It is often assumed that sexual and romantic attractions are aligned: that the gender(s) a person is attracted to sexually “matches” the gender(s) to which they are romantically attracted. In this study, I challenge that assumption by centering asexual perspectives on attraction. Drawing on interviews with 77 asexual individuals (a sexual identity referring to those who experience low/no sexual attraction), I find that many frame their attraction as “split.” In this “split attraction” framework, romantic and sexual attractions are treated as having the potential to be unlinked. I examine how this leads some asexual individuals to forge complex identities that draw on both their sexual and romantic orientations, with some using multiple sexual identities simultaneously (e.g., bisexual asexual). I also consider how split attraction frameworks may be applied outside of asexual contexts, arguing that scholars should formulate study designs to accommodate for split attractions and orientations.
AdamBarry D.2000. “Love and Sex in Constructing Identity Among Men Who Have Sex with Men.” International Journal of Sexuality and Gender Studies5(4):325–339. doi:10.1023/A:1010176031080.
2.
AlburyKath. 2015. “Identity Plus? Bi-Curiosity, Sexual Adventurism and the Boundaries of ‘Straight’ Sexual Practices and Identities.” Sexualities18(5–6):649–664. doi:10.1177/1363460714561672.
AntonsenAmy N.ZdaniukBozenaYuleMoragBrottoLori A.. 2020. “Ace and Aro: Understanding Differences in Romantic Attractions Among Persons Identifying as Asexual.” Archives of Sexual Behavior49(5):1615–1630. doi:10.1007/s10508-019-01600-1.
BauerCarolineMillerTristanGinozaMaryGuoYueYoungblomKristinBabaAiPentenPhilMeinholdMaxRamarajVarshiniTrieuTheresaZiebertJacciAdroitMel. 2018. 2016 Asexual Community Survey Summary Report.
8.
BoellstorffTom. 2016. “Queer Techne: Two Theses on Methodology and Queer Studies.” Pp. 215–230 in Queer Methods and Methodologies. London: Routledge.
9.
BogaertAnthony F.2004. “Asexuality: Prevalence and Associated Factors in a National Probability Sample.” The Journal of Sex Research41(3):279–287. doi:10.1080/00224490409552235.
10.
BrownGwendolynChevaAndreeaFraserMeganZeglinRobert J.. 2023. “Asexuality: A Content Analysis of Sex Therapy Journals.” Psychology & Sexuality14(1):17–30. doi:10.1080/19419899.2022.2052943.
11.
CarrilloHéctorHoffmanAmanda. 2018. “‘Straight with a Pinch of Bi’: The Construction of Heterosexuality as an Elastic Category among Adult US Men.” Sexualities21(1–2):90–108. doi:10.1177/1363460716678561.
12.
CarrollMegan2024. “What Does Asexuality Offer Sociology? Insights from the Asexual Community Survey.” Pp. 240–254 in Outskirts: Queer Experiences on the Fringe, edited by ComptonD. R.StoneA. L.. New York: NYU Press.
ChasinC. J. DeLuzio. 2011. “Theoretical Issues in the Study of Asexuality.” Archives of Sexual Behavior40(4):713–723. doi:10.1007/s10508-011-9757-x.
15.
CollinsPatricia Hill. 1986. “Learning from the Outsider Within: The Sociological Significance of Black Feminist Thought*.” Social Problems33(6):s14–s32. doi:10.2307/800672.
16.
CopulskyDanielHammackPhillip L.. 2023. “Asexuality, Graysexuality, and Demisexuality: Distinctions in Desire, Behavior, and Identity.” The Journal of Sex Research60(2):221–230. doi:10.1080/00224499.2021.2012113.
17.
CowanTovahLeBlancAndré. 2018. “Feelings under Dynamic Description: The Asexual Spectrum and New Ways of Being.” Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology38(1):29–41. doi:10.1037/teo0000076.
DiamondLisa M.2003. “What Does Sexual Orientation Orient? A Biobehavioral Model Distinguishing Romantic Love and Sexual Desire.” Psychological Review110(1):173–192. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.110.1.173.
23.
DiamondLisa M.2008. Sexual Fluidity: Understanding Women’s Love and Desire. Cambridge, MA, US: Harvard University Press.
24.
Du BoisW. E. B.2015. The Souls of Black Folk. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.
25.
FoxEmilyWinerCanton. 2024. “What is Friendship? Learning from Asexual and Aromantic Perspectives.” Pp. 293–294 in Families As They Really Are. New York: Norton.
26.
GibsonLucy. 2010. Using Email Interviews: Realities Toolkit #09.
27.
