This research investigates the introduction of innovative designs through content and semiotic analyses of the visual codes of two wine regions: one known to be traditional (Bordeaux) and the other to be innovative (Barossa Valley). The content analysis indicates that the Australian wines differentiate themselves by choosing various themes and styles of illustration, while still conforming to the dominant visual codes for the layout, composition, typefaces and colours. Furthermore, the semiotic analysis shows that the themes and styles of illustration introduced in the Barossa category carry ‘signifieds’ that are relevant to the product category. Thus, the results indicate that the Barossa wineries fulfil two conditions suggested by the literature: moderate novelty and ‘ideal incongruence’ (unexpected but relevant). More importantly, by analysing the meanings of the visual codes used in the two wine regions, this work decodes the elements of graphic design language for the wine category, thus elucidating how it is possible to create a wine label that is unexpected but relevant. Finally, the research allows the identification of four main strategies for brand positioning and indicates how to express them through label graphic design.
AlywardDTurpinT (2003) New wine in old bottles: A case study of innovation territories in ‘new world’ wine production. International Journal of Innovation Management7(4): 501–525.
2.
AresGPiqueras-FiszmanBVarelaP. (2011) Food labels: Do consumers perceive what semiotics want to convey?Food Quality and Preference22(7): 689–698.
3.
AufenastJ (2002) Brands design. Harpers: The Wine and Spirit Weekly, April, pp. 22–25.
4.
AurierP (2004) L’analyse des contextes de consommation: Clé pour comprendre le marché du vin. In: d’HautevilleFCoudercJPHanninH. (eds) Bacchus 2005. Paris: Editions La vigne-Dunod, pp. 129–150.
5.
BarthesR (1964) Image, Music, Text. New York: Hill & Wang.
6.
BarthesR (1972) Mythologies. New York: Hill & Wang.
7.
BenmoussaFZMaynadierB (2013) Brand Storytelling: entre doute et croyance. Une étude des récits de la marque Moleskine. Décisions Marketing70: 119–128.
BernsteinB (1971) Class, Codes and Control. London: Routledge.
10.
BertinE (2005) Des outils sémiotiques pour la pensée stratégique? Premières investigations. In: CouegnasNBertinE (eds) Solutions sémiotiques. Limoges: Lambert-Lucas, pp. 11–24.
11.
BertinE (2010) Pour une sémiotique du champ stratégique de la communication. PhD Thesis, Université de Bourgogne, Dijon.
12.
BeverlandMB (2005) Managing the design innovation–Brand marketing interface: Resolving the tension between artistic creation and commercial imperatives. Journal of Product Innovation Management22(2): 193–207.
13.
BlanchardG (1980) Pour une sémiologie de la typographie. PhD Thesis, Paris-Sorbonne University, Paris.
14.
BlanchardG (1998) Aide au choix de la typographie – Cours supérieur. Reillanne: Atelier Perrousseaux.
15.
BlijlevensJCarbonCCMuggeR. (2012) Aesthetic appraisal of product designs: Independent effects of typicality and arousal. British Journal of Psychology103(1): 44–57.
16.
BobrieF ([2009] 2013) Les présentations packaging des vins: tendances et permanence. In: TrinquecosteJF (ed.) Le vin et ses marchés: annales 2009 to 2013. Cenon: Dareios.
17.
Borja de MozotaB (2002) Design Management. Paris: Editions d’organisation.
18.
CampbellGGuibertN (2006) Old World strategies against New World competition in a globalising wine industry. British Food Journal108(4): 233–242.
19.
CampbellMCGoodsteinRC (2001) The moderating effect of perceived risk on consumers’ evaluations of product incongruity: Preference for the norm. Journal of Consumer Research28(3): 439–449.
20.
CastaingY (2013) Stratégies et marketing du vin. Paris: Dunod.
21.
CavassilasM (2007) Clés et codes du packaging – sémiotique appliquée. Paris: Editions Hermès Sciences – Lavoisier.
22.
CelhayFPasseboisJ (2011) Wine labelling: Is it time to break with tradition? A study of the moderating role of perceived risk. International Journal of Wine Business Research23(4): 318–337.
23.
CelhayFTrinquecosteJF (2015) Package graphic design: Investigating the variables that moderate consumer response to atypical designs. Journal of Product Innovation Management32(6): 1014–1032.
24.
ChalomonINabecL (2013) Les pratiques de lecture des étiquettes nutritionnelles: Une analyse sémiotique des représentations des règles de nutrition. Décisions Marketing70: 59–74.
25.
ChandlerD (2007) Semiotics: The Basics. London: Routledge.
