The goal of the present research is to determine the degree of correspondence between the observed behavior in an experiment and the attitudes expressed in a questionnaire administered after an experiment. To do so, we replicate Driskell and Mullen’s study using more data from multiple experiments and conduct more sophisticated analyses. The attitudinal measures are questionnaire items regarding study participants’ views of themselves, a partner, and their task performance, measured after interaction. The behavioral measure records the participants’ resistance to influence from their partners and is thought to reflect underlying expectations for competence. Using confirmatory factor analysis, we find that there is a strong relationship between attitude and behavior, such that they appear to represent a single construct. Implications of this finding for experimental methodology are discussed in support of more concise approaches.
AjzenIcekFishbeinMartin. 1977. “Attitude-behavior Relations: A Theoretical Analysis and Review of Empirical Research.” Psychological Bulletin84(5):888–918.
2.
ArmitageChristopher J.ConnerMark. 2001. “Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: A Meta-analytic Review.” The British Journal of Social Psychology40(4):471–99.
3.
BaumeisterRoy F.VohsKathleen D.FunderDavid C.2007. “Psychology as the Science of Self-reports and Finger Movements: Whatever Happened to Actual Behavior?” Perspectives on Psychological Science2(4):396–403.
4.
ConnellyKayKhalilAshrafLiuYong. 2007. “Do I Do What I Say? Observed versus Stated Privacy Preferences.” Pp. 620–3 in Human-Computer Interaction–INTERACT 2007. Springer Berlin: Heidelberg.
5.
Corral-VerdugoVíctor. 1997. “Dual ‘Realities’ of Conservation Behavior: Self-reports Vs. Observations of Re-use and Recycling Behavior.” Journal of Environmental Psychology17(2):135–45.
6.
CrandallRick. 1976. “Validation of Self-report Measures Using Ratings by Others.” Sociological Methods & Research4(3):380–400.
7.
DriskellJames E.Jr.1982. “Personal Characteristics and Performance Expectations.” Social Psychology Quarterly45(4):229–37.
8.
DriskellJames E.Jr.MullenBrian. 1988. “Expectations and Actions.” Pp. 399–412 in Status Generalization: New Theory and Research, edited by WebsterMurrayJr.FoschiMartha. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
9.
FalkArminHeckmanJames. 2009. “Lab Experiments Are a Major Source of Knowledge in the Social Sciences.” Science326(5952):535–8.
10.
FazioRussell H.ZannaMark P.CooperJoel. 1978. “Direct Experience and Attitude-behavior Consistency: An Information Processing Analysis.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin4(1):48–51.
11.
FeldmanJack M.LynchJohn G.1988. “Self-generated Validity and Other Effects of Measurement on Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior.” Journal of Applied Psychology73(3):421–35.
12.
JennerE. A.FletcherBen C.WatsonP.JonesF. A.MillerL.ScottG. M.2006. “Discrepancy between Self-reported and Observed Hand Hygiene Behaviour in Healthcare Professionals.” Journal of Hospital Infection63(4):418–22.
13.
JohnsonBlair T.BoyntonMarcella H.2010. “Putting Attitudes in Their Place: Behavioral Prediction in the Face of Competing Variables.” Pp. 19–38 in The Psychology of Attitudes and Attitude Change, edited by ForgasJ. P.CooperJ.CranoW. D.New York: Psychology Press.
14.
KalkhoffWillThyeShane R.2006. “Expectation States Theory and Research New Observations from Meta-analysis.” Sociological Methods & Research35(2):219–49.
15.
KimMin-SunHunterJohn E.1993. “Attitude-behavior Relations: A Meta-analysis of Attitudinal Relevance and Topic.” Journal of Communication43(1):101–42.
16.
KrausStephen J.1995. “Attitudes and the Prediction of Behavior: A Meta-analysis of the Empirical Literature.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin21(1):58–75.
17.
LeoneLuigiPeruginiMarcoErcolaniAnna Paola. 1999. “A Comparison of Three Models of Attitude–Behavior Relationships in the Studying Behavior Domain.” European Journal of Social Psychology29(2–3):161–89.
18.
LichtmanSteven W.PisarskaKrystynaBermanEllen RaynesPestoneMicheleDowlingHillaryOffenbacherEstherWeiselHopeHeshkaStanleyMatthewsDwight E.HeymsfieldSteven B.1992. “Discrepancy between Self-reported and Actual Caloric Intake and Exercise in Obese Subjects.” New England Journal of Medicine327(27):1893–8.
19.
MarchJames G.1956. “Influence Measurement in Experimental and Semi-experimental Groups.” Sociometry19(4):260–71.
20.
MookDouglas G.1983. “In Defense of External Invalidity.” American Psychologist38(4):379–87.
21.
SaylorRyan. 2013. “Concepts, Measures, and Measuring Well an Alternative Outlook.” Sociological Methods & Research42(3):354–91.
22.
SchumanHoward. 1994. “Attitudes, Beliefs, and Behaviors.” Pp. 68–89 in Sociological Perspectives on Social Psychology, edited by CookK.FineG. A.HouseJ.Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
23.
WalkerLisa Slattery. 2014. “Developing Your Experiment.” In Laboratory Experiments in the Social Sciences. 2nd ed., edited by WebsterMurrayJr.SellJane. New York: Elsevier.
24.
WalkerLisa SlatteryWebsterMurrayJr.BianchiAlison J.2011. “Testing the Spread of Status Value Theory.” Social Science Research40:1652–63.
25.
WallaceDavid S.PaulsonRené M.LordCharles G.BondCharles F.Jr.2005. “Which Behaviors Do Attitudes Predict? Meta-analyzing the Effects of Social Pressure and Perceived Difficulty.” Review of General Psychology9(3):214–27.
26.
WebsterMurrayJr.WhitmeyerJosephRashotteLisa Slattery. 2004. “Status Claims, Performance Expectations and Inequality in Groups.” Social Science Research33:724–45.
27.
WilsonTimothy D.HodgesSara D.1992. “Attitudes as Temporary Constructions.” Pp. 37–65 in The Construction of Social Judgments, edited by MartinL. L.TesserA.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
28.
WynerGordon A.1980. “Response Errors in Self-reported Number of Arrests.” Sociological Methods & Research9(2):161–77.
