Contiguity is commonly treated as an essential, albeit noncontroversial quality of electoral districts. In contrast, we argue that the virtues ascribed to contiguity – discouraging gerrymandering, facilitating democratic deliberation, and mirroring political communities – either have weak justifications in practice or do not have a clear association with contiguity per se. Moreover, contiguity can impose significant constraints on minority representation when minorities live in segregated, widely separated settlements. We use examples from Canada to demonstrate the effects of contiguity on minority representation by creating sets of non-contiguous constituencies that substantially increase the number of districts with minority majorities. More generally, we argue that scholars should pay more attention to how the conflation of contiguity and political community are woven into state practices.
AgnewJ (1996)
Mapping politics: How context counts in electoral geography. Political Geography15(2): 129–146.
2.
AgnewJShinM (2019) Mapping Populism: Taking Politics to the People.
Blue Ridge Summit:
Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
3.
BarretoMANunoSSanchezGR, et al. (2019)
The racial implications of voter identification laws in America. American Politics Research47(2): 238–249.
4.
BirdK (2014)
Ethnic quotas and ethnic representation worldwide. International Political Science Review35(1): 12–26.
5.
BlackJH, et al. (2008) Ethnoracial minorities in the 38th parliament: Patterns of change. In: AndrewCBilesJSiemiatyckiM (eds) Electing a Diverse Canada: The Representation of Immigrants, Minorities, and Women.
Vancouver:
UBC Press, pp.229–254.
6.
BrennerN (2001)
The limits to scale? Methodological reflections on scalar structuration. Progress in Human Geography25(4): 591–614.
7.
BrockMG (1973) The Great Reform Act.
London:
Hutchinson.
8.
BybeeKJ (1998) Mistaken Identity: The Supreme Court and the Politics of Minority Representation.
Princeton, NJ:
Princeton University Press.
9.
ComrieMGilliesADayM (2002)
The Maori electoral option campaign: Problems of measuring ‘success’. Political Science54(2): 45–57.
10.
CookeP (2017) Localities: The Changing Face of Urban Britain.
Oxon:
Routledge.
DixonRG (1968) Democratic Representation: Reapportionment in Law and Politics.
New York:
Oxford University Press.
14.
DuncanSSavageM (1991) New perspectives on the locality debate, special issue. Environmental and Planning A 23(2): 155–164.
15.
EldenS (2013) The Birth of Territory.
Chicago:
University of Chicago Press.
16.
ForestB (2012)
Electoral redistricting and minority political representation in Canada and the United States. The Canadian Geographer / Le Géographe Canadien56(3): 318–338.
17.
ForestB (2018)
Electoral geography: From mapping votes to representing power. Geography Compass12(1): e12352.
18.
GrofmanB (1985)
Criteria for districting: A social-science perspective. UCLA Law Review33: 77–184.
19.
GuinierL (1994) The Tyranny of the Majority: Fundamental Fairness in Representative Democracy.
New York:
Free Press, pp.163–190.
20.
GustersonH (2017)
From Brexit to Trump: Anthropology and the rise of nationalist populism from Brexit to Trump. American Ethnologist44(2): 209–214.
21.
HandleyL (2008) A comparative survey of structures and criteria for boundary delimitation. In: HandleyLGrofmanB (eds) Redistricting in Comparative Perspective.
New York:
Oxford University Press, pp.265–283.
22.
Handley L and GrofmanB (2008) Redistricting in Comparative Perspective.
New York:
Oxford University Press.
23.
HarveyD (2013) Rebel Cities: From the Right to the City to the Urban Revolution. Paperback edition.
London:
Verso.
24.
HawkesDCMorseBW (1991) Alternative methods for aboriginal participation in the processes of constitutional reform. In: WattsRLBrownDM (eds) Options for a New Canada.
Toronto:
University of Toronto Press.
25.
HorowitzDL (1985) Ethnic Groups in Conflict.
Berkeley:
University of California Press.
26.
House of Commons Parliamentary Papers (1831). Parliamentary representation, vol XXXVII (20) IV. Published 19 January 1831. UK Parliamentary Papers, https://parlipapers.proquest.com.
27.
JohnstonRJ (2001) From Votes to Seats: The Operation of the UK Electoral System since 1945.
Manchester:
Manchester University Press.
28.
JohnstonRJPattieCJ (2006) Putting Voters in Their Place: Geography and Elections in Great Britain.
London:
Oxford University Press.
29.
KeefeDDavis-MurdochSDeveauK (2017) Representation: Toward More Effective Representation for Acadian and African Nova Scotians.
Halifax:
The Commission on Effective Electoral Representation of Acadian and African Nova Scotians.
30.
KukJHajnalZLajevardiN (2020) A disproportionate burden: strict voter identification laws and minority turnout. Politics Groups and Identities. Epub ahead of print 4 June 2020. DOI: 10.1080/21565503.2020.1773280
31.
LeibJI (1998)
Communities of interest and minority districting after Miller v. Johnson. Political Geography17(6): 683–699.
32.
LeibJIWebsterGR (1998)
On enlarging the US house of representatives. Political Geography17(3): 319–329.
33.
LijphartA (1984) Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-One Countries.
New Haven:
Yale University Press.
34.
LortieP (1991) Reforming Electoral Democracy: Final Report.
Ottawa:
Royal Commission on Electoral Reform and Party Financing.
35.