26.
ChengF (1991) Vide et plein. Paris: Editions du Seuil.
27.
ColinC (2006) L’imitation et sa négation (réutilisation, appropriation, digestion, piratage, mixage). In: ColinC (ed.) Design et imitation. Paris: éditions des industries françaises de l’ameublement, pp. 14–47.
28.
CoxJBridwellL (2007) Australian companies using globalization to disrupt the ancient wine industry. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal17(4): 209–221.
29.
DanoF (1996) Packaging: une approche sémiotique. Recherche et Applications en Marketing11(1): 23–35.
30.
DanoF (1998) Contribution de la sémiotique à la conception des conditionnements: Application à deux catégories de produits. Recherche et Applications en Marketing13(2): 9–29.
31.
De SaussureF ([1916] 2011) Course in General Linguistics. New York: Columbia University Press.
32.
Dell’EraCVergantiR (2007) Strategies of innovation and imitation of product languages. Journal of Product Innovation Management24(6): 580–599.
33.
Dell’EraCVergantiR (2011) Diffusion processes of product meanings in design-intensive industries: Determinants and dynamics. Journal of Product Innovation Management28: 881–895.
34.
Dell’EraCMarchesiAVergantiR. (2008) Language mining: Analysis of the innovation of dominant product languages in design-intensive industries. European Journal of Innovation Management11(1): 25–50.
35.
d’HautevilleFSirieixL (2007) Comprendre le consommateur de vin en 2005. In: CoudercJPd’HautevilleFHanninH. (eds) Bacchus 2008. Paris: Editions Dunod-La vigne, pp. 105–135.
36.
DivardRUrienB (2001) Le consommateur vit dans un monde en couleurs. Recherche et Applications en Marketing16(1): 3–24.
37.
DouglasM ([1986] 1999) Comment pensent les institutions, editions la Découverte/Mauss (recherches. série bibliothèque du Mauss).
38.
DoyleJRBottomleyPA (2004) Font appropriateness and brand choice. Journal of Business Research57(8): 873–880.
39.
DruckerJMcVarishE (2009) Graphic Design History: A Critical Guide. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
40.
EcoU (1965) Toward a semiotic enquiry into the television message. In: CornerJHawthorneJ (eds) Communication Studies: An Introductory Reader. London: Edward Arnold, pp. 131–150.
41.
EcoU (1981) The Role of the Reader: Explorations in the Semiotics of Texts. London: Hutchinson.
42.
FinizioG (2006) Design et Marketing: Gérer L’idée. Paris: Eska.
43.
FiskeJ (1982) Introduction to Communication Studies. London: Routledge.
44.
FleckNMailleV (2010) Thirty years of conflicting studies on the influence of congruence as perceived by the consumer: Overview, limitations and avenues for research. Recherche et Applications en Marketing25(4): 69–92.
45.
FlochJM (2003) Sémiotique, marketing et communication: sous les signes les stratégies. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
46.
FlochJM (2010) Identités visuelles. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
47.
FreireNA (2014) When luxury advertising adds the identitary values of luxury: A semiotic analysis. Journal of Business Research67: 2666–2675.
48.
GarberLLHyattEMBoyaÜÖ (2008) The mediating effects of the appearance of nondurable consumer goods and their packaging on consumer behavior. In: SchiffersteinHNJHekkertP (eds) Product Experience. Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 581–602.
49.
GiannelloniJLVernetteE (2001) Etudes de marché, 2ème édition. Paris: Vuibert.
50.
GolletyMGuichardN (2011) The dilemma of flavor and color in the choice of packaging by children. Young Consumers12(1): 82–90.
51.
GoodeMRDahlDWMoreauCP (2013) Innovation aesthetics: The relationship between category cues, categorization certainty, and newness perceptions. Journal of Product Innovation Management30(2): 192–208.
52.
GordonJ (2001) Fanfare for the common vin?Harpers: The Wine & Spirit Weekly, December, pp. 32–34.
53.
GurviezPDe MontetyC (2001) Le contrat de communication ‘Fournisseur d’accès-internautes’: une recherche exploratoire. Recherche et Applications en Marketing16(3): 55–78.
54.
HallS ([1973] 1980) Encoding/decoding. In: Center for Contemporary Cultural Studies (ed.)Culture, Media, Language: Working Papers in Cultural Studies. London: Hutchinson, pp. 128–138.
55.
HecklerSEChildersTL (1992) The role of expectancy and relevancy in memory for verbal and visual information: What is incongruency?Journal of Consumer Research18(4): 475–492.
56.
