North Korea still exists. The majority of researchers today tend to attribute the nation’s surprising resilience to the total social control the regime exerts. There are telltale signs, however, that the information cordon that once surrounded the country is deteriorating and that the outside world is filtering in through such means as cell phones. It is therefore reasonable to assume that North Koreans already have accumulated enough information to judge how miserable and hopeless their lot is. A true mystery of North Korea thus becomes the question of why the regime has survived, when so many North Koreans hate it. There is some parallelism between the present-day North Korea and the final days of Germany under the Third Reich. At that time, although Germans knew how despicable the Hitler regime was and how that regime was bound to end, they nonetheless supported Hitler and fought to the end. This has been ascribed to their fear of the Soviet Red Army. In this vein, we could assume that North Koreans see no alternative to the current regime and instead opt to be inert because they believe they face an overwhelming threat to their existence, as the Germans did 70 years ago.
Bennett, Bruce W., & Lind, Jennifer. (2011). The collapse of North Korea. International Security, 36(2), 84–119.
2.
Beyme, Klaus Von. (1986). Attitudes of German youth toward relations between the two German States. In American Institute for Contemporary German Studies (Ed.), West Germany, East Germany and the German question (pp. 33–43). Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University.
3.
Blij, Harm de. (2012). Why geography matters: More than ever. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4.
Coghlan, David. (2008). Prospects from Korean reunification. Carlisle Barracks, PA: Strategic Studies Institute, US Army War College.
5.
Demick, Barbara. (2014). Nothing to envy. London, UK: Granta.
6.
Faustmann, Hubert. (2006). Challenges of reunification: The case of Germany. A updated version of the paper originally presented at a Symposium organized by the Cyprus Academic Forum on Challenges of Reunification: The Cases of Germany, Ireland and Cyprus, Goethe Zentrum, Nicosia, Cyprus, 31 March 2004.
7.
Fukuyama, Francis. (2006). The end of history and the last man. New York, NY: Free Press.
8.
Gause, Ken E. (2012). Coercion, control, surveillance, and punishment. Washington, DC: Committee for Human Rights in North Korea.
9.
German Criminal Code (2009, October2). Federal Republic of Germany.
10.
Halliday, Jon. (1981). The North Korean enigma. In RobinMurray, ChristineWhite & GordonWhite (Eds), Socialist transformation and development in third world (pp. 18–52). New York, NY: Harvest Press.
11.
Huntington, Samuel P. (1996). The clash of civilizations. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster Paperbacks.
12.
Hyun, In-Taek, & Kim, Woosang. (2002). Conceptualizing post-unification defense challenges and strategies. In Natalie W.Crawford & Chung-InMoon (Eds), Emerging threats, force structures and the role of air force in Korea (conference proceeding) (pp. 71–88). Santa Monica, CARand Corporation.
13.
Kahneman, Daniel. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
14.
Kaplan, Robert D. (2013). The revenge of geography, what the map tells us about coming conflicts and battle against fate. New York, NY: Random House.
15.
Kershaw, Ian. (2011). The end. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
16.
Kim, Suki. (2014). Without you, there is no us. London, UK: Rider.
17.
Kim, Yersu. (2011). On the possibility of a sudden change in North Korea and its aftermath. A paper presented at International Conference on ‘Asian Perspectives on Humanitarian Intervention in the 21st Century’, Doshisha University, Kyoto, Japan, June 16.
18.
Kim, Yonho. (2014). Cell phones in North Korea. Washington, DC: The US-Korea Institute at SAIS.
19.
Kim, Yoon Hee. (2012). North Korean defectors seeking health certification to take the national medical licensing examination in the Republic of Korea: Figures and procedures. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professionals, 9(12), 121–123.
20.
Kohli, Atul. (1994). Where do high political economies come from? The Japanese lineage of Korea’s ‘developmental state. World Development, 22(9), 1269–1293.
21.
Kraft, Daniel. (2006). South Korea’s national security law: A tool of oppression in an insecure world. Wisconsin International Law Journal, 24(2), 627–659.
22.
Kydd, Andrew H. (2014). China, The United States and Korean unification. A memo prepared for the occasion of ‘Beyond the Pivot: Managing Asian Security Crises’ held in Washington, DC, April 30.
North Korean Constitution. (2009). Northeast Asia matters: The Korean Peninsula internet archives. Retrieved 7 January 2015, from http://web.archive.org
Sajer, Guy. (2013). The forgotten soldier, war on the Russian front—A true story. London, UK: Cassel.
31.
Song, Yeonghun, Kim, Byeongro, & Park, Myeonggyu. (2014). Bukhanjumin Tongileuisik, 2008–2013 (North Koreans’ perception about the Korean reunification, 2008–2013). Seoul, Korea: Institute for Peace and Unification Studies, Seoul National University.
32.
Swaine, Michael D., Eberstadt, Nicholas, Fravel, M. Taylor, Herberg, Mikkal, Keidel, Albert, Revere, Evans J.R., Romberg, Alan D., Freund, Eleanor, Odel, Rachel Esplin, & Wong, Audrye. (2015). Conflict and cooperation in the Asia-Pacific region, a strategic net assessment. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
33.
The National Security Law (2012). London, United Kingdom: Amnesty International.
