This research aims at understanding the role of market offers constructing a stigmatised identity for consumers with disabilities; it further underlines the conditions under which these consumers may manage this stigma effectively. After a literature review focused on stigmatised identity construction through a symbolic interactionist perspective, the authors describe a qualitative study carried out with motor-disabled consumers. The results illustrate how both standard offers and those specially designed for the motor disabled lead to a dead end that contributes to stigmata construction. They also point out how these consumers manage to develop other identities.
AdkinsNROzanneJL (2005) The low literate consumer. Journal of Consumer Research32(1): 93–105.
2.
AkrichMRabeharisoaV (2012) L’expertise profane dans les associations de patients, un outil de démocratie sanitaire. Santé Publique24(1): 69–74.
3.
ArgoJJMainKJ (2008) Stigma by association in coupon redemption: Looking cheap because of others. Journal of Consumer Research35(4): 559–572.
4.
ArnouldEJThompsonCJ (2005) Consumer Culture Theory (CCT): Twenty years of research. Journal of Consumer Research31(4): 868–882.
5.
BaïdakN (2007) Apports des ‘Disability Studies’ britanniques à la compréhension sociologique du handicap. Journée d’étude ‘Approches socio-économiques du handicap’, Université de Namur, Namur, 10décembre.
6.
BakerSM (2006) Consumer normalcy: Understanding the value of shopping through narratives of consumers with visual impairments. Journal of Retailing82(1): 37–50.
7.
BakerSMKaufman-ScarboroughC (2001) Marketing and public accommodation: A retrospective on Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing20(2): 297–304.
8.
BakerSMGentryJWRittenburgTL (2005) Building understanding of the domain of consumer vulnerability. Journal of Macromarketing25(2): 128–139.
9.
BakerSMStephensDLHillRP (2001) Marketplace experiences of consumers with visual impairments: Beyond the Americans with Disabilities Act. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing20(2): 215–224.
10.
BakerSMStephensDLHillRP (2002) How can retailers enhance accessibility: Giving consumers with visual impairments a voice in the marketplace. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services9(4): 227–239.
11.
BannisterENHoggMK (2004) Negative symbolic consumption and consumers’ drive for self-esteem: The case of the fashion industry. European Journal of Marketing38(7): 850–868.
12.
BelkRW (1988) Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research15(2): 139–168.
13.
BorgersonJ (2005) Materiality, agency, and the constitution of consuming subjects: Insights for consumer research. In: MenonGRaoAR (eds.) Advances in Consumer Research Volume 32. Duluth, MN: Association for Consumer Research, pp. 439–443.
14.
BurnettJJ (1996) What services marketers need to know about mobility-disabled consumer. Journal of Services Marketing10(3): 3–20.
15.
BurnettJJBakerHB (2001) Assessing the travel–related behaviors of the mobility–disabled consumer. Journal of Travel Research40(1): 4–11.
16.
ChildersTLKaufman-ScarboroughC (2009) Expanding opportunities for online shoppers with disabilities. Journal of Business Research62(5): 572–578.
17.
ClochardFDesjeuxD (2013) Le consommateur malin face à la crise. Paris: Editions L’Harmattan.
18.
CooleyCF (1902) Human nature and the Social Oder. New York: Scribner.
19.
CorbinJMStraussA (1988) Unending Work and Care: Managing Chronic Illness at Home. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
20.
CovaBCovaV (2009) Faces of the new consumer: A genesis of consumer governmentality. Recherche et Applications en Marketing24(3): 81–100.
21.
CrockettDWallendorfM (2004) The role of normative political ideology in consumer behaviour. Journal of Consumer Research31(3): 511–528.
22.
De SardanJPO (1998) Emique. L’homme147: 151–166.
23.
DenzinNKLincolnYS (1994) Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
24.
DubarC (2010) La socialisation: construction des identités sociales et professionnelles. Paris: Armand Colin.
25.
FabricantSMGouldSJ (1993) Women’s makeup careers: An interpretive study of color cosmetic use and ‘face value’. Psychology and Marketing10(6): 531–548.
