Increasing attention to stakeholders is becoming an important trend in construction project management. This study extends construction project goals beyond traditional iron triangle goals to stakeholder collective performance, responding to the demand of promoting stakeholder management. Researchers collected 231 questionnaires from sources within the Chinese construction industry and conducted empirical analysis. The research uncovers the internal mechanisms of how project managers’ responsible leadership enhances stakeholder performance, complements the mediating mechanism on team members’ psychological cognition, and reveals the important contribution of caring ethical climate in achieving stakeholder collective performance. The findings also provide practical suggestions for enhancing construction stakeholder management from various perspectives.
BakarAbuOmillion-HodgesH., L. (2020). The mediating role of relative communicative behavior on the relationship between ethical leadership and organizational identification. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 41(1), 52–72, doi:10.1108/Lodj-04-2019-0190
2.
AfsarB.MaqsoomA.ShahjehanA.AfridiS. A.NawazA.FazlianiH. (2020). Responsible leadership and employee's proenvironmental behavior: The role of organizational commitment, green shared vision, and internal environmental locus of control. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(1), 297–312, doi:10.1002/csr.1806
3.
AhmadM. S.IqbalF.SiddiqueR.AbbasS.FakhrZ. (2020). Responsible leadership and workplace deviant behaviour: Modelling trust and turnover intention as mediator. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 41(7), 939–952, doi:10.1108/Lodj-05-2019-0212
4.
ArshadiN. (2011). The relationships of perceived organizational support (POS) with organizational commitment, in-role performance, and turnover intention: Mediating role of felt obligation. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 30, 1103–1108, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.10.215
5.
AshforthB. E.MaelF. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20–39, doi:10.5465/amr.1989.4278999
6.
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Journal of Applied Psychology, 12(1), 169, doi:10.4135/9781446221129.n6
7.
BarattucciM.TeresiM.PietroniD.IacobucciS.Lo PrestiA.PagliaroS. (2021). Ethical climate(s), distributed leadership, and work outcomes: The mediating role of organizational identification. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 11, doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.564112
8.
BarlingJ.LoughlinC.KellowayE. K. (2002). Development and test of a model linking safety-specific transformational leadership and occupational safety. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 488–496, doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.488
9.
BrislinR. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185–216, doi:10.1177/135910457000100301
10.
BurkeC. S.SimsD. E.LazzaraE. H.SalasE. (2007). Trust in leadership: A multi-level review and integration. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(6), 606–632, doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.09.006
11.
BusemeyerJ. R.JonesL. E. (1983). Analysis of multiplicative combination rules when the causal variables are measured with error. Psychological Bulletin, 93, 549–562, doi:10.1037/0033-2909.93.3.549
12.
ChanA. P. C.OppongG. D. (2017). Managing the expectations of external stakeholders in construction projects. Engineering Construction and Architectural Management, 24(5), 736–756, doi:10.1108/Ecam-07-2016-0159
13.
ChenC.-C.ChenM. Y.-C.LiuY.-C. (2013). Negative affectivity and workplace deviance: The moderating role of ethical climate. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(15), 2894–2910, doi:10.1080/09585192.2012.753550
14.
ChengK.ZhuQ. L.LinY. H. (2021). Family-Supportive supervisor behavior, felt obligation, and unethical pro-family behavior: The moderating role of positive reciprocity beliefs. Journal of Business Ethics, 177, 261–273, doi:10.1007/s10551-021-04765-9
15.
ChiM.ChongH.-Y.XuY. (2022). The effects of shared vision on value co-creation in megaprojects: A multigroup analysis between clients and main contractors. International Journal of Project Management, 40(3), 218–234, doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2022.01.008
16.
ChowV.LeiringerR. (2019). The practice of public engagement on projects: From managing external stakeholders to facilitating active contributors. Project Management Journal, 51(1), 24–37, doi:10.1177/8756972819878346
17.
CollinsB. J.GalvinB. M.MeyerR. D. (2019). Situational strength as a moderator of the relationship between organizational identification and work outcomes. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 26(1), 87–97, doi:10.1177/1548051818774550
18.
