Here we aim to search for stable intra- and inter-band cross-correlations during the peri-ictal transition of focal onset seizures. Furthermore, we search for dynamic features by analyzing relative eigenvalues of the cross-correlation matrix.
Methods:
In this study, we analyze 50 extracranial electroencephalographic recordings from 24 patients with different types of focal epilepsy, separating the data into different frequency bands. Thereby we construct a multiband cross-correlation matrix, evaluate stability of the correlation structures and the time evolution of relative eigenvalues using a running window approach.
Results:
We find a consistent, pronounced average cross-correlation pattern that is independent of the physiological state, is subject-independent, and is highly similar across different frequency bands. In contrast, dynamic features of brain activity are encoded in deviations from this baseline pattern, expressed by relative eigenvalues along the whole spectrum.
Conclusion:
We associate the stable background pattern as the dynamics upon (or close to) the attractor dynamics, necessary to maintain the brain in an efficient operational mode. Transient dynamical features are expressed by temporal deviations from this pattern. Our results are congruent with the hypothesis that the brain is a complex system operating close to a critical point of a phase transition.
Impact Statement
We found a distinct average cross-correlation pattern, which is independent of the physiological state, is subject-independent, and is very similar in different frequency bands. This is surprising, as it is well known that different brain activities are associated with different frequency bands. We relate this counterintuitive result to the hypothesis that the brain operates near a critical point of a phase transition, which explains the presence of permanently active, pronounced large-scale cross-correlations. Our research opens new avenues of linear correlation analysis of brain activity, which can help in understanding sleep architecture, cognitive processes, and learning of brain activity during epileptic events.
Ansari-AslK, SenhadjiL, BellangerJ-J, et al.Quantitative evaluation of linear and nonlinear methods characterizing interdependencies between brain signals. Phys Rev E, 2006; 74(3):31916; doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.74.031916
2.
Apablaza-YevenesDE, Corsi-CabreraM, Martinez-GuerreroA, et al.Stationary stable cross-correlation pattern and task specific deviations in unresponsive wakefulness syndrome as well as clinically healthy subjects. PLoS ONE, 2024; 19(3):e0300075; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300075
3.
Arzate-MenaJD, AbelaE, Olguín-RodríguezPV, et al.Stationary eeg pattern relates to large-scale resting state networks–an eeg-fmri study connecting brain networks across time-scales. Neuroimage, 2022; 246:118763; doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118763
4.
AshtianiMN, AshtianiMN, OskoeiMA. Cognitive perturbations affect brain cortical activity and postural control: An investigation of human eeg and motion data. Biomed Signal Process Control, 2021; 69:102955; doi: 10.1016/j.bspc.2021.102955
BeggsJ, TimmeN. Criticality in large-scale brain fmri dynamics unveiled by a novel point process analysis. Front Physiol, 2012; 3:163; doi: 10.3389/fphys.2012.00015
7.
BeggsJ. Addressing skepticism of the critical brain hypothesis. Front Comput Neurosci, 2022; 16:703865–703823; doi: 10.3389/fncom.2022.703865
8.
BeggsJ, PlenzD. Neuronal avalanches are diverse and precise activity patterns that are stable for man hours in cortical slice cultures. J Neurosci, 2004; 24(22):5216–5229; doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0540-04.2004
9.
BohbotV, CoparaM, GotmanJ, et al.Low-frequency theta oscillations in the human hippocampus during real-world and virtual navigation. Nat Commun, 2017; 8(1):14415; doi: 10.1038/ncomms14415
10.
CasdagliM. Chaos and deterministic versus stochastic non-linear modelling. J. R. Statist. Soc. B, 1992; 54(2):303–328; doi: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1992.tb01884.x
11.
ChellaF, PizzellaV, ZappasodiF, et al.Impact of the reference choice on scalp eeg connectivity estimation. J Neural Eng, 2016; 13(3):36016; doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/13/3/036016
12.
DaumeJ, GruberT, EngelAK, et al.Phase-amplitude coupling and long-range phase synchronization reveal frontotemporal interactions during visual working memory. J Neurosci, 2017; 37(2):313–322; doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2130-16.2016
13.
