Tacit knowledge is considered critical to the success of open innovation projects, yet little is known about the factors that promote or impede tacit knowledge sharing in such projects. This article uses exponential random graph modeling to examine both tacit and explicit knowledge sharing in two early-stage open innovation projects. Results indicate autonomous motivation predicts tacit knowledge sharing, suggesting that managers need to promote a team culture that satisfies members’ needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness. The modeling also suggests that brokerage is important in the early stage of a project to build the strong informal social structures needed to facilitate the exchange of tacit knowledge.
AmabileT. M.PrattM. G. (2016). The dynamic componential model of creativity and innovation in organizations: Making progress, making meaning. Research in Organizational Behavior, 36, 157–183.
2.
AmarA. D.JunejaJ. A. (2008). A descriptive model of innovation and creativity in organizations: A synthesis of research and practice. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 6(4), 298–311.
3.
AminA.RobertsJ. (2008). Knowing in action: Beyond communities of practice. Research Policy, 37(2), 353–369.
4.
BarneyJ. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.
5.
BockG. -W.KimY. -G. (2001). Breaking the myths of rewards: An exploratory study of attitudes about knowledge sharing. Pacis 2001 Proceedings, 31, 78.
6.
BockG. -W.ZmudR. W.KimY. -G.LeeJ. -N. (2005). Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: Examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 87–111.
7.
BonessoS.ComacchioA.PizziC. (2014). Open innovation at project level: Key issues and future research agenda. In BonessoS.ComacchioA.PizziC. (Eds.), Project-based knowledge in organizing open innovation (pp. 85–95). London, England: Springer.
8.
BurtR. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9.
BurtR. S. (2001). Structural holes versus network closure as social capital. In LinN.CookK.BurtR. S. (Eds.), Social capital: Theory and research (pp. 31–56). New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
10.
BurtR. S. (2004). Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology, 110(2), 349–399.
11.
CavusgilS. T.CalantoneR. J.ZhaoY. (2003). Tacit knowledge transfer and firm innovation capability. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 18(1), 6–21.
12.
ChesbroughH. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
13.
ChesbroughH. W.BogersM. (2014). Explicating open innovation: Clarifying an emerging paradigm for understanding innovation. In ChesbroughH.VanhaverbekeW.WestJ. (Eds.), New frontiers in open innovation (pp. 3–28). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
14.
ĆirićD.LalićB.GračaninD. (2016). Managing innovation: Are project management methods enemies or allies. International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 7(1), 31–41.
15.
CollinsJ. D.HittM. A. (2006). Leveraging tacit knowledge in alliances: The importance of using relational capabilities to build and leverage relational capital. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 23(3), 147–167.
16.
CookS. D.BrownJ. S. (1999). Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing. Organization Science, 10(4), 381–400.
17.
DavenportT. H.PrusakL. (1998). Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
18.
DavisJ. P. (2010). Agency and knowledge problems in network dynamics: Brokers and bridges in innovative interorganizational relationships(Working Paper). Cambridge, MA: MIT Sloan School of Management.
19.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (1985). The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19(2), 109–134.
20.
DuguidP. (2005). “The art of knowing:” Social and tacit dimensions of knowledge and the limits of the community of practice. The Information Society, 21(2), 109–118.
21.
DurstS.StåhleP. (2013). Success factors of open innovation—A literature review. International Journal of Business Research and Management (IJBRM), 4(4), 111–131.
22.
DyerJ. H.SinghH. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660–679.
23.
EckbladJ.GolovkoE. (2016). Organizing for innovation. Journal of Evolutionary Studies in Business, 1(1), 15–37.
24.
EnkelE.GassmannO.ChesbroughH. (2009). Open R&D and open innovation: Exploring the phenomenon. R&D Management, 39(4), 311–316.
25.
ErautM. (2000). Non-formal learning and tacit knowledge in professional work. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70(1), 113–136.
26.
FilippovS.MooiH. (2009). Innovation project management: A research agenda. 6th International Conference for Innovation and Management (ICIM2009), São Paolo, Brazil.
27.
FrankO.StraussD. (1986). Markov graphs. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81(395), 832–842.
28.
GagnéM. (2009). A model of knowledge-sharing motivation. Human Resource Management, 48(4), 571–589.
29.