De RuiterM.SchavelingJ.CiullaJ. B.NijhofA. (2018). Leadership and the creation of corporate social responsibility: An introduction to the special issue. Journal of Business Ethics, 151(4), 871–874, doi:10.1007/s10551-018-3883-5
19.
DuanJ. Y.WangX. H.JanssenO.FarhJ. L. (2021). Transformational leadership and voice: When does felt obligation to the leader matter?Journal of Business and Psychology, 37, 543–555, doi:10.1007/s10869-021-09758-z
20.
EisenbergerR.ArmeliS.RexwinkelB.LynchP. D.RhoadesL. (2001). Reciprocation of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 42–51, doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.42
21.
FullerJ. B.MarlerL. E.HesterK. (2006). Promoting felt responsibility for constructive change and proactive behavior: Exploring aspects of an elaborated model of work design. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(8), 1089–1120, doi:10.1002/job.408
22.
GarbaO. A.BabalolaM. T.GuoL. (2018). A social exchange perspective on why and when ethical leadership foster customer-oriented citizenship behavior. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 70, 1–8, doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2017.10.018
23.
GefenD.StraubD. W.BoudreauM. (2000). Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 4(7), 1–79
24.
GokK.BabalolaM. T.LakshmanC.SumanthJ. J.VoL. C., Decoster, S., . . . Coşkun, A. (2022). Enhancing employees’ duty orientation and moral potency: Dual mechanisms linking ethical psychological climate to ethically focused proactive behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 44(1), 157–175, doi:10.1002/job.2667
25.
GuoQ. Y.LiuW. X.ZhouK.MaoJ. H. (2020). Leader humility and employee organizational deviance: The role of sense of power and organizational identification. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 41(3), 463–479, doi:10.1108/Lodj-07-2019-0287
26.
HackmanJ. R. (1987). Handbook of organizational behavior. Prentice-Hall.
27.
HackmanJ. R.OldhamG. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16(2), 250–279, doi:10.1016/0030-5073(76)90016-7
28.
HanZ. Y.WangQ.YanX. (2019). How responsible leadership predicts organizational citizenship behavior for the environment in China. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 40(3), 305–318, doi:10.1108/Lodj-07-2018-0256
29.
HaqueA.FernandoM.CaputiP. (2019). The relationship between responsible leadership and organisational commitment and the mediating effect of employee turnover intentions: An empirical study with Australian employees. Journal of Business Ethics, 156(3), 759–774, doi:10.1007/s10551-017-3575-6
30.
HeW.LiW.XuS.WangW.AnX. (2021). Time, cost, and energy consumption analysis on construction optimization in high-rise buildings. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(10), 04021128, doi:10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0002160
31.
HuoC.SafdarM. A.AkhtarM. W.AhmedM. (2022). Linking responsible leadership and green innovation: The role of knowledge sharing and leader-member exchange. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, doi:10.3389/fenvs.2022.945817
32.
IslamM. M.AlharthiM. (2020). Relationships among ethical commitment, ethical climate, sustainable procurement practices, and SME performance: An PLS-SEM analysis. Sustainability, 12(23), 1–25, doi:10.3390/su122310168
33.
JavedM.AliH. Y.Asrar-ul-HaqM.AliM.KirmaniS. A. A. (2020). Responsible leadership and triple-bottom-line performance-do corporate reputation and innovation mediate this relationship?Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 41(4), 501–517, doi:10.1108/Lodj-07-2019-0329
34.
JoeS. W.HungW. T.ChiuC. K.LinC. P.HsuY. C. (2018). To quit or not to quit. Personnel Review, 47(5), 1062–1076, doi:10.1108/pr-04-2017-0124
35.
KaminskyJ. (2021). Who are we talking to? Situating construction engineering and management knowledge. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(2), 06020003, doi:10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001977
36.
KhanA.WarisM.PanigrahiS.SajidM. R.RanaF. (2021). Improving the performance of public sector infrastructure projects: Role of project governance and stakeholder management. Journal of Management in Engineering, 37(2), 04020112, doi:10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0000886
37.
