This conceptual paper analyzes the definitions and the explicit and implicit relationships among Environmental, Social, and Corporate Governance (ESG), Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), and environmental justice. We explore their roles in public relations theory and practice. Furthermore, we suggest a path for articulating justice and equity more explicitly for future ESG communication. This synthesis leads to defining six equity strategies for ESG communication: Clarity, conflict, reflectiveness, community empowerment, and collaborative, justice-oriented outcomes.
AntonopoulosNKaryotakisMA (2020) Environmental Communication. Sage Int. Encycl. Mass Media Soc1: 551–552.
2.
ArendtH (1958) The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3.
ArendtH (1963) Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil. New York: Viking Press.
4.
AronczykMEspinozaMI (2019) Sustainable communication: green PR and the export of corporate environmentalism, 1989–1997. Environmental Sociology5(3): 308–322. DOI: 10.1080/23251042.2018.1564455.
5.
AronczykMEspinozaMI (2021) A Strategic Nature: Public Relations and the Politics of American Environmentalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6.
AustinLGaitherBGaitherTK (2019) Corporate social advocacy as public interest communications: Exploring perceptions of corporate involvement in controversial social-political issues. The Journal of Public Interest Communications3(2): 3–3.
7.
BanerjeeSB (2011) Voices of the governed: towards a theory of the translocal. Organization18(3): 323–344. DOI: 10.1177/1350508411398729.
8.
BartlettJTywoniakSHatcherC (2007) Public relations professional practice and the institutionalisation of CSR. Journal of Communication Management11(4): 281–299. DOI: 10.1108/13632540710843904.
9.
BeckU (1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.
10.
BomanCD (2021) Examining characteristics of prebunking strategies to overcome PR disinformation attacks. Public Relations Review47(5): 102105. DOI: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2021.102105.
11.
BowenSA (2005) A practical model for ethical decision making in issues management and public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research17(3): 191–216. DOI: 10.1207/s1532754xjprr1703_1.
12.
BullardRDWrightBH (1990) The quest for environmental equity: mobilizing the African‐American community for social change. Society & Natural Resources3(4): 301–311. DOI: 10.1080/08941929009380728.
13.
BullardRDWrightB (eds) (2009) Race, Place, and Environmental Justice after Hurricane Katrina: Struggles to Reclaim, Rebuild, and revitalize New Orleans and the Gulf Coast. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
14.
BytwerkRL (1979) The SST controversy: a case study of the rhetoric of technology. Central States Speech Journal30(2): 187–198. DOI: 10.1080/10510977909368011.
15.
CamilleriMA (2022) Strategic attributions of corporate social responsibility and environmental management: the business case for doing well by doing good. Sustainable Development30(3): 409–422. DOI: 10.1002/sd.2256.
16.
CapizzoL (2020) The right side of history, inc.: social issues management, social license to operate, and the Obergefell v. Hodges decision. Public Relations Review46(5): 101957. DOI: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2020.101957.
17.
CapizzoL (2022) What counts amid contention? Measuring perceived intractable problems in public relations. Public Relations Review48(2): 102179. DOI: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2022.102179.
18.
CapizzoL (2023) Managing intractability: wrestling with wicked problems and seeing beyond consensus in public relations. Public Relations Review49(1): 102263. DOI: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2022.102263.
19.
CapizzoLFeinmanM (2022) Extending civic values in architectures of listening: Arendt, Mouffe and the pluralistic imperative for organizational listening. Journal of Public Relations Research34(6): 274–295. DOI: 10.1080/1062726X.2022.2127728.
20.
CapizzoLSommerfeldtE (2021) Defining the contours of contention: Facets of intractability in social issues management. International Journal of Strategic Communication15(4): 357–374.
21.
CarrollAB (1991) The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons34: 39–48. DOI: 10.1016/0007-6813(91)90005-g.
22.
ChengYChenZF (2020) Encountering misinformation online: antecedents of trust and distrust and their impact on the intensity of Facebook use. Online Information Review45(2): 372–388. DOI: 10.1108/OIR-04-2020-0130.
23.
ChristensenLTCheneyG (2011) Interrogating the communicative dimensions of corporate social responsibility. In: IhlenØBartlettJLMayS (eds). The Handbook of Communication and Corporate Social Responsibility. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell, 491–504.
24.
CiszekEL (2016) Digital activism: how social media and dissensus inform theory and practice. Public Relations Review42(2): 314–321. DOI: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2016.02.002.
25.
