This essay responds to David Harvey (2017, ‘Listen, Anarchist!’ a personal
response to Simon Springer’s ‘Why a radical geography must be anarchist’.
Dialogues in Human Geography) by proposing that Karl Marx
could be considered an anarchist. To make this argument, I draw on Kojin
Karatani’s Transcritique: On Kant and Marx (2005, Cambridge:
MIT Press).
GlassmanJ (1990) Radical Social Ecology and the
Interpretation of Modern US History. PhD
Dissertation, University of
Minnesota.
2.
HarveyD (2017) ‘Listen, Anarchist!’ a
personal response to Simon Springer’s ‘Why a radical geography must be
anarchist’. Dialogues in Human Geography7(3):
233–250.
3.
KarataniK (2005) Transcritique: On Kant and
Marx. Cambridge: MIT
Press.
4.
KarataniK (2014) The Structure of World History: From
Modes of Production to Modes of Exchange. Durham,
NC: Duke
University.
5.
KarataniKWainwrightJ (2012) ‘Critique is impossible
without moves’: an interview of Kojin Karatani by Joel
Wainwright. Dialogues in Human Geography2(30):
30–52.
6.
MannG (2014) It’s just not
true. Dialogues in Human Geography4(3):
271–275.
7.
MarxK (1976 [1848]) The
poverty of philosophy. In: Marx-Engels Collected
Works: Volume 6: Marx and Engels, 1845–1848. New
York: International
Publishers.
8.
MarxK (1977 [1867]) Capital Vol
I. New York:
Vintage.
9.
SpringerS (2014) Why a radical geography must
be anarchist. Dialogues in Human Geography4(3):
249–270.
10.
WainwrightJ (2016) The spatial structure of
world history. Journal of Japanese
Philosophy4: 33–59.
11.
YukiT (2013) Proudhon’s socialism and
Marx’s market theory: the theory of free credit and the theory of value
form. The Uno NewsletterII(13). Available at:http://unotheory.org/en/news_II_13 (accessed 24 August
2015).
