Through an engagement with Sylvia Wynter, this article explores how black feminist critiques of the human can inform critical genealogies of religion. Specifically, the article develops a theoretical framework to interrogate how the modern construction of religion and the secular also produces racial identities and hierarchies. To draw attention to the global dimensions of this project, the article foregrounds the seminal work of Jason Ā. Josephson-Storm in his book, The Invention of Religion in Japan. The article argues that studies like Josephson-Storm's show how religion helps transform existing forms of social organization within a bio-evolutionary conception of the nation, and is used by the state to differentiate between who can be considered fully human and who cannot. In this process “superstition” or “irrationality” is rewritten as a biological threat to the health and well-being of “the people,” and political domination is represented as a struggle to purify the nation.
AsadTalal. 1993. Genealogies of Religion: Discipline and Reasons of Power in Christianity and Islam.
Baltimore and London:
Johns Hopkins University Press.
2.
AsadTalal. 2003. Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity.
Stanford:
Stanford University Press.
3.
BarrettLindon. 2014. Racial Blackness and the Discontinuity of Western Modernity.
Chicago:
University of Illinois Press.
4.
BaylySusan. 1999. “Race in Britain and India.” In Nation and Religion: Perspectives on Europe and Asia, edited by Petervan der Veer and HartmutLehmann, 71–95.
Princeton:
Princeton University Press.
5.
ChidesterDavid. 1996. Savage Systems: Colonialism and Comparative Religion in Southern Africa.
Charlottesville:
University Press of Virginia.
6.
ChidesterDavid. 2013. Empire of Religion: Imperialism and Comparative Religion.
Chicago:
The University of Chicago Press.
7.
ChowRey. 2002. The Protestant Ethnic and the Spirit of Capitalism.
New York:
Columbia University Press.
8.
da SilvaDenise Ferreira. 2007. Toward a Global Idea of Race.
Minneapolis:
University of Minnesota Press.
9.
DubuissonDaniel. 2003. The Western Construction of Religion: Myths, Knowledge, and Ideology. Translated by William Sayers. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.
10.
JohnsonSylvester. 2015. African American Religions, 1500–2000: Colonialism, Democracy, and Freedom.
New York:
Cambridge University Press.
11.
JosephsonJason Ānanda2012. The Invention of Religion in Japan.
Chicago:
The University of Chicago Press.
12.
LongCharles. 1999. Significations: Signs, Symbols and Images in the Interpretation of Religion.
Aurora:
The Davies Group Publishers.
13.
McKittrickKatherine. 2014. Sylvia Wynter: On Being Human as Praxis.
Durham:
Duke University Press.
14.
MahmoodSaba. 2004. Politics of Piety: The Islamic Revival and the Feminist Subject.
Princeton:
Princeton University Press.
15.
MasuzawaTomoko. 2005. The Invention of World Religions: Or, How European Universalism Was Preserved in the Language of Pluralism.
Chicago:
University of Chicago Press.
16.
MbembeAchille. 2003. “Necropolitics.” Translated by Libby Meintjes. Public Culture 15, no. 1: 11–40.
NongbriBrett. 2013. Before Religion: The History of a Modern Concept.
New Haven:
Yale University Press.
19.
QuijanoAníbal2000.
“Coloniality of Power, Eurocentrism, and Latin America.”Nepantla: Views from South1, no. 3: 533–580.
20.
RobinsonCedric. 1983. Black Marxism: The Making of the Black Radical Tradition.
London:
Zed Press.
21.
SpillersHortense J.2003. Black, White, and in Color: Essays on American Literature and Culture.
Chicago:
The University of Chicago Press.
22.
van der VeerPeter. 1999. “The Moral State: Religion, Nation, and Empire in Victorian Britain and British India.” In Nation and Religion: Perspectives on Europe and Asia, edited by Peter van der Veer and Hartmut Lehmann, 15–43. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
23.
van der VeerPeter. 2001a. Imperial Encounters: Religion and Modernity in India and Britain.
Princeton:
Princeton University Press.
24.
van der VeerPeter. 2001b. “Transnational Religion.” Paper given to the conference on Transnational Migration: Comparative Perspectives. Princeton University, June 30–July 1, p. 6.
25.
WeheliyeAlexander. 2014. Habeas Viscus: Racializing Assemblages, Biopolitics, and Black Feminist Theories of the Human.
Durham:
Duke University Press.
26.
WengerTisa. 2009. We Have a Religion: The 1920s Pueblo Indian Dance Controversy and American Religious Freedom.
Chapel Hill:
The University of North Carolina Press.
27.
WengerTisa. 2017. Religious Freedom: The Contested History of an American Ideal.
Chapel Hill:
The University of North Carolina Press.
28.
WildersonIIIFrankB.2010. Red, White and Black: Cinema and the Structure of U.S. Antagonisms.
Durham:
Duke University Press.
29.
WynterSylvia. 1995. “1492: A New World View.” Race, Discourse, and the Origin of the Americas: A New World View, edited by Vera Lawrence and Rex Nettleford, 5–57. Washington: Smithsonian Institute Press.
30.
WynterSylvia. 2003.
“Unsettling the Coloniality of Being/Power/Truth/Freedom: Towards the Human, After Man, its Overrepresentation – An Argument.”CR: The New Centennial Review3, no. 3: 257–337.
31.
WynterSylvia. 2005. “On How We Mistook the Map for the Territory, and Re-Imprisoned Ourselves in Our Unbearable Wrongness of Being, of Désetre: Black Studies Toward the Human Project.” In Not Only the Master’s Tools: African American Studies in Theory and Practice, edited by Lewis R. Gordon and Jane Anna Gordon, 107–169. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.
