The current research investigates people’s attitudes toward an ambiguous situation of police violence against a woman suspect. We hypothesize that the suspect’s race and participants’ ambivalent sexism, particularly benevolent sexism, will jointly inform perceptions of the suspect’s femininity, and in turn, perceptions of the suspect’s pain, judgments of who is to blame, and perceptions the officer was justified in using force against the suspect. Across two studies, we found support for our hypotheses: participants who reported more benevolent sexism thought the suspect were more feminine, but this association was only present when the suspect was White, as opposed to Black. Perceived femininity, in turn, predicted perceptions the suspect felt more pain, was less blameworthy for the situation, and perceptions that the officer’s use of force was less justified (Study 2).
BemS. L. (1993). The lenses of gender: Transforming the debate on sexual inequality. Yale University Press.
2.
BoskinJ. (1986). Sambo: The rise and demise of an American jester. Oxford University Press.
3.
ConnorR. A.GlickP.FiskeS. T. (2017). Ambivalent sexism in the twenty-first century. In SibleyC. G.BarlowF. K. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of the psychology of prejudice (pp. 295–320). Cambridge University Press.
4.
CooleyE.LeiR.Brown-IannuzziJ. L.EllerkampT. (2019). Personal prejudice, other guilt: explicit prejudice toward black people predicts guilty verdicts for white officers who kill black men. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45, 754–766.
5.
CrenshawK. W. (2011). From private violence to mass incarceration: Thinking intersectionally about women, race, and social control. UCLA Law Review, 59, 1418.
DavisG. L.CrossH. J. (1979). Sexual stereotyping of Black males in interracial sex. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 8, 269–279.
8.
DonovanR. A.WestL. M. (2015). Stress and mental health: Moderating role of the strong Black woman stereotype. Journal of Black Psychology, 41(4), 384–396.
9.
EdwardsF.LeeH.EspositoM. (2019). Risk of being killed by police use of force in the United States by age, race–ethnicity, and sex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116, 16793–16798.
10.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA. G.BuchnerA. (2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191.
11.
GlickP.DieboldJ.Bailey-WernerB.ZhuL. (1997). The two faces of Adam: Ambivalent sexism and polarized attitudes toward women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1323–1334.
12.
GlickP.FiskeS. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512.
13.
GlickP.FiskeS. T. (1997). Hostile and benevolent sexism: Measuring ambivalent sexist attitudes toward women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(1), 119–135.
14.
GlickP.RabergL. (2018). Benevolent sexism and the status of women. In TravisC. B.WhiteJ. W.RutherfordA.WilliamsW. S.CookS. L.WycheK. F. (Eds.), APA handbooks in psychology. APA handbook of the psychology of women: History, theory, and battlegrounds (pp. 363–380). American Psychological Association.
15.
GlickP.Sakalli-UğurluN.FerreiraM. C.de SouzaM. A. (2002). Ambivalent sexism and attitudes toward wife abuse in Turkey and Brazil. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 292–297.
16.
GoffP. A.ThomasM. A.JacksonM. C. (2008). “Ain’t I a woman?”: Towards an intersectional approach to person perception and group-based harms. Sex Roles, 59, 392–403.
17.
HayesA. F. (2015). An index and test of linear moderated mediation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50, 1–22.
18.
HayesA. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford publications.
19.
HenryP. J.SearsD. O. (2002). The symbolic racism 2000 scale. Political Psychology, 23, 253–283.
20.
HidegI.FerrisD. L. (2016). The compassionate sexist? How benevolent sexism promotes and undermines gender equality in the workplace. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111, 706.
21.
HoffmanK. M.TrawalterS.AxtJ. R.OliverM. N. (2016). Racial bias in pain assessment and treatment recommendations, and false beliefs about biological differences between blacks and whites. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113, 4296–4301.
22.
HullG. T.Bell ScottP.SmithB. (1982). But some of us are brave: All the women are White, all the Blacks are men: Black women’s studies. Feminist.
23.
JewellS. K. (1993). From mammy to Miss America and beyond: Cultural images and the shaping of US policy. Routledge.
24.
KatzJ.MerrileesC.HoxmeierJ. C.MotisiM. (2017). White female bystanders’ responses to a black woman at risk for incapacitated sexual assault. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 41, 273–285.
25.
KatzJ.MerrileesC.LaRoseJ.EdigingtonC. (2018). White female bystanders’ responses to a black woman at risk for sexual assault: Associations with attitudes about sexism and racial injustice. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment, & Trauma, 27, 444–459.
26.
McMahonJ. M.KahnK. B. (2016). Benevolent racism? The impact of target race on ambivalent sexism. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 19(2), 169–183.
27.
MyersC. D.RobinsonM. E.RileyJ. L.IIISheffieldD. (2001). Sex, gender, and blood pressure: Contributions to experimental pain report. Psychosomatic Medicine, 63, 545–550.
28.
PlantE. A.DevineP. G. (1998). Internal and external motivation to respond without prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 811.
29.
PlousS.WilliamsT. (1995). Racial stereotypes from the days of American slavery: A continuing legacy. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 795–817.
RolleroC.GlickP.TartagliaS. (2014). Psychometric properties of short versions of the ambivalent sexism inventory and ambivalence toward men inventory. Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 21, 149–159.
32.
SakalliN. (2001). Beliefs about wife beating among Turkish college students: The effects of patriarchy, sexism, and sex differences. Sex Roles, 44, 599–610.
33.
ShepherdM.ErchullM. J.RosnerA.TaubenbergerL.QueenE. F.McKeeJ. (2011). “I’ll get that for you”: The relationship between benevolent sexism and body self-perceptions. Sex Roles, 64, 1–8.
WandnerL. D.ScipioC. D.HirshA. T.TorresC. A.RobinsonM. E. (2012). The perception of pain in others: How gender, race, and age influence pain expectations. The Journal of Pain: Official Journal of the American Pain Society, 13(3), 220–227.
36.
WiseE. A.PriceD. D.MyersC. D.HeftM. W.RobinsonM. E. (2002). Gender role expectations of pain: Relationship to experimental pain perception. Pain, 96, 335–342.
37.
WyattJ. (2008). Patricia Hill Collin’s black sexual politics and the genealogy of the strong black woman. Studies in Gender & Sexuality, 9, 52–67.
38.
YamawakiN. (2007). Rape perception and the function of ambivalent sexism and gender-role traditionality. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22, 406–423.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
