Loss aversion accounts for negative changes having a higher psychological impact than positive changes. Our paper reviews existing marketing literature on loss aversion and suggests directions for future research. We distinguish four dimensions of loss aversion — neural, cognitive, affective and conative — and identify socio-demographic characteristics, product characteristics and exchange conditions as three main groups of loss aversion moderators. We formulate strategic recommendations for marketers based on consumer loss aversion.
AbdellaouiM.BleichrodtH.ParaschivC. (2007). Measuring loss aversion under prospect theory: A parameter-free approach, Management Science, 53, 11, 1659–1674.
2.
AlbaJ.HutchinsonW. (1987), Dimensions of consumer expertise, Journal of Consumer Research, 13, 4, 411–454.
3.
ArielyD.HuberJ.WertenbrochK. (2005), When do losses loom larger than gains?, Journal of Marketing Research, 42, 2, 134–138.
4.
ArielyD.SimonsonI. (2003), Buying, bidding, playing, or competing? Value assessment and decision dynamics in online auctions, Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13, 1–2, 113–123.
5.
BecharaA.DamasioH.TranelD.DamasioA. (1997), Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy, Science, 5304, 275, 1293–1295.
6.
BeckerG.StiglerG. (1977), De gustibus non est disputandum, American Economic Review, 67, 2, 76–90.
7.
BenartziS.ThalerR. (1995), Myopic loss aversion and the equity premium puzzle, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 73–92.
8.
BewleyT. (1998), Why not cut pay?, European Economic Review, 42, 3–5, 459–490.
9.
BrennerL.RottenstreichY.SoodS.BilginB. (2007), On the psychology of loss aversion: Possession, valence, and reversals of the endowment effect, Journal of Consumer Research, 34, 3, 369–376.
10.
CamererC. (2005), Three cheers — Psychological, theoretical, empirical — for loss aversion, Journal of Marketing Research, 42, 2, 129–133.
11.
CamererC.BabcockL.LoewensteinG.ThalerR. (1997), Labor supply of New York City cabdrivers: One day at a time, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 2, 407–441.
12.
CarmonZ.ArielyD. (2000), Focusing on the forgone: How value can appear so different to buyers and sellers, Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 3, 360–370.
13.
CarmonZ.WertenbrochK.ZeelenbergM. (2003), Option attachment: When deliberating makes choosing feel like losing, Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 1, 15–29.
14.
CarpenterG. S.NakamotoK. (1990), La formation des préférences du consommateur et l'avantage pionnier, Recherche et Applications en Marketing, 5, 2, 17–43.
15.
ChapmanG. (1998), Similarity and reluctance to trade, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 11, 1, 47–58.
16.
ChenK.LakshminarayananV.SantosL. (2006), How basic are behavioral biases? Evidence from capuchin monkey, Journal of Political Economy, 114, 3, 517–537.
17.
De BorgerB.FosgerauM. (2007), The trade-off between money and time: a test of the theory of reference dependent preferences, Working document, Technical University of Denmark
18.
DharR.WertenbrochK. (2000), Consumer choice between hedonic and utilitarian goods, Journal of Marketing Research, 37, 1, 60–72.
19.
DubourgW. R.Jones-LeeM. W.LoomesG. (1994), Imprecise preferences and the WTP-WTA disparity, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 9, 2, 115–133.
20.
GalD. (2006), A psychological law of inertia and the illusion of loss aversion, Judgment and Decision Making, 1, 1, 23–32.
21.
GenesoveD.MayerC. (2001), Loss aversion and seller behavior: Evidence from the housing market, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116, 4, 1233–1260.
22.
HaighM.ListJ. (2005), Do professional traders exhibit myopic loss aversion? An experimental analysis, The Journal of Finance, 60, 1, 523–534.
23.
HarbaughW.KrauseK.VesterlundL. (2001), Are adults better behaved than children? age, experience, and the endowment effect, Economics Letters, 70, 2, 175–181.
24.
HaririA. R.MattayV. S.TessitoreA.KolachanaB.FeraF.GoldmanD.EganM. F.WeinbergerD. R. (2002), Serotonin transporter genetic variation and the response of the human amygdala, Science, 297, 400–403.
25.
HardieB.JohnsonE.FaderP. (1993), Modeling loss aversion and reference dependence effects, Marketing Science, 12, 4, 378–394.
26.
HeathT.RyuG.ChatterjeeS.McCarthyM.MothersbaughD.MilbergS.GaethG. (2000), Asymmetric competition in choice and the leveraging of competitive disadvantages, Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 3, 291–308.
27.
HeathC.SollJ. (1996), Mental budgeting and consumer decisions, Journal of Consumer Research, 23, 1, 40–52.
28.
HeymanJ.OrhunS.ArielyD. (2004), Auction fever: The effect of opponents and quasi-endowment on product valuations, Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18, 4, 4–21.
29.
JaniszewskiC.CunhaM. (2004), The influence of price discount framing on the evaluation of a product bundle, Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 4, 534–546. Johnson E., Gaechter J. and Herrmann A. (2006), Exploring the nature of loss aversion, IZA Discussion paper n° 2015
30.
