Positive communication is crucial for effective teaching, influencing student engagement, motivation, and educational outcomes. Synthesizing educational and interdisciplinary literature, this article develops two core propositions: (1) cultivating classroom relationships through responsive interactions and peer connectedness, and (2) strengthening teacher affirmation and credibility via authentic and empathetic communication practices. Specific strategies, such as personalized feedback, inclusive communication methods, structured confirmation behaviors, and generationally responsive techniques, equip educators to enhance classroom environments, improve student learning experiences, and prepare students effectively for academic achievement and professional collaboration.
AlmossaS. Y. (2021). University students’ perspectives toward learning and assessment during COVID-19. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 7163–7181.
2.
AyanwaleM. A.AdelanaO. P.MolefiR. R.AdeekoO.IsholaA. M. (2024). Examining artificial intelligence literacy among pre-service teachers for future classrooms. Computers and Education Open, 6, 100179.
3.
ChoiJ. J.RobbC. A.MifliM.ZainuddinZ. (2021). University students’ perception to online class delivery methods during the COVID-19 pandemic: A focus on hospitality education in Korea and Malaysia. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 29, 100336.
4.
DutaN.PanisoaraG.PanisoaraI. O. (2015). The effective communication in teaching: Diagnostic study regarding the academic learning motivation to students. Procedia–Social and Behavioral Sciences, 186, 1007–1012.
5.
FrisbyB. N.MartinM. M. (2010). Instructor–student and student–student rapport in the classroom. Communication Education, 59(2), 146–164.
6.
FrymierA. B. (2005). Students’ classroom communication effectiveness. Communication Quarterly, 53(2), 197–212.
7.
GoodboyA. K.MyersS. A. (2008). The effect of teacher confirmation on student communication and learning outcomes. Communication Education, 57(2), 153–179.
8.
HammarL. M.HolmströmI. K.SkoglundK.MeraniusM. S.SundlerA. J. (2017). The care of and communication with older people from the perspective of student nurses. A mixed method study. Nurse Education Today, 52, 1–6.
9.
HentzB. S.LuciaB.VintM. (2022). Critical approaches to sustainability in the business communication classroom: A developmental perspective. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 85(1), 99–114.
10.
HobjilăA. (2012). Positive politeness and negative politeness in didactic communication—landmarks in teaching methodology. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 63, 213–222.
11.
HowickJ.MoscropA.MebiusA.FanshaweT. R.LewithG.BishopF. L.MistiaenP.RobertsN. W.DieninytėE.HuX. Y.AveyardP.OnakpoyaI. J. (2018). Effects of empathic and positive communication in healthcare consultations: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 111(7), 240–252.
12.
LeeA. M.RagupathiK. (2025). Trust and ethos in academic development: Credibility, identity, and value. International Journal for Academic Development, 30(1), 68–81.
13.
MartinD. (2024). When does positive communication maximize effective information flow?Business and Professional Communication Quarterly. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/23294906241275954
14.
McCaffreyR.HayesR. M.CassellA.Miller-ReyesS.DonaldsonA.FerrellC. (2012). The effect of an educational programme on attitudes of nurses and medical residents towards the benefits of positive communication and collaboration. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 68(2), 293–301.
15.
MyersS. A. (2002). Perceived aggressive instructor communication and student state motivation, learning, and satisfaction. Communication Reports, 15(2), 113–121.
16.
PhanT. A. (2024). AI integration for communication skills: A conceptual framework in education and business. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/23294906241302000
17.
PhanT. A.PhanN. (2024). Fostering teamwork satisfaction in competitive project-based learning environments. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/23294906241278916
18.
RathelJ. M.DrasgowE.BrownW. H.MarshallK. J. (2014). Increasing induction-level teachers’ positive-to-negative communication ratio and use of behavior-specific praise through e-mailed performance feedback and its effect on students’ task engagement. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 16(4), 219–233.
19.
RathelJ. M.DrasgowE.ChristleC. C. (2008). Effects of supervisor performance feedback on increasing preservice teachers’ positive communication behaviors with students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 16(2), 67–77.
20.
RayburnS. W.AndersonS.SierraJ. J. (2021). Future thinking continuity of learning in marketing: A student perspective on crisis management in higher education. Marketing Education Review, 31(3), 241–255.
21.
ReesC.SheardC. (2002). The relationship between medical students’ attitudes towards communication skills learning and their demographic and education-related characteristics. Medical Education, 36(11), 1017–1027.
22.
RuppertB.GreenD. A. (2012). Practicing what we teach: Credibility and alignment in the business communication classroom. Business Communication Quarterly, 75(1), 29–44.
23.
SchrodtP. (2003). Students’ appraisals of instructors as a function of students’ perceptions of instructors’ aggressive communication. Communication Education, 52(2), 106–121.
24.
ShanS.LiC.ShiJ.WangL.CaiH. (2014). Impact of effective communication, achievement sharing and positive classroom environments on learning performance. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 31(3), 471–482.
25.
SidelingerR. J.Booth-ButterfieldM. (2010). Co-constructing student involvement: An examination of teacher confirmation and student-to-student connectedness in the college classroom. Communication Education, 59(2), 165–184.
26.
WangD.TaoY.ChenG. (2024). Artificial intelligence in classroom discourse: A systematic review of the past decade. International Journal of Educational Research, 123, 102275.
27.
XuX.Schönrock-AdemaJ.JaarsmaA. D. C.DuvivierR. J.BosN. A. (2022). A conducive learning environment in international higher education: A systematic review of research on students’ perspectives. Educational Research Review, 37, 100474.
