A longitudinal sample from the Educational Longitudinal Study of 2002 was used to determine differences in work outcomes between (a) individuals with learning disabilities or emotional-behavior disorders and (b) individuals with or without disabilities. Twelve factors were arranged into individual, family, school-peer, and community categories. Individuals with high-incidence disabilities were more likely to be unemployed, whereas those without disabilities were more likely to be employed for 20 hr or more per week. A limited number of risk factors were significant contributors of work outcomes. Ordered logistic regression revealed individuals with high-incidence disabilities and all women experienced less positive work outcomes. Parental discussions with children about work plans enhanced the likelihood of positive work outcomes, but only for adolescents without disabilities.
AngoldA.CostelloE. J.ErkanliA. (1999). Comorbidity. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 40, 57–87. doi:10.1111/1469-7610.00424
2.
BarkleyR. A. (2006). Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: A handbook for diagnosis and treatment (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.
3.
BenardB. (1993). Fostering resiliency in kids. Educational Leadership, 51(3), 44–48.
4.
BenzM. R.YovanoffP. M.DorenB. (1997). School-to-work components that predict post school success for students with and without disabilities. Exceptional Children, 63, 151–164.
5.
BetzN. (2005). Women’s career development. In BrownS. D.LentR. W. (Eds.), Career development and counseling: Putting theory and research to work (pp. 253–280). New York, NY: John Wiley.
6.
BlackorbyJ.WagnerM. (1996). Longitudinal postschool outcomes of youth with disabilities: Findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study. Exceptional Children, 62, 399–413.
7.
BurtR. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8.
CahanS.FonoD.NirelR. (2012). The regression-based discrepancy definition of learning disability: A critical appraisal. Journal of Learning Disability, 45, 170–178. doi:10.1177/0022219409355480
9.
Chakraborti-GhoshS.MofieldE.OrellanaK. (2010). Cross-cultural comparisons and implications for students with EBD: A decade of understanding. International Journal of Special Education, 25, 162–170.
10.
ComingsJ.SoriconeL. (2007). Adult literacy research: Opportunities and challenges [NCSALL Occasional Paper]. Boston, MA: National Center for the Study of Adult Learning and Literacy. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED495439)
11.
CosdenM.BrownC.ElliotK. (2002). Development of self-understanding and self-esteem in children and adults with learning disabilities. In WongB. Y. L.MavisM. L. (Eds.), The social dimensions of learning disabilities: Essays in honor of Tanis Bryan (pp. 33–51). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12.
CrossR.BorgattiS. P.ParkerA. (2002). Making invisible work visible: Using social network analysis to support strategic collaboration. California Management Review, 44, 25–46.
13.
CullinanD. (2004). Classification and definition of emotional and behavioral disorders. In RutherfordR. B.QuinnM. M.MathurS. R. (Eds.), Handbook of research in emotional and behavioral disorders (pp. 32–53). New York, NY: Guilford.
14.
DayJ. C.NewburgerE. C. (2002). The big payoff: Educational attainment and synthetic estimates of work-life earnings. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/prod/2002pubs/p23-210.pdf
15.
DietzS.MontagueM. (2006). Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder comorbid with emotional and behavioral disorders and learning disabilities in adolescents. Exceptionality, 14, 19–33. doi:10.1207/s15327035ex1401_3
16.
DorenB.GauJ.LindstromL. (2011). The role of gender in the long-term employment outcomes of young adults with disabilities. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 34, 35–42. doi:10.3233/JVR-2010-0532
17.
FoleyT.SafranS. P. (1994). Gender-biased language in learning disability textbooks. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2, 309–314. doi:10.1177/002221949402700507
18.
GonzalezR.RosenthalD. A.KimJ. H. (2011). Predicting vocational rehabilitation outcomes of young adults with specific learning disabilities: Transitioning from school to work. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 34, 163–172. doi:10.3233/jvr-2011-0544
19.
GottfredsonL. S. (1986). Special groups and the beneficial use of vocational interest inventories. In WalshW. B.OsipowS. H. (Eds.), Advances in vocational psychology, Volume I: The assessment of interests (pp. 127–198). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
20.
GranovetterM. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380. doi:10.1086/225469
21.
