BayerJ. B.CampbellS. W.LingR. (2016). Connection cues: Activating the norms and habits of social connectedness. Communication theory, 26(2), 128–149. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12090
2.
BoaseJ.HumphreysL. (2018). Mobile methods: Explorations, innovations, and reflections. Mobile Media & Communication, 6(2), 153–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157918764215
3.
ChanM. (2015). Mobile phones and the good life: Examining the relationships among mobile use, social capital and subjective well-being. New Media & Society, 17(1), 96–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813516836
4.
ChanM.HuP.MakM. K. F. (2022). Mediation analysis and warranted inferences in media and communication research: Examining research design in communication journals from 1996 to 2017. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 99(2), 463–486. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699020961519
MaccagnanA.Wren-LewisS.BrownH.TaylorT. (2018). Wellbeing and society: Towards quantification of the co-benefits of wellbeing. Social Indicators Research, 141(1), 217–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1826-7
8.
MatthesJ.KarsayK.SchmuckD.StevicA. (2020). “Too much to handle”: Impact of mobile social networking sites on information overload, depressive symptoms, and well-being. Computers in Human Behavior, 105, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.106217
9.
RainieL.WellmanB. (2012). Networked: The new social operating system. MIT Press.
10.
RodmanG.FryK. G. (2009). Communication technology and psychological well-being: Yin, yang, and the golden mean of media effects. In Y. Amichai-Hamburger (Ed.), Technology and psychological well-being (pp. 9–33). Cambridge University Press.
11.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141–166. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141
12.
SchneiderF. M.LutzS.HalfmannA.MeierA.ReineckeL. (2021). How and when do mobile media demands impact well-being? Explicating the Integrative Model of Mobile Media Use and Need Experiences (IM3UNE). Mobile Media & Communication, 10(2), 251–271. https://doi.org/10.1177/20501579211054928
13.
SchneiderF. M.ReichS.ReineckeL. (2018). Methodological challenges of permanently online/permanently connected for communication research. In D. H. P. Vorderer, L. Reinecke, & C. Klimmt (Ed.), Permanently online, permanently connected: Living and communicating in a POPC world (pp. 29–39). Routledge.
14.
SchrockA. R. (2015). Communicative affordances of mobile media: Portability, availability, locatability, and multimediality. International Journal of Communication, 9, 1229–1246.
15.
SundarS. S.JiaH.WaddellT. F.HuangY. (2015). Toward a theory of interactive media effects (TIME): Four models for explaining how interface features affect user psychology. In S. S. Sundar (Ed.), The handbook of the psychology of communication technology (pp. 47–86). Wiley Blackwell.
16.
TaylorS. H.BazarovaN. N. (2021). Always available, always attached: A relational perspective on the effects of mobile phones and social media on subjective well-being. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 26(4), 187–206. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmab004
17.
TurkleS. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. Basic Books.
18.
Vanden AbeeleM. M. P. (2021). Digital wellbeing as a dynamic construct. Communication Theory, 31(4), 932–955. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtaa024
19.
Vanden AbeeleM. M. P.NguyenM. H. (2022). Digital well-being in an age of mobile connectivity: An introduction to the special issue. Mobile Media & Communication, 10(2), 174–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/20501579221080899
