Ecopolitics of extractivism in natural resource-rich regions and the struggles of Indigenous communities are globally known phenomena. This article outlines the ecopolitics of extractivism leading to a development paradox, while the Indigenous Asur communities encounter the detrimental effects of mining and unfulfilled pledges of developmental agendas. Based on a qualitative research approach, it explores the lived experiences of the Asur (a Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Group) in Gumla district of Jharkhand in India. It reveals that the Asur tribal people, influenced by promises of socio-economic development and better employment opportunities, consented to the acquisition of their land for bauxite mining. However, the failure of private sector entities to fulfil these promises has contributed to the policy-enabled patterns of mineral resource exploitation. The socio-ecological compensation for the sacred Asur tribe land formed a paradoxical scenario and development dynamics. The article underscores that the preservation of land rights, environmental sustainability and social welfare for tribal people has notably been futile in India. Moreover, the extractivism leading to severe health hazards, ecological destruction, depletion of forest resources, environmental pollution and loss of livelihood within the Asur habitat evidenced from the narratives. The analysis has implications for rights-based, ecologically grounded and Indigenous community-led approaches.
AcostaA. (2013). Extractivism and neoextractivism: Two sides of the same curse. Beyond Development: Alternative Visions from Latin America, 1, 61–86.
2.
AliA. (2015). A study on Asur community: A particularly Vulnerable Tribal Group—Its origin, culture and social status. ZENITH International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 5(7), 93–99.
3.
AllenA. (2014). Paradoxes of development: Rethinking the right to development. In Tietjens MeyersD. (Ed.), Poverty, agency, and human rights. Oxford Scholarship Online. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199975877.003.0011
4.
AnnandaleM., MeadowsJ., & ErskineP. (2021). Indigenous forest livelihoods and bauxite mining: A case-study from northern Australia. Journal of Environmental Management, 294, 113014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113014
5.
ArselM., HogenboomB., & PellegriniL. (2016). The extractive imperative in Latin America. The Extractive Industries and Society, 3(4), 880–887.
6.
BaintonN. (2020). Mining and indigenous peoples. In Oxford research encyclopedia of anthropology. Oxford University Press.
7.
BaintonN. A., BallardC., & GillespieK. (2012). The end of the beginning? Mining, sacred geographies, memory and performance in Lihir. The Australian Journal of Anthropology, 23(1), 22–49.
8.
BanchirigahS. M. (2006). How have reforms fuelled the expansion of artisanal mining? Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa. Resources Policy, 31(3), 165–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2006.12.001
9.
BebbingtonA., BebbingtonD. H., BuryJ., LinganJ., MuñozJ. P., & ScurrahM. (2008). Mining and social movements: Struggles over livelihood and rural territorial development in the Andes. World Development, 36(12), 2888–2905.
10.
BhanumathiK. (2003). Labour and women in mining. Background Paper by Mines, Minerals and People (MMP) for the Indian Women and Mining Seminar, Delhi, April. http://www.minesandcommunities.org/article.php?a=858
11.
BiceS. (2017). Corporate social responsibility as institution: A social mechanisms framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 143(1), 17–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2791-1
12.
BihariA., & ShajahanP. K. (2024). Why are social work professionals relevant in corporate social responsibility? A case of CSR and non-CSR projects in India. The International Journal of Community and Social Development, 6(3), 282–298. https://doi.org/10.1177/25166026241259524
13.
BlühdornI., & WelshI. (2007). Eco-politics beyond the paradigm of sustainability: A conceptual framework and research agenda. Environmental Politics, 16(2), 185–205, https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010701211650
14.
BordeR., & RaschE. D. (2018). Internationalized framing in social movements against mining in India and the Philippines. Journal of Developing Societies, 34(2), 195–218.
15.
BoriJ. P. (2023). (Re)conceptualizing and contextualizing ‘community’ in tribal/indigenous cultures and development in India. The International Journal of Community and Social Development, 5(1), 30–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/25166026221142696
16.
BridgeG. (2004). Contested terrain: Mining and the environment. Annual Review Environmental Resource, 29, 205–259.
17.
BrosiusJ. P. (1999). Analyses and interventions: Anthropological engagements with environmentalism. Current Anthropology, 40(3), 277–309.
18.
ChowdhuryA. R., & Lahiri-DuttK. (2016). The geophagous peasants of Kalahandi: De-peasantisation and artisanal mining of coloured gemstones in India. The Extractive Industries and Society, 3(3), 703–715.
19.
ChowdhuryA. R., & Lahiri-DuttK. (2018). Agrarian distress and gemstone mining in India: The political economy of survival. In Between the plough and the pick informal, artisanal and small-scale mining in the contemporary world. The Australian National University.
