Given the prevalence of social network sites (SNS) uptake among college students, and Facebook use in particular, we seek to understand the variety of ways in which Facebook is embedded in the routine, everyday lives of undergraduates. In addition to Facebook use, we aim to shed light on non-use; why do some American undergraduates choose to use Facebook sparingly, or not at all? Our findings indicate that while the majority of students were frequent Facebook users, they sought control over their Facebook use by articulating a moral space of norms governing interactions with parents, friends, and strangers; through selective and temporary de-domestication of the technology; and through non-use.
AcquistiAGrossR (2006) Imagined communities: Awareness, information sharing, and privacy on the Facebook. In: GollePDanezisG (eds) Proceedings of 6th Workshop on Privacy Enhancing Technologies, Cambridge: Robinson College, pp. 36–58.
2.
BallHWanzerMServossT (2013) Parent-child communication on Facebook: Family communication patterns and young adults’ decisions to ‘friend’ parents. Communication Quarterly61(5): 615–629.
3.
BakardjievaM (2010) The Internet in everyday life: Exploring the tenets and contributions of diverse approaches. In: BurnettRConsalvoMEssC (eds) The Handbook of Internet Studies, Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 59–82.
4.
BarkuusLTashiroJ (2010) Student socialization in the age of Facebook. In: Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York: ACM Press, pp. 133–142.
5.
BerkerTHartmannMPunieY (2005) Introduction. In: BerkerTHartmannMPunieY (eds) Domestication of Media and Technology, Berkshire, UK: Open University Press, pp. 1–16.
6.
BolgerNDavisARafaeliE (2003) Diary methods: Capturing life as it is lived. Annual Review of Psychology54: 579–616.
7.
BoschT (2009) Using online social networking for teaching and learning: Facebook use at the University of Cape Town. Communication: South African Journal for Communication Theory and Research35(2): 185–200.
8.
boyddHargittaiE (2010) Facebook privacy settings: Who cares?. First Monday15(8): 1–24.
9.
DebatinBLovejoyJHornA-K (2009) Facebook and online privacy: Attitudes, behaviors, and unintended consequences. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication15: 83–108.
10.
Duggan M, Ellison N, Lampe C, et al. (2015) Social media update. Report, Pew Research Center, Washington, DC, June.
11.
EllisonNSteinfieldCLampeC (2007) The benefits of Facebook ‘friends:’ Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication12(3): 1143–1168.
12.
EllisonNSteinfieldCLampeC (2011) Connection strategies: Social implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices. New Media & Society13(6): 873–892.
13.
GershunyJSullivanO (1998) The sociological uses of time-use diary analysis. European Sociological Review14(1): 69–85.
14.
GlaserBStraussA (1967) Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research, Chicago: Aldine Transaction.
15.
HaddonL (2006) The contribution of domestication research to in-home computing and media consumption. The Information Society22: 195–203.
16.
HaddonL (2011) Domestication analysis, objects of study, and the centrality of technologies in everyday life. Canadian Journal of Communication36: 311–323.
17.
HartmannM (2005) The discourse of the perfect future – Young people and new technologies. In: SilverstoneR (ed.) Media, Technology and Everyday Life in Europe, Aldershot, UK: Ashgate, pp. 141–158.
18.
HarveyA (1999) Guidelines for time use data collection and analysis. In: PentlandWHarveyALawtonM (eds) Time Use Research in the Social Sciences, New York: Kluwer Academic, pp. 19–46.
19.
JenkinsH (2006) Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21st Century, Chicago: The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation.
20.
JuncoR (2012) The relationship between frequency of Facebook use, participation in Facebook activities, and student engagement. Computers & Education58: 162–171.
21.
JuncoR (2015) Student class standing, Facebook use, and academic performance. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology36: 18–29.
22.
KalpidouMCostinDMorrisJ (2011) The relationship between Facebook and the well-being of undergraduate college students. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking14(4): 183–189.
23.
Karpinski A and Duberstein A (2009) A description of Facebook use and academic performance among undergraduate and graduate students. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
24.
LiuC-YYuC-P (2013) Can Facebook use induce well-being?. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking16(9): 674–678.
