This paper traces the evolution of conceptions of project management from the use of tools and techniques on standalone projects to the conceptualization of project management as an organizational capability. Working from the premise that project management is a socially constructed field of practice that has developed through the conversations and deliberate efforts of practitioners, principles of discourse analysis are used as a framework for studying the extent to which practice reflects the espoused theories of organizational project management capability development. The actuality of practice is represented by periodic reports over a five-year period by the “owners” of project management in an organization with an expressed commitment to development of organizational project management capability and is analysed with reference to the related espoused theories of practitioners as represented in the project management literature, including bodies of knowledge, standards, and guides.
AlvessonM., & KarremanD. (2000). Varieties of discourse: On the study of organizations through discourse analysis. Human Relations, 53(9), 1125–1149.
2.
ArgyrisC. (1995). On organisational learning.Oxford: Blackwell Business.
3.
ArgyrisC., & SchonD.A. (1977). Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
4.
Association for Project Management. (2004). Directing change. A guide to governance of project management.High Wycombe, UK: Association for Project Management.
5.
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. (2001). The new Basel capital accord: consultative document. [Web Page] Bank for International Settlements. Retrieved November 18, 2006, from http://www.bis.org/publ/bcbsca03.pdf
6.
BettsM., & LansleyP. (1995). International Journal of Project Management: A review of the first ten years. International Journal of Project Management, 13(4), 207–217.
7.
ChrissisM. B., KonradM., & ShrumS. (2003). CMMI®: Guidelines for process integration and product improvement.Boston: Addison Wesley Professional.
8.
Cooke-DaviesT.J., SchlichterJ., & BredilletC. (2001). Beyond the PMBOK® guide: Creating a standard for organizational project management maturity. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual Project Management Institute 2001 Seminars & Symposium, Nashville, TN, USA, CD-ROM.
9.
Cooke-DaviesT. J. (2004). Project management maturity models. In MorrisP. W. G., & PintoJ. K. (Eds.), The Wiley Guide to Managing Projects.Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
10.
CrawfordL., PollackJ., & EnglandD. (2006). Uncovering the trends in project management: Journal emphases over the last 10 years. International Journal of Project Management, 24(2), 174–184.
11.
CrawfordL. H. (2004a). Global body of project management knowledge and standards. In MorrisP. W. G., & PintoJ. K. (Eds.), The Wiley guide to managing projects.Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
12.
CrawfordL. H. (2004b). Supporting delivery capability: The many faces of project support in organisations. In Proceedings of 17th IPMA World Congress on Project Management, June 2004.Budapest, Hungary: IPMA.
13.
DaiC. X., & WellsW. G. (2004). An exploration of project management office features and their relationship to project performance. International Journal of Project Management, 22(7), 523–532.
14.
DinsmoreP. C. (1996a). On the leading edge of management: Managing organizations by projects. PM Network, 10(3), 9–11.
15.
DinsmoreP. C. (1996b). Tom Peters is behind the times. PM Network, 10(9), 8–11.
16.
DinsmoreP. C. (1996c). Toward corporate project management: Beefing up the bottom line with MOBP. PM Network, 10(6), 10–13.
17.
DinsmoreP. C. (1996d). What if the CEOs find out?: The strategic positioning of project management. PM Network, 10(12), 8–11.
18.
DinsmoreP. C. (1999). Winning with enterprise project management.New York: AMACOM.
19.
GareisR. (1992a). The handbook of management by projects.Vienna: Manz.
20.
GareisR. (1992b). Management of networks of projects. 1992 AACE Transactions, Volume 2, American Association of Cost Engineers, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA, J.1.1–J.1.6.
21.
GrahamR. J., & EnglundR. L. (1997). Creating an environment for successful projects: The quest to manage project management.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
22.
HardyC. (2001). Researching organizational discourse. International Studies of Management & Organization, 31(3), 25–47.
HobbsJ. B., & AubryM. (2005). A realistic portrait of PMOs: The results of an empirical investigation. In Proceedings of PMI Global Congress North America, Toronto, Canada.Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
25.
HodgsonD. E. (2004). Project work: The legacy of bureaucratic control in the post-bureaucratic organization. Organization, 11(1), 81–100.
26.
HumphreyW. S., & SweetW. L. (1987). A method for assessing the software engineering capability of contractors: CMU/SEI-87-TR-23, ESD/TR-87-186.Pittsburgh, PA: Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University.
27.
KerznerH. (1979). Project management: A systems approach to planning, scheduling and controlling (1st ed.). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
28.
KloppenborgT. J., & OpferW. A. (2000). Forty years of project management research: Trends, interpretations, and predictions. In Project Management Research at the Turn of the Millennium: Proceedings of PMI Research Conference (pp. 41–59), 21 - 24 June 2000, Paris, France.
29.
KoskelaL., & HowellG. (2002). The underlying theory of project management is obsolete. In SlevinD. P., ClelandD.I., & PintoJ. K. (Eds.), Frontiers of Project Management Research and Application: Proceedings of PMI Research Conference (pp. 293–301), July 2002, Seattle, WA, USA.
30.
MorrisP.W.G. (1994). The management of projects (1st ed.). London: Thomas Telford.
31.
MorrisP.W.G. (2000). Researching the unanswered questions of project management. In SlevinD. P., ClelandD.I., & PintoJ. K. (Eds.), Project Management Research at the Turn of the Millennium: Proceedings of PMI Research Conference (pp. 87–101), 21 - 24 June 2000, Paris, France.
32.
MorrisP. W. G., PatelM. B., & WearneS.H. (2000). Research into revising the APM project management body of knowledge. International Journal of Project Management, 18(3), 155–164.
PaulkM. C., WeberC. V., CurtisB., & ChrissisM. B. (1995). The capability maturity model: Guidelines for improving the software process.Boston: Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc.
36.
PennypackerJ.S., & GrantK.P. (2003). Project management maturity: An industry benchmark. Project Management Journal, 34(1), 4–11.
37.
PiotrowskiC., & ArmstrongT. R. (2004). The research literature in organization development: Recent trends and current directions. Organization Development Journal, 22(2), 48.
38.
Project Management Institute. (2003). Organizational Project Management Maturity Model: Knowledge Foundation.Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute, Inc.
39.
ShenharA. J. (1998). From theory to practice: Toward a typology of project management styles. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 45(1), 33–48.
40.
StrettonA. (1994a). A short history of project management: Part one: the 1950s and 60s. The Australian Project Manager, 14(1), 36–37.
41.
ThemistocleousG., & WearneS. H. (2000). Project management topic coverage in journals. International Journal of Project Management, 18(1), 7–11.
42.
ThomasJ., DelisleC., & JugdevK. (2002). Selling project management to senior executives: Framing the moves that matter.Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
43.
UrliB., & UrliD. (2000). Project management in North America, stability of the concepts. Project Management Journal, 31(3), 33–43.
44.
van DijkT. A. (1997). The study of discourse. In van DijkT. A. (Ed.), Discourse as structure and process—Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction. (pp. 1–34). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
45.
WengerE. C., & SnyderW. M. (2000). Communities of practice: The organizational frontier. Harvard Business Review, 78(1), 139–146.
46.
ZobelA. M., & WearneS. H. (2000). Project management topic coverage in recent conferences. Project Management Journal, 31(2), 32–37.