20.
Collins English Dictionary. (n.d.). Ecopolitics. In Collins English Dictionary. Retrieved [April252024], from https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/ecopolitics
21.
ConleyV. A. (1997). Ecopolitics: The environment in the post-structuralist thought. (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203012277
22.
CousinsD., & NieuwenhuysenJ. (1984). Aboriginals and the mining industry: Case studies of the Australian experience. Allen & Unwin.
23.
CreswellJ. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications.
24.
DalbyS. (1992). Ecopolitical discourse: ‘Environmental security’ and political geography. Progress in Human Geography, 16(4), 503–522. https://doi.org/10.1177/030913259201600401
25.
DoyleC. (2015). Australia: Rolling back on progress towards rights realization: The Wik peoples’ experiences with 40 years of bauxite mining in their homelands. In DoyleC. M., TugendhatH., & HalipR. (Eds.), Mining, the aluminium industry, and indigenous peoples: Enhancing corporate respect for indigenous peoples’ rights (pp. 49–70). Asia Indigenous Peoples Pact; Forest Peoples Programme; International Union for Conservation of Nature.
26.
EscobarA. (1995). Encountering development: The making and unmaking of the Third World. Princeton University Press.
27.
FraserJ. (2021). Mining companies and communities: Collaborative approaches to reduce social risk and advance sustainable development. Resources Policy, 74, 101144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2018.02.003
28.
FrynasJ. G. (2005). The false developmental promise of corporate social responsibility: Evidence from multinational oil companies. International Affairs, 81(3), 581–598.
29.
GaleanoE. (1997). Open veins of Latin America: Five centuries of the pillage of a continent. Monthly Review Press.
30.
GedicksA. (1993). The New Resource Wars: Native and environmental struggles against multinational corporations. South End Press.
31.
GilbertJ. (2017). Land grabbing, investments & indigenous peoples’ rights to land and natural resources: Legal analysis and case studies from Tanzania, Kenya, India, Myanmar, Colombia, Chile, and Russia. International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs. https://iwgia.org/images/publications/new-publications/land-grabbing-indigenous-peoples-rights.compressed.pdf
32.
GomezE. T., & SawyerS. (2012). State, capital, multinational institutions, and indigenous peoples. In SawyerS. & GomezE. T. (Eds), The politics of resource extraction. International political economy series. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230368798_3
33.
GuhaR., & Martínez-AlierJ. (2013). Varieties of environmentalism: Essays North and South (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315070766
34.
HajatiS., & HalikA. (2020). Public consultation in the acquisition of customary land in Indonesia: A case study of the development of a palm oil plantation in Riau Province. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 13(11), 1–15. https://ijicc.net/images/vol_13/Iss_11/131150_Hajati_2020_E_R.pdf
35.
HarveyD. (2004). The ‘new’ imperialism: Accumulation by dispossession. Socialist Register, 40, 63–87.
36.
HuX., & LiM. (2020). Ecopolitical discourse: Authoritarianism or democracy?—Evidence from China. PLoS One, 15(10), e0239872. https://doi.org/10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0239872
37.
JackaK. J. (2018). The anthropology of mining: The social and environmental impacts of resource extraction in the mineral age. Annual Review of Anthropology, 47, 61–77. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102317-050156
38.
JairathV. (2021). Environment as land: Understanding anti-displacement politics in Jharkhand. Journal of Developing Societies, 37(2), 216–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/0169796X211001250
39.
JalbertK., WillowA., CasagrandeD., & PaladinoS. (Eds). 2017. ExtrACTION: Impacts, engagements, and alternative futures. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315225579
40.
KaleS. S. (2020). From company town to company village: CSR and the management of rural aspirations in eastern India’s extractive economies. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 47(6), 1211–1232. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2020.1825290
41.
KaurG., SinghS. K., UpadhyayP., KaurP., SainiJ., PandeyA. K., & MishraM. (2022). Eastern Son Valley, Uttar Pradesh, India: A case for IUGS geological heritage site designation. Geoheritage, 14(4), 115.
42.
KimH., SefcikJ. S., & BradwayC. (2017). Characteristics of qualitative descriptive studies: A systematic review. Research in Nursing & Health, 40(1), 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.21768
43.
KrögerM. (2013). Contentious agency and natural resource politics. Routledge.
44.
KrögerM. (2020a). Politics of extraction: Theories and new concepts for critical analysis. Oxford Bibliographies in International Relations. https://doi.org/10.1093/OBO/9780199743292-0292
45.
KrögerM. (2020b). Natural resources, energy politics, and environmental consequences. Oxford Bibliographies in International Relations. https://doi.org/10.1093/OBO/9780199743292-0291
46.
