Although the transformational-transactional leadership paradigm is successful in explaining considerable portions of variance in organizationally relevant outcome criteria, recent critiques emphasized that this paradigm might be incomplete. Thus, Antonakis and House (2002) suggested that instrumental leadership might extend the transformational-transactional leadership paradigm and allow for a more detailed and realistic description of the leadership phenomenon. The present study is the first to test – among basic aspects of construct validity – the prognostic validity of instrumental leadership with regard to performance and job satisfaction. Results from three independent empirical studies revealed that four dimensions of instrumental leadership (i.e., Environmental Monitoring, Strategy Formulation, Path-Goal Facilitation, and Outcome Monitoring) can be distinguished. As for concurrent validity, Environmental Monitoring and Path-Goal Facilitation were related to job satisfaction. This result was obtained while controlling for transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership, lending support for the incremental validity of instrumental leadership. With regard to the predictive validity, Environmental Monitoring, Strategy Formulation, and Path-Goal Facilitation (assessed at T1) were related to subsequent objective performance (assessed at T2) in a second study. Finally, in a third study, Path-Goal Facilitation (T1) was associated with subsequent job satisfaction and affective commitment (both T2). Overall, these results demonstrate that potentially, instrumental leadership is a valid extension to the transformational-transactional leadership paradigm.
AbrellC.RowoldJ.MönninghoffM.WeiblerJ. (2011). Evaluation of a long-term transformational leadership development program. Zeitschrift f. Personalforschung – German Journal of Research in Human Resources, 25(3), 205–224, DOI 10.1688/1862–0000_ZfP_2011_03_Abrell.
2.
Alban-MetcalfeR. J.Alimo-MetcalfeB. (2000). An analysis of the convergent and discriminant validity of the transformational leadership questionnaire. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8(3), 158–175.
3.
AllenN. J.MeyerJ. P. (1990).The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 1–18.
4.
AntonakisJ.HouseR. (2004). On instrumental leadership: Beyond transactions and transformations. Omaha: UNL Gallup Leadership Institute Summit.
5.
AntonakisJ.HouseR. J. (2002). The full-range leadership theory: The way forward. In AvolioB.YammarinoF. (Eds.), Transformational and charismatic leadership: The road ahead (pp. 3–34). Amsterdam: JAI.
6.
AntonakisJ.AvolioB. J.SivasubramaniamN. (2003). Context and leadership: An examination of the nine-factor full-range leadership theory using the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. Leadership Quarterly, 14(3), 261–295.
7.
AvolioB. J.BassB. M. (2002). Developing potential across a full range of leadership: Cases on transactional and transformational leadership. Mahwah, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
8.
AvolioB. J.ZhuW.KohW. L.BhatiaP. (2004). Transformational leadership and organizational commitment: Mediating role of psychological empowerment and moderating role of structural distance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 951–968.
9.
BarlingJ.WeberT.KellowayE. K. (1996). Effects of transformational leadership training on attitudinal and financial outcomes: A field experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(6), 827–832.
10.
BassB. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press.
11.
BerryC. M.CarpenterN. C.BarrattC. L. (2011). Do other-reports of counterproductive work behavior provide an incremental contribution over self-reports? A meta-analytic comparison. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(3), 613–636.
12.
BoalK. B. (2007). Strategic leadership, organizational learning, and network ties. In HooijbergR.HuntJ.AntonakisJ.BoalK.LaneN. (Eds.), Being there even when you are not: Leading through strategy, structures, and systems (pp. 69–86). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
BonoJ. E.JudgeT. A. (2004). Personality and transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 901–910.
15.
BurkeM. J.DunlapW. P. (2002). Estimating interrater agreement with the Average Deviation Index: A user's guide. Organizational Research Methods, 5(2), 159–172.
16.
ByosiereP.LuethgeD. J. (2004). Realizing vision through envisioning reality: Strategic leadership in building knowledge spheres. In BurkeR.CooperC. (Eds.), Leading in turbulent times. Managing in the new world of work (pp. 243–258). Malden: Blackwell.
17.
ColbertA. E.Kristoff-BrownA. L.BradleyB. H.BarrickM. R. (2008). CEO transformational leadership: The role of goal importance congruence in top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 51, 81–96.
18.
CongerJ. A.HuntJ. G. (1999). Overview – Charismatic and transformational leadership: Taking stock of the present and future (Part I). Leadership Quarterly, 10(2), 121–127.
19.
ConwayJ. M.HuffcuttA. I. (1997). Psychometric properties of multisource performance ratings – A meta-analysis of subordinate, supervisor, peer, and self-ratings. Human Performance, 10(4), 313–360.
20.
DeRueD. S.WellmanN.NahrgangJ. D.HumphreyS. E. (2011). Trait and behavioral theories of leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Personnel Psychology, 64, 7–52.
21.
DumdumU. R.LoweK. B.AvolioB. J. (2002). A meta-analysis of transformational and transactional leadership correlates of effectiveness and satisfaction: An update and extension. In AvolioB.YammarinoF. (Eds.), Transformational and charismatic leadership: The road ahead (pp. 35–66). Amsterdam: JAI.
22.
FurnhamA. (2001). Self-estimates of intelligence: Culture and gender differences in self and other estimates of both general (g) and multiple intelligences. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 1381–1405.
23.
GraenG.RowoldJ.HeinitzK. (2010). Issues in operationalizing and comparing leadership constructs. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(3), 563–575.
24.