26.
FiratAFVenkateshA (1995) Liberatory postmodernism and the reenchantment of consumption. Journal of Consumer Research22(3): 239–267.
27.
FlanaganJC (1954) The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin31(4): 327–358.
28.
Garcia-BardidiaRNauJP (2012) Je suis addict mais pas no-life stigmatisation et identités non-désirées de consommation numérique. In: Colloque de l’Association Française de Marketing, Brest, 9–12 May.
29.
GardouC (2012) La société inclusive, parlons-en! Il n’y a pas de vie minuscule. Toulouse: Erès.
30.
GarfinkelH (1984) Studies in Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
31.
GeertzC (1973) The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.
32.
GoffmanE (1973a) La mise en scène de la vie quotidienne: La présentation de soi, tome 1. Paris: Les Editions de Minuit.
33.
GoffmanE (1973b) La mise en scène de la vie quotidienne: Les relations en public, tome 2. Paris: Les Editions de Minuit.
34.
GoffmanE (1974) Les rites d’interactionParis: Les Editions de Minuit.
35.
GoffmanE (1975) Stigmate: les usages sociaux des handicaps. Paris: Editions de minuit.
36.
GopaldasAFischerE (2011) Beyond gender: Intersectionality, culture, and consumer behavior. In: TuncayLOtnesC (eds) Gender, Culture, and Consumer Behavior. Sussex: Psychology Press, pp. 393–410.
37.
HenryG (2008) L’Offre des biens et services et les personnes à mobilité réduite. mémoire de maîtrise, directeur Ch. Derbaix, FUCAM, Mons.
38.
HenryPCCaldwellM (2006) Self-empowerment and consumption: Consumer remedies for prolonged stigmatization. European Journal of Marketing40(9–10): 1031–1048.
39.
HirschmanAO (1970) Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
40.
HirschmanEC (1992) The consciousness of addiction: Toward a general theory of compulsive consumption. Journal of Consumer Research19(2): 155–179.
41.
HoggMKMichellPCN (1996) Identity, self and consumption: A conceptual framework. Journal of Marketing Management12(7): 629–644.
42.
HoltD (1997) Poststructuralist lifestyle analysis: Conceptualizing the social patterning of consumption in postmodernity. Journal of Consumer Research23(4): 326–350.
43.
KaufmanC (1995) Shop ’til you drop: Tales from a physically challenged shopper. Journal of Consumer Marketing12(3): 2–55.
44.
Kaufman-ScarboroughC (1999) Reasonable access for mobility-disabled persons is more than widening the door. Journal of Retailing75(4): 479–508.
45.
Kaufman-ScarboroughC (2000) Seeing through the eyes of the color-deficient shopper: Consumer issues for public policy. Journal of Consumer Policy23(4): 461–492.
46.
KaufmannJC (2004) L’invention de soi, une théorie de l’identité. Paris: Hachette Littératures.
KozinetsRV (2001) Utopian enterprise: Articulating the meanings of Star Trek’s culture of consumption. Journal of Consumer Research28(1): 67–88.
49.
Le BretonD (2012) L’interactionnisme symbolique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France (PUF).
50.
LetartreM (2007) Le comportement du consommateur à mobilité réduite: Une approche interprétative. mémoire de maîtrise, directeur Ch.Derbaix, FUCAM, Mons.
51.
LewisJ (1998) Learning to strip: The socialization experiences of exotic dancers. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality7(1): 51–66.
52.
LincolnYSGubaEG (1985) Naturalist Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
53.
LinkBGPhelanJC (2001) Conceptualizing stigma. Annual Review of Sociology27: 363–385.
54.
MarionG (2003) Apparence et identité: Une approche sémiotique du discours des adolescents à propos de leur expérience de la mode. Recherche et Applications en Marketing18(2): 1–29.
55.
MasonMPaviaT (2006) When the family system includes disability: Adaptation in the marketplace, roles and identity. Journal of Marketing Management22: (9–10): 1009–1030.
