Teaching leadership presents a challenge as students come into the topic with underlying assumptions of what makes for a good or bad leader. The experiential exercise described here brings together the worlds of leadership and art to elicit the students’ implicit leadership theories. We have students look at works of art and relate them to their perception of leadership. This produces a rich discussion, and as an additional benefit, it improves students’ observational abilities which will allow them to better capture the complexities of the workplace. We discuss debriefing ideas and further assignments. The exercise has been successfully run in a face-to-face leadership class but it lends itself easily to online classes. We share the images we have collected.
AdlerN. J. (2006). The arts & leadership: Now that we can do anything, what will we do?Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5(4), 486–499. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2006.23473209
2.
AdlerN. J. (2015). Finding beauty in a fractured world: Art inspires leaders—Leaders change the world. Academy of Management Review, 40(3), 480–494. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2015.0044
3.
AdlerN. J.DelbecqA. L. (2018). Twenty-first century leadership: A return to beauty. Journal of Management Inquiry, 27(2), 119–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492617710758
BartunekJ. M.CarboniI. (2006). A time for hope: A response to Nancy Adler. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5(4), 500–504. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2006.23473210
DavidJ.-L. (1805). Napoleon Crossing the Alps [Painting]. Chateau de Malmaison.
11.
De CiantisC. (1995). Using an art technique to facilitate leadership development (No. 166). Center for Creative Leadership.
12.
DelacroixE. (1830). Liberty Leading the People [Painting]. Louvre.
13.
DeRueD. S. (2011). Adaptive leadership theory: Leading and following as a complex adaptive process. Research in Organizational Behavior, 31, 125–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2011.09.007
14.
DolevJ. C.FriedlaenderL. K.BravermanI. M. (2001). Use of fine art to enhance visual diagnostic skills. Journal of the American Medical Association, 286(9), 1020–1021. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.286.9.1019
15.
DuBrinA. J. (2016). Leadership: Research findings, practice and skills. Cengage Learning.
16.
EpitropakiO.MartinR. (2004). Implicit leadership theories in applied settings: Factor structure, generalizability, and stability over time. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(2), 293–310. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.2.293
17.
EpitropakiO.MartinR. (2005). From ideal to real: A longitudinal study of the roles of implicit leadership theories on leader-member exchanges and employee outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(4), 659–676. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.4.659
18.
EpitropakiO.SyT.MartinR.Tram-QuonS.TopakasA. (2013). Implicit leadership and followership theories “in the wild”: Taking stock of information-processing approaches to leadership and followership in organizational settings. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(6), 858–881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.10.005
19.
FeldmanE. B. (1992). Varieties of visual experience (4th ed). Prentice Hall.
20.
GallosJ. (2020). The arts and the art and science of management teaching. In BerghD. D. (Ed.), The Oxford research encyclopedia of business and management. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.013.186
21.
Gayá WicksP.RippinA. (2010). Art as experience: An inquiry into art and leadership using dolls and doll-making. Leadership, 6(3), 259–278. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715010368767
22.
GreenhalghA. M.MaxwellC. I. (2019). The mirror and the window: Making implicit perceptions of leadership explicit. Journal of Management Education, 43(6), 598–629. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562919851186
Katz-BuonincontroJ. (2011). How might aesthetic knowing relate to leadership? A review of the literature. International Journal of Education & the Arts, 12(SI 1.3), 1–18. https://www.ijea.org/v12si1/
35.
KouzesJ. M.PosnerB. Z. (2002). The leadership challenge (3rd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
36.
LederH.NadalM. (2014). Ten years of a model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments: The aesthetic episode—Developments and challenges in empirical aesthetics. British Journal of Psychology, 105(4), 443–464. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12084
37.
LeeH. C. (2015). Conductor [Painting].
38.
LeutzeE. (1851). Washington crossing the Delaware [Painting]. Metropolitan Museum of Art.
39.
LordR. G.EpitropakiO.FotiR. J.HansbroughT. K. (2020). Implicit leadership theories, implicit followership theories, and dynamic processing of leadership information. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 7, 49–74. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012119-045434
40.
LordR. G.MaherK. J. (1991). Leadership and information processing: Linking perceptions and performance. Unwin Everyman.
41.
LussierR. N.AchuaC. F. (2016). Leadership: Theory, application and skill development. Cengage Learning.
42.
MagritteR. (1964). The son of man [Painting]. Private Collection.
43.
MartinR.EpitropakiO.O’BroinL. (2018). Methodological issues in leadership training research: In pursuit of causality. In GalavanR. J.SundG. P.HodgkinsonK. J. (Eds.), Methodological challenges and advances in managerial and organizational cognition (Vol. 2, pp. 73–94). Emerald Publishing.
PellicoL. H.FriedlaenderL.FennieK. P. (2009). Looking is not seeing: Using art to improve observational skills. Journal of Nursing Education, 48(11), 648–653. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20090828-02
51.
PetersonT. O.PetersonC. M.OlekC. R.PetersonE. N.CruszS. C.BollingerE. G.KochT. C. (2016). Leading through courageous following: The artist’s view. Management Teaching Review, 1(2), 99–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/2379298115627424
52.
PierceJ. L.NewstromJ. W. (2006). Leadership and the leadership process: Readings, self-assessments & applications. McGraw-Hill Irwin.
SchynsB.KeiferT.KerschreiterR.TynnonA. (2011). Teaching implicit leadership theories to develop leaders and leadership: How and why it can make a difference. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 10(3), 397–408. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2010.0015
ShondrickS. J.DinhJ. E.LordR. G. (2010). Developments in implicit leadership theory and cognitive science: Applications to improving measurement and understanding alternatives to hierarchical leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(6), 959–978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.10.004
59.
SoubaW. W.SoubaM. H. (2018). Challenging your implicit leadership theory. Journal of Leadership Education, 17(4), 195–207. https://doi.org/10.12806/V17/I4/T1
60.
SpellerR. (1942). Churchill and the victory sign [Photograph]. Getty Images.
61.
StoutC. J. (1997). Multicultural reasoning and the appreciation of art. Studies in Art Education, 38(2), 96–111. https://doi.org/10.2307/1320586
62.
SutherlandI.JelinekJ. (2015). From experiential learning to aesthetic knowing: The arts in leadership development. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 17(3), 289–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422315587894
63.
TamesG. (1957). The Johnson treatment [Photograph]. The New York Times.
64.
Van GoghV. (1889). Self-portrait [Painting]. National Gallery of Art.
65.
VisbalK. (2017). Fearless girl [Sculpture]. New York Stock Exchange.
66.
WeickK. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Sage.
YixinL. (2011). Stone of hope [Sculpture]. National Mall.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