GreggN. (2007). Underserved and unprepared: Postsecondary learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22, 219–228. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2007.00250.x
22.
GreggN. (2009). Adolescents and adults with learning disabilities and ADHD: Assessment and accommodation. New York, NY: Guilford.
23.
HallahanD. P.KauffmanJ. M.PullenP. C. (2009). Exceptional learners: Introduction to special education (11th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
24.
HalpernA. S. (1992). Transition: Old wine in new bottles. Exceptional Children, 58, 202–211.
25.
HansenM. T. (1999). The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 82–111. doi:10.2307/2667032
26.
HasaziS. B.GordonL. R.RoeC. A. (1985). Factors associated with the employment status of handicapped youth exiting high school from 1979–1983. Exceptional Children, 51, 455–469.
27.
HerrE. L. (1999). Theoretical perspectives on the school-to-work transition: Reactions and recommendations. Career Development Quarterly, 47, 359–364.
28.
HodappR. M.KrasnerD. V. (1994). Reflections on “Using large, national data bases in special education research.”Exceptionality, 5, 103–108. doi:10.1207/s15327035ex0502_4
29.
IngelsS. J.PrattD. J.WilsonD.BurnsL. J.CurrivanD.RogersJ. E.Hubbard-BednaszS. (2007). Education Longitudinal Study of 2002: Base-year to second follow-up data file documentation (NCES 2008-347). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
30.
IngelsS. J.ScottL. A. (1993). Exclusion of students with barriers to participation in NELS:88—Baseline excluded students two and four years later. Chicago, IL: National Opinion Research Center. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED360371)
31.
JensonJ. M.FraserM. W. (2011). A risk and resilience framework for child, youth, and family policy. In JensonJ. M.FraserM. W. (Eds.), Social policy for children and families: A risk and resilience perspective (2nd ed., pp. 5–24). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
32.
KaplanB. J.DeweyD. M.CrawfordS. G.WilsonB. N. (2001). The term comorbidity is of questionable value in reference to developmental disorders: Data and theory. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 555–565. doi:10.1177/002221940103400608
33.
KeyesC. L. M. (2004). Risk and resilience in human development: An introduction. Research in Human Development, 1, 223–227. doi:10.1207/s15427617rhd0104_1
34.
LeeI. H.RojewskiJ. W. (2009). Development of occupational aspiration prestige: A piecewise latent growth model of selected influences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 75, 82–90. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2009.03.006
35.
LesgoldA. M.Welch-RossM. (Eds.). (2012). Improving adult literacy instruction: Options for practice and research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
36.
LongJ. S.FreeseJ. (2006). Regression analysis for categorical dependent variables using Stata (2nd ed.). College Station, TX: Stata Press.
37.
LyonG. R. (1987). Learning disabilities research: False starts and broken promises. In VaughnS.BosC. S. (Eds.), Research in learning disabilities: Issues and future directions (pp. 69–85). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
38.
MadausJ. W.GerberP. J.PriceL. A. (2008). Adults with LD in the workforce: Lessons for secondary transition programs. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 23, 148–153. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2008.00272
39.
MoatsL. C.LyonG. R. (1993). Learning disabilities in the United States: Advocacy, science, and the future of the field. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26, 282–294. doi:10.1177/002221949302600501
40.
MorrisonB. M.CosdenM. A. (1997). Risk, resilience, and adjustment of individuals with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 20, 43–60. doi:10.2307/1511092
41.
MurrayC. (2003). Risk factors, protective factors, vulnerability, and resilience: A framework for understanding and supporting the adult transitions of youth with high-incidence disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 16–26. doi:10.1177/074193250302400102
NewmanL.WagnerM.CametoR.KnokeyA.-M.ShaverD. (2010). Comparisons across time of the outcomes of youth with disabilities up to 4 years after high school: A report of findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study (NLTS) and the National Longitudinal Transition Study–2 (NLTS2) (NCSER 2010-3008). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED512149)
44.
OkoloC. M.SitlingtonP. (1988). The role of special education in LD adolescents’ transition from school to work. Learning Disability Quarterly, 11, 292–306. doi:10.2307/1510774
45.
PengC.-Y. J.LeeK. L.IngersollG. M. (2002). An introduction to logistic regression analysis and reporting. Journal of Educational Research, 96, 3–14. doi:10.1080/00220670209598786
46.