GlaserBarney G.StraussAnselm L.. 2017. Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York: Routledge.
28.
GreavesLara M.BarlowFiona KateHuangYanshuStrongeSamanthaFraserGloriaSibleyChris G.. 2017. “Asexual Identity in a New Zealand National Sample: Demographics, Well-Being, and Health.” Archives of Sexual Behavior46(8):2417–2427. doi:10.1007/s10508-017-0977-6.
29.
GuptaKristina. 2015. “Compulsory Sexuality: Evaluating an Emerging Concept.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society41(1):131–154. doi:10.1086/681774.
30.
HöglundJannikeJernPatrickSandnabbaN. KennethSanttilaPekka. 2014. “Finnish Women and Men Who Self-Report No Sexual Attraction in the Past 12 Months: Prevalence, Relationship Status, and Sexual Behavior History.” Archives of Sexual Behavior43:879–889. doi:10.1007/s10508-013-0240-8.
31.
hooksbell. 2000. Feminist Theory: From Margin to Center. USA: Pluto Press.
32.
IllingworthNicola. 2006. “Content, Context, Reflexivity and the Qualitative Research Encounter: Telling Stories in the Virtual Realm.” Sociological Research Online11(1):62–73.
33.
JamesNalita. 2015. “Using Email Interviews in Qualitative Educational Research: Creating Space to Think and Time to Talk.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education29(2):150–163. doi:10.1080/09518398.2015.1017848.
34.
JenkinsCarrie. 2017. What Love is: And what it Could Be. New York: Basic Books.
35.
JourianT. J.NicolazzoZ.. 2017. “Bringing Our Communities to the Research Table: The Liberatory Potential of Collaborative Methodological Practices alongside LGBTQ Participants.” Educational Action Research25(4):594–609. doi:10.1080/09650792.2016.1203343.
36.
JulianChristopher A.ManningWendy D.Kamp DushClaire M.. 2024. “Measurement Opportunities for Studying Sexual and Gender Diverse Partnerships in Population-based Surveys.” Journal of Marriage and Family. doi:10.1111/jomf.12957.
37.
KennedyH. C.1980. “The ‘Third Sex’ Theory of Karl Heinrich Ulrichs.” Journal of Homosexuality6(1–2):103–111.
KleinFritzSepekoffBarryWolfTimothy J.. 1985. “Sexual Orientation.” Journal of Homosexuality11(1–2):35–49. doi:10.1300/J082v11n01_04.
40.
LaumannEdward O.GagnonJohn H.MichaelRobert T.MichaelsStuart. 2000. The Social Organization of Sexuality: Sexual Practices in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
41.
LeeJohn Alan. 1977. “A Typology of Styles of Loving.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin3(2):173–182. doi:10.1177/014616727700300204.
42.
MandigoDonna M.KavarLouis. 2022. “The Experience of Male Asexuality: A Phenomenological Inquiry.” The Qualitative Report27(2):488–508. doi:10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5213.
43.
McCoydJudith LMKersonToba Schwaber. 2006. “Conducting Intensive Interviews Using Email: A Serendipitous Comparative Opportunity.” Qualitative Social Work5(3):389–406.
44.
MitchellHeatherHunnicuttGwen. 2019. “Challenging Accepted Scripts of Sexual ‘Normality’: Asexual Narratives of Non-Normative Identity and Experience.” Sexuality & Culture23(2):507–524. doi:10.1007/s12119-018-9567-6.
45.
MolletAmanda L.Asexuality & Asexuality Studies. Encyclopedia of Queer Studies in Education. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill, 2021, pp. 44–49.
PriebeGiselaSvedinCarl Göran. 2013. “Operationalization of Three Dimensions of Sexual Orientation in a National Survey of Late Adolescents.” The Journal of Sex Research50(8):727–738. doi:10.1080/00224499.2012.713147.
48.
ReynoldsChelsea. 2015. “‘I Am Super Straight and I Prefer You Be Too’: Constructions of Heterosexual Masculinity in Online Personal Ads for ‘Straight’ Men Seeking Sex With Men.” Journal of Communication Inquiry39(3):213–231. doi:10.1177/0196859915575736.
49.
RothblumEsther D.KruegerEvan A.KittleKrystal R.MeyerIlan H.. 2020. “Asexual and Non-Asexual Respondents from a U.S. Population-Based Study of Sexual Minorities.” Archives of Sexual Behavior49(2):757–767. doi:10.1007/s10508-019-01485-0.
Savin-WilliamsRitch C.2014. “An Exploratory Study of the Categorical Versus Spectrum Nature of Sexual Orientation.” The Journal of Sex Research51(4):446–453. doi:10.1080/00224499.2013.871691.