DoldanL, BuyattiD, FarezM, et al.Frontal vs temporal lobe epilepsy: Personality traits and neuropsychological profile. P03.139. Neurology, 2013; 80(7_supplement); doi: 10.1212/WNL.80.7_supplement.P03.139
14.
ElamJS, GlasserMF, HarmsMP, et al.The human connectome project: A retrospective. Neuroimage, 2021; 244:118543; doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118543
15.
FeinG, RazJ, BrownFF, et al.Common reference coherence data are confounded by power and phase effects. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 1988; 69(6):581–584; doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(88)90171-X
16.
FellJ, AxmacherN, HauptS. From alpha to gamma: Electrophysiological correlates of meditation-related states of consciousness. Med Hypotheses, 2010; 75(2):218–224; doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2010.02.025
17.
FisherRS, BoasWVE, BlumeW, et al.Epileptic seizures and epilepsy: Definitions proposed by the international league against epilepsy (ilae) and the international bureau for epilepsy (ibe). Epilepsia, 2005; 46(4):470–472; doi: 10.1111/j.0013-9580.2005.66104.x
18.
FosqueL, Williams-GarcíaR, BeggsJ, et al.Evidence for quasicritical brain dynamics. Phys Rev Lett, 2021; 126(9):98101; doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.098101
19.
FoxM, RaichleM. Spontaneous fluctuations in brain activity observed with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Nat Rev Neurosci, 2007; 8(9):700–711; doi: 10.1038/nrn2201
20.
FraimanD, BalenzuelaP, FossJ, et al.Ising-like dynamicsin large-scale functional brain networks. Phys Rev E, 2009; 79(6):61922; doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.79.061922
21.
GotmanJ. A few thoughts on “what is a seizure?”. Epilepsy Behav, 2011; 22(Suppl 1):S2–S3; doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2011.08.025
22.
GrassbergerP, LehnertzK, Elger CE, and ArnholdJ, (Eds). Chaos In Brain?-Proceedings Of The Workshop. World Scientific; 2000.
23.
HughesJR. Eeg in Clinical Practice. Butterworth-Heinemann; 1994.
24.
JergerK, NetoffT, FrancisJ, et al.Comparison of methods for seizure detection. In: (MiltonJ, JungP, eds. Epilepsy as a dynamic disease. Springer-Verlag: Berlin; 2003; 237—246.
25.
KlausA, YuS, PlenzD. Statistical analyse support power law distributions found in neuronal avalanches. PLoS One, 2011; 6(5):e19779; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019779
26.
KreuzT, MormannF, AndrzejakR, et al.Measuring synchronization in coupled model systems: A comparison of different approaches. Physica D, 2007; 225(1):29–42; doi: 10.1016/j.physd.2006.09.039
27.
KrishnanS, AthavaleY. Trends in biomedical signal feature extraction. Biomed Signal Process Control, 2018; 43:41–63; doi: 10.1016/j.bspc.2018.02.008
28.
KucewiczMT, CimbalnikJ, Garcia-SalinasJS, et al.High frequency oscillations in human memory and cognition: A neurophysiological substrate of engrams? Brain, 2024; 147(9):2966–2982; doi: 10.1093/brain/awae159
29.
LalouxL, CizeauP, BouchaudJP, et al.Noise dressing of financial correlation matrices. Phys Rev Lett, 1999; 83(7):1467–1470; doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.1467
30.
Larson-PriorLJ, OostenveldR, Della PennaS, et al.Adding dynamics to the human connectome project with meg. Neuroimage, 2013; 80:190–201; doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.056
31.
Linkenkaer-HansenK, NoxoulineV, PalvaJ, et al.Long-range temporal correlations and scaling behavior in human brain oscillations. J Neurosci, 2001; 21(4):1370–1377; doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-04-01370.2001
32.
LlinásR. The intrinsic electrophysiological properties of mammalian neurons: Insights into central nervous system function. Science (1979), 1988; 242(4886):1654–1664; doi: 10.1126/science.3059497
33.