25.
LohnesSKinzerC (2007) Questioning assumptions about students' expectations for technology in college classrooms. Innovate3(5): 1–6. .
26.
Lohnes WatulakS (2012) ‘I’m not a computer person’: Negotiating participation in academic discourses. British Journal of Educational Technology43(1): 109–118. .
27.
MadgeCMeekJWellensJ (2009) Facebook, social integration, and informal learning at university: ‘It is more for socializing and talking to friends about work than for actually doing work.’. Learning, Media, & Technology34(2): 141–155.
28.
MancaSRanieriM (2013) Is it a tool suitable for learning? A critical review of the literature on Facebook as a technology-enhanced learning environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning29(6): 487–504.
29.
MarantoGBartonM (2010) Paradox and promise: MySpace, Facebook, and the sociopolitics of social networking in the writing classroom. Computers and Composition27(1): 36–47.
McLaughlinCVitakJ (2012) Norm evoluation and violation on Facebook. New Media & Society14(2): 299–315.
32.
MullenCFox HamiltonN (2016) Adolescents' response to parental Facebook friend requests: The comparative influence of privacy management, parent-child relational quality, attitude and peer influence. Computers in Human Behavior60: 165–172.
33.
MunozCTownerT (2009) Opening Facebook: How to use Facebook in the college classroom. In: GibsonI (eds) Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2009, Chesapeake, VA: AACE, pp. 2623–2627.
34.
OnwuegbuzieADickinsonWLeechN (2009) A qualitative framework for collecting and analyzing data in focus group research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods8(3): 1–21.
35.
OphusJAbbittJ (2009) Exploring the potential perceptions of social networking systems in university courses. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching5(4): 639–648.
36.
PasekJmoreeHargittaiE (2009) Facebook and academic performance: Reconciling a media sensation with data. First Monday14(5): 1–14.
37.
PempekTYermolayevaYCalvertS (2009) College students' social networking experiences of Facebook. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology30: 227–238.
38.
PunieYBogdanowiczMBergA-J (2005) Consumption and quality of life in a digital world. In: SilverstoneR (ed.) Media, Technology and Everyday Life in Europe, Aldershot, UK: Ashgate, pp. 93–106.
39.
RoblyerMDMcDanielMWebbM (2010) Findings on Facebook in higher education: A comparison of college faculty and student uses and perceptions of social networking sites. Internet and Higher Education13: 134–140.
40.
RogersE (2003) Diffusion of Innovations, (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.
41.
SelwynN (2009a) Faceworking: Exploring students' education-related use of Facebook. Learning, Media, & Technology34(2): 157–174.
42.
SelwynN (2009b) The digital native – Myth and reality. Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives61(4): 364–379.
43.
SilverstoneR (2005) Introduction. In: SilverstoneR (ed.) Media, Technology and Everyday Life in Europe, Aldershot, UK: Ashgate, pp. 1–18.
44.
SilverstoneRHirschEMorleyD (1992) Listening to a long conversation: An ethnographic approach to the study of information and communication technologies in the home. Cultural Studies5(2): 204–227.
45.
StutzmanFGrossRAcquisitiA (2012) Silent listeners: The evolution of privacy and disclosure on Facebook. Journal of Privacy and Confidentiality4(2): 7–41.
46.
SubrahmanyamKReichSWaechterN (2008) Online and offline social networks: Use of social networking sites by emerging adults. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology29: 420–433.
47.
TandocECFerrucciPDuffyM (2015) Facebook use, envy, and depression among college students: Is Facebooking depressing?. Computers in Human Behavior43: 139–146.
48.
TufeckiZ (2008) Can you see me now? Audience and disclosure regulation in online social network sites. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society28(1): 20–36.
49.
ValenzuelaSParkNLeeK (2009) Is there social capital in a social network site?: Facebook use and college students' life satisfaction, trust, and participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication14: 875–901.
50.
YangC-CBrownBBBraunMT (2014) From Facebook to cell calls: Layers of electronic intimacy in college students' interpersonal relationships. New Media & Society16(1): 5–23.
