The purpose of this meta-analysis was to provide a comprehensive quantitative review of research to date on the antecedents of psychological and organizational safety climate. Building upon and expanding Zohar’s conceptual model, antecedents were organized into three broad categories: situational factors, interpersonal interactions, and personal factors. Data were gleaned from 136 primary studies to calculate effect sizes for 38 antecedents and the relative importance of each antecedent within the three categories. Antecedent effect sizes were generally homologous for psychological and organizational safety climate, with the strongest effect sizes for interpersonal interactions followed by organizational climate and leadership. The magnitude of the safety climate antecedent effect sizes tended to be stronger in health-care industry studies and varied inconsistently as a function of the industry-specific nature of the safety climate measure. This meta-analysis provides a much needed summary of the research to date in an effort to guide future research and practice on the development and improvement of safety climate in organizations.
AshforthB. E. (1985). Climate formation: Issues and extensions. Academy of Management Review, 10, 837–847. doi:10.5465/AMR.1985.4279106
2.
BarlingJ.LoughlinC.KellowayE. K. (2002). Development and test of a model linking safety-specific transformational leadership and occupational safety. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 488. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.87.3.488
3.
BassB. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York, NY: Free Press.
4.
BeusJ. M.DhananiL. Y.McCordM. A. (2015). A meta-analysis of personality and workplace safety: Addressing unanswered questions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 481–498. doi:10.1037/a0037916
5.
BeusJ. M.McCordM. A.ZoharD. (2016). Workplace safety: A review and research synthesis. Organizational Psychology Review, 6, 352–381. doi:10.1177/2041386615626243
6.
BeusJ. M.MuñozG. J.ArthurW. (2015). Personality as a multilevel predictor of climate: An examination in the domain of workplace safety. Group & Organization Management, 40, 625–656. doi:10.1177/1059601115576597
7.
BeusJ. M.PayneS. C.ArthurW.Jr.MuñozG. J. (2019). The development and validation of a cross-industry safety climate measure: Resolving conceptual and operational issues. Journal of Management, 45, 1987–2013. doi:10.1177/0149206317745596
8.
BeusJ. M.PayneS. C.BergmanM. E.ArthurW. E.Jr. (2010). Safety climate and injuries: An examination of theoretical and empirical relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 713–727. doi:10.1037/a0019164
9.
BlieseP. D.HalversonR. R. (1998). Group size and measures of group-level properties: An examination of eta-squared and ICC values. Journal of Management, 24, 157–172. doi:10.1177/014920639802400202
10.
BonoJ. E.JudgeT. A. (2004). Personality and transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 901–910. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.901
11.
BorensteinM.HedgesL. V.HigginsJ. P.RothsteinH. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. Chicago, IL: John Wiley & Sons.
12.
BoscoF. A.UggerslevK. L.SteelP. (2017). MetaBUS as a vehicle for facilitating meta-analysis. Human Resource Management Review, 27, 237–254. doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.09.013
13.
BrownA. D. (2000). Making sense of inquiry sensemaking. Journal of Management Studies, 37, 45–75. doi:10.1111/1467-6486.00172
14.
ChenG.BlieseP. D.MathieuJ. E. (2005). Conceptual framework and statistical procedures for delineating and testing multilevel theories of Homology. Organizational Research Methods, 8, 375–409. doi:10.1177/1094428105280056
15.
ChristianM. S.BradleyJ. C.WallaceJ. C.BurkeM. J. (2009). Workplace safety: A meta-analysis of the roles of person and situation factors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1103–1127. doi:10.1037/a0016172
16.
ClarkeS. (2010). An integrative model of safety climate: Linking psychological climate and work attitudes to individual safety outcomes using meta-analysis. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 553–578. doi:10.1348/096317909x452122
17.
ClarkeS. (2013). Safety leadership: A meta-analytic review of transformational and transactional leadership styles as antecedents of safety behaviours. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 86, 22–49. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8325.2012.02064.x/full
18.
CuiL.FanD.FuG.ZhuC. J. (2013). An integrative model of organizational safety behavior. Journal of Safety Research, 45, 37–46. doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2013.01.001
19.
DemeroutiE.BakkerA. B.NachreinerF.SchaufeliW. B. (2001). The job demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 499–512. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.86.3.499
20.
DeJoyD. M.SchafferB. S.WilsonM. G.VandenbergR. J.ButtsM. M. (2004). Creating safer workplaces: Assessing the determinants and role of safety climate. Journal of Safety Research, 35, 81–90. doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2003.09.018
21.