GagnéM.DeciE. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 331–362.
30.
GagnéM.ForestJ.VansteenkisteM.Crevier-BraudL.Van den BroeckA.AspeliA. K.…WestbyeC. (2015). The multidimensional work motivation scale: Validation evidence in seven languages and nine countries. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24(2), 178–196.
31.
GassmannO.EnkelE.ChesbroughH. (2010). The future of open innovation. R&D Management, 40(3), 213–221.
32.
GranovetterM. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.
33.
GranovetterM. (1983). The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociological Theory, 1(1), 201–233.
34.
GrantR. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 109–122.
35.
GrantR. M.Baden-FullerC. (1995). A knowledge-based theory of inter-firm collaboration. Academy of Management Proceedings, 38, 17–21.
36.
HargadonA. (2014). Brokerage and innovation. In DodgsonM.GannD. M.PhillipsN. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation management (p. 163). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
37.
HauY. S.KimB.LeeH.KimY. -G. (2013). The effects of individual motivations and social capital on employees’ tacit and explicit knowledge sharing intentions. International Journal of Information Management, 33(2), 356–366.
38.
HaugaardM. (2012). Rethinking the four dimensions of power: Domination and empowerment. Journal of Political Power, 5(1), 33–54.
39.
HeizmannH.OlssonM. R. (2015). Power matters: The importance of Foucault’s power/knowledge as a conceptual lens in KM research and practice. Journal of Knowledge Management, 19(4), 756–769.
40.
HendersonR. M.ClarkK. B. (1990). Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 9–30.
41.
HolsteJ. S.FieldsD. (2010). Trust and tacit knowledge sharing and use. Journal of Knowledge Management, 14(1), 128–140.
42.
HorvathJ. A. (2000). Working with tacit knowledge. Woburn, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann.
43.
HungS. -Y.DurcikovaA.LaiH. -M.LinW. -M. (2011). The influence of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation on individuals’ knowledge sharing behavior. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 69(6), 415–427.
44.
KäserP. A.MilesR. E. (2001). Knowledge activists: The cultivation of motivation and trust properties of knowledge sharing relationships. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2001(1), D1–D6.
45.
KatzJ. S. (2016). What is a complex innovation system?PLoS One, 11(6), e0156150.
46.
KlineS. J.RosenbergN. (1986). An overview of innovation. In LandauR.RosenbergN. (Eds.), The positive sum strategy: Harnessing technology for economic growth (pp. 275–305). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
47.
KoskinenK. U.PihlantoP.VanharantaH. (2003). Tacit knowledge acquisition and sharing in a project work context. International Journal of Project Management, 21(4), 281–290.
48.
KoskinenK. U.VanharantaH. (2002). The role of tacit knowledge in innovation processes of small technology companies. International Journal of Production Economics, 80(1), 57–64.
49.
KucharskaW.KowalczykR. (2016). Trust, collaborative culture and tacit knowledge sharing in project management—A relationship model. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Intellectual Capital, Knowledge Management & Organisational Learning (ICICKM), Ithaca, NY.
50.
LamA.Lambermont-FordJ. -P. (2010). Knowledge sharing in organisational contexts: A motivation-based perspective. Journal of Knowledge Management, 14(1), 51–66.
LeonardD.BartonM. (2014). Knowledge and the management of creativity and innovation. In DodgsonMarkGannDavid M.PhillipsNelson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation management (pp. 121–138). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
53.
LeonardD.SensiperS. (1998). The role of tacit knowledge in group innovation. California Management Review, 40(3), 112–132.
54.
LevinD. Z.CrossR. (2004). The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Science, 50(11), 1477–1490.
55.
LinH. -F. (2007). Effects of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation on employee knowledge sharing intentions. Journal of Information Science, 33(2), 135–149.
56.
LusherD.KoskinenJ.RobinsG. (2013). Exponential random graph models for social networks: Theory, methods, and applications. Oxford, UK: Cambridge University Press.
57.
LusherD.KremerP.RobinsG. (2014). Cooperative and competitive structures of trust relations in teams. Small Group Research, 45(1), 3–36.
58.
LusherD.RobinsG.PattisonP. E.LomiA. (2012). “Trust me:” Differences in expressed and perceived trust relations in an organization. Social Networks, 34(4), 410–424.