CiszekELoganN (2018) Challenging the dialogic promise: how Ben & Jerry’s support for black lives matter fosters dissensus on social media. Journal of Public Relations Research30(3): 115–127. DOI: 10.1080/1062726x.2018.1498342.
26.
CoombsWTHolladaySJ (2018) Social issue qua wicked problems: the role of strategic communication in social issues management. Journal of Communication Management22(1): 79–95. DOI: 10.1108/JCOM-11-2016-0093.
27.
CoxR (2007) Nature’s “crisis disciplines”: does environmental communication have an ethical duty?Environmental Communication1(1): 5–20. DOI: 10.1080/17524030701333948.
28.
DavenportSLeitchS (2005) Circuits of power in practice: strategic ambiguity as delegation of authority. Organization Studies26(11): 1603–1623. DOI: 10.1177/0170840605054627.
29.
DavidsonS (2016) Public relations theory: an agonistic critique of the turns to dialogue and symmetry. Public Relations Inquiry5(2): 145–167. DOI: 10.1177/2046147X16649007.
30.
DawkinsJ (2005) Corporate responsibility: the communication challenge. Journal of Communication Management9(2): 108–119. DOI: 10.1108/13632540510621362.
31.
DempseySE (2007) Negotiating accountability within international contexts: the role of bounded voice. Communication Monographs74(3): 311–332. DOI: 10.1080/03637750701543485.
32.
DempseySE (2010) Critiquing community engagement. Management Communication Quarterly24(3): 359–390. DOI: 10.1177/0893318909352247.
33.
Sasidharan DhaneshG (2012) The view from within: internal publics and CSR. Journal of Communication Management16(1): 39–58. DOI: 10.1108/13632541211197987.
34.
DhaneshGS (2014) CSR as organization–employee relationship management strategy: a case study of socially responsible information technology companies in India. Management Communication Quarterly28(1): 130–149. DOI: 10.1177/0893318913517238.
35.
DhaneshGS (2015) Why corporate social responsibility? An analysis of drivers of CSR in India. Management Communication Quarterly29(1): 114–129. DOI: 10.1177/0893318914545496.
36.
DionisopoulosGNCrableRE (1988) Definitional hegemony as a public relations strategy: the rhetoric of the nuclear power industry after Three Mile Island. Central States Speech Journal39(2): 134–145. DOI: 10.1080/10510978809363244.
37.
DoddM (2018) Globalization, pluralization, and erosion: the impact of shifting societal expectations for advocacy and public good. The Journal of Public Interest Communications2(2): 221–221. DOI: 10.32473/jpic.v2.i2.p221.
38.
DoddMDSupaDW (2014) Conceptualizing and measuring “corporate social advocacy” communication: examining the impact on corporate financial performance. Public Relations Journal8(3): 2–23.
39.
DongCLiY (2022) Understanding CSR partnership communication from a portfolio approach. In: O’ConnorA (ed). The Routledge Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility Communication. London: Routledge, 296–309.
40.
DongCHuangQNiS, et al. (2023) Constructing care-based corporate social responsibility (CSR) communication during the COVID-19 pandemic: a comparison of Fortune 500 companies in China and the United States. Journal of Business Ethics: 1–28. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-023-05531-9.
41.
DouglasM (1986) How Institutions Think. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
42.
DouglasM (1992) Risk and Blame. London: Routledge.
43.
DouglasMWildavskyA (1983) Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technological and Environmental Dangers. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
DuSBhattacharyaCBSenS (2010) Maximizing business returns to corporate social responsibility (CSR): the role of CSR communication. International Journal of Management Reviews12(1): 8–19. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00276.x.
46.
EdwardsL (2016) The role of public relations in deliberative systems. Journal of Communication66(1): 60–81. DOI: 10.1111/jcom.12199.
47.
EdwardsL (2021) Organised lying and professional legitimacy: public relations’ accountability in the disinformation debate. European Journal of Communication36(2): 168–182. DOI: 10.1177/0267323120966851.
48.
EisenbergEM (1984) Ambiguity as strategy in organizational communication. Communication Monographs51(3): 227–242. DOI: 10.1080/03637758409390197.
49.
EngNTroyCLBortreeDS (2023) Symbolic and substantive legitimation: examining corporate commitments to sustainable development goal 12. Journal of Communication Management. DOI: 10.1108/JCOM-06-2022-0075.
50.