DieneschR. M.LidenR. C. (1986). Leader-member exchange model of leadership: A critique and further development. Academy of Management Review, 11, 618–634. doi:10.5465/AMR.1986.4306242
22.
DuvalS. J.TweedieR. L. (2000a). Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56, 455–463.
23.
DuvalS. J.TweedieR. L. (2000b). A nonparametric “trim and fill” method of accounting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95, 89–98. doi:10.1080/01621459.2000.10473905
24.
EggerM.SmithG. D.SchneiderM.MinderC. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. British Medical Journal, 315, 629–634. doi:10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629
25.
FlinnR.MearnsK.O’ConnorP.BrydenR. (2000). Measuring safety climate: Identifying the common features. Safety Science, 34, 177–192. doi:10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00012-6
26.
GhiselliE. E.CampbellJ. P.ZedeckS. (1981). Measurement theory for the behavioral sciences. San Francisco, CA: W.H. Freeman. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00142-9
27.
GilsonL. (2003). Trust and the development of health care as a social institution. Social Science & Medicine, 56, 1453–1468. doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(02)00142-9
28.
González-RomáV.PeiróJ. M.TorderaN. (2002). An examination of the antecedents and moderator influences of climate strength. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 465–473. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.465
29.
GriffinM. A.NealA. (2000). Perceptions of safety at work: A framework for linking safety climate to safety performance, knowledge, and motivation. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5, 347–358. doi:10.1037fl1076-8998.5.3.347
30.
HeQ.DongS.RoseT.LiH.YinQ.CaoD. (2016). Systematic impact of institutional pressures on safety climate in the construction industry. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 93, 230–239. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2015.11.034
31.
HigginsJ. P. T.ThompsonS. G.DeeksJ. J.AltmanD. G. (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analysis. British Medical Journal, 327, 557–560.
32.
HofmannD. A.MorgesonF. P.GerrasS. J. (2003). Climate as a moderator of the relationship between leader-member exchange and content specific citizenship: Safety climate as an exemplar. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 170–178. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.1.170
33.
HuangY.ZoharD.RobertsonM. M.GarabetA.LeeJ.MurphyL. A. (2013). Development and validation of safety climate scales for lone workers using truck drivers as exemplar - transport research international documentation. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 17, 5–19. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2012.08.011
34.
HuangY. H.ZoharD.RobertsonD.LeeJ. (2012). Development and validation of safety climate scales for the trucking industry. Hopkinton, MA: LM Research Institute for Safety. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2013.09.005
35.
JiangL.LavaysseL. M.ProbstT. M. (2018). Safety climate and safety outcomes: A meta-analytic comparison of universal vs. industry-specific safety climate predictive validity. Work & Stress, 33, 41–57. doi:10.1080/02678373.2018.1457737
36.
JohnsonJ. W.LeBretonJ. M. (2004). History and use of relative importance indices in organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 7, 238–257. doi:10.1177/1094428104266510
37.
KeiserN. L.PayneS. C. (2018). Safety climate measurement: An empirical test of context-specific vs. general assessments. Journal of Business and Psychology, 33, 479–494. doi:10.1007/s10869-017-9504-y
38.
KellowayE. K.BarlingJ. (2010). Leadership development as an intervention in occupational health psychology. Work & Stress, 24, 260–279. doi:10.1080/02678373.2010.518441
39.
KellowayE. K.MullenJ.FrancisL. (2006). Divergent effects of transformational and passive leadership on employee safety. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 11, 76–86. doi:10.1037/1076-8998.11.1.76
40.
KepesS.BanksG. C.McDanielM.WhetzelD. L. (2012). Publication bias in the organizational sciences. Organizational Research Methods, 15, 624–662. doi:10.1177/1094428112452760
41.
KepesS.McDanielM. A. (2015). The validity of conscientiousness is overestimated in the prediction of job performance. PLoS One, 10, e0141468. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0141468
42.
KleinK. J.KozlowskiS. W. J. (2000). From micro to meso: Critical steps in conceptualizing and conducting multilevel research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 211–236. doi:10.1177/109442810033001
43.
KrasikovaD. V.GreenS. G.LeBretonJ. M. (2013). Destructive leadership: A theoretical review, integration, and future research agenda. Journal of Management, 39, 1308–1338. doi:10.1177/0149206312471388.
44.
LandisR. S. (2013). Successfully combining meta-analysis and structural equation modeling: Recommendations and strategies. Journal of Business and Psychology, 28, 251–261. doi:10.1007/s10869-013-9285-x
45.
