As environmental research increasingly values and foregrounds traditional knowledge in a reinvigorated participatory turn, many of the original problematics and harms re-emerge through ostensible collaborations with knowledge-holders. These issues are not just instances of ethical oversight; they are the result of ant logic: narrow, spatialized conceptualizations of power, knowledge, and death as contained and fixed within bodies and space and preoccupations with visibility that produces ontological conceptions of local communities, traditional knowledge-holders, state actors, and neoliberal forces. This article unwinds the tight Foucauldian grip with which environmental social sciences are held to reveal power, knowledge, and death as vibrant, immaterial actors and explores the role of ant logic as an actor itself. In doing so, another key environmental actor is uncovered, one who leverages the death-centric form of articulation to define power and knowledge: the necrolocutor.
AgambenG (1998) Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
2.
AgrawalA (1995) Dismantling the divide between indigenous and scientific knowledge. Development and change26(3): 413–439.
3.
AgrawalA (2005) Environmentality: Technologies of Government and the Making of Subjects. Ethics and International Affairs19(3).
4.
AlfordCF (2000) What would it matter if everything Foucault said about prison were wrong? ‘Discipline and punish’ after twenty years. Theory and Society29(1): 125–146.
5.
BennettJ (2004) The force of things: Steps toward an ecology of matter. Political Theory32(3): 347–372.
BessireL (2014) The rise of indigenous hypermarginality: Native culture as a neoliberal politics of life. Current Anthropology55(3): 276–295.
8.
BessireLBondD (2014) Ontological anthropology and the deferral of critique. American Ethnologist41(3): 440–456.
9.
BridgewaterPRotherhamID (2019) A critical perspective on the concept of biocultural diversity and its emerging role in nature and heritage conservation. People and Nature1(3): 291–304.
10.
CavanaghCJHimmelfarbD (2015) ‘Much in blood and money’: Necropolitical ecology on the margins of the Uganda protectorate. Antipode47(1): 55–73.
11.
CepekML (2011) Foucault in the forest: Questioning environmentality in Amazonia. American Ethnologist38(3): 501–515.
12.
ChalisseryJMRenyardAGriesR, et al. (2019) Ants sense, and follow, trail pheromones of ant community members. Insects10(11): 383.
13.
CookeBKothariU (2001) Participation: The new tyranny? In: CookeBKothariU (eds) Participation: The New Tyranny?London: Zed Books, 1–15.
14.
DeanM (2015) Foucault must not be defended. History and Theory54(3): 389–403.
15.
DeBoomMJ (2021) Climate necropolitics: Ecological civilization and the distributive geographies of extractive violence in the Anthropocene. Annals of the American Association of Geographers111(3): 900–912.
16.
DeleuzeG (1992) ‘Dispositifs’. In: ArmstrongTJ (ed) Michel Foucault, Philosopher: International Conference, Paris, 9, 10, 11, January 1988. New York: Routledge, 159–168.
17.
DemosTJ (2020) ‘Blackout: The necropolitics of extraction’. In: SteinbockEIevenBValckMd (eds) Art and Activism in the Age of Systemic Crisis: Aesthetic Resilience. New York: Routledge, 49–61.
18.
EldenStuart (2001) Mapping the Present : Heidegger, Foucault and the Project of a Spatial History. London, UK: Continuum.
19.
FanonF (1967) Black Skin, White Masks. New York: Grove Press.
20.
FitzmauriceS (2004) Subjectivity, intersubjectivity and the historical construction of interlocutor stance: From stance markers to discourse markers. Discourse Studies6(4): 427–448.
21.
FletcherR (2010) Neoliberal environmentality: Towards a poststructuralist political ecology of the conservation debate. Conservation and Society8(3): 171–181.
22.
FletcherR (2017) Environmentality unbound: Multiple governmentalities in environmental politics. Geoforum: Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences85: 311–315.
23.
FletcherRCortes-VazquezJA (2020) Beyond the green panopticon: New directions in research exploring environmental governmentality. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space3(2): 289–299.
24.
FoucaultM (1977) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (Alan Sheridan, Trans.). New York: Vintage Books.
25.
FoucaultM (1990) The History of Sexuality: The Will to Knowledge (Robert Hurley, Trans.). London: Penguin.
26.