GregersenS.Vincent-HöperS.NienhausA. (2014). Health-relevant leadership behaviour: A comparison of leadership constructs. Zeitschrift f. Personalforschung – German Journal of Research in Human Resources, 28(1–2), 117–138, DOI 10.1688/ZfP-2014-01-Gregersen.
25.
HambletonR. K. (2001). The next generation of the ITC test translation and adaptation guidelines. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 17, 164–172.
26.
HeinitzK.RowoldJ. (2007). Gütekriterien einer deutschen Adaptation des Transformational Leadership Inventory (TLI) von Podsakoff. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, 51(1), 1–15.
27.
HooijbergR.HuntJ.AntonakisJ.BoalK.LaneN. (Eds.). (2007). Being there even when you are not: Leading through strategy, structures, and systems. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
28.
HouseR. J. (1971). A path-goal theory of leadership effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16, 321–328.
29.
HouseR. J.AdityaR. M. (1997). The social scientific study of leadership: Quo vadis?Journal of Management, 23, 409–473.
30.
HuntJ. G. (1991). Leadership: A new synthesis. Newbury Park: CA: Sage Publications.
31.
JamesL. R.DemareeR. G.WolfG. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(1), 85–98.
32.
JudgeT. A.PiccoloR. F. (2004). Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 755–768.
33.
JudgeT. A.PiccoloR. F.IliesR. (2004).The forgotten ones? The validity of consideration and initiating structure in leadership research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(1), 36–51.
34.
JudgeT. A.ThoresenC. E.BonoJ. E.PattonG. K. (2001). The job satisfaction-job performance relationship: A qualitative and quantitative review. Psychological Bulletin, 127(3), 376–407.
35.
KrügerC.RowoldJ.BorgmannL.StaufenbielK.HeinitzK. (2011). The discriminant validity of transformational and transactional leadership – A multi-trait-multimethod analysis of and norms for the German Transformational Leadership Inventory (TLI). Journal of Personnel Psychology, 10(2), 49–60.
36.
LinesR. (2004). Influence of participation in strategic change: Resistance, organizational commitment and change goal achievement. Journal of Change Management, 4(3), 193–215.
37.
LoweK. B.KroeckK. G.SivasubramaniamN. (1996). Effectiveness correlates of transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic review of the MLQ literature. The Leadership Quarterly, 7(3), 385–425.
38.
MeindlJ.EhrlichS. (1987). The romance of leadership and the evaluation of organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal, 30(1), 91–109.
39.
MeyerJ. P.StanleyD. J.HerscovitchL.TopolnytskyL. (2002). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61, 20–52.
40.
NadlerD. A.TushmanM. L. (1990). Beyond the charismatic leader: Leadership and organizational change. California Management Review, 4, 77–97.
41.
NeubergerO.AllerbeckM. (1978). Messung und Analyse von Arbeitszufriedenheit [Measurement and analysis of job satisfaction]. Bern: Huber.
42.
PiccoloR. F.BonoJ. E.HeinitzK.RowoldJ.DuehrE.JudgeT. A. (2012). The relative impact of complementary leader behaviors: Which matter most?Leadership Quarterly, 23(3), 567–581.
43.
PillaiR.SchriesheimC. A.WilliamsE. S. (1999). Fairness perceptions and trust as mediators for transformational and transactional leadership: A two-sample study. Journal of Management, 25(6), 897–933.
44.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.LeeJ. Y.PodsakoffN. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.
45.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.BommerW. H. (1996). Transformational leader behaviors and substitutes for leadership as determinants of employee satisfaction, commitment, trust, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Management, 22(2), 259–298.
46.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.MoormanR. H.FetterR. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers' trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Leadership Quarterly, 1, 107–142.
47.
RikettaA. (2008). The causal relation between job attitudes and performance: A meta-analysis of panel studies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(2), 472–481.
48.
RowoldJ. (2011). Relationship between leadership behaviors and performance: The moderating role of a work team's level of age, gender, and cultural heterogeneity. Leadership and Organizational Development Journal, 32(6), 628–647.
49.
RowoldJ.HeinitzK. (2007). Transformational and charismatic leadership: Assessing the convergent, divergent and criterion validity of the MLQ and the CKS. Leadership Quarterly, 18, 121–133.
50.
SchmidtF. L.HunterJ. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 262–274.
51.
ShroutP. E.FleissJ. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86(2), 420–428.
52.
TepperB. J.MossS. E.LockhartD. E.CarrJ. C. (2007). Abusive supervision, upward maintenance communication, and subordinates psychological distress. Academy of Management Journal, 50(5), 1169–1180.
53.
van der KlinkM.GielenE.NautaC. (2001). Supervisory support as a major condition to enhance transfer. International Journal of Training and Development, 5(1), 52–63.
54.
WaldmanD. A.JavidanM.VarellaP. (2004). Charismatic leadership at the strategic level: A new application of upper echelons theory. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(3), 355–380.
55.
WalumbwaF. O.AvolioB. J.GardnerW. L.WernsingT. S.PetersonS. J. (2008). Authentic leadership: Development and validation of a theory-based measure. Journal of Management, 34(1), 89–126.
56.
YuklG. (1999a). An evaluation of conceptual weaknesses in transformational and charismatic leadership theories. The Leadership Quarterly, 10(2), 285–305.
57.
YuklG. (1999b). An evaluative essay on current conceptions of effective leadership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 8(1), 33–48.
58.
YuklG. A. (2009). Leadership in organizations (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