LewinK.LippittR.WhiteR. K. (1939). Patterns of aggressive behavior in experimentally created “Social Climates”. The Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 269–299. doi:10.1080/00224545.1939.9713366
LidenR. C.GraenG. (1980). Generalizability of the vertical dyad linkage model of leadership. Academy of Management Journal, 23, 451–465. doi:10.2307/255511
48.
LindellM. K.BrandtC. J. (2000). Climate quality and climate consensus as mediators of the relationship between organizational antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 331–348. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.85.3.331
49.
ListS. K.KepesS.McDanielM. A.MacDanielX. (2018, August). Assessing the trustworthiness of our cumulative knowledge in learning, behavior, and performance. Paper presented at the Academy of Management conference, Chicago, IL.
50.
McCraeR. R.CostaP. T.Jr. (1999). A five-factor theory of personality. In LawrenceL. A.JohnO. P. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 139–153). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
51.
McFaddenK. L.StockG. N.GowenC. R.III (2015). Leadership, safety climate, and continuous quality improvement: Impact on process quality and patient safety. Health Care Management Review, 40, 24–34. doi:10.1097/HMR.0000000000000006
52.
MeyerR. D.DalalR. S.BonaccioS. (2009). A meta-analytic investigation into the moderating effects of situational strength on the conscientiousness-performance relationship. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 1077–1102. doi:10.1002/job.60
53.
MullenJ. E.KellowayE. K. (2009). Safety leadership: A longitudinal study of the effects of transformational leadership on safety outcomes. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 82, 253–272. doi:10.1348/096317908X325313
54.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998-2011). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
55.
NahrgangJ. D.MorgesonF. P.HofmannD. A. (2011). Safety at work: A meta-analytic investigation of the link between job demands, job resources, burnout, engagement, and safety outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 71–94. doi:10.1037/a0021484
56.
NealA.GriffinM. A. (2004). Safety climate and safety at work. In J. Barling & M. R. Frone (Eds.), The psychology of workplace safety (pp. 15–34). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Retrieved fromhttp://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/2003-88217-002
57.
NealA.GriffinM.HartP. (2000). The impact of organizational climate on safety climate and individual behavior. Safety Science, 34, 99–109. doi:10.1016/s0925-7535(00)00008-4
58.
NewnamS.GriffinM. A.MasonC. (2008). Safety in work vehicles: A multilevel study linking safety values and individual predictors to work-related driving crashes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 632–644. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.632
59.
OrwinR. G.VeveaJ. L. (2009). Evaluating coding decisions. In CooperH.HedgesL. V.ValentineJ. C. (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (pp. 177–203). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
60.
OstroffC.KinickiA. J.TamkinsM. M. (2003). Organizational culture and climate. In BormanW. C.IlgenD. R. (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 565–593). New York, NY: John Wiley. doi:10.1002/0471264385.wei1222
61.
PetersJ. L.SuttonA. J.JonesD. R.AbramsK. R.RushtonL. (2007). Performance of the trim and fill method in the presence of publication bias and between-study heterogeneity. Statistics in Medicine, 26, 4544–4562. doi:10.1002/sim.2889
62.
PhippsD. L.MalleyC.AshcroftD. M. (2012). Job characteristics and safety climate: The role of effort-reward and demand-control-support models. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 17, 279–289. doi:10.1037/a0028675
63.
RajuN. S.BrandP. A. (2003). Determining the significance of correlations corrected for unreliability and range restriction. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 52–71. doi:10.1177/0146621602239476
64.
RajuN. S.BurkeM. J.NormandJ.LandisG. M. (1991). A new meta-analytic approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 432–446. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.76.3.432
65.
ReichersA. E.SchneiderB. (1990). Climate and culture: An evolution of constructs. In SchneiderB. (Ed.), Organizational climate and culture (pp. 5–39). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
66.
SalancikG. R.PfefferJ. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 224–253. doi:10.2307/2392563
67.
SchmidtF.HunterJ. (2015). Methods of meta-analysis. London: SAGE.
68.
SchmidtF. L.HunterJ. E. (2016). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
69.
SchneiderB. (1987). The people make the place. Personnel Psychology, 40, 437–453. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1987.tb00609.x
70.
SchneiderB.EhrhartM. G.MaceyW. H. (2013). Organizational climate and culture. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 361–388. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143809
71.
SchneiderB.GoldsteinH. W.SmithD. B. (1995). The ASA framework: An update. Personnel Psychology, 48, 747–773. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01780.x
72.
SchneiderB.Gonzáles-RomáV.OstroffC.WestM. A. (2017). Organizational climate and culture: Reflections on the history of the constructs in JAP. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102, 468–482. doi:10.1037/apl0000090
73.