LamL. W.LiuY.LoiR. (2016). Looking intra-organizationally for identity cues: Whether perceived organizational support shapes employees’ organizational identification. Human Relations, 69(2), 345–367, doi:10.1177/0018726715584689
38.
LeeA.GerbasiA.SchwarzG.NewmanA. (2019). Leader-member exchange social comparisons and follower outcomes: The roles of felt obligation and psychological entitlement. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 92(3), 593–617, doi:10.1111/joop.12245
39.
LeeH. W. (2013). Locus of control, socialization, and organizational identification. Management Decision, 51(5), 1047–1055, doi:10.1108/Md-11-2012-0814
40.
LiY.SunH.LiD.SongJ.DingR. (2022). Effects of digital technology adoption on sustainability performance in construction projects: The mediating role of stakeholder collaboration. Journal of Management in Engineering, 38(3), 04022016, doi:10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0001040
41.
LiJ.YingW.XiongR.YingC.BagherpourM. (2022). Project executive’s ethical leadership and construction projects’ social responsibility: Evidence from Wuhan, China. Advances in Civil Engineering,2022, 1–13, doi:10.1155/2022/6332424
42.
LiX.PengP. (2022). How does inclusive leadership curb workers’ emotional exhaustion? The mediation of caring ethical climate and psychological safety. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.877725
43.
LiY.LiuZ.QinK. Y.CuiJ. Y.ZengX. Y., Ji, M., . . . Li, Y. (2021). Organizational trust and safety operation behavior in airline pilots: The mediating effects of organizational identification and organizational commitment. Journal of Air Transport Management, 92, doi:10.1016/j.jairtraman.2021.102018
44.
LiangJ. (2014). Ethical leadership and employee voice: Examining a moderated-mediation model. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 46(2), 252–264, doi:10.3724/sp.J.1041.2014.00252
45.
LiangJ.FarhC. I. C.FarhJ. L. (2012). Psychological antecedents of promotive and prohibitive voice: A two-wave examination. Academy of Management Journal, 55(1), 71–92, doi:10.5465/amj.2010.0176
46.
LiaoZ. J.ZhangM. T. (2020). The influence of responsible leadership on environmental innovation and environmental performance: The moderating role of managerial discretion. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(5), 2016–2027, doi:10.1002/csr.1942
47.
LinC. P.HuangH. T.HuangT. Y. (2020). The effects of responsible leadership and knowledge sharing on job performance among knowledge workers. Personnel Review, 49(9), 1879–1896, doi:10.1108/Pr-12-2018-0527
48.
LinX.McKennaB.HoC. M. F.ShenG. Q. P. (2019). Stakeholders’ influence strategies on social responsibility implementation in construction projects. Journal of Cleaner Production, 235, 348–358, doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.253
49.
LingF. Y. Y.ZhangZ.YewA. Y. R. (2022). Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on demand, output, and outcomes of construction projects in Singapore. Journal of Management in Engineering, 38(2), 04021097, doi:10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0001020
50.
LiuC. M.LinC. P. (2018). Assessing the effects of responsible leadership and ethical conflict on behavioral intention. Review of Managerial Science, 12(4), 1003–1024, doi:10.1007/s11846-017-0236-1
51.
LiuJ.WangY.WangZ. (2022). Effect of pressure on construction company compliance attitudes: Moderating role of organizational ethical climate. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 148(11), 04022125, doi:10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0002400
52.
LiuX. L.ZhouY. (2017). Status quo and prospect of felt obligation research. Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference on Education, E-Learning and Management Technology, Xi'an, China, doi:10.12783/dtssehs/eemt2017/14522
53.
LiuY.ZhaoS. M.LiR.ZhouL. L.TianF. (2018). The relationship between organizational identification and internal whistle-blowing: The joint moderating effects of perceived ethical climate and proactive personality. Review of Managerial Science, 12(1), 113–134, doi:10.1007/s11846-016-0214-z
54.
