Although urban scenario planning is widely applied for exploring various directions of urban development, it often has high requirements on the medium of quantitative information analysis and transformation. Thus, this study establishes a method of combining scenario planning with a spatial dynamic planning support system to predict urban growth. Specifically, a scenario-based spatial dynamic modelling method is integrated with the information module of planning policy for better decision support. The integrated modelling method is applied for an actual urban land use planning case of Nanjing, an evolving city in China. The spatial forms of future urban land use are simulated under four different pre-set policy scenarios. The differences in simulated results under multi-criteria restrictions reveal the effectiveness and practical value of the integration approach. The findings of this study provide policymakers with a process-based approach to test and evaluate ‘what-if’ consequences and help stakeholders reach consensus.
AmerMDaimTUJetterA (2013)
A review of scenario planning. Futures46: 23–40.
2.
BarredoJIDemicheliLLavalleC, et al. (2004)
Modelling future urban scenarios in developing countries: An application case study in Lagos. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design32(1): 65–84.
3.
BergCRogersSMineauM (2016)
Building scenarios for ecosystem services tools: Developing a methodology for efficient engagement with expert stakeholders. Futures81: 68–80.
4.
BezoldC (2009)
Aspirational futures. Journal of Futures Studies13(4): 81–90.
5.
BurianJStastnySBrusJ, et al. (2015)
Urban planner: Model for optimal land use scenario modelling. Geografie120(3): 330–353.
6.
CarrMHZwickP (2005)
Using GIS suitability analysis to identify potential future land use conflicts in North Central Florida. Journal of Conservation Planning1: 89–105.
7.
CarrMHZwickP (2007) Smart Land-Use Analysis: The LUCIS Model.
Redlands:
ESRI Press.
8.
ChakrabortyAKazaNKnaapGJ, et al. (2011)
Robust plans and contingent plans: Scenario planning for an uncertain world. Journal of the American Planning Association77(3): 251–266.
9.
ChenGLiXLiuX, et al. (2020)
Global projections of future urban land expansion under shared socioeconomic pathways. Nature Communication11: 537.
10.
DealBPanH (2017)
Discerning and addressing environmental failures in policy scenarios using planning support system (PSS) technologies. Sustainability9(1): 13.
11.
DealBPanHTimmS, et al. (2017)
The role of multidirectional temporal analysis in scenario planning exercises and planning support systems. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems64: 91–102.
12.
DealBSchunkD (2004)
Spatial dynamic modeling and urban land use transformation: A simulation approach to assessing the costs of urban sprawl. Ecological Economics51(1–2): 79–95.
13.
DendonckerNRounsevellMBogaertP (2007)
Spatial analysis and modeling of land use distributions in Belgium. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems31(2): 188–205.
14.
DuNLiY (2005)
Planning support system (PSS) and its application to decision-making for urban spatial development. Journal of Wuhan University (Engineering)38(1): 137–142.
15.
FoleyJDefriesRAsnerG, et al. (2005)
Global consequences of land use. Science309(5734): 570–574.
16.
GeertmanS (2002)
Participatory planning and GIS: A PSS to bridge the gap. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design29(1): 21–35.
17.
GeertmanSStillwellJ (2009) Planning Support Systems Best Practice and New Methods.
Dordrecht:
Springer.
18.
GeertmanSStillwellJ (2012) Planning Support Systems in Practice.
Berlin:
Springer.
19.
InayatullahS (2008)
Six pillars: Futures thinking for transforming. Foresight10(1): 4–21.
20.
JohnsonPASieberR (2009) Agent-based modelling: A dynamic scenario planning approach to tourism PSS. In: GeertmanSStillwellJ (eds) Planning Support Systems Best Practice and New Methods. Dordrecht:
Springer, pp.211–226.
21.
KaiserEJGodschalkDRChapinFS (1995) Urban Land Use Planning.
Chicago:
University of Illinois Press.
22.
KlostermanRE (1999)
The what-if? Collaborative planning support system. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design26(3): 393–408.
23.
KlostermanREPettitCJ (2005)
An update on planning support system. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design32: 447–484.
24.
KoontzTM (2005)
We finished the plan, so now what? Impacts of collaborative stakeholder participation on land use policy. Policy Studies Journal33: 459–481.
25.
KosowHGaßnerR (2008)
Methods of future and scenario analysis: Overview, assessment, and selection criteria. Deutsches Institut Fur Entwicklungspoliti Studies39: 133.
26.
LiuHSilvaE (2017)
Examining the dynamics of the interaction between the development of creative industries and urban spatial structure by agent-based modelling: A case study of Nanjing, China. Urban Studies55(5): 1013–1032.
27.