FawkesJ (2012) Interpreting ethics: public relations and strong hermeneutics. Public Relations Inquiry1(2): 117–140. DOI: 10.1177/2046147x12437023.
51.
FreemanAMHavemanRH (1972) Clean rhetoric and dirty water. The Public Interest28: 51–65.
52.
GillanSLKochAStarksLT (2021) Firms and social responsibility: a review of ESG and CSR research in corporate finance. Journal of Corporate Finance66: 101889. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.101889.
53.
GlikDC (2007) Risk communication for public health emergencies. Annual Review of Public Health28: 33–54. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.28.021406.144123.
54.
GolobUPodnarKZabkarV (2023) Sustainability communication. International Journal of Advertising42(1): 42–51. DOI: 10.1080/02650487.2022.2144035.
55.
GregoryA (2022) Public relations practice equipped for the future: evolution or radical change? In: PompperDPlaceKRWeaverCK (eds). The Routledge Companion to Public Relations. London: Routledge, 392–404.
56.
HarrisonV (2019) “It’s a delicate dance”: understanding CSR relationships from the nonprofit perspective. Journal of Communication Management23(2): 142–158. DOI: 10.1108/JCOM-10-2018-0100.
57.
HarrisonVS (2021) Does your corporation “care”? Exploring an ethical standard for communicating CSR relationships online. Public Relations Inquiry10(3): 333–356. DOI: 10.1177/2046147X211032913.
58.
HeathRLMcComasK (2014) Interest, interest, whose interest is at risk? Risk governance, issues management, and the fully functioning society. In: Fra PaleoU (ed) Risk Governance: The Articulation of Hazard, Politics and Ecology. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 117–133.
HolmströmS (2005) Reframing public relations: the evolution of a reflective paradigm for organizational legitimization. Public Relations Review31(4): 497–504. DOI: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2005.08.008.
62.
HurstBJohnstonKALaneAB (2020) Engaging for a social licence to operate (SLO). Public Relations Review46(4): 101931. DOI: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2020.101931.
63.
IhlenØ (2008) Mapping the environment for corporate social responsibility: stakeholders, publics and the public sphere. Corporate Communications: An International Journal13(2): 135–146. DOI: 10.1108/13563280810869578.
64.
IhlenØRaknesK (2020) Appeals to ‘the public interest’: how public relations and lobbying create a social license to operate. Public Relations Review46(5): 101976. DOI: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2020.101976.
65.
JiYGTaoWRimH (2022) Theoretical insights of CSR research in communication from 1980 to 2018: a bibliometric network analysis. Journal of Business Ethics177(2): 327–349. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-021-04748-w.
66.
KimYFergusonMA (2019) Are high-fit CSR programs always better? The effects of corporate reputation and CSR fit on stakeholder responses. Corporate Communications: An International Journal24(3): 471–498. DOI: 10.1108/CCIJ-05-2018-0061.
67.
L'EtangJ (1994) Public relations and corporate social responsibility: some issues arising. Journal of Business Ethics13(2): 111–123. DOI: 10.1007/bf00881580.
68.
LeeSYChungS (2023) Publics’ views of corporate social advocacy initiatives: exploring prior issue stance, attitude toward a company, and news credibility. Management Communication Quarterly37(2): 281–309. doi: 10.1177/08933189221105808
69.
LeeTHComelloMLNG (2019) Transparency and industry stigmatization in strategic CSR communication. Management Communication Quarterly33(1): 68–85.
70.
LeeAMDe ZuñigaHGColemanR, et al. (2014) The dialogic potential of social media: Assessing the ethical reasoning of companies’ public relations on Facebook and Twitter. In: DiStasoMBortreeD (eds). Ethical Practice of Social Media in Public Relations. London: Routledge, 157–175.
71.
LeeMTRaschkeRLKrishenAS (2022) Signaling green! Firm ESG signals in an interconnected environment that promote brand valuation. Journal of Business Research138: 1–11. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.08.061.
72.
LeitchSDavenportS (2002) Strategic ambiguity in communicating public sector change. Journal of Communication Management7(2): 129–139. DOI: 10.1108/13632540310807340.
73.
LeitchSDavenportS (2007) Strategic ambiguity as a discourse practice: the role of keywords in the discourse on ‘sustainable’ biotechnology. Discourse Studies9(1): 43–61. DOI: 10.1177/1461445607072106.
74.
LiTTWangKSueyoshiT, et al. (2021) ESG: research progress and future prospects. Sustainability13(21): 11663. DOI: 10.3390/su132111663.
75.
