Y.PleyersG.MussweilerT. (2009). Beyond awareness and resources: Evaluative conditioning may be sensitive to processing goals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 279–282.
7.
DawsonM. E.RisslingA. J.SchellA. M.WilcoxR. (2007). Under what conditions can human affective conditioning occur without contingency awareness? Test of the evaluative conditioning paradigm. Emotion, 7, 755–766.
8.
DedonderJ.CorneilleO.YzerbytV.KuppensT. (2010). Evaluative conditioning of high-novelty stimuli does not seem to be based on an automatic form of associative learning. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 1118–1121.
9.
De HouwerJ. (2009). The propositional approach to associative learning as an alternative for association formation models. Learning & Behavior, 37, 1–20.
10.
De HouwerJ.ThomasS.BaeyensF. (2001). Associative learning of likes and dislikes: A review of 25 years of research on human evaluative conditioning. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 853–869.
11.
DijksterhuisA. (2004). I like myself but I don’t know why: Enhancing implicit self-esteem by subliminal evaluative conditioning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 345–355.
12.
FelisbertiF. M.SolomonJ. A.MorganM. J. (2005). The role of target salience in crowding. Perception, 34, 823–833.
13.
FiedlerK.UnkelbachC. (2011). Evaluative conditioning depends on higher order encoding processes. Cognition and Emotion, 25, 639–656.
14.
FieldA. P.MooreA. C. (2005). Dissociating the effects of attention and contingency awareness on evaluative conditioning effects in the visual paradigm. Cognition and Emotion, 19, 217–243.
15.
FördererS.UnkelbachC. (2012). Hating the cute kitten or loving the aggressive pit-bull: EC effects depend on CS-US relations. Cognition and Emotion, 26, 534–540.
16.
FulcherE. P.HammerlM. (2001). When all is revealed: Dissociation between evaluative learning and contingency awareness. Consciousness and Cognition, 10, 524–549.
17.
GalliM.GornG. (2011). Unconscious transfer of meaning to brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 21, 215–225.
18.
GastA.GawronskiB.De HouwerJ. (2012). Evaluative conditioning: Recent developments and future directions. Learning and Motivation, 43, 79–88.
19.
GastA.RothermundK. (2011). What you see is what will change: Evaluative conditioning effects depend on a focus on valence. Cognition and Emotion, 25, 89–110.
20.
GawronskiB.WalterE. (2012). What do memory data tell us about the role of contingency awareness in evaluative conditioning?Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 617–623.
21.
HofmannW.De HouwerJ.PeruginiM.BaeyensF.CrombezG. (2010). Evaluative conditioning in humans: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 390–421.
22.
HütterM.SweldensS.StahlC.UnkelbachC.KlauerK. C. (2012). Dissociating contingency awareness and conditioned attitudes: Evidence of contingency-unaware evaluative conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 539–557.
23.
JonesC. R.FazioR. H.OlsonM. A. (2009). Implicit misattribution as a mechanism underlying evaluative conditioning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 933–948.
24.
JonesC. R.OlsonM. A.FazioR. H. (2010). Evaluative conditioning: The “How” question. In ZannaM. P.OlsonJ. M. (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 43, pp. 205–255). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
25.
JuolaJ. F.CooperE. E.WarnerC. B.BouwhuisD. G. (1991). Control of attention around the fovea. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 125–141.
26.
KattnerF. (2011). Revisiting the relation between contingency awareness and attention: Evaluative conditioning relies on a contingency focus. Cognition and Emotion, 26, 166–175.
27.
KluckenT.KagererS.SchweckendiekJ.TabbertK.VaitlD.StarkR. (2009). Neural electrodermal and behavioral response patterns in contingency aware and unaware subjects during a picture-picture conditioning paradigm. Neuroscience, 158, 721–731.
28.
KrosnickJ. A.BetzA. L.JussimL. J.LynnA. R. (1992). Subliminal conditioning of attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 152–162.
29.
LascellesK. R. R.DaveyG. C. L. (2006). Successful differential evaluative conditioning using simultaneous and trace conditioning procedures in the picture-picture paradigm. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 482–492.
30.
LippO. V.PurkisH. M. (2005). No support for dual process accounts of human affective learning in simple Pavlovian conditioning. Cognition and Emotion, 19, 269–282.
31.
LovibondP. F.ShanksD. R. (2002). The role of awareness in Pavlovian conditioning: Empirical evidence and theoretical implications. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 28, 3–26.
32.
NiedenthalP. M. (1990). Implicit perception of affective information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 505–527.
33.
OlsonM. A.FazioR. H. (2001). Implicit attitude formation through classical conditioning. Psychological Science, 12, 413–417.
34.
PleyersG.CorneilleO.LuminetO.YzerbytV. (2007). Aware and (Dis)liking: Item-based analyses reveal that valence acquisition via evaluative conditioning emerges only when there is contingency awareness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 130–144.
35.
PleyersG.CorneilleO.YzerbytV.LuminetO. (2009). Evaluative conditioning may incur attentional costs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 35, 279–285.
36.
RescorlaR. A.WagnerA. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In BlackA. H.ProkasyW. F. (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory (pp. 64–99). New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
37.
RydellR. J.McConnellA. R.MackieD. M.StrainL. M. (2006). Of two minds: Forming and changing valence inconsistent implicit and explicit attitudes. Psychological Science, 17, 954–958.
38.
SchwartzB. (1989). Psychology of learning and behavior (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Norton.
39.
SpruytA.De HouwerJ.HermansD. (2009). Modulation of semantic priming by feature-specific attention allocation. Journal of Memory and Language, 61, 37–54.
40.
StahlC.UnkelbachC. (2009). Evaluative learning with single versus multiple USs: The role of contingency awareness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 35, 286–291.
41.
StahlC.UnkelbachC.CorneilleO. (2009). On the respective contributions of awareness of US valence and US identity in attitude formation through evaluative conditioning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 404–420.
42.
SweldensS.Van OsselaerS. M. J.JaniszewkiC. (2010). Evaluative conditioning procedures and the resilience of conditioned brand attitudes. Journal of consumer Research, 37, 473–489.
43.
VermeulenN.LuminetO.CorneilleO. (2006). Alexithymia and the automatic processing of affective information: Evidence from the affective priming paradigm. Cognition and Emotion, 20, 64–91.
44.
WaltherE. (2002). Guilty by mere association: Evaluative conditioning and the spreading attitude effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 919–934.
