Ruez and Cockayne point out that queer theorist Eve Sedgwick’s reflections on paranoid and reparative readings accompanying one another came directly out of her queer political as well as textual practice in the U.S. Wrongly dismissed as mundane, this crucial contextualizing work is something geographers do especially well. Indeed, understanding the context for Sedgwick’s theories of paranoid and reparative reading is vital as we reflect on how her concepts travel across time and space.
AlfordCF (2001) Melanie Klein and Critical Social Theory: An Account of Politics, Art, and Reason Based on Her Psychoanalytic Theory. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
2.
AminK (2017) Disturbing Attachments: Genet, Modern Pederasty, and Queer History. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
3.
ButlerJ (1993) Against proper objects: introduction. Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies6(2–3): 1–26.
4.
DugganLMuñozJE (2009) Hope and hopelessness: a dialogue. Women & Performance: A Journal of Feminist Theory19(2): 275–283.
5.
EhrenreichB (2010) Bright-Sided: How the Relentless Promotion of Positive Thinking Has Undermined America. New York, NY: Picador.
6.
EngDL (2016) Colonial object relations. Social Text34(1): 1–19.
GeorgisD (2013) The Better Story: Queer Affects from the Middle East. Albany, GA: State University of New York Press.
9.
GilmoreRW (2007) Golden Gulag: Prisons, Surplus, Crisis, and Opposition in Globalizing California. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
10.
McKittrickK (2011) On plantations, prisons, and a black sense of place. Social & Cultural Geography12(8): 947–963.
11.
RuezDCockayneD (2021) Feeling otherwise: ambivalent affects and the politics of critique in geography. Dialogues in Human Geography11(1): 88–107.
12.
SedgwickEK (1997) Paranoid reading and reparative reading; or, you’re so paranoid, you probably think this introduction is about you. In: EveKS (ed), Novel Gazing: Queer Readings in Fiction. Durham, NC: Duke University press, pp. 1–37.
13.
SedgwickEK (2011) Melanie Klein and the difference affect makes. In: JanetHParkerA (eds) After Sex? On Writing Since Queer Theory. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 283–301.
