Urban form is regularly identified as a potential key factor for reducing road traffic and the resulting energy consumption, but the nature of the link between mobility and urban form has been subject to considerable debate. This paper employs quantitative research methods to investigate the influence of urban form on daily mobility energy consumption. First, we used archetypal cities, representative of French large-sized cities, which allow us to isolate the impact of urban form and to have more generalised results. Second, we simulated daily mobility in those archetypal cities by using an individual-based daily mobility simulation model, Mobisim-Soft and then calculated the resulting energy consumptions. Our results confirm that the periurban city is the most energy consuming compare to the axialized and the polycentric cities, but it appears that the global structure of an agglomeration is a second-order factor compared to the inner arrangement of its neighbourhoods.
ADEME (2008) Efficacité énergétique et environnementale des modes de transport. Synthèse Publique.
2.
AguileraAMignotD (2003) Polycentrisme et mobilité domicile-travail. Lyon: ASRDLF, 2003.
3.
AguileraAMadreJ-LMignotD (2004) Métropolisation, formes urbaines et mobilité. Présentation du dossier. Les Cahiers scientifiques du transport45: 5–14.
4.
AllainR (2004) Morphologie urbaine: géographie, aménagement et architecture de la ville. Collection U/Géographie. Paris: Armand Colin.
5.
AndersonWPKanaroglouPSMillerEJ (1996) Urban form, energy and the environment: a review of issues, evidence and policy. Urban Studies33(1): 7–35. DOI: 10.1080/00420989650012095.
6.
AntoniJPVuidelG (2011) MobiSim : un modèle multi-agents et multi-scalaire pour simuler les mobilités urbaines. Modéliser la ville. Forme urbaine et Politiques de transport. Paris: Economica, 50–77.
7.
BanisterDWatsonSWoodC (1997) Sustainable cities: transport, energy, and urban form. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design24(1): 125–143. DOI: 10.1068/b240125.
8.
BaroJ (2015) Modélisation multi-échelles de la morphologie urbaine à partir de données carroyées de population et de bâti. Paris: Thèse de doctorat. Université de Paris-Est.
9.
BernabéACalmetIMusyM, et al. (2013) Classification automatique des tissus urbains par la méthode des nuées dynamiques. In: 31 èmes Rencontres de l’AUGC, Cachan, France, 2013.
10.
BoninOBonneauPClercM, et al. (2020) Projet SOFT - rapport. Rapport de recherche, June. Thé MA; Institut pour la Transition Energétique, Efficacity; LVMT. Available at:https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03111221 (accessed 16 November 2021).
11.
BorsdorfA (2004) On the way to post-suburbian Changing structures in the outskirts o European cities. In: ZembriPBorsdorfA (eds), European Cities; Insights on Outskirts: Structures. METL-PUCA et ESF COST Office, 7–30. Available athttps://hal-enpc.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01583131 (accessed 24 November 2021).
12.
BurgessEW (1925) The Ecological Approach to the Study of Human Community. Chicago III: The University of Chicago Press.
13.
CerveroRKockelmanK (1997) Travel demand and the 3Ds: density, diversity, and design. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment2(3): 199–219. DOI: 10.1016/S1361-9209(97)00009-6.
14.
CirilliAVeneriP (2009) Spatial structure and mobility patterns: towards a taxonomy of the Italian urban systems. Rivista di Economia e Statistica del Territorio1(1): 25–62. DOI: 10.3280/REST2009-001003.
EwingRCerveroR (2001) Travel and the built environment: a synthesis. In: Transportation Research Record, 1 October 2001. DOI: 10.3141/1780-10.
17.
EwingRCerveroR (2010) Travel and the built environment. Journal of the American Planning Association76(3): 265–294. DOI: 10.1080/01944361003766766.
18.
FischlerR (2002) Forme urbaine, développement métropolitain et mobilité des personnes: rapport final soumis à la Commission de consultation sur l’amélioration de la mobilité entre Montréal et la Rive-Sud le 29 mai 2002.
19.
FuscoG (2018) Ville, complexité, incertitude. Enjeux de connaissance pour le géographe et l’urbaniste. Habilitation à diriger des recherches. Université Côte d’Azur.
20.