FoucaultM. (1994) Power. London: Penguin UK.
27.
FoucaultM (2007) Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1977–78. Hampshire, UK/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
28.
FoucaultM (2008) The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–1979. Hampshire, UK/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
29.
Gay-AntakiM (2023) Embodied geographies of environmental justice: Toward the sovereign right to wholly inhabit oneself. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space6(4): 2379–2399.
30.
GibsonL (2020) Bycatch of the day: Wild meat consumption, ecological knowledge, and symbolic capital among indigenous maroon parrot hunters of Jamaica. Journal of Ethnobiology40(2): 167–182.
31.
GibsonL (2023) Plastic monsters: Abjection, worms, the Cthulhic, and the black single-use plastic bag. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space: 529–548.
32.
GopalP (2021) On decolonisation and the university. Textual Practice35(6): 873–899.
33.
GraeberD (2015) Radical alterity is just another way of saying ‘reality’: A reply to Eduardo Viveiros de Castro. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory5(2): 1–41.
34.
GroveK (2014) Biopolitics and adaptation: Governing socio-ecological contingency through climate change and disaster studies. Geography Compass8(3): 198–210.
35.
GuMD (2020) What is ‘decoloniality’? A postcolonial critique. Postcolonial Studies23(4): 596–600.
36.
HallS (1995) Negotiating Caribbean identities. New Left Review209: 3.
37.
HartAJacksonDE (2006) U-turns on ant pheromone trails. Current Biology16(2): R42–R43.
38.
HitomiMKLoringPA (2018) Hidden participants and unheard voices? A systematic review of gender, age, and other influences on local and traditional knowledge research in the north. FACETS3(1): 830–848.
39.
HollandSP (2000) Raising the Dead: Readings of Death and (Black) Subjectivity. Duke University Press.
40.
IgnatieffM (1981) State, civil society, and total institutions: A critique of recent social histories of punishment. Crime and Justice3: 153–192.
41.
JacksonDEChâlineN (2007) Modulation of pheromone trail strength with food quality in Pharaoh's ant, Monomorium pharaonis. Animal Behaviour74(3): 463–470.
42.
JonesALucinda MandaD (2006) Violence and ‘othering’ in colonial and postcolonial Africa. Case study: Banda’s Malaŵi. Journal of African Cultural Studies18(2): 197–213.
43.
KingA (2024) Disassembling the actant: A valediction to actor-network theory. Journal of Classical Sociology24(3): 272–294.
44.
KirschSMitchellD (2004) The nature of things: Dead labor, nonhuman actors, and the persistence of Marxism. Antipode36(4): 687–705.
45.
LaclauE (1994) The Making of Political Identities. London: Verso.
46.
LaclauEMouffeC (1985) Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.
47.
LatourB (2005) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
48.
LaurieNAndolinaRRadcliffeS (2005) Ethnodevelopment: Social movements, creating experts and professionalising indigenous knowledge in Ecuador. Antipode37(3): 470–496.
49.
LaveR (2012) Bridging political ecology and STS: A field analysis of the Rosgen wars. Annals of the Association of American Geographers102(2): 366–382.
50.
LiTM (2000) Articulating indigenous identity in Indonesia: Resource politics and the tribal slot. Comparative Studies in Society and History42(1): 149–179.
51.
LoftusA (2020) Political ecology II: Whither the state?Progress in Human Geography44(1): 139–149.
52.
LowePPhillipsonJWilkinsonK (2013) Why social scientists should engage with natural scientists. Contemporary Social Science8(3): 207–222.
53.
MarguliesJD (2019) Making the ‘man-eater’: Tiger conservation as necropolitics. Political Geography69: 150–161.
54.
MbembeA (2019) Necropolitics (Steven Corcoran, Trans.). Durham: Duke University Press.
55.
McKittrickK (2013) Plantation futures. Small Axe: A Caribbean Journal of Criticism17(3 (42)): 1–15.
56.
MillsT (2018) What has become of critique? Reassembling sociology after Latour. The British Journal of Sociology69(2): 286–305.
57.
MontesJTsheringSPhuntshoT, et al. (2020) Cosmological subjectivities exploring ‘truth’ environmentalities in the Haa highlands of Bhutan. Conservation & Society18(4): 355–365.
