Self-control allows people to curb destructive behavior and behave more pro-socially in relationships. Thus, individuals generally trust partners with high dispositional self-control more. However, it is not clear whether partner self-control influences individuals’ responses to acutely risky situations, such as when partners are rejecting. A daily diary study of married and cohabiting couples examined whether actors with high self-control partners behave less self-protectively in risky situations. On days partners were highly rejecting, actors were less likely to retaliate against and more likely to value high self-control partners. On days after partners had been rejecting, actors also reported that high self-control partners behaved more responsively. Actors also trusted partners with high self-control more regardless of risk. Taken together, our findings suggest that partners’ greater self-control may help foster more positive interaction cycles in romantic relationships.
BarnettR. C.MarshallN. L.RaudenbushS. W.BrennanR. T. (1993). Gender and the relationship between job experiences and psychological distress: A study of dual earner couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 794–806.
2.
BarnettR. C.RaudenbushS. W.BrennanR. T.PleckJ. H.MarshallN. L. (1995). Change in job and marital experiences and change in psychological distress: A longitudinal study of dual-earner couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 839–850.
3.
BaumeisterR. F.BratslavskyE.MuravenM.TiceD. M. (1998). Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource?Journal of Personality and Social Psychlogy, 74, 1252–1265.
4.
BaumeisterR. F.VohsK. D. (2007). Self-regulation, ego depletion, and motivation. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 1, 115–128.
5.
CollinsN. L.ReadS. J. (1990). Adult attachment, working models, and relationship quality in dating couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 644–663.
6.
DeHueF. M. J.McClintockC. G.LiebrandW. B. G. (1993). Social value related response latencies: Unobtrustive evidence for individual differences in information processing. European Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 273–293.
7.
DeWallC. N.BaumeisterR. F.GailliotM. T.ManerJ. K. (2008). Depletion makes the heart grow less helpful: Helping as a function of self-regulatory energy genetic relatedness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1653–1662.
8.
FeeneyB.CollinsN. (2001). Predictors of caregiving in adult intimate relationships: An attachment theoretical perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 972–994.
9.
FinkelE. J.CampbellW. K. (2001). Self-control and accommodation in close relationships: An interdependence analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 263–277.
10.
FinkelE. J.DeWallC. N.SlotterE. B.OatenM.FosheeV. A. (2009). Self-regulatory failure and intimate partner violence perpetration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 483–499.
11.
GoldsteinH.RasbashJ.PlewisI.DraperD.BrownW.YangM.HealyM. (1998). A user’s guide to MlwiN. London, UK: Multilevel Models Project, Institute of Education, University of London.
12.
GomillionS.MurrayS. L. (2014). Shifting dependence: The influence of partner instrumentality and self-esteem on responses to interpersonal risk. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 57–69.
13.
GriffinD.RossL. (1991). Subjective construal, social inference, and human misunderstanding. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 319–359). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
14.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis a regression-based approach. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
15.
HeathertonT. F.VohsK. D. (1998). Why is it so difficult to inhibit behavior?Psychological Inquiry, 9, 212–216.
16.
KelleyH. H. (1979). Personal relationships: Their structures and processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17.
KennyD. A. (1996). Models of non-independence in dyadic research. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 13, 279–294.
18.
LuchiesL. B.FinkelE. J.FitzsimonsG. M. (2011). The effects of self-regulatory strength, content, and strategies on close relationships. Journal of Personality, 79, 1251–1279.
19.
MurrayS. L.BellaviaG.RoseP.GriffinD. (2003). Once hurt, twice hurtful: How perceived regard regulates daily marital interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 126–147.
20.
MurrayS. L.GomillionS.HolmesJ. G.HarrisB.LamarcheV. (2013). The dynamics of relationship promotion: Controlling the automatic inclination to trust. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 305–334.
21.
MurrayS. L.HolmesJ. G.CollinsN. L. (2006). Optimizing assurance: The risk regulation system in relationships. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 641–666.
22.
MurrayS. L.HolmesJ. G.GriffinD. W.BellaviaG.RoseP. (2001). The mismeasure of love: How self-doubt contaminates relationship beliefs. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 423–436.
23.
MurrayS. L.PinkusR.Holmes J. G.HarrisB.GomillionS.AloniM.DerrickJ. L.LederS. (2011). Signaling when (and when not) to be cautious and self-protective: Impulsive and reflective trust in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 485–502.
24.
MurrayS. L.RoseP.BellaviaG.HolmesJ.KuscheA. (2002). When rejection stings: How self-esteem constrains relationship-enhancement processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 556–573.
25.
OverallN. C.SibleyC. G. (2009). Attachment and dependence regulation within daily interactions with romantic partners. Personal Relationships, 16, 239–261.
26.
PeetzJ.KammrathL. (2011). Only because I love you: Why people make and why they break promises in romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 887–904.
27.
PronkT. M.KarremansJ. C.WigboldusD. H. J. (2011). How can you resist? Executive control helps romantically involved individuals to stay faithful. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 827–837.
28.
RaudenbushS.W.BrennanR. T.BarnettR. C. (1995). A multivariate hierarchical model for studying psychological change within married couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 9, 161–174.
29.
RighettiF.FinkenauerC. (2011). If you are able to control yourself, I will trust you: The role of perceived self-control in interpersonal trust. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 874–886.
30.
RosenbergM. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
31.
RusbultC. E.MartzJ. M.AgnewC. R. (1998). The investment model scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5, 357–391.
32.
RusbultC. E.VeretteJ.WhitneyG. A.SlovikL. F.LipkusI. (1991). Accommodation processes in close relationships: Theory and preliminary empirical evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 53–78.
33.
RydellR. J.GawronskiB. (2009). I like you, I like you not: Understanding the formation of context-dependent automatic attitudes. Cognition & Emotion, 23, 1118–1152.
34.
TangneyJ. P.BaumeisterR. F.BooneA. L. (2004). High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. Journal of Personality, 72, 271–322.
35.
YovetichN. A.RusbultC. E. (1994). Accommodative behavior in close relationships: Exploring transformation of motivation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 138–164.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