GiulianoGNarayanD (2003) Another look at travel patterns and urban form: the US and great britain. Urban Studies40(11): 2295–2312. DOI: 10.1080/0042098032000123303.
21.
GordonPWongHL (1985) The costs of urban sprawl: some new evidence. Environment and Planning A: Economy and SpaceSage Publications Ltd, 17(5): 661–666. DOI: 10.1068/a170661.
22.
HandySCaoXMokhtarianPL (2006) Self-selection in the relationship between the built environment and walking: empirical evidence from northern California. Journal of the American Planning AssociationRoutledge, 72(1): 55–74. DOI: 10.1080/01944360608976724.
23.
HarrisCDUllmanEL (1945) The nature of cities. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social ScienceSage Publications Inc, 242(1): 7–17. DOI: 10.1177/000271624524200103.
24.
HaughtonGHunterC (1994) Sustainable cities. Regional Policy and Development Series 7. Bristol, London: J. Kingsley Publishers, Regional Studies Association.
25.
HoytH (1939) The Structure and Growth of Residential Neighborhoods in American Cities. U.S. Government Printing Office.
Le NéchetF (2015) De la forme urbaine à la structure métropolitaine : une typologie de la configuration interne des densités pour les principales métropoles européennes de l’Audit Urbain. Cybergeo: European Journal of Geography. DOI: 10.4000/cybergeo.26753.
31.
LevinsonDM (1998) Accessibility and the journey to work. Journal of Transport Geography6(1): 11–21. DOI: 10.1016/S0966-6923(97)00036-7.
32.
LevinsonDMKumarA (1997) Density and the journey to work. Growth and Change28(2): 147–172.
33.
LongNKergomardC (2005) Classification morphologique du tissu urbain pour des applications climatologiques. Revue Internationale de Géomatique15: 487.
NaessPCaoXStrandA (2017) Which D’s are the important ones? The effects of regional location and density on driving distance in Oslo and Stavanger. Journal of Transport and Land Use10(1). DOI: 10.5198/jtlu.2017.1183.
36.
NewmanPWKenworthyJR (1989) Cities and Automobile Dependence: A Sourcebook. Aldershot: Gower Technical.
37.
Office de l’efficacité énergétique canadien (2021) Guide de consommation de carburant 2021 - Rapport. Ressources naturelles Canada. Available athttps://fcr-ccc.nrcan-rncan.gc.ca/fr (accessed 31 July 2021).
38.
PouyanneG (2004) Forme urbaine et mobilité quotidienne. Bordeaux: Thèse de doctorat. Université Montesquieu - Bordeaux IV.
39.
RattiCBakerNSteemersK (2005) Energy consumption and urban texture. Energy and Buildings37(7): 762–776. DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2004.10.010.
40.
SaelensBEHandySL (2008) Built environment correlates of walking: a review. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise40(7): S550–S566. DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31817c67a4.
41.
SchwanenTDielemanFMDijstM (2001) Travel behaviour in Dutch monocentric and policentric urban systems. Journal of Transport Geography9(3): 173–186. DOI: 10.1016/S0966-6923(01)00009-6.
42.
SchwanenTDielemanFMDijstM (2003) Car use in Netherlands daily urban systems: does polycentrism result in lower commute times?Urban Geography24(5): 410–430. DOI: 10.2747/0272-3638.24.5.410.
43.
SchwanenTDielemanFMDijstM (2004) The impact of metropolitan structure on commute behavior in The Netherlands: a multilevel approach. Growth and Change35(3): 304–333. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2257.2004.00251.x.
SilvaMOliveiraVLealV (2017) Urban form and energy demand: a review of energy-relevant urban attributes. Journal of Planning Literature32(4): 346–365. DOI: 10.1177/0885412217706900.
46.
SteadDMarshallS (2001) The relationships between urban form and travel patterns. An international review and evaluation. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research1(2). DOI: 10.18757/EJTIR.2001.1.2.3497.
47.
StevensMR (2017) Does compact development make people drive less?Journal of the American Planning Association83(1): 7–18. DOI: 10.1080/01944363.2016.1240044.
48.
VandersmissenM-HVilleneuvePThériaultM (2003) Analyzing changes in urban form and commuting time. The Professional Geographer55(4): 446–463. DOI: 10.1111/0033-0124.5504004.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
