Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study offers a comparative quantitative analysis of media bias in the coverage of the 2022 FIFA World Cup by The Guardian and the New York Times versus Al Jazeera English. Utilizing a combination of sentiment analysis and topic modeling, the research assesses narrative tones and framing across these outlets during the Mega-event itself. The findings reveal that Western media consistently politicized the event, focusing on human rights and workers’ rights to highlight value conflicts, thereby transforming sports reporting into political discourse. In contrast, Al Jazeera downplayed political issues that did not align with its interests, instead emphasizing the unifying and celebratory aspects of the World Cup and when addressing the political issues doing so through a less critical, and even defensive, frame of Qatar. This study demonstrates how media framing - through politicization or selective omission - reflects underlying biases, interests, shaping global perceptions and reinforcing divergent worldviews. The analysis highlights the need for a more balanced approach in sports journalism to more accurately represent both the events and their broader implications.

Keywords

FIFA World Cup 2022 Qatar Arab Media Framing Sentiment Analysis Topic Modeling

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abdul Rehman

Jebril

(2023). The portrayal of non-western sports hosts in international media: A comparative analysis of BBC, Al Jazeera, and RT’s coverage of the 2022 FIFA world Cup. International Communication Gazette, 1–22.

All Sides . (2024). Media bias. https://www.allsides.com/unbiased-balanced-news

Bagdikian

B. H.

(2004). The new media monopoly: A completely revised and updated edition with seven new chapters. Beacon Press.

Ben Labidi

Al Zo’by

M. A.

(2025). Not just a game: Power, politics, and media coverage of Qatar’s World Cup 2022. International Journal of Cultural Studies.

Bettine

Ozdemir

(2024). The men’s World Cup in Qatar 2022 through the lens of the Western media: Soft power, sports diplomacy, and sportswashing. Sociology International Journal, 8(4), 190–196. https://doi.org/10.15406/sij.2024.08.00394

Beukeboom

Burgers

(2017). Linguistic bias. In Oxford research encyclopedia of communication. Oxford University Press.

Billings

A. C.

Hardin

(2023). Maximized sporting events for maximized communicative impact: The role of megasporting events in 2023. Communication & Sport, 11(6), 1039–1041. https://doi.org/10.1177/21674795231204072

Blei

Jordan

(2003). Latent dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3, 993–1022. https://www.jmlr.org/papers/volume3/blei03a/blei03a.pdf.

Bleich

van der Veen

A. M.

(2018). Media portrayals of Muslims: A comparative sentiment analysis of American newspapers, 1996–2015. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 9(1), 20–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2018.1531770

10.

Boatwright

B. C.

(2023). Embracing computational approaches to social media research: Implications for theory and praxis in sport communication. Communication & Sport, 13(1), 6–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/21674795231196429

11.

Boykoff

(2022). Framing the games: US media coverage of the Beijing 2022 winter Olympics. Communication & Sport, 12(1), 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/21674795221122938

12.

Brannagan

Reiche

(2022). Qatar and the 2022 FIFA world Cup: Politics, controversy, change. Springer.

13.

Brannagan

P. M.

Giulianotti

(2018). The soft power–soft disempowerment nexus: The case of Qatar. International Affairs, 94(5), 1139–1157. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiy125

14.

Bravo-Marquez

Mendoza

Poblete

(2014). Meta-level sentiment models for big social data analysis. Knowledge-Based Systems, 69, 86–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2014.05.016

15.

Brun

Gomez

(2022). Politics and geopolitics in staging the FIFA World Cup: What is at stake for the hosting nations? In The business of the FIFA world Cup. Routledge.

16.

Cornelissen

(2010). The geopolitics of global aspiration: Sport mega-events and emerging powers. International Journal of the History of Sport, 27(16–18), 3008–3025. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523367.2010.508306

17.

Curran

(2002). Media and power. Psychology Press.

18.

D’Alessio

Allen

(2000). Media bias in presidential elections: A meta-analysis. Journal of Communication, 50(4), 133–156. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/50.4.133

19.

DiMaggio

Nag

Blei

(2013). Exploiting affinities between topic modeling and the sociological perspective on culture: Application to newspaper coverage of U.S. government arts funding. Poetics, 41(6), 570–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2013.08.004

20.

Doyle

(2013). Understanding media economics. Sage.

21.

Dunaway

(2013). Media ownership and story tone in campaign news. American Politics Research, 41(1), 24–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x12454564

22.

Entman

(1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x

23.

Fan

White

Sharma

Choubey

Huang

Wang

(2019). In plain sight: Media bias through the lens of factual reporting. In Proceedings of the 2019 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing and the 9th international joint conference on natural language processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP) (pp. 6342–6348). Association for Computational Linguistics.