59.
LynnG. S.MazzucaM.MoroneJ. G.PaulsonA. S. (1998). Learning is the critical success factor in developing truly new products. Research-Technology Management, 41(3), 45–51.
60.
MarabelliM.NewellS. (2014). Knowing, power and materiality: A critical review and reconceptualization of absorptive capacity. International Journal of Management Reviews, 16(4), 479–499.
61.
MarsdenP. V. (1982). Brokerage behavior in restricted exchange networks. Social Structure and Network Analysis, 7(4), 341–410.
62.
NahapietJ.GhoshalS. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266.
63.
ObstfeldD. (2002). Knowledge creation, social networks and innovation: An integrative study. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2002(1), H1–H6.
64.
ObstfeldD. (2005). Social networks, the tertius iungens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(1), 100–130.
65.
ObstfeldD.BorgattiS. P.DavisJ. (2014). Brokerage as a process: Decoupling third party action from social network structure. In BrassD. J.LabiancaG.MehraA.HalginD. S.BorgattiS. P. (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives on organizational social networks (pp. 135–159). Bingley, England: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
66.
OsterlohM.FreyB. S. (2000). Motivation, knowledge transfer, and organizational forms. Organization Science, 11(5), 538–550.
67.
PackendorffJ. (1995). Inquiring into the temporary organization: New directions for project management research. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 11(4), 319–333.
68.
PattisonP.RobinsG. (2002). Neighborhood-based models for social networks. Sociological Methodology, 32(1), 301–337.
69.
PattisonP.WassermanS. (1999). Logit models and logistic regressions for social networks: II. Multivariate relations. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 52(2), 169–193.
70.
PeterafM. A. (1993). The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 14(3), 179–191.
71.
PhelpsC.HeidlR.WadhwaA. (2012). Knowledge, networks, and knowledge networks a review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), 1115–1166.
72.
PolanyiM. (1966). The tacit dimension. New York, NY: Doubleday & Company.
RammstedtB.JohnO. P. (2007). Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the big five inventory in English and German. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(1), 203–212.
75.
RanucciR. A.SouderD. (2015). Facilitating tacit knowledge transfer: Routine compatibility, trustworthiness, and integration in M&As. Journal of Knowledge Management, 19(2), 257–276.
76.
RobinsG.PattisonP.KalishY.LusherD. (2007). An introduction to exponential random graph (p*) models for social networks. Social Networks, 29(2), 173–191.
77.
RobinsG.PattisonP.WangP. (2009). Closure, connectivity and degree distributions: Exponential random graph (p*) models for directed social networks. Social Networks, 31(2), 105–117.
78.
RostK. (2011). The strength of strong ties in the creation of innovation. Research Policy, 40(4), 588–604.
79.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2000a). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67.
80.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2000b). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.
81.
SalterA.AlexyO. (2014). The nature of innovation. In DodgsonM.GannD. M.PhillipsN. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation management (pp. 26–52). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
82.
SmithE. A. (2001). The role of tacit and explicit knowledge in the workplace. Journal of Knowledge Management, 5(4), 311–321.
83.
SnijdersT. A. (2011). Statistical models for social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 37, 131–153.
84.
SteenJ.MacaulayS.KastelleT. (2011). Small worlds: The best network structure for innovation?Prometheus, 29(1), 39–50.
85.
SwitzerC. (2008). Time for change: Empowering organizations to succeed in the knowledge economy. Journal of Knowledge Management, 12(2), 18–28.
86.
TsaiW.GhoshalS. (1998). Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41(4), 464–476.
87.
TurnerJ. R.MüllerR. (2003). On the nature of the project as a temporary organization. International Journal of Project Management, 21(1), 1–8.
88.
UnsworthK. L.CleggC. W. (2010). Why do employees undertake creative action?Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(1), 77–99.
89.
WangP.RobinsG.PattisonP.KoskinenJ. (2014). MPNet: Program for the simulation and estimation of (p*) exponential random graph models for multilevel networks. Melbourne, Australia: Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences.
90.
WassermanS.PattisonP. (1996). Logit models and logistic regressions for social networks: I. An introduction to Markov graphs and p*. Psychometrika, 61(3), 401–425.
91.
WernerfeltB. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180.