KumarS. (2015). Acquiring land in tribal areas: A study of the Land Acquisition Act, 2013. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 22(6), 93–96. https://www.iosrjournals.org/iosr-jhss/papers/Vol.%2022%20Issue6/Version-9/E2206093036.pdf
47.
KumarR., & SaikiaP. (2020). Forest resources of Jharkhand, Eastern India: Socio-economic and bio-ecological perspectives. Socio-economic and eco-biological dimensions in resource use and conservation: Strategies for sustainability (pp. 61–101). Springer International Publishing.
48.
Lahiri-DuttK., KrishnanR., & AhmadN. (2012). Land acquisition and dispossession: Private coal companies in Jharkhand. Economic & Political Weekly, 47(6), 39–45.
49.
LangstonJ. D., LubisM. I., SayerJ. A., MargulesC., BoedhihartonoA. K., & DirksP. H. (2015). Comparative development benefits from small and large scale mines in North Sulawesi, Indonesia. The Extractive Industries and Society, 2(3), 434–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2015.02.007
50.
LeCainT. J. (2009). Mass destruction: The men and giant mines that wired America and scarred the planet. Rutgers University Press.
51.
LeithD. (2002). Freeport and the Suharto regime, 1965–1998. Contemporary Pacific, 14(1), 69–100.
52.
LeonardL. (2010). The background to global ecopolitics. In LeonardL. & BarryJ. (Eds), Global ecological politics (Advances in ecopolitics, Vol. 5, pp. 1–18). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2041-806X(2010)0000005005
53.
Lok Sabha Secretariat. (2013). Rehabilitation of people due to developmental projects. Reference Note, No.30/RN/Ref./December/2013, Government of India.
54.
MabeyP. T., LiW., SundufuA. J., & LashariA. H. (2020). Environmental impacts: Local perspectives of selected mining edge communities in Sierra Leone. Sustainability, 12(14), 5525. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12145525
55.
MählerA., & PierskallaJ. H. (2015). Indigenous identity, natural resources, and contentious politics in Bolivia: A disaggregated conflict analysis, 2000-2011. Comparative Political Studies, 48(3), 301–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414014545012
56.
MinzD., & HansdaD. M. (2010). Encyclopaedia of Scheduled Tribes in Jharkhand. Gyan Publishing House.
57.
MohantaB. K. (2016). Ethnoscience of indigenous iron making in central-eastern India. In PrasadD. V. & TripathyB. (Eds), Ethnoscience and traditional technology in India. Aayu Publications.
58.
Moreno-TabarezU. (2020). Towards Afro-Indigenous ecopolitics: Addressing ecological devastation in Costa Chica. City, 24(1–2), 22–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2020.1739912
59.
MundaR. D. (2005). Globalization and the challenges of tribal development. Council for Social Development and India International Centre (Durgbai Deshmukh Memorial Lecture).
60.
NandaD. K., & JojoB. (2023). What makes pro-poor public policy dysfunctional? Evidence from the select public policies in Odisha, India. The International Journal of Community and Social Development, 5(2), 168–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/25166026231175361
61.
NayakB. S. (2020, June10). Disasters of neoliberalism and Hindutva fascism in India. http://oxfordpoliticalreview.com/2020/06/10/disasters-of-neoliberalism-and-hindutva-fascism-in-india/
62.
NeelakantanA. (2012). Asura: Tale of the vanquished: The story of Ravana and his people. One Point Six Technology Pvt. Ltd.
63.
NeergaardM. A., OlesenF., AndersenR. S., & SondergaardJ. (2009). Qualitative description—The poor cousin of health research?BMC Medical Research Methodology, 9(52), 1–5.
64.
NepalP. (2004). Ecopolitics and ideology relocating green themes in modern ideological thinking. The Indian Journal of Political Science, 65(4), 603–619.
65.
OskarssonP. (2017). Diverging discourses on bauxite mining in Eastern India: Life-supporting hills for adivasis or national treasure chests on barren lands?Society & Natural Resources, 30(8), 994–1008. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2017.1295496
66.
OskarssonP. (2018). Landlock: Paralysing dispute over minerals on Adivasi land in India. ANU Press.
67.
PandaA. B., RamegowdaA., LakshmanaG., & PawarM. (2024). Corporate social responsibility and the sustainable development goals: Insights from India. The International Journal of Community and Social Development, 6(3), 299–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/25166026241261850
68.
PandeyR. (2020). Mining, agriculture change and resilience: Reflections from indigenous knowledge in the Anthropocene. In BauddhK., KumarS., SinghR. & KorstadJ. (Eds), Ecological and practical applications for sustainable agriculture. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3372-3_18
69.
