The research used videotaped ethnographic observation and analysis of verbal and non-verbal actions to examine how a public relations practitioner (PRP) handled a client during a time of financial crisis in the client’s organization. Three interactions in which the PRP discussed media messaging with his client were analysed to discover what techniques the PRP employed and how much influence he had in constructing and disseminating the organization’s media strategy. The research provides rare empirical evidence of the day-to-day practices of PRPs in consultancy–client relationships, which is an area under-examined by researchers. The analysis found the relationship was characterized by competing interests and information asymmetry, which often hampered collaboration and reduced PRP influence.
AlvessonMKärremanDSturdyA. (2009) Unpacking the client(s): Constructions, positions and client-consultant dynamics. Scandinavian Journal of Management25: 253–263.
2.
BergerBK (2005) Power over, power with, and power to relations: Critical reflections on public relations, the dominant coalition, and activism. Journal of Public Relations Research17(1): 5–28.
3.
BergholzH (1999) Do more than fix my company. Journal of Management Consulting10(4): 19–33.
4.
CampbellDE (1979) Interior office design and visitor response. Journal of Applied Psychology64(6): 648–653.
5.
ChiaJ (2005) Is trust a necessary component of relationship management?Journal of Communication Management9(3): 277–285.
6.
DaymonCHodgesCEM (2009) Researching public relations occupational culture in Mexico. Public Relations Review35: 429–433.
7.
DoorleyJGarciaHF (2011) Reputation Management: The Key to Successful Public Relations and Corporate Communication. New York: Routledge.
8.
DozierDGrunigLAGrunigJE (1995) Manager’s Guide to Excellence in Public Relations and Communication Management. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
9.
EdwardsL (2009) Symbolic power and public relations: Locating individual practitioners in their social context. Journal of Public Relations Research21(3): 251–272.
FinkelsteinS (1992) Power in top management teams: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. The Academy of Management Journal35(3): 505–538.
14.
FlanaganJ (1954) The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin51(4): 327–358.
15.
GitlinT (1980) The Whole World is Watch: Mass Media in the Making and Unmaking of the New Left. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
16.
GoffmanE (1964) The neglected situation. American Anthropologist66(6): 133–136.
17.
Goldin-MeadowS (2003) How Our Hands Help Us Think. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
18.
GregoryAWillisP (2013) Strategic Public Relations Leadership. Abingdon: Routledge.
19.
GreinerLEMetzgerRO (1983) Consulting to Management. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
20.
GrunigJE (1992) Excellence in Public Relations and Communication Management. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
21.
HallET (1963) A system for the notation of proxemic behavior. American Anthropologist65(5): 1003–1026.
22.
HoltzhausenD (2000) Postmodern values in public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research12(1): 93–114.
23.
JuckerA (1986) News Interviews: A Pragmalinguistic Analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
24.
KeatingeD (2002) Versatility and flexibility: Attributes of the critical incident technique in nursing research. Nursing and Health Sciences4: 33–39.
25.
KendonA (1967) Some functions of gaze-direction in social interaction. Acta Psychologica26: 22–63.
26.
KendonA (2004) Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27.
KimJNHung-BaeseckeCFYangS. (2013) A strategic management approach to reputation, relationships, and publics: The research heritage of the excellence theory. In: CarrollCE (ed.) The Handbook of Communication and Corporate Reputation. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell, pp.197–212.
28.
KjellmerG (2009) Where do we backchannel? On the use of mm, mhm, uh huh and such like. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics14(1): 81–112.
29.
LalondeCAdlerC (2015) Information asymmetry in process consultation. Leadership & Organization Development Journal36(2): 177–211.
30.
L’EtangJ (2005) Critical public relations: Some reflections. Public Relations Review31: 521–526.
31.
MachinDMayrA (2012) How to Do Critical Discourse Analysis: A Multimodal Introduction. London: Sage.
MorrowPCMcElroyJC (1981) Interior office design and visitor response: A constructive replication. Journal of Applied Psychology66(5): 646–650.
39.
NorrisS (2004) Analyzing Multimodal Interaction: A Methodological Framework. New York: Routledge.
40.
NorrisS (2011) Identity in (Inter)Action: Introducing Multimodal (Inter)Action Analysis. London and New York: Routledge.
41.
PfefferJ (1992) Understanding power in organizations. California Management Review34(2): 29–50.
42.
PieczkaM (2006) ‘Chemistry’ and the public relations industry: An exploration of the concept of jurisdiction and issues arising. In: L’EtangJPieczkaM (eds) Public Relations Critical Debates and Contemporary Practice. New York: Routledge, pp.303–331.
43.
PlaceK (2012) Power-control or empowerment? How women public relations practitioners make meaning of power. Journal of Public Relations Research24(5): 435–450.
44.
ReberBBergerB (2006) Finding influence: Examining the role of influence in public relations practice. Journal of Communication Management10(3): 235–249.
45.
SallotLJohnsonE (2006) To contact or not? Investigating journalists’ assessments of public relations subsidies and contact preferences. Public Relations Review32: 83–86.
46.
Saville-TroikeM (1989) The Ethnography of Communication: An Introduction (2nd edition). Oxford and Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
SchegloffEJeffersonGSacksH (1977) The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language53(2): 361–382.
49.
ScheinEH (1999) Process Consultation Revisited: Building the Helping Relationship. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley; San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
50.
ScheinEH (2009) Helping: How to Offer, Give, and Receive Help. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
51.
SchiffrinD (1987) Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
TannenD (1990) Ordinary conversation and literary discourse: Coherence and the poetics of repetition. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences583: 15–30.
54.
TannenD (1996) Gender & Discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.
55.
TurkJV (1985) Information subsidies and influence. Public Relations Review11(3): 10–25.
56.
Van DijkT (1988) News as Discourse. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
57.
Van DijkT (2001) Critical discourse analysis. In: SchiffrinDTannenDHamiltonH (eds) The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. pp.352–371.
58.
WeissRF (1969) Repetition of persuasion. Psychological Reports25: 669–670.
59.
WerrAStyhreA (2002) Management consultants – Friend or foe? Understanding the ambiguous client-consultant relationship. International Studies of Management and Organization32(4): 43–66.
60.
WestC (1995) Women’s competence in conversation. Discourse & Society6(1): 107–131.
61.
WilliamsM (2000) Interpretivism and generalisation. Sociology34(2): 209–224.
62.
WodakRMeyerM (2001) Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage.
63.
ZhangP (2013) Power and trust in board-CEO relationships. Journal of Management & Governance17(3): 745–765.
64.
ZweigenhaftR (1976) Personal space in the faculty office: Desk placement and the student-faculty interaction. Journal of Applied Psychology61(4): 529–532.
