Engaging the ‘Geographies of Dissociation’ in the spirit of constructive dialogue and debate, this commentary recognizes its contributions and raises issues and questions relating to the potential and perils of pluralism, value, the material and the symbolic, and uneven geographical development and its politics. Building on the claim that pluralism needs to be a means to greater explanation and understanding rather than an end in and of itself, it argues for a more balanced culturally and politically grounded economic geography.
BarnesTSheppardE (2010) ‘Nothing includes everything’: towards engaged pluralism in Anglophone economic geography. Progress in Human Geography34(2): 193–214.
2.
BirchKSiemiatyckiM (2016) Neoliberalism and the geographies of marketisation: the entangling of states and markets. Progress in Human Geography40(2): 177–198.
3.
BridgeGBradshawM (2017) Making a global gas market: territoriality and production networks in liquefied natural gas. Economic Geography93(3): 215–240.
4.
HallS (2017) Regulating the geographies of market making: offshore Renminbi markets in London’s international financial district. Economic Geography94(3): 259–278.
IbertOHessMKleibertJ. (2019) Geographies of dissociation: value creation, ‘dark’ places, and ‘missing’ links. Dialogues in Human Geography9(1): 43–63.
7.
JonesA (2016) Geographies of production II: political economic geographies: A pluralist direction?Progress in Human Geography40(5): 697–706.
8.
PeckJ (2013) For Polanyian economic geographies. Environment and Planning A45(7): 1545–1568.
9.
PikeA (2015) Origination: The Geographies of Brands and Branding. Oxford: Wiley.
10.
PikeA (2017) Origination: a response to the reviews. Dialogues in Human Geography7(1): 112–115.
11.
PikeAMacKinnonDCumbersA. (2016) Doing evolution in economic geography. Economic Geography92(2): 123–144.
12.
SheppardE (2011) Geographical political economy. Journal of Economic Geography11(2): 319–331.
13.
SunleyP (2012) Inheritance or exchange? Pluralism and the relationships between economic geography and economics. In: BarnesTPeckJSheppardE (eds), The Wiley-Blackwell Companion to Economic Geography. Oxford: Wiley, pp. 581–593.