MannK, BäckerP, RöschkeJ. Dynamical properties of the sleep eeg in different frequency bands. Int J Neurosci, 1993; 73(3–4):161–169; doi: 10.3109/00207459308986666
34.
Marín–GarcíaA, Arzate-MenaJD, Corsi-CabreraM, et al.Stationary correlation pattern in highly non stationary meg recordings of healthy subjects and its relation to former eeg studies. PLoS One, 2024; 10:e0307378; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307378
35.
MiltonJ, JungP. Epilepsy as a Dynamic Disease. Springer Science & Business Media; 2003.
36.
MormannF, KreuzT, RiekeC, et al.on the predictability of epileptic seizures. Clin. Neurophysiol, 2005; 116(3):569–587; doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2004.08.025
37.
MüllerMF, RummelC, GoodfellowM, et al.Standing waves as an explanation for generic stationary correlation patterns in noninvasive eeg of focal onset seizures. Brain Connect, 2014; 4(2):131–144; doi: 10.1089/brain.2013.0192
38.
MüllerM, BaierG, GalkaA, et al.Detection and characterization of changes of the correlation structure in multivariate time series. Phys Rev E, 2005; 71(4):46116; doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.71.046116
39.
MüllerM, BaierG, López-JiménezY, et al.Evolution of genuine cross-correlation strength of focal onset seizures. J Clin Neurophysiol, 2011; 28(5):450–462; doi: 10.1097/WNP.0b013e318231c894
40.
MüllerM, CaporroM, GastH, et al.Linear and nonlinear interrelations show fundamentally distinct network structure in pre-ictal intracranial eeg of epilepsy patients. Hum. Brain Mapp, 2020; 41(2):467–483; doi: 10.1002/hbm.24816
41.
MüllerM, JiménezYL, RummelC, et al.Localized short-range correlations in the spectrum of the equal-time correlation matrix. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys, 2006; 74(4 Pt 1):41119; doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.74.041119
42.
NunezPL. Rest: A good idea but not the gold standard. Clin Neurophysiol: Official J Intr Federation Clin Neurophysi, 2010; 121(12):2177–2180; doi: 0.1016/j.clinph.2010.04.029
43.
Olguín-RodríguezPV, Arzate-MenaJD, Corsi-CabreraM, et al.Characteristic fluctuations around stable attractor dynamics extracted from highly nonstationary electroencephalographic recordings. Brain Connect, 2018; 8(8):457–474; doi: 10.1089/brain.2018.0609
44.
PalusM. Nonlinearity in normal human eeg: Cycles, temporal asymmetry, non-stationarity and randomness, not chaos. Biol. Cybern, 1996; 75(5):389–396; doi: 10.1007/s004220050304
45.
PetermannT, ThiagarajanT, LebedevM, et al.Spontaneous cortical activity in awake monkeys composed of neuronal avalanches. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2009; 106(37):15921–15926; doi: 10.1073/pnas.0904089106
46.
PijnJP, VelisDN, van der HeydenMJ, et al.Nonlinear dynamics of epileptic seizures on basis of intracranial eeg recordings. Brain Topogr, 1997; 9(4):249–270; doi: 10.1007/BF01464480
47.
PlerouV, GopikrishnanP, RosenowB, et al.Random matrix approach to cross correlations in financial data. Phys Rev E, 2002; 65(6):66126; doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.65.066126
48.
PlerouV, GopikrishnanP, RosenowB, et al.Universal and nonuniversal properties of cross correlations in financial time series. Phys Rev Lett, 1999; 83(7):1471–1474; doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.1471
49.
Puentes-MestrilC, RoachJ, NiethardN, et al.Brain work and brain imaging. How rhythms of the sleeping brain tune memory and synaptic plasticity. Sleep, 2019; 42(7):1–14; doi: 10.1093/sleep/zsz095
50.
RaichleM, MintunM. Brain work and brain imaging. Annu Rev Neurosci, 2006; 29:449–476; doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.29.051605.112819
51.
RaichleM. The brain’s dark energy. Science, 2006; 314(5803):1249–1250; doi: 10.1126/science.1134405
52.
