This research examines the relationship between foreign direct investment and exports and their impact on economic development in Chinese provinces. The study employs the dynamic generalized method of moments to analyse a sample from 31 provinces and cities in China from 2000 to 2022. The results indicate that net foreign direct investment harms economic growth, whereas exports enhance the economic growth rate in Chinese provinces and major cities. These findings support the resource mobility theory and the open economy models, but do not support the spillover effect theory. Our study provides valuable insights into sustainable economic growth, particularly at the provincial level in emerging nations.
AkalplerE., & HoveS. (2019). Carbon emissions, energy use, real GDP per capita, and trade matrix in the Indian economy-an ARDL approach. Energy, 168, 1081–1093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.12.012
2.
ÁlvarezL. J., HurtadoS., SánchezI., & ThomasC. (2011). The impact of oil price changes on Spanish and euro area consumer price inflation. Economic Modelling, 28(1–2), 422–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2010.08.006
3.
BachmannR., & FelderR. (2021). Labour market transitions, shocks and institutions in turbulent times: A cross-country analysis. Empirica, 48(2), 329–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10663-019-09469-y
4.
ButerinV., FajdetićB., & FunarićB. (2023). Understanding the macroeconomic effects of female participation in the labour market. Economies, 11(11), 280https://doi.org/10.3390/economies11110280
5.
CarleiV., AffortunatoF., MarraA., & BrogiM. (2019). Does centrality of importing countries affect export prices in the global trade?Quality & Quantity, 53, 529–551. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-018-0773-y
6.
ChurchJ. D. (2016). Comparing the consumer price index with the gross domestic product price index and gross domestic product implicit price deflator. Monthly Labour Review, 139, 1.
7.
DuongK. D., NguyenS. D., PhanP. T. T., & LuongL. K. (2022). How foreign direct investment, trade openness, and productivity affect economic growth: Evidence from 90 middle-income countries. Scientific Papers of the University of Pardubice. Series D, Faculty of Economics & Administration, 30(3). https://doi.org/10.46585/sp30031615
8.
DuongK. D., PhanP. T. T., LeA. N. N., & TungH. T. (2023). The nonlinearity between innovations and deposits growth: Evidence from a transition economy. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 19(3), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.14254/1800-5845/2023.19-3.6
9.
GhoshT., & ParabP. M. (2021). Assessing India’s productivity trends and endogenous growth: New evidence from technology, human capital and foreign direct investment. Economic Modelling, 97, 182–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2021.02.003
10.
HuangY., RazaS. M. F., & UsmanM. (2023). Asymmetric role of natural resources dependence, industrialization, and foreign direct investment in China’s economic growth. Resources Policy, 85, 103932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103932
11.
KongQ., PengD., NiY., JiangX., & WangZ. (2021). Trade openness and economic growth quality of China: Empirical analysis using ARDL model. Finance Research Letters, 38, 101488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101488
12.
LeA. N. N., PhamH., PhamD. T. N., & DuongK. D. (2023). Political stability and foreign direct investment inflows in 25 Asia-Pacific countries: The moderating role of trade openness. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02075-1
13.
LeH. T. P., PhamH., DoN. T. T., & DuongK. D. (2024). Foreign direct investment, total factor productivity, and economic growth: Evidence in middle-income countries. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1–11.
14.
LeanH. H., & SmythR. (2010). Multivariate Granger causality between electricity generation, exports, prices and GDP in Malaysia. Energy, 35(9), 3640–3648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.05.008
15.
LeeK. K., & VuT. V. (2020). Economic complexity, human capital and income inequality: A cross-country analysis. The Japanese Economic Review, 71(4), 695–718. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42973-019-00026-7
16.
LiuB., ZhengD., ZhouS., ChenL., & YangJ. (2022). VFDB 2022: A general classification scheme for bacterial virulence factors. Nucleic Acids Research, 50(D1), D912–D917. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkab1107
17.
MahadikaI. N., KalayciS., & AltunN. (2017). Relationship between GDP, foreign direct investment and export volume: Evidence from Indonesia. International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance, 8(1), 51–54. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijtef.2017.8.1.538
18.
NarulaR., & LeeJ. M. (2020). The theories of the multinational enterprise. Encyclopedia of International Economics and Global Trade, 20202, 89–114.
19.
NguyenH. T., LeA. N. N., LeH. V., & DuongK. D. (2024). Foreign direct investment and employments in Asia Pacific nations: The moderating role of labor quality. Heliyon, 10(9), e30133.
20.
PelinescuE. (2015). The impact of human capital on economic growth. Procedia Economics and Finance, 22, 184–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00258-0
21.
PengD., JiY., & KongQ. (2023). OFDI and firms’ sustainable productive capacity: Evidence from Chinese industrial firms. International Review of Economics & Finance, 83, 641–652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2022.10.010
22.
RanjanB., & KaurD. (2023). Achieving enhanced pseudocapacitance in MoS2 nanowires rationally sputtered over NiMnIn shape memory alloy for flexible Na-ion supercapacitor. Journal of Energy Storage, 71, 108122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2023.108122
23.
SayariN., SariR., & HammoudehS. (2018). The impact of value added components of GDP and FDI on economic freedom in Europe. Economic Systems, 42(2), 282–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2017.03.003
24.
SzkorupováZ. (2014). A causal relationship between foreign direct investment, economic growth and export for Slovakia. Procedia Economics and Finance, 15, 123–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00458-4
25.
TemouriY., VogelA., & WagnerJ. (2013). Self-selection into export markets by business services firms: Evidence from France, Germany and the United Kingdom. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 25, 146–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2012.02.004
26.
TranT. T. T., TranH. T., & DuongK. D. (2025). The non-linear relationship between economic development and air pollution: Evidence from panel data analysis. Asian Journal of Economics and Banking, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJEB-09-2024-0112
27.
WangJ., HassanM. S., AlharthiM., ArshedN., HanifI., & SaeedM. I. (2022). Inspecting non-linear behavior of aggregated and disaggregated renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on GDP per capita in Pakistan. Energy Strategy Reviews, 39, 100772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2021.100772
28.
WangQ., & MaZ. (2024). The measurement of China’s provincial physical capital stock based on the improved method and indicators. PloS One, 19(8), e0307946. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307946
29.
WuD., & LiuJ. (2016). Multi-regional input-output (MRIO) study of the provincial ecological footprints and domestic embodied footprints traded among China’s 30 provinces. Sustainability, 8(12), 1345. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8121345
30.
ZhangY., & DilanchievA. (2022). Economic recovery, industrial structure and natural resource utilization efficiency in China: Effect on green economic recovery. Resources Policy, 79, 102958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102958