56.
MeadGH (1934) Mind, Self, and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
57.
MialetH (2012) Hawking Incorporated: Stephen Hawking and the Anthropology of the Knowing Subject. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
58.
MurphyRF (1990) The Body Silent. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
59.
NizetJRigauxN (2005) La sociologie de Erving Goffman. Paris: Deécouverte.
60.
OdouPBonninG (2014) Consumers’ neutralization strategies to counter normative pressure: The case of illegal downloading. Recherche et Applications en Marketing29(1): 114–133.
61.
PeñalozaL (1995) Immigrant consumers: Marketing and public policy considerations in the global economy. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing14(1): 83–94.
62.
PhelanJCLinkBGStueveA. (2000) Public conceptions of mental illness in 1950 and 1996: What is mental illness and is it to be feared?Journal of Health and Social Behavior41(2): 188–207.
63.
PietteW (2009) Le marketing et le matériel d’aide à la mobilité. mémoire de maîtrise, directeur Ch.Derbaix, FUCAM, Mons.
64.
RigauxN (2012) Introduction à la sociologie par sept grands auteurs. Bruxelles: De Boeck.
65.
SaillantFFougeyrollasP (2007) L’icône du handicap. Reliance25(3): 81–87.
66.
SandikciÖGerG (2010) Veiling in style: How does a stigmatized practice become fashionable?Journal of Consumer Research37(1): 15–36.
67.
ScarabotoDFischerE (2012) Frustrated fatshionistas: An institutional theory perspective on consumer quests for greater choice in mainstream markets. Journal of Consumer Research39(6): 1234–1257.
68.
SchoutenJW (1991) Personal rites of passage and the reconstruction of self. Advances in Consumer Research18(2): 49–51.
69.
SchoutenJWMartinDDuFaultB (2015) Neomaterialism and ontological flattening: Sending canonical theories back to school. In: Interpretive consumer research conference, Edinburgh, 16–17 Avril.
70.
SenA (2012) L’idée de justice. Paris: Editions Flammarion.
71.
ShankarAElliottRFitchettJA (2009) Identity, consumption and narratives of socialization. Marketing Theory9(1): 75–94.
72.
SheldonKCaldwellL (1994) Urinary incontinence in women: Implications for therapeutic recreation. Therapeutic Recreation Journal28(4): 203–212.
73.
SirgyMJ (1982) Self-concept in consumer behavior: A critical review. Journal of Consumer Research9(3): 287–300.
74.
StikerHJ (2013) Corps infirmes et socieéteés. Paris: Dunod.
75.
TepperK (1994) The role of labeling processes in elderly consumers’ responses to age segmentation cues. Journal of Consumer Research20(4): 503–519.
76.
TiercelinA (2013) Les transgressions des normes de marché. Le cas des consommatrices intensives de jeux vidéo. Thèse de doctorat en sciences de gestion, Université de Rouen, Rouen.
77.
ÜstünerTHoltDB (2007) Dominated consumer acculturation: The social construction of poor migrant women’s consumer identity projects in a Turkish squatter. Journal of Consumer Research34(1): 41–56.
78.
VignierNRavaudJ-FVilleI (2007) La population des usagers de fauteuil roulant en France, à domicile et en institution - L’apport des enquêtes nationales Handicap Incapcités Dépendance. Disponible à l’adresse suivante: http://www.invs.sante.fr/publications/2007/jvs_2007/posters%20invs/P14.pdf (dernier accès le 8 septembre 2015).
79.
VilleIFillionERavaudJF (2014) Introduction à la sociologie du handicap. Louvain-la-Neuve: De Boeck.
80.
WinanceM (2003) La double expérience des personnes atteintes d’une maladie neuromusculaire: Rétraction et extension. Sciences Sociales et Santé21(2): 5–30.
81.
WinanceM (2006) Trying out the wheelchair. The mutual shaping of people and devices through adjustment. Science, Technology & Human Values31(1): 52–72.