ParasuramanS. (1999). Displacement due to the Bolani iron ore mines. In The development dilemma. Institute of Social Studies, The Hague. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-27248-8_7
70.
PelusoN. L., & WattsM.2001. Violent environments. In PelusoN. L. & WattsM. (Eds), Violent environments, (pp. 3–38). Cornell University Press.
71.
PiragesD. (1982). The origins of ecopolitics. In FalkR. (Ed.), Toward a just world order (pp. 442–466). Routledge.
72.
RaftopoulosM.(Ed.). (2018). Social-environmental conflicts, extractivism and human rights in Latin America. Routledge.
73.
RajA. A., & AhmedZ. (2021). Environmental impact assessment of mining in India: A review of legal and institutional mechanism. In Baharul IslamK. M. & Mahfooz NomaniZ. (Eds), Environment impact assessment: Precept & practice (pp. 339–351). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003198208
74.
RajakishorM. (2019). Negotiating marginality: Conflicts over tribal development in India. Routledge.
75.
RobinsN. A. (2011). Mercury, mining, and empire: The human and ecological cost of colonial silver mining in the Andes. Indiana University Press.
76.
RoyA. (2022). Political economy of dispossession and economic change: A case of Rajarhat in West Bengal, India. The International Journal of Community and Social Development, 4(1), 10–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/25166026221076630
77.
SahooU., & JojoB. (2020). Examining displacement, resettlement and rehabilitation processes: The case of Rengali dam displaced communities in Odisha, India. The International Journal of Community and Social Development, 2(1), 29–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/2516602620908971
78.
SandelowskiM. (2000). Whatever happened to qualitative description?Research in Nursing & Health, 23(4), 334–340.
79.
SarpongS. (2021). Geopolitics of natural resources. In CrowtherD. & SeifiS. (Eds), The Palgrave Handbook of corporate social responsibility. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42465-7_15
80.
SarupriaM., ManjareS. D., & GirapM. (2019). Environmental impact assessment studies for mining area in Goa, India, using the new approach. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 191(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-018-7135-z
81.
SenM. (2022). Between religion and politics: The political deification of Mahishasur. Religion, 52(4), 616–636.
82.
ShahA. (2011). In the shadows of the state: Indigenous politics, environmentalism, and insurgency in Jharkhand, India. Oxford University Press.
83.
ShiquanD., Amuakwa-MensahF., DeyiX., YueC., & YueC. (2022). The impact of mineral resource extraction on communities: How the vulnerable are harmed. The Extractive Industries and Society, 10, 101090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2022.101090
84.
SingalA. K. (2021). CSR initiatives and practices: Empirical evidence from Indian metal and mining companies. SAGE Open, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211032674
85.
SinhaA. K. (2015). Asur—An ancient iron smelter, can get global recognition. The Researchers’ International Research Journal, 1(1), 1–22.
86.
SinhaR. K., PandeyD. K., & SinhaA. K. (2000). Mining and the environment: A case study from Bijolia quarrying site in Rajasthan, India. The Environmentalist, 20, 195–203. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006795529201
87.
SteffenW., CrutzenP. J., & McNeillJ. R. (2007). The Anthropocene: Are humans now overwhelming the great forces of nature?AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment, 36(8), 614–621.
88.
TripathyS. N. (2020). Problems of displacement and deprivation of tribes due to mining industrialization in Eastern India (Orissa). In RajanS. I. & BaralD. (Eds), Development, environment and migration: Lessons for sustainability (1st ed.). Routledge India. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003049982
89.
VagholikarN., MogheK. A., & DuttaR. (2003). Undermining India: Impacts of mining on ecologically sensitive areas. Kalpavriksh.
90.
VallentyneJ. R. (1999). Infusing ecology into politics. Aquatic Ecosystem Health & Management, 2(2), 83–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1463-4988(99)00016-0
91.
WainwrightJ. (2008). Decolonizing development: Colonial power and the maya. Blackwell.
92.
WarnerR. (2010). Ecological modernisation theory: Towards a critical ecopolitics of change?Environment Politics, 19(4), 538–556. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2010.489710
93.
WilsonA. S. (2019). Mining-induced displacement and resettlement: A critical appraisal. Journal of Sustainable Mining, 18(2), 67–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.087
94.
WongM. T. (2018). Natural resources, extraction and indigenous rights in Latin America: Exploring the boundaries of environmental and state-corporate crime in Bolivia, Peru and Mexico. Routledge.
95.
YakovlevaN. (2017). Corporate social responsibility in the mining industries. Routledge.
