This study explored how coworkers use internal social media (ISM) to contribute to the construction of organizational identity. The study analyzed 3 months of interactions among coworkers at a large Danish bank on ISM. In addition, 17 coworkers were interviewed to provide additional understanding about the online interactions. The study found that these coworkers constructed organizational identity when they challenge, negotiate, and discuss organizational issues on ISM. They use phrases from vision and mission statements to support their arguments and to push the understanding of organizational identity so that it is in line with their perceptions of what the bank really is or should be. Some of these discussions on ISM develop into organizational stories, which are shared and discussed in informal, in-person conversations among coworkers. The stories become narratives, which contribute to the organizational identity, help coworkers make sense of the organization, and help them identify with the organization.
AlbertS.WhettenD. A. (1985). Organizational identity. In StawB. M.CumminingsL. L. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 7, pp. 263-295). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
2.
AshforthB. E.MaelF. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14, 20-39.
3.
Beers FägerstenK. (2015). Snuff said! Conflicting employee and corporate interests in the pursuit of a tobacco client. In DaricsE. (Ed.), Digital business discourse (pp. 142-159). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
4.
BennettJ.OwersM.PittM.TuckerM. (2010). Workplace impact of social networking. Property Management, 28, 138-148.
5.
BrandtzaegP. B.HeimJ. (2011). A typology of social networking sites users. International Journal of Web Based Communities, 7, 28-51.
6.
BrewerM. B.GardnerW. (1996). Who is this “We”? Levels of collective identity and self representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 83-93.
7.
BurnardP. (1991). A method of analysing interview transcripts in qualitative research. Nurse Education Today, 11, 461-466.
8.
CastellsM. (2007). Communication, power and counter-power in the network society. International Journal of Communication, 1, 238-266.
9.
CheneyG.ChristensenL. T.DaileyS. L. (2014). Communicating identity and identification in and around organizations. In PutnamL. L.MumbyD. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational communication (3rd ed., pp. 695-716). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10.
ChristensenL. T.CheneyG. (2000). Self-absorption and self-seduction in the corporate identity game. In SchultzM.HatchM. J.LarsenM. H. (Eds.), The expressive organization: Linking identity, reputation, and the corporate brand (pp. 246-270). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
11.
ChristensenL. T.CornelissenJ. (2010). Bridging corporate and organizational communication: Review, development and a look to the future. Management Communication Quarterly, 25, 383-414.
12.
CorleyK. G. (2004). Defined by our strategy or our culture? Hierarchical differences in perceptions of organizational identity and change. Human Relations, 57, 1145-1178.
13.
CornelissenJ. P. (2012). Sensemaking under pressure: The influence of professional roles and social accountability on the creation of sense. Organization Science, 23, 118-137.
14.
CouplandC.BrownA. D. (2004). Constructing organizational identities on the web: A case study of Royal Dutch/Shell. Journal of Management Studies, 41, 1325-1347.
15.
De CilliaR.ReisiglM.WodakR. (1999). The discursive construction of national identities. Discourse & Society, 10, 149-173.
DuttonJ. E.DukerichJ. M. (1991). Keeping an eye on the mirror: Image and identity in organizational adaptation. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 517-554.
19.
EisenhardtK. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 532-550.
20.
El OuirdiA.El OuirdiM.SegersJ.HenderickxE. (2015). Employees’ use of social media technologies: A methodological and thematic review. Behaviour & Information Technology, 35, 454-464.
21.
FlyvbjergB. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12, 219-245.
22.
FrandsenF.JohansenW. (2010). Crisis communication, complexity, and the cartoon affair: A case study. In CoombsW. T.HolladayS. J. (Eds.), The handbook of crisis communication (pp. 425-448). Oxford, England: Wiley-Blackwell.
23.
GioiaD. A.PatvardhanS. (2012). Identity as process and flow. In SchultzM. (Ed.), Constructing identity in and around organizations (2nd ed., pp. 50-62). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
24.
GioiaD. A.PatvardhanS. D.HamiltonA. L.CorleyK. G. (2013). Organizational identity formation and change. Academy of Management Annals, 7, 123-193.
25.
GlaserB.StraussA. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
26.
HeH.BrownA. D. (2013). Organizational identity and organizational identification: A review of the literature and suggestions for future research. Group & Organization Management, 38, 3-35.