LoosemoreM.LimB. T. H. (2017). Linking corporate social responsibility and organizational performance in the construction industry. Construction Management and Economics, 35(3), 90–105, doi:10.1080/01446193.2016.1242762
55.
LorinkovaN. M.PerryS. J. (2019). The importance of group-focused transformational leadership and felt obligation for helping and group performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(3), 231–247, doi:10.1002/job.2322
56.
LynhamS. A.ChermackT. J. (2006). Responsible leadership for performance: A theoretical model and hypotheses. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 12(4), 73–88, doi:10.1177/107179190601200405
57.
MaakT. (2007). Responsible leadership, stakeholder engagement, and the emergence of social capital. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(4), 329–343, doi:10.1007/s10551-007-9510-5
58.
MaakT.PlessN. M. (2006). Responsible leadership in a stakeholder society—A relational perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 66(1), 99–115, doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9047-z
59.
MaelF.AshforthB. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma-mater—A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(2), 103–123, doi:10.1002/job.4030130202
60.
MalhotraN.AshillN.LagesC. R.HomayounfardA. (2022). Understanding the role of frontline employee felt obligation in services. Service Industries Journal, 42(11–12), 843–871, doi:10.1080/02642069.2020.1858062
61.
MorrisonE. W.PhelpsC. C. (1999). Taking charge at work: Extrarole efforts to initiate workplace change. Academy of Management Journal, 42(4), 403–419, doi:10.2307/257011
62.
MuffK.DelacosteC.DyllickT. (2021). Responsible leadership competencies in leaders around the world: Assessing stakeholder engagement, ethics and values, systems thinking and innovation competencies in leaders around the world. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(1), 273–292, doi:10.1002/csr.2216
63.
MüllerR.TurnerJ. R. (2007). Matching the project manager’s leadership style to project type. International Journal of Project Management, 25(1), 21–32, doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.04.003
64.
NajiK. K.GunduzM.HamaidiM. F. (2022). Major factors affecting construction waste management in infrastructure projects using structural equation model. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 148(10), 04022101, doi:10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0002358
65.
NewmanA.RoundH.BhattacharyaS.RoyA. (2017). Ethical climates in organizations: A review and research agenda. Business Ethics Quarterly, 27(4), 475–512, doi:10.1017/beq.2017.23
66.
OgunfoworaB.MaerzA.VartyC. T. (2021). How do leaders foster morally courageous behavior in employees? Leader role modeling, moral ownership, and felt obligation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 42(4), 483–503, doi:10.1002/job.2508
67.
OppongG. D.ChanA. P. C.DansohA. (2017). A review of stakeholder management performance attributes in construction projects. International Journal of Project Management, 35(6), 1037–1051, doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.04.015
68.
PailléP.ValéauP. (2020). “I don’t owe you, but I am committed”: Does felt obligation matter on the effect of green training on employee environmental commitment?Organization & Environment, 34(1), 123–144, doi:10.1177/1086026620921453
69.
PlessN.MaakT. (2005). Relational intelligence for leading responsibly in a connected world. Paper presented at the 66th Academy of Management Annual Meeting, Atlanta, GA, United States, doi:10.5465/ambpp.2005.18783524
70.
PodsakoffN. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903, doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
71.
RaghuramS. (2011). Organizational identification among young software professionals in India. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(18), 3913–3928, doi:10.1080/09585192.2011.561224
72.
RenX.YanZ.WangZ.HeJ. (2019). Inter-project knowledge transfer in project-based organizations: An organizational context perspective. Management Decision, 58(5), 844–863, doi:10.1108/md-11-2018-1211
73.
RochS. G.ShannonC. E.MartinJ. J.SwiderskiD.AgostaJ. P.ShanockL. R. (2019). Role of employee felt obligation and endorsement of the just world hypothesis: A social exchange theory investigation in an organizational justice context. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 49(4), 213–225, doi:10.1111/jasp.12578
74.
RousseauD. M. (1998). Why workers still identify with organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19(3), 217–233, doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-1379(199805)19:3<217::aid-job931>3.0.co;2-n
75.