LockISeeleP (2017) Measuring credibility perceptions in CSR communication: a scale development to test readers’ perceived credibility of CSR reports. Management Communication Quarterly31(4): 584–613.
76.
LoganN (2019) Corporate personhood and the corporate responsibility to race. Journal of Business Ethics154(4): 977–988. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-018-3893-3.
77.
LuisiM (2023) The Gucci “Wool Balaclava Jumper” case is a listening failure; it will happen again. Journal of Media Ethics38(2): 126–128. DOI: 10.1080/23736992.2023.2194291.
78.
LuoLTangQ (2022) The real effects of ESG reporting and GRI standards on carbon mitigation: international evidence. Business Strategy and the Environment32(6): 2985–3000. DOI: 10.1002/bse.3281.
79.
MacnamaraJ (2016) Organizational listening: addressing a major gap in public relations theory and practice. Journal of Public Relations Research28(4): 146–169. DOI: 10.1080/1062726X.2016.1228064.
80.
MaddenS (2019) The issue with issues management: considering the emotional and gendered core of issues. Public Relations Inquiry8(3): 299–317. DOI: 10.1177/2046147X19872240.
81.
MaktoufiRO’ConnorAShumateM (2020) Does the CSR message matter? Untangling the relationship between corporate–nonprofit partnerships, created fit messages, and activist evaluations. Management Communication Quarterly34(2): 188–212. DOI: 10.1177/0893318919897059.
82.
Martinez GonzalezACapizzoL (2023, Nov 16-19) The Role of Moral Decoupling on Corporate Social Advocacy Support: Testing Moral Decoupling Theory across Causes. MD, United States: National Communication Association 109th Annual Convention, National Harbor. [Paper presentation].
83.
MayerBRunningKBergstrandK (2015) Compensation and community corrosion: perceived inequalities, social comparisons, and competition following the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. Sociological Forum30(2): 369–390. DOI: 10.1111/socf.12167.
84.
MckieDGallowayC (2007) Climate change after denial: global reach, global responsibilities, and public relations. Public Relations Review33(4): 368–376. DOI: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2007.08.009.
85.
MehtaAMLiuBFTyquinE, et al. (2021) A process view of crisis misinformation: how public relations professionals detect, manage, and evaluate crisis misinformation. Public Relations Review47(2): 102040. DOI: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2021.102040.
86.
Melchiades SoaresA (2023) Climate change framing in the communication of CSR policies: the secil group example. Journal of Communication Management27(2): 226–240. DOI: 10.1108/jcom-04-2022-0048.
87.
MilsteinTPileggiMMorganEL (2017) Introducing environmental communication pedagogy and practice. In: MilsteinTPileggiMMorganEL (eds). Environmental Communication Pedagogy and Practice. New York: Taylor & Francis, 1–8.
88.
MinnichE (2014) The evil of banality: arendt revisited. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education13(2): 158–179. DOI: 10.1177/1474022213513543.
89.
MorenoACapriottiP (2009) Communicating CSR, citizenship and sustainability on the web. Journal of Communication Management13(2): 157–175. DOI: 10.1108/13632540910951768.
90.
MotionJ (2019) Climate change imperatives for global public relations: who pays and who cares? In: SrirameshKVerčičD (eds). The Global Public Relations Handbook. New York: Routledge, 258–267.
91.
MotionJ (2019b) Undoing art and oil: an environmental tale of sponsorship, cultural justice and climate change controversy. Environmental Politics28(4): 727–746. DOI: 10.1080/09644016.2017.1416904.
92.
MouffeC (2013) Agonistics: Thinking the World Politically. New York: Verso Books.
93.
MunshiDKurianP (2005) Imperializing spin cycles: a postcolonial look at public relations, greenwashing, and the separation of publics. Public Relations Review31(4): 513–520. DOI: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2005.08.010.
OhHJChaYKimJN (2023) Fans, friends, critics, and foes: how CSR-based stakeholder segmentation differentiates perceived corporate ethics, trust, and perceived brand quality. Public Relations Review49(2): 102317. DOI: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2023.102317.
96.
OravecC (1981) John Muir, Yosemite, and the sublime response: a study in the rhetoric of preservationism. Quarterly Journal of Speech67(3): 245–258. DOI: 10.1080/00335638109383570.
97.
OvertonHKimJKZhangN, et al. (2021) Examining consumer attitudes toward CSR and CSA messages. Public Relations Review47(4): 102095. DOI: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2021.102095.