27.
HeideM.SimonssonC. (2011). Putting coworkers in the limelight: New challenges for communication professionals. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 5, 201-220.
28.
HendersonA.CheneyG.WeaverC. K. (2015). The role of employee identification and organizational identity in strategic communication and organizational issues management about genetic modification. International Journal of Business Communication, 52, 12-41.
29.
HoggM. A.ReidS. A. (2006). Social identity, self-categorization, and the communication of group norms. Communication Theory, 16, 7-30.
JohansenW.FrandsenF. (2007). Krisekommunikation: Når virksomhedens image og omdømme er truet [Crisis communication: When the organizations’ image and reputation is threatened]. Frederiksberg, Denmark: Samfundslitteratur.
34.
KaplanA. M.HaenleinM. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53, 59-68.
35.
KarremanD.AlvessonM. (2001). Making newsmakers: Conversational identity at work. Organization Studies, 22, 59-89.
36.
KingN. (2012). Doing template analysis. In SymonG.CassellC. (Eds.), Qualitative organizational research: Core methods and current challenges (pp. 426-450). London, England: Sage.
37.
KochH.GonzalezE.LeidnerD. (2012). Bridging the work/social divide: The emotional response to organizational social networking sites. European Journal of Information Systems, 21, 699-717.
38.
KozinetsR. V. (2002). The field behind the screen: Using netnography for marketing research in online communities. Journal of Marketing Research, 39, 61-72.
39.
KozinetsR. V. (2010). Netnography: Doing ethnographic research online. London, England: Sage.
LeonardiP. M.HuysmanM.SteinfieldC. (2013). Enterprise social media: Definition, history, and prospects for the study of social technologies in organizations. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19, 1-19.
42.
MaitlisS.ChristiansonM. (2014). Sensemaking in organizations: Taking stock and moving forward. Academy of Management Annals, 8, 57-125.
43.
MazzeiA. (2010). Promoting active communication behaviors through internal communication. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 15, 221-234.
44.
MillikenF. J.MorrisonE. W.HewlinP. F. (2003). An exploratory study of employee silence: Issues that employees don’t communicate upward and why. Journal of Management Studies, 40, 1453-1476.
45.
NeergaardH. (2007). Udvælgelse af cases i kvalitative undersøgelser [Selecting cases in qualitative studies]. Frederiksberg, Denmark: Samfundslitteratur.
46.
ParryE.SolidoroA. (2013). Social media as a mechanism for engagement?Advanced Series in Management, 12, 121-141.
47.
PutnamL. L. (2013). Dialectics, contradictions, and the question of agency. A tribute to James R. Taylor. In RobichaudD.CoorenF. (Eds.), Organization and organizing: Materiality, agency, and discourse (pp. 23-36). London, England: Routledge.
48.
ScottS. G.LaneV. R. (2000). A stakeholder approach to organizational identity. Academy of Management Review, 25, 43-62.
49.
SiggelkowN. (2007). Persuasion with case studies. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 20-24.
50.
ThomasG. (2010). How to do your case study: A guide for students and researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
51.
TreemJ. W.LeonardiP. M. (2012). Social media use in organizations: Exploring the affordances of visibility, editability, persistence, and association. In SalmonC. T. (Ed.), Communication yearbook (Vol. 36, pp. 143-189). New York, NY: Routledge.
52.
ValentiniC.AndersenM. A.Agerdal-HjermindA. (2013, January). Co-creating organizational changes in social media: A theoretical framework. Paper presented at the 16th Annual International Public Relations Research Conference, Miami, FL. Retrieved from http://www.instituteforpr.org/wp-content/uploads/16IPRRC-Procedings-FINAL.pdf
53.
VuoriV.OkkonenJ. (2012). Knowledge sharing motivational factors of using an intra-organizational social media platform. Journal of Knowledge Management, 16, 592-603.
54.
WeickK. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
55.
WelchM. (2012). Appropriateness and acceptability: Employee perspectives of internal communication. Public Relations Review, 38, 246-254.
56.
YinR. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
57.
ZerfassA.FrankeN. (2013). Enabling, advising, supporting, executing: A theoretical framework for internal communication consulting within organizations. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 7, 118-135.