RaichleM. The restless brain. Brain Connect, 2011; 1(1):3–12; doi: 10.1089/brain.2011.0019
53.
Rios-HerreraWA, EscalonaJ, Rivera-LópezD, et al.On the estimation of phase synchronization, spurious synchronization and filtering. Chaos, 2016; 26:123106; doi: 10.1063/1.4970522
54.
Ríos-HerreraWA, Olguín-RodríguezPV, Arzate-MenaJD, et al.The influence of eeg references on the analysis of spatio-temporal interrelation patterns. Front Neurosci, 2019; 13:941; doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00941
55.
RummelC, BaierG, MüllerM. The influence of static correlations on multi-variate correlation analysis of the eeg. J Neurosci Methods, 2007; 166(1):138–157; doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.06.023
56.
RummelC, MüllerM, SchindlerK. Data-driven estimates of the number of clusters in multivariate time series. Phys Rev E, 2008; 78(6):66703; doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.78.066703
57.
RummelC. Quantification of intra- and inter-cluster relations in nonstationary and noisy data. Phys Rev E, 2008; 77(1):16708; doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.77.016708
58.
SadaghianiS, KleinschmidtA. Brain networks and α-oscillations: Structural and functional foundations of cognitive control. Trends Cogn. Sci, 2016; 20(11):805–817; doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.09.004
59.
SarbadhikariS, ChakrabartyK. Chaos in the brain: A short review alluding to epilepsy, depression, exercise and lateralization. Medical Eng & Physics, 2001; 23(7):447–457; doi: 10.1016/s1350-4533(01)00075-3
60.
SchindlerK, LeungH, ElgerC, et al.Assessing seizure dynamics by analysing the correlation structure of multichannel intracranial eeg. Brain, 2007; 130(Pt 1):65–77; doi: 10.1093/brain/awl304
61.
ShewWL, PlenzD. The functional benefits of criticality in the cortex. Neuroscientist, 2013; 19(1):88–100; doi: 10.1177/1073858412445487
62.
ShewWL, YangH, PetermannT, et al.Neuronal avalanches imply maximum dynamic range in cortical networks at criticality. J Neurosci, 2009; 29(49):15595–15600; doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3864-09.2009
63.
ShewWL, YangH, YuS, et al.Information capacity and transmission are maximized in balanced cortical networks with neuronal avalanches. J Neurosci, 2011; 31(1):55–63; doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4637-10.2011
64.
StamJ. Nonlinear dynamical analysis of eeg and meg: Review of an emerging field. Clin Neurophysiol, 2005; 116(10):2266–2301; doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.06.011
65.
StepienR. Testing for non-linearity in eeg signals of healthy subjects. Acta Neurobiol, 2002; 62:277–281; doi: 10.55782/ane-2002-1445
66.
TagliazucchiE, BalenzuelaP, FraimanD, et al.Criticality in large-scale brain fmri dynamics unveiled by a novel point process analysis. Front Physiol, 2012; 3:15; doi: 10.3389/fphys.2012.00015
67.
TheilerJ, RappP. Re-examination of the evidence for low-dimensional, nonlinear structure in the human electroencephalogram. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 1996; 98(3):213–222; doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(95)00240-5
68.
TononiG, EdelmanGM. Consciousness and complexity. Science, 1998; 282(5395):1846–1851; doi: 10.1126/science.282.5395.1846
69.
TononiG. An information integration theory of consciousness. BMC Neurosci, 2004; 5(1)–:22; doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-5-42
70.
VinckM, OostenveldR, Van WingerdenM, et al.An improved index of phase-synchronization for electrophysiological data in the presence of volume-conduction, noise and sample-size bias. Neuroimage, 2011; 55(4):1548–1565; doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.01.055
71.
Von SteinA, SarntheinJ. Different frequencies for different scales of cortical integration: From local gamma to long range alpha/theta synchronization. Int. J. Psychophysiology, 2000; 38:301–313; doi: 10.1016/S0167-8760(00)00172-0
72.
WestS, NevittSJ, CottonJ, et al.Surgery for epilepsy. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2019:6; doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010541.pub3