98.
O’ConnorAGronewoldKL (2012) Black gold, green earth: an analysis of the petroleum industry’s CSR environmental sustainability discourse. Management Communication Quarterly27(2): 210–236. DOI: 10.1177/0893318912465189.
99.
O’ConnorAShumateM (2010) An economic industry and institutional level of analysis of corporate social responsibility communication. Management Communication Quarterly24(4): 529–551. DOI: 10.1177/0893318909358747.
100.
O’ConnorAShumateM (2018) A multidimensional network approach to strategic communication. International Journal of Strategic Communication12(4): 399–416. DOI: 10.1080/1553118X.2018.1452242.
101.
PalazzoGSchererAG (2006) Corporate legitimacy as deliberation: a communicative framework. Journal of Business Ethics66(1): 71–88. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-006-9044-2.
102.
PeñaDG (2011) Structural violence, historical trauma, and public health: the environmental justice critique of contemporary risk science and practice. In: BurtonLMMatthewsSALeungM, et al. (eds) Communities, Neighborhoods, and Health. New York, NY: Springer, 203–218.
103.
PerezACGraftonBMohaiP, et al. (2015) Evolution of the environmental justice movement: activism, formalization and differentiation. Environmental Research Letters10: 1–12. DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/10/10/105002.
104.
PérezAGarcía de los SalmonesMDMLiuMT (2020) Information specificity, social topic awareness and message authenticity in CSR communication. Journal of Communication Management24(1): 31–48. DOI: 10.1108/jcom-06-2019-0097.
105.
PlaceKR (2022) Toward a framework for listening with consideration for intersectionality: insights from public relations professionals in borderland spaces. Journal of Public Relations Research34(2): 4–19.
106.
PlaceKREdwardsLBowenSA (2021) Dignity and respect or homocommodification? Applying moral philosophy to LGBTQ public relations. Public Relations Review47(4): 102085. DOI: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2021.102085.
107.
PompperD (2016) Beyond the business case: building upon traditional approaches and opening new spaces for multiple perspectives on climate and sustainability communication. Mass Communication & Society19(5): 543–547. DOI: 10.1080/15205436.2016.1204151.
108.
PrattCBYanadaA (2014) Risk communication and Japan’s Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant meltdown: ethical implications for government-citizen divides. Public Relations Journal8(4): 1–27.
RimHDongC (2018) Trust and distrust in society and public perception of CSR: a cross-cultural study. Social Responsibility Journal14(1): 1–19. DOI: 10.1108/SRJ-01-2017-0016.
111.
RimHLeeYYooS (2020) Polarized public opinion responding to corporate social advocacy: social network analysis of boycotters and advocators. Public Relations Review46(2): 101869. DOI: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2019.101869.
112.
Roberts-MillerP (2002) Fighting without Hatred: Hannah Arendt’s Agonistic Rhetoric. JAC. 585–601. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/20866511.
113.
RoperJ (2012) Environmental risk, sustainability discourses, and public relations. Public Relations Inquiry1(1): 69–87. DOI: 10.1177/2046147X11422147.
114.
RoperJToledanoM (2005) Taking in the view from the edge: issues management recontextualized. Public Relations Review31(4): 479–485. DOI: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2005.08.005.
115.
SandlerRDPezzulloPC (eds) (2007) Environmental Justice and Environmentalism: The Social Justice Challenge to the Environmental Movement. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
116.
SchererAGRascheAPalazzoG, et al. (2016) Managing for political corporate social responsibility: new challenges and directions for PCSR 2.0. Journal of Management Studies53(3): 273–298. DOI: 10.1111/joms.12203.
117.
ScottRL (1973) On not defining “Rhetoric.”. Philosophy and Rhetoric6(2): 81–96.
118.
SharmaNCKivlinJEFliegelFC (1975) Environmental pollution: is there enough public concern to lead to action?Environment and Behavior7(4): 455–471. DOI: 10.1177/0013916575007004.
119.
ShiD (2022) Firm-serving or public-serving? Analyzing public responses to employee volunteer program communication. Corporate Communications: An International Journal27(4): 690–704. DOI: 10.1108/CCIJ-05-2021-0061.
120.
ShimKKimJN (2021) The impacts of ethical philosophy on corporate hypocrisy perception and communication intentions toward CSR. International Journal of Business Communication58(3): 386–409. DOI: 10.1177/2329488417747597.
121.