HeilbrunnB (1997) Representation and legitimacy: A semiotic approach to the logo. In: NöthW (ed.) Semiotics of the Media: State of the Art, Projects, and Perspectives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 175–189.
57.
HeilbrunnB (1998) My brand the hero? A semiotic analysis of the consumer-brand relationship. In: LambkinM (ed.) European Perspectives on Consumer Behaviour. Hemel Hempstead: Prentice Hall, pp. 1–43.
58.
HeilbrunnB (2006) Le marketing à l’épreuve du design. In: FlamandB (ed.) Le design – essais sur des théories et des pratiques. Paris: Editions de l’Institut Français de la mode et Editions du regard, pp. 277–294.
59.
HekkertPSneldersDVan WieringenPCW (2003) Most advanced, yet acceptable: Typicality and novelty as joint predictors of aesthetic preference in industrial design. British Journal of Psychology94(1): 111–124.
60.
HetzelPMarionG (1993) Les contributions françaises de la sémiotique au marketing et à la publicité. Gestion2000(3): 117–154.
61.
HurlburtA (1977) Layout: The Design of the Printed Page. New York: Watson-Guptill Publications.
62.
JeanneretYSouchierE (1999) L’étiquette des vins: analyse d’un objet ordinaire. Communication & Langages121: 72–85.
63.
JolibertAJourdanP (2011) Marketing research: méthodes de recherche et d’études en marketing. Paris: Dunod.
64.
JubertR (2006) Typography and Graphic Design: From Antiquity to the Present. Paris: Flammarion.
65.
KadarDZ (2011) A graphic-semiotic analysis of the Chinese multimodal elevation and denigration phenomenon. US-China Foreign Language9(2): 77–88.
66.
KassarjianHH (1977) Content analysis in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research4(1): 8–17.
67.
Kehret-WardT (1988) Using a semiotic approach to study the consumption of functionally related products. International Journal of Research in Marketing4(3): 187–200.
68.
KiddI (1999) The power of packaging. Australian and New Zealand Wine Industry Journal14(1): 52–57.
69.
KiddI (2001) What is an Australian label and does anyone care?The Australian Grapegrower & Winemaker, August, pp. 83–84.
70.
KönigBLickE (2014) Wine labels in Austrian food retail stores: A semiotic analysis of multimodal red wine labels. Semiotica200: 313–334.
71.
KozinetRV (2008) Technology/ideology: How ideological fields influence consumers’ technology narratives. Journal of Consumer Research34: 865–881.
72.
KrishnaAMorrinM (2008) Does touch affect taste? The perceptual transfer of product container haptic cues. Journal of Consumer Research34(6): 807–818.
73.
KrishnaAElderRSCaldaraC (2010) Feminine to smell but masculine to touch? Multisensory congruence and its effect on the aesthetic experience. Journal of Consumer Psychology20(4): 410–418.
74.
LandwehrJRWentzelDHerrmannA (2013) Product design for the long run: Consumer responses to typical and atypical designs at different stages of exposure. Journal of Marketing77(5): 92–107.
75.
LidwellWHoldenKButlerJ (2010) Universal Principles of Design. Beverly, MA: Rockport Publishers.
76.
LoewyR (1951) Never Leave Well Enough Alone. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
77.
McCarthyMSMothersbaughDL (2002) Effects of typographic factors in advertising-based persuasion: A general model and initial empirical tests. Psychology & Marketing9(7–8): 663–691.
78.
McNealJUJiMF (2003) Children’s visual memory of packaging. Journal of Consumer Marketing20(5): 400–427.
79.
McQuarrieEFMickDG (2003) The contribution of semiotic and rhetorical perspectives to the explanation of visual persuasion in advertising. In: ScottLMBatraR (eds) Persuasive Imagery A Consumer Response Perspective. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 191–221.
80.
MailleVFleckN (2011) Perceived congruence and incongruence: Toward a clarification of the concept, its formation and measure. Recherche et Applications en Marketing26(2): 77–113.
81.
MandlerG (1982) The structure of value: Accounting for taste. In: ClarkMSFiskeST (eds) Affect and Cognition: The Seventeenth Annual Carnegie Symposium. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 55–78.
82.
MarionG (2003) Apparence et identité: une approche sémiotique du discours des adolescentes à propos de leur expérience de la mode. Recherche et Applications en Marketing26(2): 1–29.
83.
MaynadierB (2014) De quoi le logo d’une ville est-il le signe?Décisions Marketing74: 115–127.
84.
MickDG (1986) Consumer research and semiotics: Exploring the morphology of signs, symbols, and significance. Journal of Consumer Research13(2): 196–213.
