The generous commentaries provided by Acker, Cresswell, Engelmann, and Nassar in response to my article, ‘Climate Geopoetics (The Earth is a Composted Poem)’, point to various potentialities for the geopoetic project upon and beyond the page. In this response, I focus on three threads woven through the commentaries: form, self, and potential.
AckerM (2021) Gesturing towards the common and the desperation: climate geopoetics’ potential. Dialogues in Human Geography11(1): 23–26.
2.
CresswellT (2021) Beyond geopoetics: for hybrid texts. Dialogues in Human Geography11(1): 36–39.
3.
EngelmannS (2021) Geopoetics: on organizing, mourning, and the incalculable. Dialogues in Human Geography11(1): 31–35.
4.
GhoshA (2016) The Great Derangement: Climate Change and the Unthinkable. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
5.
HulmeM (2017) Weathered: Cultures of Climate. London: Sage.
6.
MagraneE (2020) We need to go into this future armed with nature as our strongest ally. Writing Out of Time: Creative Writing and Climate Chaos, 2 June. Available at: https://writingoutoftime.weebly.com/home/a-poem-by-eric-magrane(accessed 14 December 2020).
7.
MagraneE (2021) Climate geopoetics (the earth is a composted poem). Dialogues in Human Geography11(1): 8–22.
8.
NassarA (2021) Geopoetics: storytelling against mastery. Dialogues in Human Geography11(1): 27–30.
Schneider-MayersonMWeik von MossnerAMałeckiWP (2020) Empirical ecocriticism: environmental texts and empirical methods. Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment (ISLE)27(2): 327–336.