LiuXLiangXLiX, et al. (2017)
A future land use simulation model (FLUS) for simulating multiple land use scenarios by coupling human and natural effects. Landscape and Urban Planning168: 94–116.
28.
LiuYFangFLiY (2014)
Key issues of land use in China and implications for policy making. Land Use Policy40: 6–12.
29.
LoCPYangX (2002)
Drivers of land-use/land-cover changes and dynamic modeling for Atlanta, Georgia Metropolitan Area. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing68(10): 1073–1082.
30.
LongYShenZMaoQ (2012)
Retrieving spatial policy parameters from an alternative plan using constrained cellular automata and regionalized sensitivity analysis. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design39(3): 586–605.
31.
LongYZhangY (2015)
Land-use pattern scenario analysis using planner agents. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design42: 615–637.
32.
LooBPYWangB (2018)
Factors associated with home-based e-working and e-shopping in Nanjing, China. Transportation45(2): 365–384.
33.
MeissnerPWulfT (2013)
Cognitive benefits of scenario planning: Its impact on biases and decision quality. Technological Forecasting and Social Change80(4): 801–814.
34.
MitsudaYItoS (2011)
A review of spatial-explicit factors determining spatial distribution of land use/land-use change. Landscape and Ecological Engineering7(1): 117–125.
35.
MurthaTWangLDuanL (2019)
Historical analysis of land use change and geo-design of rapid urbanization: Orlando, Florida, USA. Journal of Digital Landscape Architecture4: 205–212.
36.
PanHDealB (2019)
Reporting on the performance and usability of planning support systems—Towards a common understanding. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy13: 137–159.
37.
PanHDealBDestouniG, et al. (2018)
Sociohydrology modeling for complex urban environments in support of integrated land and water resource management practices. Land Degradation & Development29(10): 3639–3652.
38.
PanHPageJZhangL, et al. (2019a)
Using comparative socio-ecological modeling to support climate action planning (CAP). Journal of Cleaner Production232: 30–42.
39.
PanHZhangLCongC, et al. (2019b)
A dynamic and spatially explicit modeling approach to identify the ecosystem service implications of complex urban systems interactions. Ecological Indicators102: 426–436.
40.
PerveenSKamruzzamanMYigitcanlarT (2017)
Developing policy scenarios for sustainable urban growth management: A Delphi approach. Sustainability9(10): 1787.
41.
RafordN (2015)
Online foresight platforms: Evidence for their impact on scenario planning & strategic foresight. Technological Forecasting and Social Change97: 65–76.
42.
SchwartzP (2012) The Art of the Long View: Planning for the Future in an Uncertain World.
New York:
Crown Business.
43.
ShoemakerPJH (1995)
Scenario planning: A tool for strategic thinking. Sloan Management Review36(2): 25–40.
44.
StojanovicMMitkovicPMitkovicM (2014)
The scenario method in urban planning. Facta Universitatis - Series: Architecture and Civil Engineering12(1): 81–85.
45.
TevisRE (2010)
Creating the future: Goal-oriented scenario planning. Futures42(4): 337–344.
46.
VeldkampAFrescoLO (1996)
CLUE: A conceptual model to study the conversion of land use and its effects. Ecological Modelling85(2–3): 253–270.
47.
VolkeryARibeiroT (2009)
Scenario planning in public policy: Understanding use, impacts and the role of institutional context factors. Technological Forecasting and Social Change76(9): 1198–1207.
48.
WilsonI (1994)
Strategic planning isn’t dead – It changed. Long Range Planning27(4): 12–24.
49.
WuF (2015) Planning for Growth: Urban and Regional Planning in China.
New York:
Routledge.
50.
XiangWNClarkeKC (2003)
The use of scenarios in land-use planning. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design30: 885–909.
51.
XuCHaaseDSuM, et al. (2020) Assessment of landscape changes under different urban dynamics based on a multiple-scenario modeling approach. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science. DOI: 10.1177/2399808320910161.
52.
YuWZangSWuC, et al. (2011)
Analyzing and modeling land use land cover change (LUCC) in the Daqing city, China. Applied Geography31: 600–608.
53.
ZegrasCRayleL (2012)
Testing the rhetoric: An approach to assess scenario planning’s role as a catalyst for urban policy integration. Futures44(4): 303–318.
54.
ZhaoYHuangCZhangH (2014)
Ecological risk assessment of provincial land-use overall planning in China. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal20(6): 1491–1506.
55.
ZhengXZhaoLXiangW, et al. (2012)
A coupled model for simulating spatio-temporal dynamics of land-use change: A case study in Changqing, Jinan, China. Landscape and Urban Planning106(1): 51–61.
56.
ZhouYHuangXChenY, et al. (2017)
The effect of land use planning (2006-2020) on construction land growth in China. Cities68: 37–47.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