85.
MickDGBuhlC (1992) A meaning-based model of advertising experiences. Journal of Consumer Research19(3): 317–338.
86.
MickDGBurroughsJEHetzelP. (2004) Pursuing the meaning of meaning in the commercial world: An international review of marketing and consumer research founded on semiotics. Semiotica152(1–4): 1–74.
87.
MuggeRDahlDW (2013) Seeking the ideal level of design newness: Consumer response to radical and incremental product design. Journal of Product Innovation Management30(S1): 34–47.
88.
OrthURMalkewitzK (2008) Holistic package design and consumer brand impressions. Journal of Marketing72(3): 64–81.
89.
Pantin-SohierG (2009) The influence of the product package on functional and symbolic associations of brand image. Recherche et Applications en Marketing24(2): 53–72.
90.
Pantin-SohierGLancelot-MiltgenC (2012) The emotional and cognitive effects of a new food product’s information stimuli on the consumer. Recherche et Applications en Marketing27(1): 3–32.
91.
Pantin-SohierGLancelot-MiltgenCCamusS (2015) Innover dans le secteur traditionnel: l’importance de l’authenticité et de la typicalité perçues. Décisions Marketing77: 63–84.
92.
ParceroOJVillanuevaE (2012) The success of new exporting countries in a traditional Agri-business industry, 1961-2005. Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization10(1): 1–15.
93.
PasseboisJPichonFTrinquecosteJF (2015) Stratégies d’artification dans le domaine du luxe: le cas des vins de prestige. Décisions Marketing80: 109–124.
94.
PeirceCS (1931–1958) The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, volumes 1–8. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
95.
PersonOSchoormansJPLSneldersD. (2008) Should new products look similar or different? The influence of the market environment on strategic product styling. Design Studies29: 30–48.
96.
PracejusJWOlsenJDO’GuinnTC (2006) How nothing became something: White space, rhetoric, history, and meaning. Journal of Consumer Research33(1): 82–90.
97.
RemaudHCoudercJP (2006) Wine business practices: A new versus old wine world perspective. Agribusiness22(3): 405–416.
98.
RobertsLEThriftJ (2002) The Designer and the Grid. New York: Watson-Guptill Publication.
99.
RoulletBDroulersO (2005) Pharmaceutical packaging color and drug expectancy. Advances in Consumer Research32(1): 164–171.
100.
SchoormansJPLRobbenHSJ (1997) Effect of new package design on product attention, categorization and evaluation. Journal of Economic Psychology18(2–3): 271–287.
101.
SchroderKC (1994) Discours critique ou marketing. Les enjeux d’une sémiotique de la publicité. Hermes13–14: 333–349.
102.
ScottL (1994) Images in advertising: The need for a theory of visual rhetoric. Journal of Consumer Research21: 252–273.
103.
SneldersDHekkertP (1999) Association measures as predictors of product originality. Advances in Consumer Research26: 588–592.
104.
SundarANoseworthyTJ (2014) Place the logo high or low? Using conceptual metaphors of power in packaging design. Journal of Marketing78: 138–151.
105.
TalkeKSalomoSWieringaJE. (2009) What about design newness? Investigating the relevance of a neglected dimension of product innovativeness. Journal of Product Innovation Management26(6): 601–615.
106.
Tissier-DesbordesE (2004) L’analyse de visuels: pour une complémentarité des principales approches. Décisions Marketing36: 63–74.
107.
ToncarMFetscherinM (2012) A study of visual puffery in fragrance advertising: Is the message sent stronger than the actual scent?European Journal of Marketing46(1–2): 52–72.
108.
TschicholdJ ([1929] 1995) The Principles of the New Typography. Berkeley: University of California Press.
109.
TschicholdJ ([1975] 1997) The Form of the Book: Essays on the Morality of Good Design. Vancouver, BC, Canada: Hartley & Marks.
110.
UtterbackJM (1994) Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
111.
Van RompayTJLPruynATH (2011) When visual product features speak the same language: Effects of shape-typeface congruence on brand perception and price expectations. Journal of Product Innovation Management28(4): 599–610.
112.
VeryzerRHutchinsonJW (1998) The influence of unity and prototypicality on aesthetic responses to new product design. Journal of Consumer Research24(4): 374–394.
113.
WhiteAW (2011) The Elements of Graphic Design. New York: Allworth Press.
114.
ZhaoXBelkRW (2008) Politicizing consumer culture: Advertising’s appropriation of political ideology in China’s social transition. Journal of Consumer Research35: 231–244.