SchuhS. C.CaiY. H.KaluzaA. J.SteffensN. K.DavidE. M.HaslamA. (2021). Do leaders condone unethical pro-organizational employee behaviors? The complex interplay between leader organizational identification and moral disengagement. Human Resource Management, 60(6), 969–989, doi:10.1002/hrm.22060
76.
ShahS. H. A.CheemaS.Al-GhazaliB. M.AliM.RafiqN. (2021). Perceived corporate social responsibility and pro-environmental behaviors: The role of organizational identification and coworker pro-environmental advocacy. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(1), 366–377, doi:10.1002/csr.2054
77.
StahlG. K.de LuqueSully, M. (2014). Antecedents of responsible leader behavior: A research synthesis, conceptual framework, and agenda for future research. Academy of Management Perspectives, 28(3), 235–254, doi:10.5465/amp.2013.0126
78.
SuW.HahnJ. (2022). A multi-level study on whether ethical climate influences the affective well-being of millennial employees. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1028082
79.
SwannW. B. (1997). The trouble with change: Self-verification and allegiance to the self. Psychological Science, 8(3), 177–180, doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00407.x
80.
TajfelH. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. Psychology of Intergroup Relations, 13(3), 7–24.
81.
TeresiM.PietroniD. D.BarattucciM.GiannellaV. A.PagliaroS. (2019). Ethical climate(s), organizational identification, and employees’ behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01356
82.
ThompsonP. S.BergeronD. M.BolinoM. C. (2020). No obligation? How gender influences the relationship between perceived organizational support and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 105(11), 1338–1350, doi:10.1037/apl0000481
83.
TisakJ. (1994). Determination of the regression coefficients and their associated standard errors in hierarchical regression analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 29(2), 185–201, doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2902_4
84.
HaqUlRajaI.AlamU.De ClercqI.SaleemD., S. (2021). Servant leadership and mistreatment at the workplace: Mediation of trust and moderation of ethical climate. Personnel Review, 51(3), 1061–1084, doi:10.1108/Pr-04-2019-0172
85.
VardamanJ. M.GondoM. B.AllenD. G. (2014). Ethical climate and pro-social rule breaking in the workplace. Human Resource Management Review, 24(1), 108–118, doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2012.05.001
86.
VauxJ. S.KirkW. M. (2018). Relationship conflict in construction management: Performance and productivity problem. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144(6), 4018032, doi:10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001478
87.
VictorB.CullenJ. B. (1988). The organizational bases of ethical work climates. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33(1), 101–125, doi:10.2307/2392857
88.
VoegtlinC. (2011). Development of a scale measuring discursive responsible leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(S1), 57–73, doi:10.1007/s10551-011-1020-9
89.
VoegtlinC.FrischC.WaltherA.SchwabP. (2020). Theoretical development and empirical examination of a three-roles model of responsible leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 167(3), 411–431, doi:10.1007/s10551-019-04155-2
90.
VoegtlinC.PatzerM.SchererA. G. (2012). Responsible leadership in global business: A new approach to leadership and its multi-level outcomes. Journal of Business Ethics, 105(1), 1–16, doi:10.1007/s10551-011-0952-4
91.
WaldmanD. A.GalvinB. M. (2008). Alternative perspectives of responsible leadership. Organizational Dynamics, 37(4), 327–341, doi:10.1016/j.orgdyn.2008.07.001
92.
WangH. Q.XiaoJ. L. (2021). Examining the within-person effects of abusive supervision on multifoci deviance: Ethical climate as a moderator. Business Ethics the Environment & Responsibility, 30(4), 784–800, doi:10.1111/beer.12369
93.
WangS.HuangW.GaoY.AnsettS.XuS. (2015). Can socially responsible leaders drive Chinese firm performance?Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 36(4), 435–450, doi:10.1108/lodj-01-2014-0006
94.
WeberJ.Opoku-DakwaA. (2022). Ethical work climate 2.0: A normative reformulation of Victor and Cullen's 1988 framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 178(3), 629–646, doi:10.1007/S10551-021-04778-4
95.
