Despite some sporadic attention since the 1950s, the concept of the public interest has failed to attract the consideration of public relations scholars in the same way it has other disciplines. This article examines this seeming anomaly while also presenting an overview of how scholars from politics, media, law, anthropology and planning have engaged with and often embraced the public interest, including through key public interest theories or intersections with the work of other theorists, such as Habermas. The article also explains why the public interest historically polarised scholars and suggests how this may account for its marginalisation within public relations. It draws on themes developed in a new book – Public Relations and the Public Interest – in challenging public relations to more fully engage in this space. The article concludes that public relations may benefit from a deeper understanding of the complexity of the public interest and the ways in which it is viewed and adopted in other fields in order to more robustly connect with democratic processes and social change agendas.
BellowGKettlesonL (1978) From ethics to politics: Confronting scarcity and fairness in public interest practice. Boston University Law Review58: 337–390.
7.
BendittTM (1973) The public interest. Philosophy and Public Affairs2(3): 291–311.
8.
BivinsTH (1993) Public relations, professionalism, and the public interest. Journal of Business Ethics12(2): 117–126.
9.
BourdieuP (1986) The forms of capital. In: RichardsonJ (ed.) Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. New York: Greenwood Press, pp.241–258.
10.
BozemanB (1979) Public Management and Policy Analysis. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
11.
BozemanB (2007) Public Values and Public Interest: Counterbalancing Economic Individualism. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
CampbellHMarshallR (2002) Utilitarianism’s bad breath? A re-evaluation of the public interest justification for planning. Planning Theory1(2): 163–187.
15.
Canada Public Relations Society (CPRS) (2013) Mission, definition and values. Available at: http://www.cprs.ca/aboutus/mission.aspx (accessed 15 December 2013).
16.
CarterMBourisA (2006) Freedom of Information: Balancing the Public Interest (2nd edition). London: The Constitution Unit-University College.
17.
CassinelliCW (1958) Some reflections of the concept of the public interest. Ethics69(1): 48–61.
CochranCE (1974) Political science and the public interest. The Journal of Politics36(2): 327–355.
20.
Crown Prosecution Services (2012) Interim guidelines for prosecutors for assessing the public interest in cases affecting the media, April. Available at: http://www.cps.gov.uk/consultations/mg_consultation.pdf (accessed 5 June).
21.
CurtinPAGaitherTK (2005) Privileging identity, difference, and power: The circuit of culture as a basis for public relations theory. Journal of Public Relations Research17(2): 91–115.
22.
CurtinPAGaitherTK (2007) International Public Relations: Negotiating Culture, Identity and Power. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23.
CurtinPAGaitherTK (2012) Globalization and Public Relations in Postcolonial Nations. Amherst, NY: Cambria Press.
24.
CutlipSM (1995) Public Relations History: From the 17th to the 20th Century. New York: Routledge.
25.
CutlipSMCenterAHBroomGM (1985) Effective Public Relations. Edgewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
26.
DemetriousK (2013) Public Relations, Activism and Social Change: Speaking up. New York: Routledge.
27.
DeweyJ (1927) The Public and Its Problems. New York: H. Holt & Co.
28.
DouglassB (1980) The common good and the public interest. Political Theory8(1): 103–117.
29.
DownsA (1962) The public interest: Its meaning in a democracy. Social Research29(1): 1–36.
30.
DuttaM (2011) Communicating Social Change. New York: Routledge.
31.
EdwardsL (2011) Questions of self-interest, agency and the rhetor. Management Communication Quarterly25(3): 531–540.
32.
EhlingWP (1992) Estimating the value of public relations and communication to an organization. In: GrunigJE (ed.) Excellence in Public Relations and Communication Management. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp.617–638.
33.
FlathmanR (1966) The Public Interest. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
34.
FoucaultM (1976) The History of Sexuality, Vol. 1: An Introduction (trans. HurleyR). Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
35.
GrunigJE (2001) Two-Way symmetrical public relations: Past, present, and future. In: HeathRLVasquezG (eds) Handbook of Public Relations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp.11–30.
36.
GrunigLA (1992) How public relations/communication departments should adapt to the structure and environment of an organization … and what they actually do. In: GrunigJE (ed.) Excellence in Public Relations and Communication Management. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp.467–482.
37.
GunnJAW (1968) Jeremy Bentham and the public interest. Canadian Journal of Political Science1(4): 398–413.
38.
GunnJAW (1969) Politics and the Public Interest in the 17th Century. London: Routledge.
39.
HabermasJ (1996) Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
HealeyP (1992) Planning through debate: the communicative turn in planning theory. Town Planning Review63(2): 143–62.
42.
HeathRL and Associates (1988) Strategic Issues Management: How Organizations Influence and Respond to Public Interests and Policies. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
43.
HeathRL (1992) Vision of critical studies in public relations. In: TothELHeathRL (eds) Rhetorical and Critical Approaches to Public Relations. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp.317–318.
44.
HeathRL (2009) The rhetorical tradition. In: HeathRLTothELWaymerD (eds) Rhetorical and Critical Approaches to Public Relations II. New York: Routledge, pp. 17–47.
45.
HeathRL (2013) The fully functioning society. In: HeathRL (ed.) Encyclopedia of Public Relations, vol. 1 (2nd edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp.368–370.
46.
HeldV (1970) The Public Interest and Individual Interests. New York: Basic Books.
47.
HeritageZDoorisM (2009) Community participation and empowerment in healthy cities. Health Promotion International24(1): 45–55.
48.
HillJW (1958) Corporate Public Relations: Arm of Modern Management. New York: Harper & Brothers.
49.
HillJW (1963) The Making of a Public Relations Man. New York: David McKay.
50.
