Space syntax and design

Berghauser Pont M Stavroulaki G Marcus L (2019) Development of urban types based on network centrality, built density and their impact on pedestrian movement. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science 46: 1549–1564.

Buchanan P (2006) Space syntax and urban design. In: Jenkins D (ed) Norman Foster Works 3. Munich: Prestel, 178–187.

Cai H Zimring C (2019) Cultural impacts on nursing unit design: a comparative study on Chinese nursing unit typologies and their U.S. counterparts using space syntax. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science 46: 573–594.

Choi YK (1999) The morphology of exploration and encounter in museum layouts. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 26: 241–250.

Foster N (1997) Opening address. In: Major MD Amorim L Dufaux F (eds) Space Syntax 1st International Symposium. London: University College, xvii–xxii.

Hanson J (1998) Decoding Homes and Houses. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Haq S (2003) Investigating the syntax line: configurational properties and cognitive correlates. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 30: 841–863.

Haq S Zimring C (2003) Just down the road a piece: the development of topological knowledge of building layouts. Environment and Behavior 35: 132–160.

Hillier B (1993) Specifically architectural theory: a partial account of the ascent from building as cultural transmission to building as theoretical concretion. The Harvard Architecture Review 9: 8–27.

Hillier B (1999) Centrality as a process: accounting for attraction inequalities in deformed grids. Urban Design International 4: 107–127.

Hillier B (2002) A theory of the city as object: or, how spatial laws mediate the social construction of urban space. Urban Design International 7: 153–179.

Hillier B (2012) Studying cities to learn about minds: some possible implications of space syntax for spatial cognition. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 39: 12–32.

Hillier B Hanson J (1984) The Social Logic of Space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hillier B Iida S (2005) Network and psychological effects in urban movement. In: Cohn A Mark DM (eds) Spatial Information Theory. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, 475–490.

Hillier B Leaman A (1974) How is design possible. Journal of Architectural Research 3: 4–11.

Hillier B Burdett R Peponis J , et al. (1987) Creating life: or, does architecture determine anything? Architecture and Comportement// Architecture and Behaviour 3: 233–250.

Hillier B Hanson J Graham H (1987) Ideas are in things: an application of the space syntax method to discovering house genotypes. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 14: 363–385.

Hillier B Penn A Hanson J , et al. (1993) Natural movement: or, configuration and attraction in urban pedestrian movement. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 20: 29–66.

Kabo FW Hwang Y Levenstein M , et al. (2015) Shared paths to the lab: a sociospatial network analysis of collaboration. Environment and Behavior 47: 57–84.

Lu Y Peponis J (2014) Exhibition visitors are sensitive to patterns of display co-visibility. Environment and Planning (B): Planning and Design 41: 53–68.

March L (1998) [8 + (6) + 11] = 25 + x. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 25: 10–19.

Markus TA (1987) Buildings as classifying devices. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 14: 467–484.

Ossmann M (2022) The patient and the reciprocal view. In: Zook J Sailer K (eds) The Covert Life of Hospital Architecture. London: UCL Press, 22–40.

Özbil A Peponis J Stone B (2011) Understanding the link between street connectivity, land use and pedestrian flows. Urban Design International 16: 125–141.

Peatross F. D. (2001) A syntactic study of control in restrictive settings: innovations in isovist methods. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 28(4): 529–544. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1068/b2708.

Penn A Desyllas J Vaughan L (1999) The space of innovation: interaction and communication in the work environment. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 26: 193–218.

Peponis J (2012) Building layouts as cognitive data: purview and purview interface. Cognitive Critique 6: 11–52.

Peponis J (2024a) Architecture and Spatial Culture. London: Routledge.

Peponis J (2024b) Designing the syntax of museum space in the studio. In: Peponis J (ed) Museum Configurations. An Inquiry into the Design of Spatial Syntaxes. London: Routledge, 217–259.

Peponis J Hadjinikolaou E Livieratos C , et al. (1989) The spatial core of urban culture. Ekistics-the Problems and Science of Human Settlements 56: 43–55.

Peponis J Zimring C Choi YK (1990) Finding the building in wayfinding. Environment and Behavior 22: 555–590.

Peponis J Ross C Rashid M (1997) The structure of urban space, movement and co-presence: the case of Atlanta. Geoforum 28: 341–358.

Peponis J Dalton RC Wineman J , et al. (2004) Measuring the effects of layout upon visitors’ spatial behaviors in open plan exhibition settings. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 31: 453–473.

Peponis J Bafna S Bajaj R , et al. (2007) Designing space to support knowledge work. Environment and Behavior 39: 815–840.

Rashid M Wineman J Zimring C (2009) Space, behavior, and environmental perception in open-plan offices: a prospective study. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 36: 432–449.

Read S (1999) Space syntax and the Dutch city. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 26: 251–264.

Scoppa M Peponis J (2015) Distributed attraction: the effects of street network connectivity upon the distribution of retail frontage in the City of Buenos Aires. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 42: 354–378.

Turner A (2007) From axial to road-centre lines: a new representation for space syntax and a new model of route choice for transport network analysis. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 34: 539–555.

Tzortzi K (2015) Museum Space. Where Architecture Meets Museology. London: Routledge.

Wineman JD Hwang Y Kabo FW , et al. (2014) Spatial layout, social structure and innovation in organizations. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 41: 1100–1112.