SchneiderB.SalvaggioA. N.SubiratsM. (2002). Climate strength: A new direction for climate research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 220–229. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.87.2.220
74.
SeersA. (1989). Team-member exchange quality: A new construct for role-making research. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43, 118–135. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(89)90060-5
75.
ShenY.TuuliM. M.XiaB.KohT. Y.RowlinsonS. (2015). Toward a model for forming psychological safety climate in construction project management. International Journal of Project Management, 33, 223–235. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.04.009
76.
SitkinS. B.PabloA. L. (1992). Reconceptualizing the determinants of risk behavior. The Academy of Management Review, 17, 9–38. doi:10.5465/amr.1992.4279564
77.
SquiresM.TourangeauA.LaschingerH. K. S.DoranD. (2010). The link between leadership and safety outcomes in hospitals. Journal of Nursing Management, 18, 914–925. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2834.2010.01181.x
78.
SterneJ. A. C.EggerM.MoherD. (2008). Addressing reporting biases. In HigginsJ. P. T.SallyG. (Eds.), Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions (pp. 297–333). West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
79.
TakalaJ.HämäläinenP.SaarelaK. L.YunL. Y.ManickamK.JinT. W.…LinG. S. (2014). Global estimates of the burden of injury and illness at work in 2012. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 11, 326–337. doi:10.1080/15459624.2013.863131
80.
TonidandelS.LeBretonJ. M. (2011). Relative importance analysis: A useful supplement to regression analysis. Journal of Business and Psychology, 26, 1–9. doi:10.1007/s10869-010-9204-3
Van der LindenD.Te NijenhuisJ.BakkerA. B. (2010). The general factor of personality: A meta-analysis of Big Five intercorrelations and a criterion-related validity study. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 315–327. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2010.03.003
83.
ViechtbauerW. (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36, 1–48. Retrieved fromhttp://www.jstatsoft.org/v36/i03/
84.
ViswesvaranC.OnesD. S. (1995). Theory testing: Combining psychometric meta-analysis and structural equations modeling. Personnel Psychology, 48, 865–885. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01784.x
85.
WalumbwaF. O.HartnellC. A. (2011). Understanding transformational leadership-employee performance links: The role of relational identification and self-efficacy. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 84, 153–172. doi:10.1348/096317910X485818
86.
WatsonG. W.ScottD.BishopJ.TurnbeaughT. (2005). Dimensions of interpersonal relationships and safety in the steel industry. Journal of Business and Psychology, 19, 303–318. doi:10.1007/s10869-004-2230-2
87.
WeickK. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. London, UK: Sage.
88.
WeymanA. K.ClarkeD. D. (2003). Investigating the influence of organizational role on perceptions of risk in deep coal mines. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 404–412. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.404
89.
WilsonD. B.LipseyM. W. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
90.
ZoharD. (1980). Safety climate in industrial organizations: Theoretical and applied implications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 96–102. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.65.1.96
91.
ZoharD. (2002). Modifying supervisory practices to improve subunit safety: A leadership-based intervention model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 156–163. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.1.156
92.
ZoharD. (2003). Safety climate: Conceptual and measurement issues. In QuickJ. C.TetrickL. E (Ed.), Handbook of occupational health psychology (pp. 123–142). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/10474-006
93.
ZoharD. (2008). Safety climate and beyond: A multi-level multi-climate framework. Safety Science, 46, 376–387. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2007.03.006
94.
ZoharD. (2011). Safety climate: Conceptualization, measurement, and improvement. In QuickJ. C.TetrickL. E. (Eds.), Handbook of occupational health psychology (2nd ed., pp. 141–164). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/10474-006
95.
ZoharD.HuangY. H.LeeJ.RobertsonM. (2014). A mediation model linking dispatcher leadership and work ownership with safety climate as predictors of truck driver safety performance. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 62, 17–25. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2013.09.005
96.
ZoharD.LuriaG. (2004). Climate as a social-cognitive construction of a supervisory safety practices: Scripts as a proxy of behavior patterns. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 322–333. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.2.322
97.
ZoharD.LuriaG. (2005). A multilevel model of safety climate: Cross-level relationships between organization and group-level climates. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 616–628. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.4.616
98.
ZoharD.PolachekT. (2014). Discourse-based intervention for modifying supervisory communication as leverage for safety climate and performance improvement: A randomized field study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99, 113–124. doi:10.1037/a0034096
99.
ZoharD.Tenne-GazitO. (2008). Transformational leadership and group interaction as climate antecedents: A social network analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 744–757.doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.4.744.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