24.

Freedman

(2008). The politics of media policy. Polity Press.

25.

Gainous

Vélez Serrano

Wagner

K. M.

(2023). Protesting with feeling in Puerto Rico: Twitter and el verano del 19. Political Research Quarterly, 76(2), 465–480. https://doi.org/10.1177/10659129231161286

26.

Gentzkow

Shapiro

J. M.

Stone

D. F.

(2015). Media bias in the marketplace. In Media bias in the marketplace (Vol. 1, pp. 623–645). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-444-63685-0.00014-0

27.

Graeff

Monteiro Gutierrez

Sardá

Bretherton

Bettine

(2019). Capable, splendorous and unequal: International media portrayals of Brazil during the 2014 World Cup. Third World Quarterly, 40(4), 796–814. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2018.1526070

28.

Grix

Brannagan

Houlihan

(2015). Interrogating states’ soft power strategies: A case study of sports mega-events in Brazil and the UK. Global Society, 29(3), 463–479. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2015.1047743

29.

Grix

Brannagan

P. M.

(2016). Of mechanisms and myths: Conceptualising states’ “soft power” strategies through sports mega-events. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 29(1), 231–252.

30.

Grix

Houlihan

(2014). Sports mega-events as part of a nation’s soft power strategy: The cases of Germany (2006) and the UK (2012). The British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 16(4), 572–596. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-856x.12017

31.

Grix

Lee

(2013). Soft power, sports mega-events and emerging states: The lure of the politics of attraction. Global Society, 27(4), 521–536. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2013.827632

32.

Groeling

(2013). Media bias by the numbers: Challenges and opportunities in the empirical study of partisan news. Annual Review of Political Science, 16(1), 129–151. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-040811-115123

33.

Gutierrez

D. M.

de Almeida

M. A. B.

Gutierrez

G. L.

Pedersen

Z. P.

Williams

A. S.

(2021). Two events, two brazils: A critical discourse analysis of the FIFA world Cup and the olympic games. International Journal of Sport Communication, 14(4), 591–607. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsc.2021-0052

34.

Hamborg

Donnay

Gipp

(2019). Automated identification of media bias in news articles: An interdisciplinary literature review. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 20(4), 391–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00799-018-0261-y

35.

Hamilton

J. T.

(2007). News that sells: Media competition and news content. Japanese Journal of Political Science, 8(1), 7–42. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1468109907002460

36.

Hassan

A. A. M.

Wang

(2024). The Qatar World Cup and Twitter sentiment: Unraveling the interplay of soft power, public opinion, and media scrutiny. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 59(5), 679–704. https://doi.org/10.1177/10126902231218700

37.

Herman

Chomsky

(2010). Manufacturing consent: The political economy of the mass media. Random House.

38.

John

Silberstein-Loeb

(2015). Making news: The political economy of journalism in Britain and America from the glorious revolution to the internet. Oxford Academic.

39.

Kherwa

Bansal

(2019). Topic modeling: A comprehensive review. ICST Transactions on Scalable Information Systems, 0(0), Article 159623.

40.

Kozman

Liu

(Randolph). (2025). Sports news in five Arab countries: A comparative study of journalistic role performance across platforms and sources. Communication & Sport, 13(3), 511–533. https://doi.org/10.1177/21674795241231004

41.

Lacy

(1989). A model of demand for news: Impact of competition on newspaper content. Journalism Quarterly, 66(1), 40–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769908906600105

42.

LeJeune

H. J.

Workneh

T. W.

(2025). The construction of human rights narratives in the 2022 World Cup: A critical examination of US and Qatari news coverage. Communication & Sport, 13(3), 484–510. https://doi.org/10.1177/21674795241230849

43.

Loughran

(2022). All the controversies surrounding the Qatar world Cup in 2022. New York Post. https://nypost.com/2022/11/15/all-the-controversies-surrounding-the-qatar-world-cup-in-2022/

44.

Maier

Waldherr

Miltner

Jähnichen

Pfetsch

(2018). Exploring issues in a networked public sphere: Combining hyperlink network analysis and topic modeling. Social Science Computer Review, 36(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439317690337

45.

Manzenreiter

(2010). The Beijing games in the western imagination of China: The weak power of soft power. Journal of Sport & Social Issues, 34(1), 29–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193723509358968

46.

Mast

Temmerman

(2021). What’s (the) news? Reassessing “news values” as a concept and methodology in the digital age. Journalism Studies, 22(6), 689–701. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670x.2021.1917445

47.

McCambridge

(2017). Qatar 2022: Five years to go. DW.com. https://www.dw.com/en/five-years-to-go-until-qatar-2022-what-we-know-so-far/a-41471553

48.

