The 2009 Council for the Accreditation of Counseling and Related Educational Programs
Standards present a move to outcome-based assessment of student learning outcomes. The
authors developed an assessment system for counselor education programs through a Delphi
study (n = 9). The proposed assessment system and recommendations for
implementation using existing program assignments and developing program practices around
the proposed system are presented. Future research areas are outlined including
opportunities to further develop the proposed system and explore other means of systematic
program assessment of student learning outcomes.
BaltimoreM. L.HicksonJ.GeorgeJ. D.CrutchfieldL. B. (1996). Portfolio assessment: A model for
counselor education. Counselor Education and
Supervision, 36,
113–121.
2.
BoesS. R. (2001). Portfolio development for 21st century
school counselors. Professional School Counseling,
4, 229–231.
3.
BrescianiM. J. (2008). Implementing outcomes-based assessment
process in a major metropolitan community college district.
Community College Journal of Research and Practice,
32, 970–984.
4.
BrindleyG. (2001). Outcomes-based assessment in practice:
Some examples and emerging insights. Language Testing,
18, 393–407.
doi:10.1177/026553220101800405
5.
ClaytonM. J. (1997). Delphi: A technique to harness expert
opinion for critical decision making tasks in education.
Educational Psychology, 17,
373–386. doi:10.1080/0144341970170401
6.
CobiaD. C.CarneyJ. S.BuckhaltJ. A.MiddletonR. A.ShannonD. M.TrippanyR.KunkelE., (2005). The doctoral portfolio: Centerpiece
of a comprehensive system of evaluation. Counselor Education and
Supervision, 44,
242–254.
7.
ColemanH. L. K.MorrisD.NortonR. A. (2006). Developing multicultural counseling
competence through the use of portfolios. Journal of
Multicultural Counseling and Development, 34,
27–37.
8.
Council for Accreditation of Counseling
and Related Educational Programs. (2009). 2009
Standards. Alexandria, VA:
Author.
9.
DhonauS.McAlpineD. (2005). An electronic portfolio for the
ACTFL/NCATE teacher program standards in the second language methods
course. Foreign Language Annals, 38,
69–76.
doi:10.1111/j.1944-9720.2005.tb02454.x
10.
DonnellyK. (2007). Australia's adoption of outcomes based
education: A critique. Online Submission (ERIC Document Reproduction
Service No. ED501707).
11.
FrankJ.DanoffD. (2007). The CanMEDS initiative: Implementing
an outcomes-based framework of physician competencies. Medical
Teacher, 29, 642–647.
doi:10.1080/01421590701746983
12.
HauserG.KoutouzosD.OlsonG. (2005). The standards-based school leader
digital portfolio. International Journal of Learning,
12, 311–316.
13.
HeathM. (2005). Are you ready to go digital? The pros
and cons of electronic portfolio development. Technology
Connection, 23,
66–70.
14.
JansenJ. (1998). Curriculum reform in South Africa: A
critical analysis of outcomes-based education.
CambridgeJournal of Education, 28,
321–331. doi:10.1080/0305764980280305
15.
KellyR. (2011). Faculty-driven change: How to get
buy-in, make progress. Academic Leader,
27, 4–8.
16.
LinstoneH. A.TuroffM. (1975). The Delphimethod: Techniques and applications. London,
England: Addison-Wesley.
17.
ParadiseL. V.LolanA.DickensK.TanakaH.TranP.DohertyE. (2011). Program coordinators react to CACREP
standards. Counseling Today, 53,
50–52.
Rhyne-WinklerM. C.WootenR. (1996). The school counselor portfolio:
Professional development and accountability. School
Counselor, 44,
146–150.
20.
RogersG.ChowT. (2000). Electronic portfolios and the
assessment of student learning. Assessment Update,
12, 4–5.
21.
StrudlerN.WetzelK. (2008). Costs and benefits of electronic
portfolios in teacher education: Faculty perspectives. Journal
of Computing in Teacher Education, 24,
135–142.
22.
UrofskyR. I.BobbyC. L. (2012). The evolution of a student learning
outcomes focus in the CACREP standards in relation to accountability in higher
education. Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation,
3.
