This study compares supplier relationship by multinational assemblers in China
vis-á-vis the Chinese assemblers in the stage of product development. We
surveyed seven automobile firms (four international joint ventures and three
Chinese firms) during 2005-2007, when the Chinese automobile industry began to
rear up. Based on the survey, we examined the roles of suppliers, which is one
of the critical dimensions in product development of the automobile
industry.
CheungKevinLinPing.
“Spillover Effects of FDI on Innovation in China:
Evidence from the Provincial Data,”China Economic Review15 (2004):
25–44
2.
CusumanoMichaelTakeishiAkira.
“Supplier Relations and Management: a Survey of
Japanese, Japanese-transplant, and U.S. auto plants,”Strategic Management Journal12 (1991),
563–588
3.
DriesLiesbethSwinnenJohan.
“Foreign direct investment, vertical integration and
local suppliers: evidence from the Polish dairy
sector”, World Development32 (2004),
1525–1544
4.
FujimotoTakahiro.
“Reinterpreting the Resource-capability View of the
Firm: A Case of the Development-production Systems of the Japanese
Automakers.” In The Dynamic Firm: The Role of
Technology, Strategy, Organization, and Regions. Eds. ChandlerAlfredJr.HagstromPeterSolvellOrjan.
New York, NY: Oxford Univ.
PR1998, 15–44
5.
JeanRuey-Jer
BryanSinkovicsRudolfKimDaekwan.
“Drivers and Performance Outcomes of Relationship
Learning for Suppliers in Cross-Border Customer-Supplier Relationships: The
Role of Communication Culture,”Journal of International Marketing18, 1 (2010),
63–85
6.
KrauseDanielHandfieldRobertTylerBeverly.
“The Relationships between Supplier Development,
Commitment, Social Capital Accumulation and Performance
Improvement,”Journal of Operations Management25, 2 (2007),
528–545
7.
KotabeMasaaskiParenteRonaldoMurrayJanet.
“Antecedents and Outcomes of Modular Production in the
Brazilian Automobile Industry: A Grounded Theory
Approach,”Journal of International Business Studies38, 1 (2007),
84–106
8.
KnudsenMette.
“The Relative Importance of Interfirm Relationships
and Knowledge Transfer for New Product Development
Success,”Journal of Product Innovation Management24, 2 (2007),
117–138
9.
KoufterosXenophonChengT.C.
EdwinLaiKee-Hung.
“Black-box” and “Gray-box”
Supplier Integration in Product Development: Antecedents, Consequences and
the Moderating Role of Firm Size,”Journal of Operations Management25, 4 (2007),
847–870
10.
LiWenliHumphreysPaulYeungAndyChengEdwin.
“The impact of specific supplier development efforts
on buyer competitive advantage: an empirical model,”International Journal of Production Economics106, 1 (2007),
230–247
11.
MesquitaLuizBrushThomas.
“Untangling Safeguard and Production Coordination
Effects in Long-Term Buyer-Supplier Relationships,”Academy of Management Journal51, 4 (2008),
785–807
12.
OkadaAya.
“Skills Development and Interfirm Learning Linkages
under Globalization: Lessons from the Indian Automobile
Industry,”World Development32, 7 (2004),
1265–1288
13.
PaulrajAntonyLadoAugustineChenInjazz.
“Inter-organizational Communication as a Relational
Competency: Antecedents and Performance Outcomes in Collaborative
Buyer-Supplier Relationships,”Journal of Operation Management26, 1 (2008),
45–64
14.
SuttonJohn.
The Auto-component Supply Chain in China and India - A Benchmarking
Study. Working Paper EI/34. London School of Economics.
2004
15.
SwaminathanAnandHoetkerGlennMitchellWill.
“Modularity and the impact of buyer-supplier
relationships on the survival of suppliers,”Management science53, 2 (2007),
178–191
16.
ThunEric.
Changing Lanes in China: Foreign Direct Investment, Local
Governments, and Auto Sector Development. New York,
NY: Cambridge Univ. PR,
2006