ReagansR.McEvilyB. (2003). Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 240–267. doi:10.2307/3556658
ReschlyA. L.ChristensonS. L. (2006). Prediction of dropout among students with mild disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 27, 276–292. doi:10.1177/07419325060270050301
49.
RockE. E.FesslerM. A.ChurchR. P. (1997). The concomitance of learning disabilities and emotional/behavioral disorders: A conceptual model. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 245–263. doi:10.1177/002221949703000302
50.
RojewskiJ. W.GreggN. (2011). Career choice patterns and behaviors of work-bound youth with high-incidence disabilities. In KaufmanJ. M.HallahanD. P. (Eds.), Handbook of special education (pp. 584–593). New York, NY: Routledge.
51.
RojewskiJ. W.KimH. (2003). Career choice patterns and behavior of work-bound youth during early adolescence. Journal of Career Development, 30, 89–108. doi:10.1177/089484530303000201
52.
RojewskiJ. W.LeeI. H.GreggN.GemiciS. (2012). Prominent factors affecting the formation and longitudinal growth patterns of the career aspirations of adolescents with high-incidence disabilities. Exceptional Children, 78, 157–178.
53.
RojewskiJ. W.YangB. (1997). Longitudinal analysis of select influences on adolescents’ occupational aspirations. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 51, 375–410. doi:10.1006/jvbe.1996.1561
54.
RossiR.HertingJ.WolmanJ. (1997). Profiles of students with disabilities as identified in NELS:88 (NCES 97-254). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Educational Statistics.
55.
SabornieE. J.EvansC.CullinanD. (2006). Comparing characteristics of high-incidence disability groups: A descriptive review. Remedial and Special Education, 27, 95–104. doi:10.1177/07419325060270020701
56.
SavickasM. L. (1999). The transition from school to work: A development perspective. Career Development Quarterly, 47, 326–336.
57.
ScottJ. (2000). Social network analysis: A handbook. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
58.
SongS.NerurS.TengJ. (2007). An exploratory study on the roles of network structure and knowledge processing orientation in the work unit knowledge management. Advances in Information Systems, 38(2), 8–26. doi:10.1145/1240616.1240620
59.
SuperD. E. (1980). A life-span, life-space approach to career development. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 16, 282–298. doi:10.1016/0001-8791(80)90056-1
60.
SwansonC. B. (2008). Special education in America: The state of students with disabilities in the nation’s high schools. Bethesda, MD: Editorial Projects in Education Research Center. Available at http://www.edweek.org
61.
U.S. Department of Education. (1998). Twentieth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act. Washington DC: Author.
62.
UzziB. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 35–67. doi:10.2307/2667032
63.
VogelS. A. (1990). Gender differences in intelligence, language, visual-motor abilities, and academic achievement in students with learning disabilities: A review. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 44–52. doi:10.1177/002221949002300111
64.
WagnerM.NewmanL.CametoR.GarzaN.LevineP. (2005). After high school: A first look at the postschool experiences of youth with disabilities. A report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED494935)
65.
WassermanS.FaustK. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and application. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
66.
WehmeyerM. L.WebbK. W. (Eds.). (2011). Handbook of adolescent transition education for youth with disabilities. London, England: Routledge.
67.
WellsT.SandefurG. D.HoganD. P. (2003). What happens after the high school years among young persons with disabilities?Social Forces, 82, 803–832.
68.
WernerE. E. (1993, February). A longitudinal perspective on risk for learning disabilities. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Learning Disabilities Association of America. San Francisco, CA. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED357559)
69.
WernerE.BrendtroL. (2012). Children and war: Risk, resilience, and recovery. Reclaiming Children and Youth, 21(1), 18–22. doi:10.1017/S0954579412000156
70.
WongB. Y. L. (2003). General and specific issues for researchers’ consideration in applying the risk and resilience framework to the social domain of learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 18, 68–76. doi:10.2307/1511092
71.
YoungG.BrowningJ. (2005). Learning disabilities/dyslexia and employment—A mythical view. In ReidG.FawcettA. (Eds.), Dyslexia in context: Research, policy, and practice (pp. 25–59). London, England: Whurr.