SimmonsCJBecker-OlsenKL (2006) Achieving marketing objectives through social sponsorships. Journal of Marketing70(4): 154–169. DOI: 10.1509/jmkg.70.4.154.
SongBDongC (2022) What Do We Know about CSR Authenticity? A Systematic Review from 2007 to 2021. Social Responsibility Journal19(3): 525–548. doi: 10.1108/SRJ-07-2021-0276
124.
SovacoolBKXuXZarazua De RubensG, et al. (2020) Social media and disasters: human security, environmental racism, and crisis communication in Hurricane Irma response. Environmental Sociology6(3): 291–306. DOI: 10.1080/23251042.2020.1753310.
125.
SrirameshKNgCWTingST, et al. (2007) Corporate social responsibility and public relations. In: MaySCheneyG (eds). The Debate over Corporate Social Responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 119–134.
126.
SuchmanMC (1995) Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review20(3): 571–610. DOI: 10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331.
127.
TaylorM (2013) Corporate social responsibility campaigns: what do they tell us about organization-public relationships? In: RiceREAtkinCK (eds). Public Communication Campaigns. 4th edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 259–272.
UlmerRRSellnowTL (1997) Strategic ambiguity and the ethic of significant choice in the tobacco industry's crisis communication. Communication Studies48(3): 215–233. DOI: 10.1080/10510979709368502.
130.
United Church of Christ (1987) Toxic Wastes and Race in the United States: A National Report on the Racial and Socioeconomic Characteristics of Communities with Hazardous Wastes Sites. Retrieved fromhttps://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1310/ML13109A339.pdf
United States General Accounting Office [Gao] (1983) Siting of Hazardous Waste Landfills and Their Correlation with Racial and Economic Status of Surrounding Communities. Washington, D.C.: GAO. Available at: https://www.gao.gov/products/rced-83-168.
133.
Van RulerB (2015) Agile public relations planning: the reflective communication scrum. Public Relations Review41(2): 187–194. DOI: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.11.008.
134.
VasquezR (2022) CSR, CSA, or CPA? Examining corporate climate change communication strategies, motives, and effects on consumer outcomes. Sustainability14(6): 3604. DOI: 10.3390/su14063604.
135.
WaddellC (1995) Defining sustainable development: a case study in environmental communication. Technical Communication Quarterly4(2): 201–216. DOI: 10.1080/10572259509364597.
136.
WangRCooperKR (2022) Corporate social responsibility in emerging social issues: (Non) institutionalized practices in response to the global refugee crisis. Journal of Communication Management26(1): 98–114. DOI: 10.1108/jcom-04-2021-0042.
137.
WebbDJMohrLA (1998) A typology of consumer responses to cause-related marketing: from skeptics to socially concerned. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing17(2): 226–238. DOI: 10.1177/074391569801700207.
138.
WeberM (2008) The business case for corporate social responsibility: a company-level measurement approach for CSR. European Management Journal26(4): 247–261. DOI: 10.1016/j.emj.2008.01.006.
139.
WederF (2022) Strategic problematization of sustainability reframing dissent in strategic communication for transformation. Public Relations Inquiry11(3): 337–360. DOI: 10.1177/2046147X211026857.
140.
WrightB (2003) Race, politics and pollution: environmental Justice in the Mississippi River chemical corridor. In: EvansBAgyemanJBullardRD (eds). Just Sustainabilities: Development in an Unequal World. Taylor & Francis, 125–145.
141.
WrightBNanceEKingD, et al. (2022) A Question of human rights: transnational targeting of environmental justice communities. Humanity & Society46(3): 522–546. DOI: 10.1177/01605976211013284.
142.
XuHChangB (2023) Goodwill or just for show? The effects of different corporate social justice statements and the role of perceived authenticity. Journal of Communication Management27: 493–521. DOI: 10.1108/jcom-09-2022-0105.
143.
XuSWooD (2022) Key players in corporate social responsibility (CSR) institutionalization: an analysis of multinational companies’ interorganizational positioning via CSR reports. Management Communication Quarterly37: 3–31. DOI: 10.1177/08933189221095770.
144.
ZiemannA (2011) Communication theory and sustainability discourse. In: GodemannJMichelsenG (eds). Sustainability Communication: Interdisciplinary Perspectives and Theoretical Foundation. New York: Springer, 89–96.
145.
ZollerHM (2012) Communicating health: political risk narratives in an environmental health campaign. Journal of Applied Communication Research40(1): 20–43. DOI: 10.1080/00909882.2011.634816.
