Evidence-based practice has had a growing impact on chiropractic education and the delivery of chiropractic care. For evidence-based practice to penetrate and transform a profession, the penetration must occur at 2 levels. One level is the degree to which individual practitioners possess the willingness and basic skills to search and assess the literature. Chiropractic education received a significant boost in this realm in 2005 when the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine awarded 4 chiropractic institutions R25 education grants to strengthen their research/evidence-based practice curricula. The second level relates to whether the therapeutic interventions commonly employed by a particular health care discipline are supported by clinical research. A growing body of randomized controlled trials provides evidence of the effectiveness and safety of manual therapies.
EisenbergDMKesslerRCFosterCNorlockFECalkinsDRDelbancoTL. Unconventional medicine in the United States. Prevalence, costs, and patterns of use. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:246–252.
2.
TindleHADavisRBPhillipsRSEisenbergDM. Trends in use of complementary and alternative medicine by US adults: 1997-2002. Altern Ther Health Med. 2005;11:42–49.
3.
KreitzerMJMannD. CAM competencies for the health professions. Complement Health Pract Rev. 2008;13:63.
DelaneyPMFernandezCE. Toward an evidence-based model for chiropractic education and practice. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1999;22:114–118.
6.
DagenaisSTriccoACHaldemanS. Synthesis of recommendations for the assessment and management of low back pain from recent clinical practice guidelines. Spine J. 2010;10:514–529.
7.
KoesBWvan TulderMLinCWMacedoLGMcAuleyJMaherC. An updated overview of clinical guidelines for the management of non-specific low back pain in primary care. Eur Spine J. 2010;19:2075–2094.
8.
KentPMKeatingJLTaylorNF. Primary care clinicians use variable methods to assess acute nonspecific low back pain and usually focus on impairments. Man Ther. 2009;14:88–100.
9.
ChristensenMGKollaschMWHylandJK. Practice Analysis of Chiropractic, 2010: A Project Report, Survey Analysis, and Summary of the Practice of Chiropractic Within the United States. Greeley, CO: National Board of Chiropractic Examiners; 2010.
10.
ChristensenMGKollaschMW. Job Analysis of Chiropractic, 2005: A Project Report, Survey Analysis and Summary of the Practice of Chiropractic Within the United States. Greeley, CO: National Board of Chiropractic Examiners; 2005.
11.
Muir GrayJA. Evidence-Based Health Care: How to Make Health Policy and Management Decisions. 2nd ed. Edinburgh, Scotland: Churchill Livingstone; 2001.
12.
GuyattGCookDHaynesB. Evidence based medicine has come a long way. BMJ. 2004;329:990–991.
13.
BronfortGHaasMEvansRLeinigerBTrianoJ. Effectiveness of manual therapies: the UK evidence report. Chiropr Osteopat. 2010;18:3.
14.
HaldemanSUnderwoodM. Commentary on the United Kingdom evidence report about the effectiveness of manual therapies. Chiropr Osteopat. 2010;18:4.
15.
ChouRQaseemASnowV. Diagnosis and treatment of low back pain: a joint clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians and the American Pain Society. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147:478–491.
16.
ChouRHuffmanLH. Nonpharmacologic therapies for acute and chronic low back pain: a review of the evidence for an American Pain Society/American College of Physicians clinical practice guideline. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147:492–504.
17.
RubinsteinSMvan MiddelkoopMAssendelftWJde BoerMRvan TulderMW. Spinal manipulative therapy for chronic low-back pain: an update of a Cochrane review. Spine. 2011;36: E825–E846.
18.
ChoiBKVerbeekJHTamWWJiangJY.Exercises for prevention of recurrences of low-back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(1): CD006555.
19.
FurlanADBrosseauLImamuraMIrvinE. Massage for low back pain: a systematic review within the framework of the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group. Spine. 2002;27:1896–1910.
20.
KellerAHaydenJBombardierCvan TulderM. Effect sizes of non-surgical treatments of non-specific low-back pain. Eur Spine J. 2007;16:1776–1788.
21.
HaasMSpegmanAPetersonDHAickinMVavrekD. Dose-response and efficacy of spinal manipulation for chronic cervicogenic headache: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Spine J. 2010;10:117–128.
22.
HurwitzELCarrageeEJvan der VeldeG. Treatment of neck pain: noninvasive interventions: results of the Bone and Joint Decade 2000-2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders. Spine. 2008;33: S123–S152.
Leboeuf-YdeCHenniusBRudbergELeufvenmarkPThunmanM. Side effects of chiropractic treatment: a prospective study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1997;20:511–515.
25.
RubinsteinSM. Adverse events following chiropractic care for subjects with neck or low-back pain: do the benefits outweigh the risks?J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2008;31:461–464.
26.
GouveiaLOCastanhoPFerreiraJJ. Safety of chiropractic interventions: a systematic review. Spine. 2009;34: E405–E413.
27.
HaldemanSRubinsteinSM. Cauda equina syndrome in patients undergoing manipulation of the lumbar spine. Spine. 1992;17:1469–1473.
28.
CassidyJDBoyleECoteP. Risk of vertebrobasilar stroke and chiropractic care: results of a population-based case-control and case-crossover study. Spine. 2008;33: S176–S183.
