The purpose of this article is to understand general equilibrium impacts of international trade and globalization on social welfare and environmental emission caused on account of energy consumption by industries and households. We applied Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) modelling as the relevant methodology following Shoven and Whalley (1984). By constructing an energy/environmental Social Accounting Matrix (SAM), this article attempts to measure the effects of trade liberalization on different macroeconomic variables, energy consumption and green house gas (GHG) emission. We simulate various trade related policies like import liberalization, foreign capital inflow and use of energy saving technologies under both perfect and monopolistic competition.
Abayasiri-SilvaK.HorridgeM.(1995). Economies of scale and imperfect competition in an applied general equilibrium model of the Australian economy. Paper presented to ‘Increasing return and Economic Analysis’, an International Conference in Honour of Professor Kenneth J. Arrow, Monash University, 7–8 September 1995.
2.
AdelmanI.RobinsonS. (1978). Income distribution policies in developing countries. London: Oxford University Press.
3.
AntweilerW. (1996). The pollution terms of trade. Economic System Research, 8(4), 361–365.
4.
BranderJ.A.KrugmanP.R. (1983). A reciprocal dumping model of international trade. Journal of International Economics, 15, 313–321.
5.
BranderJ.A.SpencerB.J. (1985). Export subsidies and international market share rivalry. Journal of International Economics, 18, 83–100.
6.
ConradK.SchroderM. (1993). Environmental policy instruments using General Equilibrium models. Journal of Policy Modelling, 15, 521–543.
7.
CopelandBrian R.TaylorM.S. (1994). North–South trade and the environment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109(3), 755–787.
8.
DietzenbacherE.MukhopadhyayK. (2007). An empirical examination of the pollution heaven hypothesis for India: Towards a Green Leontief paradox?Environmental and Resource Economics, 36(4), 427–449.
9.
DixitAvinashStiglitzJoseph E. (1977). Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity. American Economic Review, 67, 297–308.
10.
DixonP.B.PermenterB.R.SuttonJ.VincentD.P. (1982). ORANI: A multi sectoral model of the Australian economy. Amsterdam: North Holland.
11.
GrossmanGene M.KruegerAlan B. (1993). Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement. In GarberPeter M. (Ed.), The US–Mexico free trade agreement, Cambridge (pp. 13–56). Massachusetts: MIT Press.
12.
HelpmanE.KrugmanP.R. (1985). Market structure and foreign trade: Increasing returns, imperfect competition, and the international economy. Cambridge: MIT Press.
13.
KrugmanP.R. (1979). Increasing returns monopolistic competition and international trade. Journal of International Economics (November), 9, 469–479.
14.
MukhopadhyayK. (2004). Environmental impacts of trade with Europe: A study on the impact of trade with EU on CO2 emissions in India during 1990s. IDPAD, Newsletter, II(1), 27–34.
15.
MukhopadhyayK.ChakrabortyD. (2005). Environmental impacts of trade in India. The International Trade Journal, 19(2), 135–163.
16.
MukhopadhyayK.FoessellO. (2005). An empirical investigation of air pollution from fossil fuel combustion and its impact on health in India during 1973–1974 to 1996–1997. Ecological Economics, 55(2), 235–250.
17.
PandaM.QuizonJ. (2001). Growth and distribution under trade liberalization in India. In GuhaA.KrishnaK.L.LahiriA.K. (Eds), Trade and industry: essays(Chapter 8). New Delhi: NIPFP–Ford Foundation Fellows, National Institute of Public Finance and Policy, New Delhi.
18.
ParikhK.S.NarayanaN.S.S.Ganesh PandaM.KumarA. (1997). Agricultural trade liberalization: Growth, welfare and large county effects. Agricultural Economics, 17(1), 1–20.
ShovenJ.B.WhalleyJ. (1984). Applied general equilibrium models of taxation and international trade. Journal of Economic Literature, XXII(3), 1007–1051.
22.
SpenceMichael E. (1976). Product selection, fixed costs and monopolistic competition. Review of Economic Studies, 53, 178–236.