McChesney

(2008). The political economy of media: Enduring issues, emerging dilemmas. Monthly Review Press.

49.

McIntyre

(2016). What makes “good” news newsworthy? Communication Research Reports, 33(3), 223–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2016.1186619

50.

McQuail

(2010). McQuail’s mass communication theory (6th ed.). Sage.

51.

Meier

H. E.

Mutz

Glathe

Jetzke

Hölzen

(2021). Politicization of a contested mega event: The 2018 FIFA world Cup on twitter. Communication & Sport, 9(5), 785–810. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167479519892579

52.

Miller

(2014). 6 reasons why the World Cup should be taken away from Qatar. Bleacher Report. https://bleacherreport.com/articles/1964708-six-reasons-why-the-world-cup-should-be-taken-away-from-qatar

53.

Montague

(2017). Qatar has a World Cup date. In It still needs a world-class team. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/09/sports/soccer/qatar-world-cup-2022.html

54.

Mosco

(2015). The political economy of communication: A living tradition. In Power, media, culture: A critical view from the political economy of communication (pp. 35–57). Palgrave Macmillan UK.

55.

Mosco

(Ed.), (2016). The political economy of journalism. In Economia política do jornalismo: Tendências, perspectivas E desenvolvimento regional. EDUFPI.

56.

Mullainathan

Shleifer

(2002). Media bias. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=335800

57.

Nye

J. S.

(1990). Bound to lead: The changing nature of American power. Basic Books.

58.

Ostrowski

(2015). Using latent Dirichlet allocation for topic modelling in Twitter. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE 9th international conference on semantic computing (IEEE ICSC 2015) (pp. 493–497). IEEE.

59.

Picard

(2011). The economics and financing of media companies. Fordham University Press.

60.

Puglisi

Snyder

Jr., J.

(Eds.), (2015). Empirical studies of media bias. In Handbook of Media Economics (Vol. 1, pp. 647–667). North-Holland.

61.

Ryfe

(2021). The economics of news and the practice of news production. Journalism Studies, 22(1), 60–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670x.2020.1854619

62.

Samuel-Azran

(2013). Al-Jazeera, Qatar, and new tactics in state-sponsored media diplomacy. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(9), 1293–1311. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213487736

63.

Samuel-Azran

Assaf

Salem

Wahabe

Halabi

(2016). Is there a Qatari–Al-Jazeera nexus? Coverage of the 2022 FIFA world Cup controversy by Al-Jazeera versus sky news, CNNI, and ITV. Global Media and Communication, 12(3), 195–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742766516676208

64.

Schudson

(2003). The sociology of news. Norton.

65.

Shoemaker

(2006). News and newsworthiness: A commentary. Communications, 31(1), 105–111. https://doi.org/10.1515/commun.2006.007

66.

Soo-Guan Khoo

Nourbakhsh

J. C.

(2012). Sentiment analysis of online news text: A case study of appraisal theory. Online Information Review, 36(6), 858–878. https://doi.org/10.1108/14684521211287936

67.

Spinde

Kreuter

Gaissmaier

Hamborg

Gipp

Giese

(2021). Do you think it’s biased? How to ask for the perception of media bias. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE joint conference on digital libraries (JCDL). IEEE.

68.

Swart

Hussain

(2023). FIFA 2022 world Cup in Qatar: Under the gaze of western media. In Sports mega-events in asia (pp. 199–222). Palgrave Macmillan.

69.

Vladisavljević

(2015). Media framing of political conflict: A review of the literature (working paper). MeCoDEM. https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/117315/

70.

Walter

Ophir

(2019). News frame analysis: An inductive mixed-method computational approach. Communication Methods and Measures, 13(4), 248–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2019.1639145

71.

Wasko

Murdock

Sousa

(Eds.), (2011). The handbook of political economy of communications (1st ed.). Wiley.

72.

Wells

(2018). All you need to know about the 2022 World Cup. Mirror. https://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/2022-world-cup-key-information-12585254

73.

Ylä-Anttila

Eranti

Kukkonen

(2021). Topic modeling for frame analysis: A study of media debates on climate change in India and USA. Global Media and Communication, 18(1), 91–112.

74.

Yoo

J. J.

Min

Koh

(2022). Cross-national news narratives of the Paralympic Games: Computational text analysis of the media coverage in the United States and South Korea. Communication & Sport, 12(2), 230–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/21674795221090420

75.

Zaharopoulos

(2007). The news framing of the 2004 Olympic Games. Mass Communication and Society, 10(2), 235–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205430701265752

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.18 MB

0.00 MB