KahnemanD.TverskyA. (1979), Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk, Econometrica, 47, 2, 263–291.
31.
KahnemanD.KnetschJ.ThalerR. (1990), Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the Coase theorem, Journal of Political Economy, 98, 6, 1325–1348.
32.
KahnemanD.KnetschJ.ThalerR. (1991), The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status-quo bias, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5, 193–206.
33.
KnetschJ. (1989), The endowment effect and evidence of nonreversible indifference curves, American Economic Review, 79, 5, 1277–1284.
34.
KnetschJ.SindenJ. (1984), Willingness to pay and compensation demanded: Experimental evidence of an unexpected disparity in measures of value, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 99, 3, 507–521.
35.
KringelbachM. (2005), The human orbitofrontal cortex: Linking reward to hedonic experience, Neurosciences, 6, 691–702.
36.
LeBoeufR.ShafirE. (2004), Alternating selves and conflicting choices: identity salience and preference inconsistency, Working document, Princeton University
37.
LernerJ.SmallD.LoewensteinG. (2004), Heart strings and purse strings: Carryover effects of emotions on economic decisions, Psychological Science, 15, 5, 337–341.
38.
ListJ. (2003), Does market experience eliminate market anomalies?, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118, 1, 41–71.
39.
ListJ. (2004), Neoclassical theory versus prospect theory: Evidence from the marketplace, Econometrica, 72, 2, 615–625.
40.
LoewensteinG.O'DonoghueB. (2004), Animal spirits: affective and deliberative processes in economic behavior draft, Working document, Carnegie Mellon University
41.
MandelD. (2002), Beyond mere ownership: Transaction demand as a moderator of the endowment effect, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 88, 2, 737–747.
42.
MayhewG.WinerR. (1992), An empirical analysis of internal and external reference prices using scanner data, Journal of Consumer Research, 19, 1, 62–71.
43.
NovemskyN.KahnemanD. (2005a), The boundaries of loss aversion, Journal of Marketing Research, 42, 2, 119–128.
44.
NovemskyN.KahnemanD. (2005b), How do intentions affect loss aversion?, Journal of Marketing Research, 42, 2, 139–140.
45.
OdeanT. (1998), Are investors reluctant to realize their losses?, Journal of Finance, 53, 5, 1775–1798.
46.
OkadaE. (2001), Trade-ins, mental accounting, and product replacement decisions, Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 4, 433–446.
47.
OliverR. (1997), Satisfaction: on a behavioral perspective on the consumer, New York, McGraw-Hill.
48.
PenningsJ.SmidtsA. (2003), The shape of utility functions and organizational behaviour, Management Science, 49, 9, 1251–1263.
49.
PetersE.SlovicP.GregoryR. (2003), The role of affect in the WTA/WTP disparity, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 16, 4, 309–330.
50.
PlottC.ZeilerK. (2005), The willingness to pay -willingness to accept gap, the endowment effect. Subject misperceptions and experimental procedures for eliciting valuations, American Economic Review, 95, 3, 530–545.
51.
PurohitD. (1995), Playing the role of buyer and seller: The mental accounting of trade-ins, Marketing Letters, 6, 2, 101–110.
52.
PutlerD. (1992), Incorporating reference price effects into a theory of consumer choice, Marketing Science, 11, 3, 287–309.
SaymanS.ÖncülerA. (2005), Effects of study design characteristics on the WTA/WTP disparity: A meta analytical framework, Journal of Economic Psychology, 26, 2, 289–312.
55.
SenS.JohnsonE. (1997), Mere-possession effects without possession in consumer choice, Journal of Consumer Research, 24, 2, 105–117.
56.
SimonsonI.DroletA. (2004), Anchoring effects on consumers' willingness-to-pay and willingness-to-accept, Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 3, 681–690.
57.
SimonsonI.TverskyA. (1992), Choice in context: Trade-off contrast and extremeness aversion, Journal of Marketing Research, 29, 3, 281–295.
58.
StrahilevitzM.LoewensteinG. (1998), The effect of ownership history on the valuation of objects, Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 3, 276–289.
59.
ThalerR. (1980), Towards a positive theory of consumer choice, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1, 39–60.
TomS.FoxC.TrepelC.PoldrackR. (2007), The neural basis of loss aversion in decision-making under risk, Science, 315, 515–518.
63.
TrepelC.FoxC.PoldrackR. (2005), Prospect theory on the brain? Toward a cognitive neuroscience of decision under risk, Cognitive Brain Research, 23, 34–50.
64.
TverskyA.KahnemanD. (1991), Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106, 4, 1039–1062.
65.
TverskyA.KahnemanD. (1992), Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 297–323.
66.
Van DijkE.van KnippenbergD. (1998), Trading wine: On the endowment effect, loss aversion and the comparability of consumer goods, Journal of Economic Psychology, 19, 4, 485–495.
67.
WeberB.AholtA.NeuhausC.TrautnerP.ElgerC.TeichertT. (2007), Neural evidence for reference-dependence in real-market-transactions, Neuro Image, 35, 1, 441–447.