HoLS (2011) Public Policy and the Public Interest. London: Routledge.
51.
HoLS (2013) Health Policy and the Public Interest. London: Routledge.
52.
HoltzhausenD (2012) Public Relations as Activism: Postmodern Approaches to Theory and Practice. New York: Routledge.
53.
Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales (ICAEW) (2012) Acting in the Public Interest: A Framework for Analysis. Market Foundations Initiative. Available at: http://www.icaew.com/en/technical/ethics/the-public-interest (accessed 2 March 2015).
54.
JohnstonFPaleyJSabloffP. (1997) Public Interest Anthropology: Planning Seminar, a Program for Research, Teaching and Action. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania.
55.
JohnstonJ (2015) Origins and developments of the public interest: An historical perspective for public relations. Paper delivered at the international history of public relations conference, Bournemouth University, Poole, 7–9 July.
56.
JohnstonJ (2016) Public Relations and the Public Interest. New York: Routledge.
57.
JohnstonJMacnamaraJ (2013) Public relations literature and scholarship in Australia: A brief history of change and diversification. PRism Journal10(1): 1–16.
58.
KeyzerP (2010) Open Constitutional Courts. Sydney, NSW, Australia: Federation Press.
59.
LamphereL (2004) The convergence of applied, practicing, and public anthropology in the 21st century. Human Organization63(4): 431–43.
60.
L’EtangJ (2004) Public Relations in Britain. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
61.
L’EtangJPieczkaM (1996) Critical Perspectives in Public Relations. London: International Thomson Business Press.
62.
L’EtangJPieczkaM (eds) (2006) Public Relations: Critical Debates and Contemporary Practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
63.
L’EtangJMcKieDSnowN. (2016) The Routledge Handbook of Critical Public Relations. London: Routledge.
64.
LevesonLJ (2012) An inquiry into the culture, practice and ethics of the press, 29November. Available at: http://www.levesoninquiry.org.uk (accessed 29 May 2014).
65.
LevineMEForrenceJL (1990) Regulatory capture, public interest, and the public agenda: toward a synthesis. Journal of Law, Economics & Organization6: 167–98.
66.
LippmannW (1927) The Phantom Public. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co. (Transaction Publishers 1993).
67.
LippmannW (1955) Essays in the Public Philosophy. Boston, MA: Little Brown.
68.
McGintyS (2002) Community capacity building. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Australian association for research in education, Brisbane, QLD, Australia, December. Available at: http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED473884.pdf (accessed 1 March 2015).
69.
McKieDMunshiD (2007) Reconfiguring Public Relations: Ecology, Equity and Enterprise. New York: Routledge.
70.
McQuailD (1992) Media Performance: Mass Communication and the Public Interest. London: Sage.
71.
MansbridgeJ (1998) On the contested nature of the public good. In: PowellWWClemensES (eds) Private Action and the Public Good. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, pp.3–19.
72.
MessinaA (2007) Public relations, the public interest and persuasion: An ethical approach. Journal of Communication Management11(1): 29–52.
73.
MeyersonD (2007) Why courts should not balance rights against the public interest, Melbourne University Law Review31(3): 873–903.
74.
MickeyRJ (2003) Deconstructing Public Relations: Public Relations Criticism. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
75.
MitnickB (1980) The Political Economy of Regulation. New York: Columbia University Press.
76.
MitnickBGetzKA (2008) Regulation and regulatory practices. In: KolbRW (ed.) Encyclopedia of Business Ethics and Society, vol. 5. Los Angeles, CA: Sage, pp.1787–1802.
77.
MoloneyK (2006) Rethinking Public Relations (2nd ed). London: Routledge.
78.
O’MohoneyC (2014) If a constitution is easy to amend, can judges be less restrained? Rights, social change, and proposition 8. Harvard Human Rights Journal27: 191–242.
79.
PieczkaM (2006) Paradigms, systems theory, and public relations. In: L’EtangJPieczkaM (eds) Public Relations: Critical Debates and Contemporary Practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp.331–359.
80.
PrestonA (2005) Public interest. In: HeathR (ed.) Encyclopedia of Public Relations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp.673–675.
81.
PrestonA (2013) Public interest. In: HeathR (ed.) Encyclopedia of Public Relations (2nd edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp.717–719.
Public Interest in the UK Law Courts (2011) Belfast: Economic and Social Research Council, and Queens College. Available at: http://publicinterest.info/ (accessed 7 December 2014).
Public Relations Society of America (PRSA) (2012) Public relations defined: A modern definition for a new era of public relations, 11April. Available at: http://prdefinition.prsa.org/ (accessed 13 December 2013).
86.
RawlsJ (1971) A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
87.
SandayPRJannowitzC (2004) Public interest anthropology: A Boasian service-learning initiative. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning10: 64–75.
88.
SandercockL (1998) Toward Cosmopolis: Planning for Multicultural Cities. Chichester: John Wiley.
89.
SchubertG (1961) The Public Interest. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
SoraufFJ (1957) The public interest reconsidered. The Journal of Politics19(4): 616–639.
92.
The new public interest lawyers (1970) The Yale Law Journal79(6): 1069–1152.
93.
Traverse-HealyT (1972) Tomorrow’s world: A challenge for PR. Public Relations25(7): 162.
94.
WeaverCKMotionJRoperJ (2006) From propaganda to discourse (and back again): Truth, power, the public interest, and public relations. In: L’EtangJPieczkaM (eds) Public Relations: Critical Debates and Contemporary Practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp.7–23.
95.
WheelerC (2006) The public interest: we know it’s important, but do we know what it means. In CreykeRMantelA (eds), AIAL Forum 48, Australian Institute of Administrative Law, pp.12–26.