LublinD (1997) The Paradox of Representation: Racial Gerrymandering and Minority Interests in Congress.
Princeton, NJ:
Princeton University Press.
36.
LublinD (2014) Minority Rules: Electoral Systems, Decentralization, and Ethnoregional Party Success.
New York:
Oxford University Press.
37.
LublinDWrightM (2013)
Engineering inclusion: Assessing the effects of pro-minority representation policies. Electoral Studies32(4): 746–755.
38.
McDowellL (1983)
Towards an understanding of the gender division of urban space. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space1(1): 59–72.
MarstonSA (2000)
The social construction of scale. Progress in Human Geography24(2): 219–242.
41.
MartisKCRowlesRA (1982) The Historical Atlas of United States Congressional Districts: 1789-1983.
New York/London: Free Press of Glencoe/Collier Macmillan.
42.
MasseyDB (1995) Spatial Divisions of Labour: Social Structures and the Geography of Production.
Basingstoke:
Macmillan.
43.
MonmonierMS (2001) Bushmanders & Bullwinkles: How Politicians Manipulate Electronic Maps and Census Data to Win Elections.
Chicago:
University of Chicago Press.
44.
MorganES (1988) Inventing the People: The Rise of Popular Sovereignty in England and America.
New York:
Norton.
45.
NagarRLawsonVMcDowellL, et al. (2002)
Locating globalization: Feminist (re)readings of the subjects and spaces of globalization. Economic Geography78(3): 257–284.
46.
NorrisP (2006)
The impact of electoral reform on women’s representation. Acta Politica41(2): 197–213.
47.
OwenDSmithG (2015)
Survey article: Deliberation, democracy, and the systemic turn. Journal of Political Philosophy23(2): 213–234.
48.
PalMChoudhryS (2014)
Still not equal? Visible minority vote dilution in Canada. Canadian Political Science Review8: 85–101.
49.
PappasTS (2014)
Populist democracies: Post-Authoritarian Greece and Post-Communist Hungary. Government and Opposition49(1): 1–23.
50.
Parliament of Canada (1964a) Debates of the House of Commons: First Session - Twenty-Sixth Parliament. vol.
5.
Ottawa:
Roger Duhamel.
51.
Parliament of Canada (1964b) Debates of the House of Commons: First Session - Twenty-Sixth Parliament. vol.
6.
Ottawa:
Roger Duhamel.
52.
Parliament of Canada (1964c) Debates of the House of Commons: Second Session - Twenty-Sixth Parliament. vol.
2.
Ottawa:
Roger Duhamel.
53.
Parliament of the United Kingdom (1867) Debates of the Parliament of the United Kingdom: Second Session - Nineteenth Parliament.
Ottawa:
Malcolm Cameron.
54.
PattieCJohnstonR (2000)
“People who talk together vote together”: An exploration of contextual effects in Great Britain. Annals of the Association of American Geographers90(1): 41–66.
55.
Pildes RH and DonoghueKA (1995)
Cumulative voting in the United States. Chicago Legal Forum241: 241–314.
56.
PoffenrothK (2005)
Raîche v Canada: A new direction in drawing electoral boundaries?Commonwealth Law Bulletin31(2): 53–60.
57.
PopescuMTókaG (2008) Districting and redistricting in Eastern and Central Europe: Regulations and practices. In: HandleyLGrofmanB (eds) Redistricting in Comparative Perspective.
New York:
Oxford University Press, pp.251–264.
58.
RehfeldA (2005) The Concept of Constituency: Political Representation, Democratic Legitimacy, and Institutional Design.
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
59.
ReillyB (2001) Democracy in Divided Societies: Electoral Engineering for Conflict Management.
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
60.
RemsterBKramerR (2018)
Shifting power: The impact of incarceration on political representation. Du Bois Review-Social Science Research on Race15(2): 417–439.
61.
RobsonB (2014)
Maps and mathematics: Ranking the English boroughs for the 1832 reform act. Journal of Historical Geography46: 66–79.
62.
Rosa-ClotM (2011)
The apportionment act of 1842: ‘An odious use of authority’. Parliaments, Estates and Representation31(1): 33–52.
63.
RossiterDJJohnstonRJPattieCJ (1999) The Boundary Commissions: Redrawing the UK’s Map of Parliamentary Constituencies.
Manchester:
Manchester University Press.
64.
SackRD (1986) Human Territoriality: Its Theory and History.
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
65.
SayerA (1982)
Explanation in economic geography: Abstraction versus generalization. Progress in Human Geography6(1): 68–88.
66.
UrbinatiNWarrenME (2008)
The concept of representation in contemporary democratic theory. Annual Review of Political Science11(1): 387–412.
67.
VarsanyiMW (2012) Fighting for the vote: The struggle against felon and immigrant disenfranchisement. In: LoydJMMitchelsonMBurridgeA (eds) Beyond Walls and Cages: Prisons, Borders, and Global Crisis, pp.266–276.
68.
WalksRA (2006)
The causes of city-suburban political polarization? A Canadian case study. Annals of the Association of American Geographers96(2): 390–414.
69.
WebsterGR (2000)
Women, politics, elections, and citizenship. Journal of Geography99(1): 1–10.
70.
WebsterGR (2013)
Reflections on current criteria to evaluate redistricting plans. Political Geography32: 3–14.
71.
ZagarriR (1987) The Politics of Size: Representation in the United States, 1776–1850.
Ithaca:
Cornell University Press.