WimbushJ. C.ShepardJ. M. (1994). Toward an understanding of ethical climate: Its relationship to ethical behavior and supervisory influence. Journal of Business Ethics, 13(8), 637–647, doi:10.1007/bf00871811
96.
WuG. D.QiangG. F.ZuoJ.ZhaoX. B.ChangR. D. (2018). What are the key indicators of mega sustainable construction projects? A stakeholder-network perspective. Sustainability, 10(8), 2939, doi:10.3390/su10082939.
97.
WuJ. B.HomP. W.TetrickL. E.ShoreL. M.JiaL.LiC.SongL. J. (2015). The norm of reciprocity: Scale development and validation in the Chinese context. Management and Organization Review, 2(3), 377–402, doi:10.1111/j.1740-8784.2006.00047.x
98.
XueJ.ShenG. Q.YangR. J.WuH. Q.LiX.LinX.XueF. (2020). Mapping the knowledge domain of stakeholder perspective studies in construction projects: A bibliometric approach. International Journal of Project Management, 38(6), 313–326, doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2020.07.007
99.
YangY.HuangJ.WuP.ZhengX.LinH.JiS. (2022). Responsible leadership and project citizenship behavior: A cross-level investigation. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.960290
100.
YasinR. (2021). Responsible leadership and employees’ turnover intention: Explore the mediating roles of ethical climate and corporate image. Journal of Knowledge Management, 25(7), 1760–1781, doi:10.1108/Jkm-07-2020-0583
101.
YuJ.LeungM.-Y. (2018). Structural stakeholder model in public engagement for construction development projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144(6), 04018046, doi:10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001462
102.
YuanJ.SkibniewskiM. J.LiQ.ZhengL. (2010). Performance objectives selection model in public-private partnership projects based on the perspective of stakeholders. Journal of Management in Engineering, 26(2), 89–104, doi:10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0000011
103.
ZagenczykT. J.PurvisR. L.CruzK. S.ThoroughgoodC. N.SawyerK. B. (2021). Context and social exchange: Perceived ethical climate strengthens the relationships between perceived organizational support and organizational identification and commitment. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32(22), 4752–4771, doi:10.1080/09585192.2019.1706618
104.
ZhangL.QianQ. (2017). How mediated power affects opportunism in owner–contractor relationships: The role of risk perceptions. International Journal of Project Management, 35(3), 516–529, doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.12.003
105.
ZhangY.LiuX.ZhangX. (2022). How responsible leadership shapes followers’ low-carbon behavior: A dual-mediation model. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1086504
106.
ZhangZ.MinM.CaiX.QiuH. (2022). Mitigating the negative performance effect of project complexity through an informal mechanism: The conditional mediating role of knowledge hiding. International Journal of Project Management, 40(3), 192–204, doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2022.01.002
107.
ZhangZ.ZhangL.LiA. (2019). Investigating the effects of reward interdependence and nonfinancial incentives on NPD collaboration in diverse project teams. Project Management Journal, 50(6), 641–656, doi:10.1177/8756972819847049
108.
ZhaoC. H.TianG. X.WenZ. Z.GaoX. Y. (2021). Charismatic leadership and millennial employee innovation performance relationship mediated by employees’ leadership, professional, and organizational identification. Social Behavior and Personality, 49(1), 1–11, doi:10.2224/sbp.9643
109.
ZhaoD.JiangY.LinC.LiuX.WuY. J. (2022). Impacts of knowledge expectations on recipients’ continuous cross-project learning intention. International Journal of Project Management, 40(2), 120–131, doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2021.10.003
110.
ZhaoH. D.ZhouQ. Y. (2019). Exploring the impact of responsible leadership on organizational citizenship behavior for the environment: A leadership identity perspective. Sustainability, 11(4), 944, doi:10.3390/su11040944
111.
ZhuJ. Q.WeiH. G.LiH.OsburnH. (2021). The paradoxical effect of responsible leadership on employee cyberloafing: A moderated mediation model. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 32(4), 597–624, doi:10.1002/hrdq.21432