52.
ScherrerKristin S.2008. “Coming to an Asexual Identity: Negotiating Identity, Negotiating Desire.” Sexualities11(5):621–641. doi:10.1177/1363460708094269.
53.
SedgwickEve Kosofsky. 1993. Tendencies. Durham: Duke University Press.
SilvaTony. 2017. “Bud-Sex: Constructing Normative Masculinity among Rural Straight Men That Have Sex With Men.” Gender & Society31(1):51–73. doi:10.1177/0891243216679934.
58.
SilvaTony. 2021. Still Straight: Sexual Flexibility Among White Men in Rural America. New York: NYU Press.
59.
SilvaTony J.WhaleyRachel Bridges. 2018. “Bud-Sex, Dude-Sex, and Heteroflexible Men: The Relationship between Straight Identification and Social Attitudes in a Nationally Representative Sample of Men with Same-Sex Attractions or Sexual Practices.” Sociological Perspectives61(3):426–443. doi:10.1177/0731121417745024.
60.
SternbergRobert J.1986. “A Triangular Theory of Love.” Psychological Review93(2):119–135. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.93.2.119.
61.
StremelEmily. 2022. “A History of Asexuality: From Medical Problem to a Recognized Sexual Orientation.” The Ascendant Historian2:68–77.
62.
TablerJenniferGonzalezCarlos M.SynderJamie A.SchmitzRachel M.GeistClaudia. Hidden (and Not so Hidden) Messaging in Top-Utilized US Social Surveys: The Persistence of Heteronormative Ideology and the Gender Binary. In: BaumleA.NordmarkenS. (eds) Demography of transgender, nonbinary and gender minority populations. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 2022, pp. 13–46.
63.
TesslerHannah. 2023. “Aromanticism, Asexuality, and Relationship (Non-)Formation: How a-Spec Singles Challenge Romantic Norms and Reimagine Family Life.” Sexualities. Online First. doi:10.1177/13634607231197061.
64.
TesslerHannahWinerCanton. 2023. “Sexuality, Romantic Orientation, and Masculinity: Men as Underrepresented in Asexual and Aromantic Communities.” Sociology Compass17(11):e13141. doi:10.1111/soc4.13141.
65.
TimmermansStefanTavoryIddo. 2012. “Theory Construction in Qualitative Research: From Grounded Theory to Abductive Analysis.” Sociological Theory30(3):167–186. doi:10.1177/0735275112457914.
66.
Van HoudenhoveEllenPaulEnzlinGijsLuk. 2017. “A Positive Approach Toward Asexuality: Some First Steps, But Still a Long Way to Go.” Archives of Sexual Behavior46:647–651. doi:10.1007/s10508-016-0921-1.
67.
WalkerAlicia. 2014. “‘I’m Not a Lesbian; I’m Just a Freak’: A Pilot Study of the Experiences of Women in Assumed-Monogamous Other-Sex Unions Seeking Secret Same-Sex Encounters Online, Their Negotiation of Sexual Desire, and Meaning-Making of Sexual Identity.” Sexuality & Culture18(4):911–935. doi:10.1007/s12119-014-9226-5.
68.
WardJane. 2008. “Dude-Sex: White Masculinities and ‘Authentic’ Heterosexuality Among Dudes Who Have Sex With Dudes.” Sexualities11(4):414–434. doi:10.1177/1363460708091742.
69.
WinerCanton. 2023. “Undoing the Absence of Asexuality in the Classroom.” Feminist Pedagogy4(1):9.
70.
WinerCanton2024a. “Erasure, Camouflage, Exceptionalism, and Cultural Criticism: Asexuality and Masculinity Threat.” Pp. 208–225 in Asexualities: Feminist and Queer Perspectives, Revised and Expanded Ten-Year Anniversary Edition, edited by CerankowskiK.MilksM.. London: Routledge.
71.
WinerCanton. 2024b. “Understanding Asexuality: A Sociological Review.” Sociology Compass18(6):e13240. doi:10.1111/soc4.13240.
72.
WinerCantonCarrollMeganYangYuchenLinderKatherineMilesBrittney. 2024. “I Didn’t Know Ace Was a Thing’: Bisexuality and Pansexuality as Identity Pathways in Asexual Identity Formation.” Sexualities27(1–2):267–289. doi:10.1177/13634607221085485.
73.
WolkomirMichelle. 2009. “Making Heteronormative Reconciliations: The Story of Romantic Love, Sexuality, and Gender in Mixed-Orientation Marriages.” Gender & Society23(4):494–519. doi:10.1177/0891243209340033.
