This paper describes a procedure that can help managers measure their return on investment for project management (PM/ROI). Current PM processes and practices of 38 different companies and government agencies in 4 different industries or application areas were quantitatively examined. A PM benchmarking procedure was developed and used to assess the PM process maturity of these different organizations. A 5-level Berkeley PM process maturity model is introduced. This information is used to measure the relative sophistication and maturity of different organizations and industries.
Al-SedairySalman T. (1994, Dec.). Project management practices in public sector construction: Saudi Arabia.Project Management Journal, 37–44.
2.
BoznakRudolph G. (1988). Project management—Today's solution for complex project engineering.IEEE.
3.
Bu-BushaitK.A. (1989, June). The application of project management techniques to construction and R&D projects.Project Management Journal, 17–22.
4.
ClelandDavid (1993, Sept.). The future of project management.PM Network, 6–8.
5.
Construction Industry Institute (CII). (1990, April). Assessment of owner project management practices and performance.Special CII Publication.
6.
DeutschMichael S. (1991, Nov.). An exploratory analysis relating the software project management process to project success.IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 38(4).
7.
DonnellyRichard G., & KezsbomDeborah S. (1993). Overcoming the responsibility-authority gap: An investigation of effective project team leadership for a new decade.AACE Transactions.
8.
GobeliDavid H., & LarsonErik W. (1986). Matrix management: More than a fad.Engineering Management International, 4.
9.
GrossRobert L., & PriceDavid (1990). Common project management problems and how they can be avoided through the use of self-managing teams.1990 IEEE International Engineering Management Conference.
10.
IbbsC.W., & KwakYoung Hoon (1997a). The benefits of project management: Financial and organizational rewards to corporations.Upper Darby, PA: Project Management Institute.
11.
IbbsC.W., & KwakYoung Hoon (1997b). Measuring project management's return on investment.PM Network, pp. 36–38.
Integrated Project Systems (IPS). (1995). Organizational Maturity Assessment Questionnaire.
14.
KerznerHarold (1987). In search of excellence in project management.Journal of Systems Management, pp. 30–39.
15.
KwakYoung Hoon (1997, May). A systematic approach to evaluate quantitative impacts of project management. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Civil Engineering, University of California, Berkeley.
LarsonErik W., & GobeliDavid H. (1989, May). Significance of project management structure on development success.IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 36(2).
18.
LundinRolf A., & SoderholmAnders (1994, Oct.). Conceptualization and learning—The black environment of PM.Proceedings of the 25th Project Management Institute 1994 Annual Seminars & Symposium. Vancouver, Canada.
19.
McCauleyMike (1993, Sept.). Developing a project-driven organization.PM Network, pp. 26–30.
20.
McCollumJames K., & ShermanJ. Daniel (1991, Feb.). The effects of matrix organization size and number of project assignments on performance.IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 38(1).
21.
McFarlinJames (1995, May). PM tools: Where is the payback?PM Network, pp. 31–34.
22.
MightRobert J., & FischerWilliam A. (1985, May). The role of structural factors in determining project management success.IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 32(2).
23.
Project Management Institute (PMI) Standards Committee. (1994). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge Exposure Draft.Upper Darby, PA: Project Management Institute.
24.
Project Management Institute (PMI) Standards Committee. (1996). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide).Upper Darby, PA: Project Management Institute.
25.
ZiomekN.L., & MeneghinG.R. (1984, Aug.) Training—A key element in implementing project management.Project Management Journal, pp. 76–83.