58.
MoosaviL (2020) The decolonial bandwagon and the dangers of intellectual decolonisation. International Review of Sociology30(2): 332–354.
MotenF (2008) The case of blackness. Criticism50(2): 177–218.
61.
MugfordSTMallonEBFranksNR (2001) The accuracy of Buffon’s needle: A rule of thumb used by ants to estimate area. Behavioral Ecology12(6): 655–658.
62.
NastHJ (2017) The body as ‘place’. In: Theory and Methods. Routledge, 539–562.
63.
NixonR (2011) Slow Violence and the Environmentalism of the Poor (Rob Nixon, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
64.
NorströmAVCvitanovicCLöfMF, et al. (2020) Principles for knowledge co-production in sustainability research. Nature Sustainability3(3): 182–190.
65.
OgraMV (2008) Human–wildlife conflict and gender in protected area borderlands: A case study of costs, perceptions, and vulnerabilities from Uttarakhand (Uttaranchal), India. Geoforum: Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences39(3): 1408–1422.
66.
PattersonO (1982) Slavery and Social Death: A Comparative Study. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
67.
PearceTFordJWilloxAC, et al. (2015) Inuit traditional ecological knowledge (TEK), subsistence hunting and adaptation to climate change in the Canadian Arctic. Arctic68(2): 233–245.
68.
PedersenDB (2016) Integrating social sciences and humanities in interdisciplinary research. Palgrave Communications2(1): 16036.
69.
ReidH (2016) Ecosystem- and community-based adaptation: Learning from community-based natural resource management. Climate and Development8(1): 4–9.
70.
Rodríguez CastroL (2021) Decolonial feminisms: Place, territory and the body-land. In: Decolonial Feminisms, Power and Place: Sentipensando with Rural Women in Colombia. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 33–58.
71.
RutherfordS (2007) Green governmentality: Insights and opportunities in the study of nature’s rule. Progress in Human Geography31(3): 291–307.
72.
SaguinKKAlvarezMK (2022) ‘Danger zones,’ ‘death zones,’ and paradoxes of infrastructural space-making in Manila. Journal of Urban Technology29(1): 145–152.
73.
SaidEW (1989) Representing the colonized: Anthropology’s interlocutors. Critical Inquiry15(2): 205–225.
74.
SandbrookC (2015) The social implications of using drones for biodiversity conservation. Ambio44(4): 636–647.
75.
SartreJ-P (2001) Colonialism and Neo-Colonizalism. London: Routledge.
76.
SextonJ (2016) The social life of social death: On afro-pessimism and black optimism. In: Time, Temporality and Violence in International Relations. Routledge, 61–75.
77.
SharpeC (2010) Monstrous Intimacies: Making Post-Slavery Subjects. Duke University Press.
SimpsonA (2007) On ethnographic refusal: Indigeneity, ‘voice’ and colonial citizenship. Junctures: The Journal for Thematic Dialogue9: 67–80.
80.
SimpsonA (2020) The sovereignty of critique. South Atlantic Quarterly119(4): 685–699.
81.
SpivakGC (1988) Can the Subaltern Speak? In: NelsonCGrossbergL (eds) Marxism and the interpretation of culture. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 271–313.
82.
StrathernM (2006) A community of critics? Thoughts on new knowledge*. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute12(1): 191–209.
StrathernM. (2022) Property, Substance, and Effect: Anthropological Essays on Persons and Things. Chicago, IL: Hau Books.
85.
SumpterDJTBeekmanM (2003) From nonlinearity to optimality: Pheromone trail foraging by ants. Animal Behaviour66(2): 273–280.
86.
TauginienėLButkevičienėEVohlandK, et al. (2020) Citizen science in the social sciences and humanities: The power of interdisciplinarity. Palgrave Communications6(1): 89.
87.
TuckE (2009) Suspending damage: A letter to communities. Harvard Educational Review79(3): 409–428.
88.
WeheliyeAG (2014) Habeas Viscus: Racializing Assemblages, Biopolitics, and Black Feminist Theories of the Human. Duke University Press.
ZaragocinSCarettaMA (2021) Cuerpo-Territorio: A decolonial feminist geographical method for the study of embodiment. Annals of the American Association of Geographers111(5): 1503–1518.
